EVE General Discussion

Inb4 "no one should be able to gank in high sec".

…you are incapable of actually provide any kind of rational argument or supporting evidence to back up your point. I understand — that's ok. These are not exactly obscure or esoteric facts we're presenting to you, but stuff that's very well known for anyone who has actually bothered to look into the matter, so it's hard for you to actually argue against them.

If you've honestly decided to stop perpetuating the silly myths of the untouchable and risk-free gank and instead accept these facts, then that's excellent news.

While you literally did not say this, you functionally did. Nothing in the history of the game has been nerfed more than ganking. It's gotten to the point where, to die at all in highsec, you either need to fall for obvious aggression tricks or the other guys have to massively outnumber you.

Highsec needs to be made less safe, not more safe. The only reason it's not already perfect safety is because there is no shortage of mental deficients who absolutely refuse to lift a finger to defend themselves.

If you have a brain in your head however, it is next to impossible to die.

Buff ganking.



It all comes down to effort, lol. You want people to not have to use any.

Tough luck. You know what makes it worth it to bother protecting yourself? Gankers. Otherwise, there is zero reason to do anything besides afk like a window licker in highsec in open space all goddamn day. As a matter of fact, that's pretty much the case anyway besides exceedingly rare occasions.



Believe me, it shows.



It's supposed to. It is intended to deter people who don't want to bother with *gasp* effort, and encourage those who actually bother to play the game correctly. The former people die in amusing and profitable ways, and the latter stay alive.




Lol @ "real PvP". Unless they've finally disqualified carebears from counting as real players (which is something I'd be just fine with personally), then it is "real PvP". As much as whatever you get yourself up to.

Oh, and as for your second sentence. Our risk is determined entirely by the victim. Their failure is our gain. Which, I might add, is working as intended.

So you seem to be in complete agreement with the New Order's definition of "bot aspirancy".

That's the other side of the coin, by the way. If they cease counting as real players when they do those things, then killing them is not only acceptable, but highly warranted.

In any case my personal definition has been for some time that unless it's quite clearly an NPC or a structure, then it's PvP. Afterall, the market is PvP in a very clear sense, regardless of whether the other guy is online to see me undercut/scam/outbid him. I am intending to do harm to the assets of another player character, another capsuleer.

Lol you're not.

Listen "valued ally," comparatively speaking, if Tippia's arguments are thin (and they aren't) then yours are non existent.

The reality is, the effort required to avoid a ganking is trivial, but non zero. The vast majority can't be bothered to take even the tiniest measure to use the ever increasing amount of tools available to protect themselves. The lazy and (occasionally) unlucky die. Please join them.

I thought doing level 5s requires going out to lowsec.

Funny, because I know plenty of people who gank on their main, including me.

Just one more nerf.

LMAO

Lenn, you're an amateur carebear! This absurdity that I just found is what a pro carebear should post!