These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can we do something about the idiots in highsec already CCP?

First post First post
Author
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#461 - 2013-11-08 15:33:56 UTC
Hm. Tempting to start a business guarding miners in ECM frigs/cruiser. Even more tempting to do so for CODE compliant miners at a discount.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Ginger Barbarella
#462 - 2013-11-08 15:36:20 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Tsufuri Ormand wrote:


I think that calling suicide gankers smoke addicts of eve is an objective statement. It has nothing to do with me approving or not. Make punishment for high-sec ganking more severe, so that gankers actually lose something and I will give suicide ganking my seal of approval.


Every time you attempt a suicide gank:



Ganker is open to attack from everyone
Ganker can fail to kill the target
Ganker faces a 50% chance of loot not dropping at all
Ganker will be hit with a sec status loss resulting in being open to attack from everyone
Ganker will be locked out of a ship for 15 min
Ganker will have a killright against them that is sellable and can be activated at any time
Gankers loot ship may be attacked
Gankers loot may be stolen by someone else
Gankers fly ships that are ironically profitable to gank
Gankers void their ship insurance

Suicide ganking is the single most punished activity in this game.


There is always going to be people who like knocking down old ladies in the street and stealing their pension check irrespective of the consequences. No difference here with gankers. :)

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Tsufuri Ormand
NE Procurement
#463 - 2013-11-08 15:44:04 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:

There is always going to be people who like knocking down old ladies in the street and stealing their pension check irrespective of the consequences. No difference here with gankers. :)


Of course there will be. People like that will still be doing this. But other gankers would choose other targets. And dont tell me all suicide gankers are psychos.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#464 - 2013-11-08 15:46:07 UTC
Tsufuri Ormand wrote:


Just to make it clear. Go gank frieghters or barges. Its perfectly fine with me. Killing shuttles and pods is a big nono for me due to 'look above'. Make changes to the game so that punishment is severe enough to repel gankers from empty shuttles and pods (aka nonprofit targets), but keep it low enough so they can gank friegthers etc with profit.


Or you can just kill that handful of people as they are -10 anyway. Or gank them in turn and make a profit.

We have plenty of ways for dealing with gankers and there are already more than enough drawbacks to this activity.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#465 - 2013-11-08 16:05:48 UTC
I see the regular trolls have gone into fantasy land mode :)

Unfortunately we play the game in realistic land.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#466 - 2013-11-08 16:10:05 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I see the regular trolls have gone into fantasy land mode
You're describing the OP, presumably?

Quote:
Unfortunately we play the game in realistic land.
Indeed we do, which is why we keep offering realistic numbers, tactics, and assumptions to counter your fantasies.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#467 - 2013-11-08 16:14:20 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I see the regular trolls have gone into fantasy land mode
You're describing the OP, presumably?

Quote:
Unfortunately we play the game in realistic land.
Indeed we do, which is why we keep offering realistic numbers, tactics, and assumptions to counter your fantasies.

Case in point ^^

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Tydeth Gilitae
Magewright Artificers
#468 - 2013-11-08 16:18:00 UTC
Profit isn't always measured in material gain for the agressor. Killing a pod that turns out to have had 1b+ in implants means a 1b profit for the killer regardless of the fact that they got no implant ever. This is because they deprived the target of the benefits of those implants for the cost of being deprived their ship by CONCORD. The victim lost far more than the ganker. In some cases, the victim would then give the ganker entertainment via sending him/her an angry EVEMail, thus bestowing profit in "tears." Since EVE is a game, and is therefore intended to be played for entertainment, these types of reactions are worth the ship loss to the players who participate in these activities. Those with blogs, like the New Order, may also share the "tears" they got, thus increasing the entertainment value and expanding the "profit."

As for shuttles, some people afk haul PLEX in those things, for whatever reason. If I was a ganker, I'd totally go for shuttles on the off chance they have PLEX and it drops. If even 1 drops, the Ganker just made a profit in real money, via gametime. The minerbumping blog has a "Kills of the Week Superpost" that features, as a save-the-best-for-last, a shuttle gank that netted the ganker the ability to play for 10 more months for free. Shuttles that are empty may tend to contain the pods in the above paragraph, which are a prime target for incurring loss on the ganked.

In short, gankers attack pods and shuttles for tears and high-isk-value killmails. If the shuttle wasn't empty, then the gank was also for the loot.
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#469 - 2013-11-08 16:21:59 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Killing other players should require skill, it should require brains, it should require risk and it should require a war dec or going to low sec or null sec.


