These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection

First post First post
Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#521 - 2014-08-30 14:31:23 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Sidrat Flush wrote:
That of the perception of protection and feeling safe will require more and more steps as people over come the perceived barrier ... will be calling for more and more steps until ... [police state] ... can't [freedom] without going through [bureaucracy] to ensure [safety]


I felt free to sum up your post ...
... which makes it applicable to both ingame- and actual reality.


You have snakes in your hair.
Angeal MacNova
Holefood Inc.
Warriors of the Blood God
#522 - 2014-08-30 14:54:30 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:
Modern society created weaklings who have stopped understanding
that being able tk protect ones self is of utter most importance.

Instead people obey to a protective authority.


The whole art of civilization is to set layers between violence and the individual. That allows those who can't protect themselves to make it alive through deadly perils such as being a child and going to school in some countries.



Wow. For Solecist to state such a thing about the real world. It's people who think like that that is wrong with the world today.

Well said Indahmawar. Well said.

http://www.projectvaulderie.com/goodnight-sweet-prince/

http://www.projectvaulderie.com/the-untold-story/

CCP's true, butthurt, colors.

Because those who can't do themselves keep others from doing too.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#523 - 2014-08-30 14:55:38 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Depends on if they are going for loot or a green killboard and tears. And no, a standard hauler, as in not a freighter, is not going to be surviving that many catalysts. It would be a push to survive 5, which would even be green on the loot side too.
No, it doesn't really depend on either of that — it's a loss. 30M in carried loot does not make up for the loss of 10–15 destroyers. And freigthers are standard haulers. As are DSTs and BRs. A non-standard hauler would be a covops or an interceptor or maybe a Damnation. If you want to say “T1 industrial” then say “T1 industrial” — they're not the only haulers around.

And funnily enough, if they were going for tears, 15 people on a 30M target — especially if it's a T1 indy — is even less likely because no-one is going to cry over that amount. It's not something that the 15 people sitting around will be interested in.

Quote:
Where are you buying your T1 catalysts for 10m a pop? 2.5m tops, and that's if you can't be bothered to wait of buy orders
Standard T2 fit arrives at roughly that price. For 2.5M tops, you're not even going to scratch the paint on many haulers.

…oh, and Ruby points out, the main cost here is actually the 3–4 mahours that go into that gank (and that's not even counting the waiting around for a worth-while target to appear).
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#524 - 2014-08-30 16:11:30 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
The serous point is that PvPrs who disrupt the non-PvP activities of players who don't engage in PvP should be exposed to have their own non-PvP acitvities disrupted by their victims.

A extreme and funny example was given by Mike Azariah in his "Peace dec" blog.

The whole risk vs reward is biased since A can force his playstyle on B but B can't force his play style on A, so B must either play as A does or quit the game. That's barely an equitable choice, but CCP are OK with it.

pvpers who disrupt the pve activities of others are already exposed to having their own activities disrupted

the game is entirely fair in that regard. each player is on an even footing, you see. people who pvp aren't handed additional tools. people who refuse the tools handed to them are at a disadvantage only due to their own choices

i'm going to type the phrase 'deal with it' followed by the emoticon wearing shades

let's put it another way. there are two hypothetical players. the first chooses to embrace all the tools provided them by the game. let's call this player the absurdly courageous space hero, paragon of virtue and morality, ruler of all those in optimal range, or ACSHPVMRATOR for short

actually i'll just end the post here because i'm tired. let's just assume i finished the hypothetical and it was fantastic. if someone can modify the title of the courageous space hero so that it ends with -RAPTOR that'd be badass thanks
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#525 - 2014-08-30 17:40:19 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:

let's put it another way. there are two hypothetical players. the first chooses to embrace all the tools provided them by the game. let's call this player the absurdly courageous space hero, paragon of virtue and morality, ruler of all those in optimal range, or ACSHPVMRATOR for short

actually i'll just end the post here because i'm tired. let's just assume i finished the hypothetical and it was fantastic. if someone can modify the title of the courageous space hero so that it ends with -RAPTOR that'd be badass thanks


absurdly courageous space hero, paragon of virtue and morality, ruler of all those players traveling in optimal range

ACSHPVMRAPTOR

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Niko Thiesman
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#526 - 2014-08-30 18:59:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Niko Thiesman
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Since I've been doing a lot of bumping lately, I am going to rename my Stabber "Falcon Punch".

You know, since it knocks you out of bounds.


Reminds me of Super Smash Brothers. lol

People need to stop whining about CODE and gankers. People also need to stop paying "mining dues". CODE calling mining without permits "illegal" is just plain stupid. CODE is not a legal entity of any kind. CODE is nothing more than a bunch of people pretending they have a right to tell people how to play. Just fit your ships properly, fly with friends, and ignore CODE. They are good for nothing except a good fireworks show, occasionally. It's just too bad they won't PvP and they chicken out of REAL fights.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2dtert/rvb_best_ban_ever_catalyst_vs_code_code_forfeits/

I do agree with CODE on one point though, If you just let your ship sit there and go AFK or something you are just asking to be podded.
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#527 - 2014-08-30 19:13:25 UTC
implants are itchy.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Niko Thiesman
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#528 - 2014-08-30 19:19:23 UTC
Omar Alharazaad wrote:
implants are itchy.



Mine too. Guess it's time to go PvP until I get podded, then get the level 5's.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#529 - 2014-08-30 20:00:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Niko Thiesman wrote:

People need to stop whining about CODE and gankers. People also need to stop paying "mining dues". CODE calling mining without permits "illegal" is just plain stupid. CODE is not a legal entity of any kind. CODE is nothing more than a bunch of people pretending they have a right to tell people how to play.
It's an extortion racket, and it's within the rules of the game to run such an enterprise, they appear to have the muscle to enforce it to a certain extent too.

