These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A petition to CCP Greyscale on Sentry Mechanics (Please Read)

First post First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nerf Burger
Doomheim
#561 - 2012-08-18 07:05:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Nerf Burger
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


. People shooting at suspects can only be shot at by the suspect they are shooting at. No calling in backup for the suspects.


Even your first line is easily proven as being wrong.

There is nothing to stop suspects for using their own alts and corpmates in the fight.

Sit down pipa, accept that you lost this argument. Accept being a loser. You've got nothing.


Derp.



reread the bolded line. And, ever heard of defenders advantage? Its high sec, and the bottom line is, CCP doesn't agree with your half-baked myopic vision of what you think EVE is supposed to be. You've got nothing.
Pipa Porto
#562 - 2012-08-18 07:06:12 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Bloodpetal wrote:
The idea of SUSPECT flagged pilots getting shot by LOW SEC gate guns is ******* stupid.

Does that mean that HI SEC suspects get shot by gate guns too?

It not, then the LOW sec ones shouldn't shoot suspects either.

Completely awful.

Maybe highsec suspects should be shot by gate guns. Just because you don't trigger CONCORD doesn't mean the gate guns should give you a free pass.

Good idea !


Bonus Nerf to Freighter/Hauler ganking.

What a great idea.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Pipa Porto
#563 - 2012-08-18 07:08:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


. People shooting at suspects can only be shot at by the suspect they are shooting at. No calling in backup for the suspects.


Even your first line is easily proven as being wrong.

There is nothing to stop suspects for using their own alts and corpmates in the fight.

Sit down pipa, accept that you lost this argument. Accept being a loser. You've got nothing.


Derp.



reread the bolded line. And, ever heard of defenders advantage? Its high sec, and the bottom line is, CCP doesn't agree with your half-baked myopic vision of what you think EVE is supposed to be. You've got nothing.


You mean, besides CONCORD? You're right.

But, by that reasoning, there's nothing stopping anti-canflippers now from joining in fights against canflipper's they don't have aggro on.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Frying Doom
#564 - 2012-08-18 07:09:01 UTC
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Pipa Porto
#565 - 2012-08-18 07:10:12 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back Lol


This change will prevent pirates from hunting pirates, cause the Gate guns will kill everyone in short order.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#566 - 2012-08-18 07:10:15 UTC
Maybe stargates, should just have their own cans out, filled with oil and other parts. Then you can can flip them, and pvp against their sentries.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Frying Doom
#567 - 2012-08-18 07:11:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Pipa Porto wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back Lol


This change will prevent pirates from hunting pirates, cause the Gate guns will kill everyone in short order.

Well maybe they could stalk each other in belts, around planets or moons for a change.

Edit: They say a change is as good as a holiday, so say thank you to CCP you pirates Smile

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Nerf Burger
Doomheim
#568 - 2012-08-18 07:23:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Nerf Burger
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


. People shooting at suspects can only be shot at by the suspect they are shooting at. No calling in backup for the suspects.


Even your first line is easily proven as being wrong.

There is nothing to stop suspects for using their own alts and corpmates in the fight.

Sit down pipa, accept that you lost this argument. Accept being a loser. You've got nothing.


Derp.



reread the bolded line. And, ever heard of defenders advantage? Its high sec, and the bottom line is, CCP doesn't agree with your half-baked myopic vision of what you think EVE is supposed to be. You've got nothing.




there's nothing stopping anti-canflippers now from joining in fights against canflipper's they don't have aggro on.


yet again you display your limited thinking.

thats the risk you take in being a can flipper now, its going to get fixed with crimewatch. Its called risk vs reward, this is EVE. Deal with it. Can flippers will still be able to attack anyone that attacks them. There is nothing to cry about.

I guess you don't understand the game enough to realize that CCP is fixing can flipping and all this patch does is benefit the game. I'm pretty sure CCP is making EVE, not you. thank goodness.

Additionally, can flippers have always been reliant on others attacking them. To now complain about can flippers not being able to initiate attacks in high sec is pretty moronic. Adapt and L2P, scrub. Seal clubbing days are over!

I'm off to bed now so have fun arguing endlessly with everyone about how you think the sky should be black.
Pipa Porto
#569 - 2012-08-18 07:40:30 UTC
Nerf Burger wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:


You mean, besides CONCORD? You're right.

