Crime & Punishment

If you want to know why there is so much hate towards the ganking community, it's because you fly with people like this:


*snip* - Please do not post in-game chatlogs in this thread. -- ISD Supogo




And this is who you allow to be your leader. A manchild with serious personality issues. Then you wonder why miners think so poorly of your community.

Here's a suggestion... stop associating with filth if you don't want to be judged as filth.

Some of us think that one of the main AG mods and FCs defecting to CODE and backstabbing his erstwhile friends is actually the kind of content that should be featured in C&P.

Anyone checking my killboards should see a crystalclear picture of what kind of stance I have been taking in game. I have engaged over 300 destroyers using 3 different characters. But yes, the last one was back in May, so I assume you are refering to me not continuing this day in and day out. But frankly, if you were frustrated by CODE, it is not my job to fix this for you. I don't have to come up with reasons or excuses for not doing more than I have done. If this makes you frustrated by me, then that's your issue.

I never 'worked' to get AG put on evelocal.com, I just decided one day that I would send Chribba a short mail asking politely. Then I forwarded his reply to some fellow anti-gankers. Why you choose to reference this is beyond me...

Regarding ISBoxer, I'm wondering if you are trying to spread lies about me. I might not even have undocked a barge the last year, especially not 2-3 months ago when I played around with ISBoxer for maybe a month total. And I certainly didn't need ISBoxer to know that I could easily run 14 clients sustaining the 23/7 open mining fleet I ran for a year. What I did use ISBoxer for, was try to see how quickly I could do missions to farm standings to improve my free refining service. I did mostly lvl 4 combat missions flying 12 caracals 1 noctis 1 vulture, some burner missions flying various frigates, as well as some lvl 4 mining missions flying ventures. It was fun for a bit, mostly because it was horribly overpowered, but I had already stopped doing it for quite a while when the news broke about input broadcasting. And I love CCP's new stance, it's one of the bravest decisions they have made.


Out of respect, I chose to withhold his name. As you were a mod at the time, you had the power to look into how he was attacked and take measures. If I recall correctly, I tried looking into it, but got distracted by numerous abusive mails, alts disrupting AG, and eventually 29 wardecs.

To make it perfectly clear, I would much rather have a channel full of respectful and clueless newbros than a channel full of disrespectful experts. A respectful atmosphere is crucial for people to want to ask all kinds of questions and be able to traverse that learning curve quickly. Also, it is entirely possible to be both respectful and knowledgeable at the same time. Frankly, being respectful is quite easy, even doing nothing at all is enough in this case. And if you have things to say, just skip the namecalling and you are halfway there already.


Thank you for your honesty, many could learn from it.

It's local spam and not even interesting spam at that. Just rather repetitive.
I agree local spam can be annoying, but I'm not sure I'd go as far as calling those doing it a manchild, filth, or even suggest he has personality issues.

I do wonder about you though, coming to such a judgement over it.

I suck at PvP, I tend towards exploration and industry. However, I think CODE. and any other ganker types make the game more fun.

I consider it a major win for me if I jump through a gate into a bubble camp and escape with my Astero in one piece. Then I might indulge in a spot of trash talking in local, whilst safely cloaked of course.

Do i get annoyed when i get podded and see 300 mill isk in cargo lost, along with an 80 mill isk ship? Of course i do.... For about 30 seconds. Then i remember something important. It is only pixels. Sure, I invested time and effort to acquire those pixels but I had some fun doing it, and I had some fun losing it too and that, surely, is the point in playing the game?

Also, if you just stick your head in the sand and refuse to adapt and evolve your game play to take into account the actions of other groups in game you deserve anything that befalls you.

Embrace the chaos. It's the Wild West in spaceships!

Me 2, but i am training.


NO!


YES!

Code has a history and the bad habit to reach to the players in front of the monitor. They still embrace the acts of erotica1, who was banned by the outrage by lots of players who usually don't post in the forums. The guy and his friends making fun of a speechimpeeded man for hours. This ban made this guy a "martyr" for the code. Those guys wanna accuse others of bad behavior when they get RL threats, when they self embrace the idea of having fun with handicapped people over their handicaps on teamspeak.

Disgusting hipocrites.

And this is what is wrong with carebears.

They are not "causing" anything. The people spouting abuse and violating the EULA are the ones at fault for that. They are responsible for their actions, and no one else.




They did not act on mine either, and I had to get the police involved with mine.

It's because their GM staff is biased.



If someone is so emotionally fragile that being laughed at makes them spew death threats, homophobic slurs and vile sexual insults, then they are an unstable, disgraceful excuse for a human being.




They are equally unacceptable, stop trying to excuse EULA violations, you slime. Stop trying to blame the only real victims here.

They can take the "emotional outburst" defense and shove it into a shattered wormhole. Presumably, we are all adults here, and adults are not ruled by their petty little feelings, nor are adults prone to violent outbursts when they lose at a videogame.

{Snip. No personal attacks allowed. -- ISD LackOfFaith}

I like him when he's not trolling. Believe it or not he does occasionally make a valid post. Not often, though.

This thread has gone way off topic, and is the subject of a high volume of reports, as such it's being closed.

- F