EVE General Discussion

I assume by 'stacking' you mean grouping on the in space hud since you can stack packaged stuff in hangars.




They might have anchored WHs in a previous patch, I remember talk of it, but I don't know if it actually got implemented, but before that you could bump them off the sig to make residents lives a pain. AFAIK, the only thing non-tangible thing you can warp to in game is a bookmark, but things like anomalies and missions all have beacons as warp to points. The continued existence of the invisible sig marker may be related to the warp code. I'm honeslty not sure, but this is my best guess. If they can remove the sigs though, that would in fact be sweet.

Otherwise, I agree with your points, I used to live in a WH full time and I know how annoying WH guarding is when cloaked and orbiting at like 50k, unable to see where you are or where you're going, and it's frustrating if you accidentally bump into someone who decloaks you. (I'm also a missile user, and it would be nice to know my actual range wtih my missiles before wasting them trying to figure out my range)

I am curious what the snap-to cursor point is about? Like, what is the purpose of it?

Here's a brand new "little thing" that you are bringing in with the new winter expansion. This is an opportunity to fix something before you break it :)

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=35676

Make sure if Someone pins a window it can be made to stay there else this will become a really irritating gripe for even more people than the current crowd who moan cause they don't even know about the existing functionality

:)

YES, THIS.

Oh my how I would love to see the other bombers when we're setting up a run.

+1 to you good sir.

Teh ability to run the game in full screen mode with multiple monitors, without losing the use of both.

I play on a laptop with a second monitor. If I play in full screen mode I lose both screens. If I play in windowed mode it doesn't properly dislpay the game on whichever screen I put it on due to the framing of the window.

Yes, it would be great to pull out GUI elements onto a second screen etc, but at least can we have basic multiple display support that works properly?

Customisable keyboard shortcuts to including mouse button support.

Visible/audible alarms when stuff happens to you in combat. I know we get an audible when we are being targetted but something to indicate we are being webbed, cap drained, jammed and so on before tryng to jump, cap is exhausted etc would be incredibly useful.

Clicking buttons should close windows as well as open them. Click the Market/Fitting/Character/ Whatever button, do stuff, click it again and it closes. Saves hunting for a tiny 'x' on an cluttered UI.

Spai's are going to love this as well LOL

It's been bug reported to **** yet always ignored.

There should be an easier way to arrange a consentual fight between two people in high/low sec without CONCORD or security penalties. Currently the only way to do so is to steal from a can (assuming you don't want to drag your entire corp into a wardec).

Proposal:

Right-click a character, Challenge to combat. The other person gets a popup asking to confirm. If he does so, both players can freely attack each other anywhere regardless of security status without any penalties. Either player, if they're not currently aggressed (1 minute gate aggression timer), can then cancel the challenge and the security systems return to working as normal.

Perhaps extend this option to fleets, so that you don't have to do n*m invitations for a staged fleet fight.


Let me just make this really clear for **** who can't read: I am not asking for any change in the current PvP mechanics. Anyone else should still be able to attack the involved parties at will (and be subject to the standard penalties). The only thing I propose is to remove CONCORD response and security status loss when both parties explicitly agree upon it.

if anyone else mentioned this before please let me know.

Targeted cyno-jamming modules.

I'm sure lots of people are tired of attacking a ship that then simply pops a cyno, and half a dozen carriers jump in to RR it, while it keeps you tackled for fighters - because any ship can fit it (even noob frigs) and there is absolutely no way to stop a ship from opening a cyno.

a simple module with a 10km range and similar fitting requirements to a warp scrambler would be sufficient. can even add cynosural field stabilizer modules too, so that there is a counter to the jamming mod.

this shouldn't really affect fleet fights - too many ships to jam them all - and even if it does - cyno in somewhere else in system - enough of this "surprise giant ships" crap. this could also be a proper supercap nerf for certain situations....

He stated very cleary that this idea should not affect the pvp mechanics (which i agree with). only allowing an option to engage another target if both consent.

the only issue i could see is having people spam challenge. so just add some sort of block option.

Better loot history, kinda like a rollback to the old syttem from last year.

There is no reason why it got changed to what it is now.

Even better would be a mining log of sorts for Orca pilots / Haulers so they (I) can split the ore more easy after an OP.