But, by that reasoning, there's nothing stopping anti-canflippers now from joining in fights against canflipper's they don't have aggro on.


yet again you display your limited thinking.

thats the risk you take in being a can flipper now, its going to get fixed with crimewatch. Its called risk vs reward, this is EVE. Deal with it. Can flippers will still be able to attack anyone that attacks them. There is nothing to cry about.

I guess you don't understand the game enough to realize that CCP is fixing can flipping and all this patch does is benefit the game. I'm pretty sure CCP is making EVE, not you. thank goodness.

Additionally, can flippers have always been reliant on others attacking them. To now complain about can flippers not being able to initiate attacks in high sec is pretty moronic. Adapt and L2P, scrub. Seal clubbing days are over!

I'm off to bed now so have fun arguing with everyone about how you think the sky should be black.



Good job with the out of context quoting. Try again tomorrow.

The Crimewatch patch exclusively benefits carebears. It's yet another in a long line of nerfs to HS PVP.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#570 - 2012-08-18 07:47:26 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
The Crimewatch patch exclusively benefits carebears. It's yet another in a long line of nerfs to HS PVP.

Highsec PvP, getting all the love and attention from CCP.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Pipa Porto
#571 - 2012-08-18 07:55:23 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
The Crimewatch patch exclusively benefits carebears. It's yet another in a long line of nerfs to HS PVP.

Highsec PvP, getting all the love and attention from CCP.


Fun Fact: Crimewatch Safe Freighting limit becomes 5+b (breakeven cost to gank ~1b for the Nados, ~1.5b for the Suicide Suspect Freighter, doubled to account for 50% drop rate).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
smokeAjoint
Catch And Release Privateering
#572 - 2012-08-18 11:42:07 UTC
/Signed.

** legalize it**
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#573 - 2012-08-18 13:27:27 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back Lol


This change will prevent pirates from hunting pirates, cause the Gate guns will kill everyone in short order.



Null sec has no gatge gun, this is a good news. Low/0 sec characters don't belong to high sec, they should have been banned for a long while from there. It's about consequences of a choice, witch seems they don't have much other than lol consequences and then cry on forums.

I'm far more concerned about low sec low/null SS residents, those in high sec can biomass or gtfo I don't care and the game will be much better without them: more dudes tired of high sec grinding is more dudes willing to come to low/null, thus more dudes to play with or shoot at.

For low sec low/null SS residents the system should remain as it was before, they only get shot if they get aggression timers. Then gate guns, well there are other tactics they can use, smart players don't see much of a problem about this.

brb
Pipa Porto
#574 - 2012-08-18 21:25:15 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Just as a funny idea why don't the pirates go hunt the pirates? or is it a problem that pirates might shoot back Lol


This change will prevent pirates from hunting pirates, cause the Gate guns will kill everyone in short order.



Null sec has no gatge gun, this is a good news. Low/0 sec characters don't belong to high sec, they should have been banned for a long while from there. It's about consequences of a choice, witch seems they don't have much other than lol consequences and then cry on forums.

I'm far more concerned about low sec low/null SS residents, those in high sec can biomass or gtfo I don't care and the game will be much better without them: more dudes tired of high sec grinding is more dudes willing to come to low/null, thus more dudes to play with or shoot at.

For low sec low/null SS residents the system should remain as it was before, they only get shot if they get aggression timers. Then gate guns, well there are other tactics they can use, smart players don't see much of a problem about this.


If you want to prevent Outlaws from entering HS, you are free to do so. They are outside of CONCORD's protection. That is the consequence of their choice. They also get chased by Faction police, limiting the types of ships they can effectively fly.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto
drunk asfck
Doomheim
#575 - 2012-08-20 12:37:52 UTC
Signed

gate guns are fine as they are how about fixing some stuff rather than messing with things that dnt need it

someone sack this greyskull dude ffs

only changes to gate guns imo is you should be able to destroy them
Scott PiIgrim
Doomheim
#576 - 2012-08-20 13:14:35 UTC
I vote for not doing anything with sentries!
Frying Doom
#577 - 2012-08-20 13:20:41 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:

I'm far more concerned about low sec low/null SS residents, those in high sec can biomass or gtfo I don't care and the game will be much better without them:

Given the numbers of hi-sec dwellers, if they gtfo there is no game. Well CCP would benefit from Dust being linked to EvE, so I suppose it could probably afford its server costs but definitely no devs to fix anything.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!