You are playing the wrong game, in eve it require skill and brains not to be killed by other people, and the rule applies everywhere and all the time.

It does have consequence, if you actively gank people in high sec, the amount of kill rights other players have on you prevent you from pretty much doing anything other then gank in high-sec.

The only problem with hi-sec is that you can dodge security status penalties, kill rights and bounties by using alts.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#470 - 2013-11-08 16:32:21 UTC
dexington wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Killing other players should require skill, it should require brains, it should require risk and it should require a war dec or going to low sec or null sec.


You are playing the wrong game, in eve it require skill and brains not to be killed by other people, and the rule applies everywhere and all the time.

It does have consequence, if you actively gank people in high sec, the amount of kill rights other players have on you prevent you from pretty much doing anything other then gank in high-sec.

The only problem with hi-sec is that you can dodge security status penalties, kill rights and bounties by using alts.

A lot of the gankers are -10 so kill rights mean nothing. Neither does getting podded since it's a quicker way back to station than self destructing or warping. Neither does losing a T1 fitted or even a T2 fitted cat.

I'm playing the right game, when I started there were consequences, very bad ones, the game has been modified and expansion creep has gotten us to the point that EvE should not be at - No consequence killing. EvE needs to be harsh the way it was intended imo.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#471 - 2013-11-08 16:38:01 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
dexington wrote:
The only problem with hi-sec is that you can dodge security status penalties, kill rights and bounties by using alts.
A lot of the gankers are -10 so kill rights mean nothing. Neither does getting podded since it's a quicker way back to station than self destructing or warping. Neither does losing a T1 fitted or even a T2 fitted cat.


Most people going -10 and staying in hi-sec are people using alts.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Doomheim
#472 - 2013-11-08 16:43:49 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
dexington wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Killing other players should require skill, it should require brains, it should require risk and it should require a war dec or going to low sec or null sec.


You are playing the wrong game, in eve it require skill and brains not to be killed by other people, and the rule applies everywhere and all the time.

It does have consequence, if you actively gank people in high sec, the amount of kill rights other players have on you prevent you from pretty much doing anything other then gank in high-sec.

The only problem with hi-sec is that you can dodge security status penalties, kill rights and bounties by using alts.

A lot of the gankers are -10 so kill rights mean nothing. Neither does getting podded since it's a quicker way back to station than self destructing or warping. Neither does losing a T1 fitted or even a T2 fitted cat.

I'm playing the right game, when I started there were consequences, very bad ones, the game has been modified and expansion creep has gotten us to the point that EvE should not be at - No consequence killing. EvE needs to be harsh the way it was intended imo.


Because being able to tank concord and smartbomb the Jita IV-IV undock was too much of a consequence right?

Honor is a fools prize. [I]Glory is of no use to the dead.[/I]

Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#473 - 2013-11-08 16:45:22 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I'm playing the right game, when I started there were consequences, very bad ones
…and those consequences are still around today. What has changed over time is people's willingness to let the gankers get off scot-free.

Quote:
the game has been modified and expansion creep has gotten us to the point that EvE should not be at - No consequence killing. EvE needs to be harsh the way it was intended imo.
So you're arguing for the reinstatement of insurance even when CONCORD gets involved; increased CONCORD spawn times (if not the outright removal of death-ray-style CONCORD); reduced sec status penalties for unlawful attacks; reverting to personal killrights; rolling back the HP buffs that barges and industrials have received… you know, the changes that have made EVE a far less harsh place than it used to be?

When I was new, ganks were common-place. Now they're not. So while you're right that the game has become less harsh, the reason for this is pretty much the exact opposite of what you're claiming: killing people has been saddled with far too many consequences for it to happen with any real frequency.
Meilandra Vanderganken
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#474 - 2013-11-08 17:05:59 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:

A lot of the gankers are -10 so kill rights mean nothing. Neither does getting podded since it's a quicker way back to station than self destructing or warping. Neither does losing a T1 fitted or even a T2 fitted cat.

Mine isn't -10 and I have no intention of letting it become -10 atm because of the draw backs of being -10. So I put in time and effort to keep it above -2.0. I have started a third account for training a second ganker that will be purely for ganking and will indeed go -10 very fast when training is completed. That costs me a PLEX a month though, just to have a second ganker. Seems like pretty harsh consequences.

But back to my non -10 ganker. Plenty of ppl have kill rights on it. Not a single one has tried using it against me though. Even when I'm in their home system running lvl 4's for sec stat with it. They have the instruments to punish me but they refuse to even look at me funny when I undock right under their noses.

