EVE General Discussion

So OP when are you planning on coming to provi to make those billons of isk? Probably never because you know that there is more isk in hi-sec level 4s and incursions than in actually populated null sec, where there is alot of competition for sites and a hotdropper in at least every 4th system.

Romney.

But calling it like I see it isn't an insult unless you take it that way.

What is your point here? i've explained to you that my position has not changed. if you think it has, why don't you link the post where you think I said something different, so I can show you where you are wrong? Of course, you would need to be interested in the truth to do that, and it doesn't seem that you are.

I am betting because they personally have a problem with the Goons in general, and that the Goons have some big bad conspiracy of lies to keep people out of nullsec because that's where all the real money is. And Infinity is the one trying to expose this Watergate to all the poor, exploited citizens of highsec.

At least, this is what I gathered from Infinity's posts thus far.

Infinity is just plugged in wrong lol. you can see that when he explains that null is safer than high because anyone in high sec can decide to suicide gank you, all despite the fact that null sec has on average 7 times as many deaths as high sec while having less than 1/5th the population.

I think the anaolgy I used is someone thinking Beverly Hills is more dangerous than South Central LA because in South Central you can see the gangsters whereas in Beverly Hills anyone in a Rolls Royce can jump out at any time and car jack you and you wouldn't see it coming!

I don't think it's just goons, I think it's all null sec people because Infinity was out screwing with TRIBE last time. It's hard to peg Infinity's motives in the matter, but it must be something big in order to get him to ignore some very simple and easily verifiable facts about the game.

Yes it does go on a bit. And the end result was me demonstrating to you that you didn't know enough about what we were talking about to have an informed opinion about the issue's being discussed (and yet, there you go having one). This was the mistake on your part, and yet you (like many like you) found the need to lay some kind of blame for it on me.

The same thing happened here. You basically said i'd somehow changed my position and I informed you that I hadn't, that you were mistaken (again....sigh) and somehow, I'm wrong for doing that too lol. That's what I find irritating, you blaming me for what amounts to your own personal cognitive failures.

Is your really name Tammy, because your sure do seem like my ex-wife......

Back to insults again, sigh!

The initial link was starting at page 25, it really started at page 18 and I edited that, in fact one of the points I made was that doing Incursions and level 4's was so boring that you end up in 0.0 because the risk is more fun and you are now in 0.0 because of that very reason:



That has an impact on the time and concentration you can spend doing missions for example, I found doing anoms in null better as I had risk which kept me interested, while doing level 4's was such that I got bored and did not really feel like doing too many, many players I know are like me and not like you.



This is where the ISK relationship seems to have changed from what you said in the earlier thread, anyway, it is what it is...

I pointed out your standard tactics, and you keep doing them, and call other people crazy.

What's the definition of doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results? Go look it up.

Bet you voted in 2012 thinking that would make a difference too.

So you are able to illustrate your own mistake, but not recognize it?

You see you are imagining a contradiction where none exists. the 1st part you link has nothing to do with what I said later.

In fact, both quotes mean the same thing: The only reason to do null PVE for me is boredom, becuase I can make isk perfectly well in empire. The isk isn't absolutely equal, but the easier time I have in high sec compensates for the small added reward of null.

Which takes me right back to the original point of out interaction in this thread. My position has not changed, you simply did not understand it (then had the nerve to blame me for your lack of understanding...Tammy). it's like in the old thread you linked, you did not have enough game knowledge to enter into the discussion in the 1st place, and got mad at me telling you (and demonstrating) the fact.

You're consistent at least, but that's not a good thing. if you are unsure about what I'm saying and want clarification, why not just ask for it rather than making yourself look foolish?

Word up!

More seriously, tell me I'm not crazy for thinking that these guys last few posts are...well....crazy lol. Either they are or I'm having a stroke right now

I was pointing out the importance of this in the other thread:




You were so fixated on insulting me or winning an argument that you did failed to understand the valid point I was making about this very important aspect!