Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

Fully supported. Great idea.

not sure if it's been mentioned

add the % to the levels like you see on the ihub to the corporation - alliances - claimed systems window so all can see what % a level is currently at in any system for any char rather than having someone to fly to the ihub for every system

It has been specifically designed to have many spread out fun fights instead of getting your blob on top of it and being fat.

That said, you can always have your fun fight on initial reinforce, there's only station/TCU/IHUB to reinforce, here's your one node. If you want to get a gudfait out of it, I suggest to tell your opponents in advance, so they will have a fun welcoming party.

You used to be able to put anything in the cargoholds of ships in a carrier hangar - that was until it was discovered you could fit Skiffs with a volume of 5,000 with cargo expanders and place 20,000+ in their cargoholds creating a jump freighter.... CCP were less than impressed hence the limits to what you can place in cargoholds.

CORRECT

NOW, however, you can spit farther than a carrier can jump and using a JF is a much much much better proposition, therefore the "NEED" for the restrictions is no longer applicable

On this,

How about a diminishing return, similar to stacked modules, so that more people can entose, but the have less return. It is a good mechanic to add pressure to defenders to get out and defend, but at the same time, they can get their stuff back that much faster.

Then, you, CCP, can fiddle with the entosis timers up or down to reach the sweet spot for fleet work.

Could also be fun to add different types of command nodes that respond differently to Entosing, so that different fleet comps are needed to capture the flag. The different types of nodes could be based on the Sov Index of the system the structure is in, so that higher sov generates bigger/badder nodes that need heavier ships/capital support. In that case, maybe you tell your line members to go anom somewhere else to keep the index artificially low since you can't field the best fleet for it.

Just random thoughts :)

This particular mechanic was removed because it turned Carriers into the default item moving vessel and was terribly abused. People would back Itty 5's (back when that was the only industrial that could hold 25k+ m3) with large guns and other items that would then be melted at some destination. The problem is that the melted minerals took up more volume than the item itself... basically compressed minerals in the form of modules.

This made logistics way too easy, was very much abused, and took roles away from the (jump) freighter and gave too much versatility to Carriers.

No, the change to disallow certain items in the cargo of Ships stored in a carrier is a good change and should not be changed. They've already given us item-specific industrials, Transport ships w/ 50k m3 fleet hangars and everything in between anyway!

From what I see on the timetable...

1) IHUBs are being reinforced only in 2 cases: people are going to live in that system, or troll purposes. Otherwise nobody cares.
2) TCUs are being reinforced for troll purposes only. Literally nobody cares about those, and honestly, there's no reason to - if enemy is willing to pay sov bills for you, who are you to forbid them? There is no benefit of having them, only the trolling liability, which is happily shifted to enemy, with all the strategic defense multiplier they have mounted over time.
3) Stations were supposed to be a gudfait, but instead they are lock break bombs trollfest, alpha thrasher gangs trollfest, and griffins trollfest. I know lock breaking is supposed to be a sov thing now, but capturing a node with only contest being a lock-breaking bomber every 5 minutes is a royal PITA.

1 is working as intended I guess. you don't need IHUB if you don't want upgrades now.
2 is questionable at the moment. Holding sov provides no meaningful benefit and not tied to stations anymore, so why hold it? All the "ego" reasons turned into thin air. Guess the new influence maps are going to be based on station ownership only...
3 I believe it was supposed to be revolving around "grid control", and trollfest parties doesn't care much about that. Well, I guess there can be meta-fix of this, involving entosis ships with high ECCM and EHP fits... but still, this was supposed to be lowsec fwfest, and it turned into hisec gankfest instead, now with no criminal flagging.

new suggestions:
Deal with 2.
For 3, increase weapon timers on attacking active entosis ships and disallow self-destruction while on timer, before whole alliances start showing up in nothing but thrashers.

Well, the "Easier" part was you didn't need 50 supers to grind the EHP of the TCU, iHUB and Station

Never was Fozzie sov supposed to be a welfare sov handout system. You still have to work for Sov

Gee, that is funny, we RF'd 28 items today, a few hours ago, we had a total of One Crow and One manitcore come hassle us. I am not sure what other window you want.

In the past week, i have entosis'd roughly 10 things SOLO and haven't seen as much as a single spaceship on my overview

Maybe you are just not doing it right