These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Share your experiences with Fozziesov!

First post First post
Author
Icycle
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#81 - 2015-08-03 16:00:36 UTC
I dont see the problem with what you call a "troll ceptor".
I mean you cant fit a Tech II entosis on a ceptor. So this is out of the question.

You can however fit a Tech I into a ceptor. But ceptor can only entosis within 25km.
So its really easy to deal what you call a "troll ceptor".
1- You can damp them and they will have to start the process again from scratch. Very easy.
2- ECM them and they will have to start the process again from scratch. Very easy.
3- Kill it. Get a fast ship and scram. The end. Easy.
4- You can scram it with an arazu. The end. Easy.
5- Also it cannot warp so all it can do is try and out run you. Get a fast ship and hunt it down. Easy.

This does not have to be as hard as quantum mechanics. Dont over think it.
Or are you asking for it to be sitting still so that you can always kill it just like you would with a cheap cyno? If so, you are not suppose to be able to kill everything you happen to see. The target is suppose to have a chance of getting out.
alpha36
Northern Freight Unlimited
Young Miners Christian Association
#82 - 2015-08-03 16:11:54 UTC
Icycle wrote:
I dont see the problem with what you call a "troll ceptor"

The problem, the real problem and the biggest problem that anyone has with this new system is that it was supposed to help stagnation in 0.0 and encourage fights.

Theres a few fights happening in the east but thats about it. Nobody in a troll ceptor is looking for a fight, they are looking to troll and be annoying, thats fine.

Trolling and being annoying is cool ingame but it has no place in a robust, fun and rewarding sovereignty system.
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2015-08-03 16:30:21 UTC
alpha36 wrote:
Icycle wrote:
I dont see the problem with what you call a "troll ceptor"

The problem, the real problem and the biggest problem that anyone has with this new system is that it was supposed to help stagnation in 0.0 and encourage fights.

Theres a few fights happening in the east but thats about it. Nobody in a troll ceptor is looking for a fight, they are looking to troll and be annoying, thats fine.

Trolling and being annoying is cool ingame but it has no place in a robust, fun and rewarding sovereignty system.


It's easy for an Entosis-fitted Interceptor to troll and annoy and alliance if that alliance is trying to hold Aegis Sov by using Dominion Sov tactics. It's impossible for an Entosis-fitted Interceptor to troll and annoy an alliance that has made the transition to Aegis Sov tactics.
Karak Bol
Low-Sec Survival Ltd.
#84 - 2015-08-03 16:42:28 UTC
Well, we are actually a ~100 guy Ally and yes, we did take sov. Kinda by accident, I just wanted a screenshot. The system is ok, but maybe, just maybe rise the size of ships needed a bit. Like T1 BS and/or T2 Cruiser at least. Make people risk something if they want sov and then lift the "no rep" limitation or something.
Billy Bojangle
Doomheim
#85 - 2015-08-03 16:46:23 UTC
alpha36 wrote:
Icycle wrote:
I dont see the problem with what you call a "troll ceptor"

The problem, the real problem and the biggest problem that anyone has with this new system is that it was supposed to help stagnation in 0.0 and encourage fights.

Theres a few fights happening in the east but thats about it. Nobody in a troll ceptor is looking for a fight, they are looking to troll and be annoying, thats fine.

Trolling and being annoying is cool ingame but it has no place in a robust, fun and rewarding sovereignty system.


Nothing about ceptor trolling keeps you from getting fights. Rocking back on your heels and whining about how hard it is to not attack your neighbors has no place in a robust, fun, and rewarding sovereignty system either. Post 1% of your coalition on ceptor guard duty and take the rest on a wildfire burn across the map. That content is avalible, but your leadership refuses to take part. They say it is pointless because all that sov can't be taken and controlled. Well yeah, that's the point guys and gals. You've said for years that it's all about the fights and now that it's actually all about the fights, we're back full-circle to the old MolleSov argument that it's about the appropriate and well-to-do players holding the space they so justly deserve.

There's absolutely nothing stopping you from holding most, if not all, the space you've got and spending the majority of your time generating content by way of absolutely melting the rest of nullsec. At one point that was the dream. Now it's all patty-cake titans around a stargate whining about how interceptors are boring. The only ones denying you content are in your own coalition. So get back to your Miniluv gank fleets and ishtar farming if that makes you happy, just don't whinge about the fact nothings going on in nullsec but ceptor trolling when the very last thing you do with your time is attack another sov holder in earnest.
alpha36
Northern Freight Unlimited
Young Miners Christian Association
#86 - 2015-08-03 16:46:45 UTC  |  Edited by: alpha36
Eli Stan wrote:
It's impossible for an Entosis-fitted Interceptor to troll and annoy an alliance that has made the transition to Aegis Sov tactics

A lot of dissonance could be eliminated from this thread if we disregard posts from npc corps, people that never had and never will have sov and people that dont want sov.