About getting podded: to fly a full t2 near max DPS cata you need implants to fit it and implants to push the DPS. Dunno the exact number my pod costs but it's at least 50m, and I'm pretty sure I'm going to lose it at one point. ofcourse you can go empty but that means significantly less dps per catalyst.

And well, since losing 10m cata's doesn't matter, I'm sure that losing a barge or two doesn't matter either, since your average retriever is only worth 2-3 of those....


Velicitia
XS Tech
#475 - 2013-11-08 17:19:56 UTC
Omar Alharazaad wrote:
Hm. Tempting to start a business guarding miners in ECM frigs/cruiser. Even more tempting to do so for CODE compliant miners at a discount.



just don't forget to report the noncompliant ones to the NODD (hell act as the warp-in lolollololTwisted)

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Ginger Barbarella
#476 - 2013-11-08 18:47:09 UTC
Tsufuri Ormand wrote:
Ginger Barbarella wrote:

There is always going to be people who like knocking down old ladies in the street and stealing their pension check irrespective of the consequences. No difference here with gankers. :)


Of course there will be. People like that will still be doing this. But other gankers would choose other targets. And dont tell me all suicide gankers are psychos.



Psychos? Of course not: I doubt ANY of them are psychos. Jerks (to put it mildly) sure, but not psychos.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Ginger Barbarella
#477 - 2013-11-08 18:48:06 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I see the regular trolls have gone into fantasy land mode :)

Unfortunately we play the game in realistic land.



A "realistic" land of pixels and fantasy role-playing?? Uh, yeah... thanks for confirming the troll status of your post(s).

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Ginger Barbarella
#478 - 2013-11-08 18:50:28 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I'm playing the right game, when I started there were consequences, very bad ones
…and those consequences are still around today. What has changed over time is people's willingness to let the gankers get off scot-free.


Eventually adults learn to just ignore screaming, nagging kids. The kiddies eventually get bored or tired of their activity and go eat some dirt somewhere outside.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Anomaly One
Doomheim
#479 - 2013-11-08 18:56:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Anomaly One
think of eve as in real life, any idiot can mug you/harm you, but it takes effort to stop him/notice him beforehand always come prepared (nvm this is bad)... in eve you get a second chance, it's a cat and mouse game specifically tom and jerry :p they bring one thing you bring another they escalate, you escalate etc. the ones who's a step ahead of the other wins.

foreseen is forearmed!
Zheng'Yi Sao
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#480 - 2013-11-08 19:20:10 UTC
I've been reading the last five pages of this thread, my head is swimming, I'm not sure what to say...

For one, laziness is the common denominator. I don't really think a ganker, or two are going to stop and blast a tanked Procurer. There are so many other idiots out there you can work much less harder to pop. Frankly, if someone took the time to hunt me down with six or seven Catas, I would be flattered. If you want to sneak up on me with a cloaky ship and point me long enough for the catas to show up and get me, again, I would be flattered for the effort. Nine times out of ten, you aren't going to get the shot though. It is SO easy to get away if you just pay attention. I, and others, have beaten this point to death I think.

So, having beaten the sensible point to death...

I don't think anyone should tank their Procurers. I think mining in a Proc is a bad idea. I like the prices low and easily replacable. The fact that Procs are SO cheap is a testament to people's greed and laziness. So go fly AFK in your Covetors and Retrievers. You don't need any tank. Watch some TV, let out the dog. You don't need to align or pay attention. I mean us paranoid people are freaks, right? Have fun, this is EVE; nothing to worry about. I want you to be out there. I want people to buy my new line of fitted ganking Catalysts. Hell, I might even set up a buy three, get one free program. Please, by all means, continue doing what you are doing. Cry to CCP to save you. I thank you now for padding my wallet and increasing my chances of survival.

Third...

I think miners should organize miner ganks. Especially when some multiboxing, non-aligned, afk turd decides to rip off the four other hard working miners who actually pay attention. This is a joke though, because paying attention while mining is not hard work. Staying away from gankers is not hard work. (beats horse furiously). But still, even if some think miners are the lowest of the low, we have standards. Anyone who vilolates miner standards should, but the logic of some, be considered the lowest scum in the galaxy. Such scum needs to be addressed...

"It's funny the things you people think are mandatory for us, as if we don't do what we do because it's a hilarious good time in a space video game." - Johnny Marzetti