Quote:
Just fit your ships properly, fly with friends, and ignore CODE.
I agree with points 1 and 2, but ignoring them is not a particularly good option, it may end in an explosion or 3, acknowledging that they exist and planning around them is much better.

Quote:
They are good for nothing except a good fireworks show, occasionally.
I don't know about that, the amount of tears they generate is astounding.

Quote:
It's just too bad they won't PvP and they chicken out of REAL fights.
If it involves another player it's PvP, as for real fights you need to define that, as I'm pretty sure they roam in lowsec and nullsec and kill people, who're flying combat ships, there too, when they're not enforcing their highsec extortion racket.

Quote:
I do agree with CODE on one point though, If you just let your ship sit there and go AFK or something you are just asking to be podded.
Totally.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#530 - 2014-08-30 20:18:29 UTC
Confessions of an erratic and usually inebriated mind....
I want Tippia to bear my space babies, as Kurosaki Rukia has given me the cold shoulder. The children would be highly intelligent, completely rational, and hell bent upon reforming the universe through force.
Jonah Gravenstein should come over to the darkside and become an inquisitor of HTFU. He knows it to be true, but still has yet to admit it to himself.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#531 - 2014-08-30 20:21:03 UTC
Omar Alharazaad wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein should come over to the darkside and become an inquisitor of HTFU. He knows it to be true, but still has yet to admit it to himself.
lol I actually spoke to Ralph about this the other day, seriously considering putting an alt in with you guys.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#532 - 2014-08-30 20:23:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Omar Alharazaad
I took the big leap and put my main (me) in. I have yet to feel any sense of regret, and it's revitalized my love for this game.

Edit: I've been told we have cookies, I have yet to see one. On the other hand I get to fight against rediculous ships with equally rediculous results... such as https://zkillboard.com/kill/40530236/

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#533 - 2014-08-30 20:26:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
I would but while this character can do many things it can do none of them well, my alt is far more combat oriented.

Omar Alharazaad wrote:
Edit: I've been told we have cookies, I have yet to see one.
It's the dark side, of course you were lied to about the cookies, you have to loot them for yourself.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#534 - 2014-08-30 20:44:21 UTC
I do have plenty of Damsels and slaves, to be fair.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

virm pasuul
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#535 - 2014-08-30 20:59:25 UTC
Falcon you are my new hero :)
Thank you for restoring my faith in CCP.

One argument that I never see the care bears never address is this:

It takes a lot of gankers to pull off the larger ganks. That means coordinating quite a few pilots to work together.
Why don't gank targets bring along an ECM friend or two to disrupt the ganks? One mediocre ECM pilot e.g. a Griffin pilot cancels out two ganker pilots. You only have to get half as many - realistically 1/3 or less - ECM friends working together to completely negate the gank. And the gankers still loose their ships.

If you are going to use resource comparisons as an argument that ganking is unbalanced you have to consider the number of people and pilots involved on each side of the gank. Any comparison this ignores this aspect is without foundation and in my opinion ( deliberately ) intellectually dishonest.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#536 - 2014-08-30 21:05:42 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:
Falcon you are my new hero :)
Thank you for restoring my faith in CCP.

One argument that I never see the care bears never address is this:

It takes a lot of gankers to pull off the larger ganks. That means coordinating quite a few pilots to work together.
Why don't gank targets bring along an ECM friend or two to disrupt the ganks? One mediocre ECM pilot e.g. a Griffin pilot cancels out two ganker pilots. You only have to get half as many - realistically 1/3 or less - ECM friends working together to completely negate the gank. And the gankers still loose their ships.

If you are going to use resource comparisons as an argument that ganking is unbalanced you have to consider the number of people and pilots involved on each side of the gank. Any comparison this ignores this aspect is without foundation and in my opinion ( deliberately ) intellectually dishonest.


But how can i do this afk? its just not fair.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#537 - 2014-08-30 21:06:56 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:
If you are going to use resource comparisons as an argument that ganking is unbalanced you have to consider the number of people and pilots involved on each side of the gank. Any comparison this ignores this aspect is without foundation and in my opinion ( deliberately ) intellectually dishonest.


Friends are overpowered. Nerf Friends.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#538 - 2014-08-30 21:23:58 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Friends are overpowered. Nerf Friends.
They're not as overpowered as avarice, stupidity and incompetence P

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#539 - 2014-08-30 21:37:26 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:
Falcon you are my new hero :)
Thank you for restoring my faith in CCP.

One argument that I never see the care bears never address is this:

It takes a lot of gankers to pull off the larger ganks. That means coordinating quite a few pilots to work together.
Why don't gank targets bring along an ECM friend or two to disrupt the ganks? One mediocre ECM pilot e.g. a Griffin pilot cancels out two ganker pilots. You only have to get half as many - realistically 1/3 or less - ECM friends working together to completely negate the gank. And the gankers still loose their ships.

If you are going to use resource comparisons as an argument that ganking is unbalanced you have to consider the number of people and pilots involved on each side of the gank. Any comparison this ignores this aspect is without foundation and in my opinion ( deliberately ) intellectually dishonest.


Would you spend all your play time escorting someone day after day so you can ECM boost him when he needs it, maybe once in six months?

If the answer is "yes", CCP should hire you, you're the kind of sucker they're looking for when they ask players to bring friends to each and every non-PvP activity.
virm pasuul
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#540 - 2014-08-30 21:44:56 UTC
I've got news for you. Everything in Eve is PVP, even the "non PVP" stuff.