I dont think anyone would argue that The Imperium has adapted to Aegis-sov the best out of all 0.0 groups and their regions are nigh impenetrable thanks to using the system.

Even in a max-ADM region theres still a 3 hour window each day where you chase uncatchable interceptors and play whack-a-mole with people that dont wanna fight.

I know Mordus Angels has a max dudes CTA to this thread but they would serve themselves a lot better by examining why they are continually frustrated at every angle. They have been beating their heads against a brick wall for years and keep asking: why does it hurt??

Little fellas over in Etherium Reach and Perrigen Falls and Curse and Scalding Pass are all taking their own sov for the first time. Any small groups that really want sov has a real shot at taking it in many places on the map.

These 40 guys think they should be able to wrest it from 14,000 players which would never happen even in the worst scenario but the dream is still there. And thats why a genuine discussion about tweaks that could and should be made to Aegis-sov devolve into trollceptor talk. Smile
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#87 - 2015-08-03 16:54:02 UTC
The way I see it is that the problem boils down to people being able to so easily contest sov without having to invest in it. What this means is that people who have no intention of taking sov can repeatedly contest it purely to time waste. That undermines the whole point of sov, which is to promote conflict over ownership of space.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Billy Bojangle
Doomheim
#88 - 2015-08-03 16:55:20 UTC
Sounds like your argument is you're totally unaffected and trollsov. Why are you posting? 40 trolls don't think they're supposed to sweep the region out from under you and they seem to be having a good time doing whatever "boring," thing you think they shouldn't be doing. Maybe it's time you stopped pretending that you care about their enjoyment and go make some content?
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2015-08-03 17:16:20 UTC
Karak Bol wrote:
Well, we are actually a ~100 guy Ally and yes, we did take sov. Kinda by accident, I just wanted a screenshot. The system is ok, but maybe, just maybe rise the size of ships needed a bit. Like T1 BS and/or T2 Cruiser at least. Make people risk something if they want sov and then lift the "no rep" limitation or something.


Sounds like CAS's experience holding sov in Fountain. Cool I noticed your TCU is now out of reinforcement and at the default 50% defense index - out of curiosity, do you plan on defending it? If not, I don't see the issue with a frigate claiming it. If yes, I again don't see an issue with frigates using Entosis Links since you can do the same and also utilize destroyers and cruisers to chase off and/or kill the frigs. It's not like you'd have to travel far since it's only a single system.

(But I assume you don't plan on keeping the system, since a system without an Outpost is a bad starting point. Did you notice that B-DBYQ right next to you doesn't have a TCU and the Outpost is in Freeport status? JF some combat ships in and stage there, and your 100-person alliance [with, I assume, 20 to 40 online at any point in time?] could make a go of holding it against VEGA, MC and the like.)
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2015-08-03 17:54:08 UTC
alpha36 wrote:
Eli Stan wrote:
It's impossible for an Entosis-fitted Interceptor to troll and annoy an alliance that has made the transition to Aegis Sov tactics

A lot of dissonance could be eliminated from this thread if we disregard posts from npc corps, people that never had and never will have sov and people that dont want sov.

I dont think anyone would argue that The Imperium has adapted to Aegis-sov the best out of all 0.0 groups and their regions are nigh impenetrable thanks to using the system.

Even in a max-ADM region theres still a 3 hour window each day where you chase uncatchable interceptors and play whack-a-mole with people that dont wanna fight.

I know Mordus Angels has a max dudes CTA to this thread but they would serve themselves a lot better by examining why they are continually frustrated at every angle. They have been beating their heads against a brick wall for years and keep asking: why does it hurt??

Little fellas over in Etherium Reach and Perrigen Falls and Curse and Scalding Pass are all taking their own sov for the first time. Any small groups that really want sov has a real shot at taking it in many places on the map.

These 40 guys think they should be able to wrest it from 14,000 players which would never happen even in the worst scenario but the dream is still there. And thats why a genuine discussion about tweaks that could and should be made to Aegis-sov devolve into trollceptor talk. Smile


(Bullet points added to match up with your above paragraphs, assuming I got my formatting right.)

- Ad hominem attacks do nothing to bolster your arguments. And anyway, people in NPC corps, people who never held sov, people who currently don't want sov, are exactly the people you should want the opinion of, because those are the people who could be moving into sov null in the future and who wouldn't want new neighbors moving in and providing content? (Besides carebears, of course.)

-Indeed. I look at Deklein and hardly ever see anything reinforced. Good job! As opposed to, for example, BL, who had a huge amount of their sov structures reinforced in Fountain recently. They're going to be having a bad time come a few hours from now when all the command nodes start spawning.

-Do you mean in backwater places like R8S-1K that have had all of 33 jumps in the past hour and a low ADM of 2.4? Yeah, that's more susceptible to trollceptors since you hardly ever have anybody there. But you have an Outpost just a single gate away in FO8M-2 which seems to have a decent amount of traffic - I can understand being annoyed at having to undock, but if sending a single person in cruiser one jump away to deal with a frig is so onerous - a frig that takes 30 minutes to create a reinforcement event (5 minute warpup and 24 minute capture) - then perhaps your leadership should reconsider their commitment to keeping a TCU there.

-They're frustrated? I got the impression from the discussions that they're actually snickering a bit about how things are going.

-Indeed, that does seem to be the case. Although it'll take more than just three weeks for some of the holders of Dominion Sov to figure out the new system and provide a bit of breathing room to these new little fellas, I think. The big guys are somewhat effectively still kicking out the little fellas at times, but at an unsustainable mental cost, it seems.

-Yup, certainly worthy of discussion.
alpha36
Northern Freight Unlimited
Young Miners Christian Association
#91 - 2015-08-03 18:14:48 UTC  |  Edited by: alpha36
Eli Stan wrote:
-They're frustrated? I got the impression from the discussions that they're actually snickering a bit about how things are going.

Their entire membership changes every two months, a new group of fresh-faced corps joins and goes: "Wow this is great, grr goons gonna kill me some CFC." Then two months later they leave for an established, stable, sov-holding alliance when they realize living in npc space with the most efficient warmachine in the history of EVE next door is no fun.

The leaders of the two biggest corps stay the same and feed the rhetoric to the next crop. People seem to be mistaken about anyone asking/looking for content?

I dont want or need anyones content, I did my time and fought in every major war of the last 4 years. I play a bit more casually now and log in a couple hours a day and run some ratting carriers or something.

Nobody in established 0.0 wants or needs anyone new to enter the arena. If somebody wants too thats cool. I would probably log in more and play more actively if 0.0 wasnt filled with coward tactics and no-commit fits. Slippy Petes and nullified interceptors zipping around everywhere.

All anyone is asking for is risk vs. reward and conflict generation, theres nothing worth fighting for right now in 0.0 and everything worth trolling for. I believe Elise Randolph put it best when he said: When Venal was worth 800b a month people fought tooth and nail for it and them wars were great.

Nobody cares about your sov laser on mah ihub. Its just not great gameplay. Knock yourself out though with them links okay?
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#92 - 2015-08-03 18:20:39 UTC
Eli Stan wrote:
And anyway, people in NPC corps, people who never held sov, people who currently don't want sov, are exactly the people you should want the opinion of, because those are the people who could be moving into sov null in the future and who wouldn't want new neighbors moving in and providing content? (Besides carebears, of course.)
This I have to disagree with. There's no reason to assume that these people will want to move into null, and there's certainly no reason why their opinion on the new sov system should be given too much attention since they don't use it. Many of the people "giving their opinions" in this thread have seen that the new sov mechanics are frustratingly boring, hate null groups and therefore support them being bored. People that support the game becoming more boring are hardly the types of people CCP should listen to when making development decisions.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#93 - 2015-08-03 19:07:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Eli Stan wrote:
And anyway, people in NPC corps, people who never held sov, people who currently don't want sov, are exactly the people you should want the opinion of, because those are the people who could be moving into sov null in the future and who wouldn't want new neighbors moving in and providing content? (Besides carebears, of course.)

It's ok, even if they've never held sov, don't want it, and are in highsec, we will welcome them.

There's still space in our Section 8 rental program.

alpha36 wrote:
Eli Stan wrote:
-They're frustrated? I got the impression from the discussions that they're actually snickering a bit about how things are going.

Their entire membership changes every two months, a new group of fresh-faced corps joins and goes: "Wow this is great, grr goons gonna kill me some CFC." Then two months later they leave for an established, stable, sov-holding alliance when they realize living in npc space with the most efficient warmachine in the history of EVE next door is no fun.

The leaders of the two biggest corps stay the same and feed the rhetoric to the next crop. People seem to be mistaken about anyone asking/looking for content?

It's ok though, that's just the way it should be. It sets the tone for their future which is either not in nullsec, or far away from us in nullsec

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Billy Bojangle
Doomheim
#94 - 2015-08-03 19:12:05 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
People that support the game becoming more boring are hardly the types of people CCP should listen to when making development decisions.

Hence, they're ignoring you and the rest of the "I CBA to chase a ceptor," crowd, because you're asking for a rollback to an even more stale and boring sov system.
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2015-08-03 19:22:55 UTC
Billy Bojangle wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
People that support the game becoming more boring are hardly the types of people CCP should listen to when making development decisions.

Hence, they're ignoring you and the rest of the "I CBA to chase a ceptor," crowd, because you're asking for a rollback to an even more stale and boring sov system.

Chasing interceptors, eh?
Tell me, how's that whole "catching instawarping interdiction nullified ships" thing working out for you?
Sure, we'll snag one or three ever so often with a lucky smartbomb, but that's about the best you can hope for.

To be 100% honest, I'd support the current system, with a single caveat. As soon as something is being entosised, all warp drives, jump drives, and prop mods currently on grid, and those that come on grid during the event are disabled until either the link is down, or the capture is complete, whichever comes first. You want to screw with sov, you should have to come prepared for a fight.
Lim Yoona
#96 - 2015-08-03 19:29:29 UTC
Activating an entosis link should be like lighting a cyno: you cant move, no burning offgrid in your nullified interceptor.

If people wanna stick a 40m mod on a 20m ship they should be prepared to lose it when engaging in sovereignty warfare. Or..you know, bring a proper support fleet with you and have a fleet fight like the system is supposed to encourage.
Billy Bojangle
Doomheim
#97 - 2015-08-03 19:57:09 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

Sure, we'll snag one or three ever so often with a lucky smartbomb, but that's about the best you can hope for.

If he's determined to keep at it, I don't see why you needing to be determined to stop it is a problem. Not being able to easily womp a troll ceptor isn't a problem when he doesn't even need to die in order to prevent his capping.

Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

You want to screw with sov, you should have to come prepared for a fight.


The entire point of the sov update was to allow screwing with sov without coming prepared for a supercap brawl. You seem to be confused. Maybe you should go talk with yourself from a year or so ago when you were behind the idea of localized conflict and occupacy sov.
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2015-08-03 20:35:31 UTC
Billy Bojangle wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

Sure, we'll snag one or three ever so often with a lucky smartbomb, but that's about the best you can hope for.

If he's determined to keep at it, I don't see why you needing to be determined to stop it is a problem. Not being able to easily womp a troll ceptor isn't a problem when he doesn't even need to die in order to prevent his capping.

Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

You want to screw with sov, you should have to come prepared for a fight.


The entire point of the sov update was to allow screwing with sov without coming prepared for a supercap brawl. You seem to be confused. Maybe you should go talk with yourself from a year or so ago when you were behind the idea of localized conflict and occupacy sov.

I am still behind these things. It is not the sov system I have as much of a problem with, as it is the meta of "ohgodruuuuun". That was a problem before the nano nerfs, it's been a problem since nullified interceptors and the Mordus ships became a thing, and this sov system has just highlighted that problem.
Billy Bojangle
Doomheim
#99 - 2015-08-03 20:42:33 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Billy Bojangle wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

Sure, we'll snag one or three ever so often with a lucky smartbomb, but that's about the best you can hope for.

If he's determined to keep at it, I don't see why you needing to be determined to stop it is a problem. Not being able to easily womp a troll ceptor isn't a problem when he doesn't even need to die in order to prevent his capping.

Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

You want to screw with sov, you should have to come prepared for a fight.


The entire point of the sov update was to allow screwing with sov without coming prepared for a supercap brawl. You seem to be confused. Maybe you should go talk with yourself from a year or so ago when you were behind the idea of localized conflict and occupacy sov.

I am still behind these things. It is not the sov system I have as much of a problem with, as it is the meta of "ohgodruuuuun". That was a problem before the nano nerfs, it's been a problem since nullified interceptors and the Mordus ships became a thing, and this sov system has just highlighted that problem.


Well you've definitely got my support if you want to talk about nerfing bubble immunity and the cancer mordu ships, but unfortunately that's not what most of the pentagoon posters here are suggesting.
Rhohan
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#100 - 2015-08-03 21:39:38 UTC
I think this new form of Sov is brilliant.
It forces Sov holders to defend their space from even the smallest annoyances.

It challenges their tactical organization and strategic commitment in trying to control so much space.
Even though the adjustment may be painful for some, its probably the best recent change to the game.

I hope the Devs stick to this change and don't cave to those unwilling to change or adapt.
I realize some minor adjustments may be needed of course.


Good work on "Aegis Sov" CCP!