These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Has suicide ganking become a problem? Empty freighters being ganked.

First post First post First post
Author
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#841 - 2014-06-24 12:46:53 UTC
Thomas Mayaki wrote:


You seem to be against people whining on the forums and yet you do it so well.
It is every Eve players god given right to through the teddy bear from the pram. Get use to it!


How did you get your head to be SO ROUND!?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#842 - 2014-06-24 13:05:22 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Thomas Mayaki wrote:


You seem to be against people whining on the forums and yet you do it so well.
It is every Eve players god given right to through the teddy bear from the pram. Get use to it!


How did you get your head to be SO ROUND!?


My guess:

LOTS of hot air.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#843 - 2014-06-24 13:45:01 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
For some of the stuff I can see where the OP is coming from.

I'd made like 10 jumps through that system over a few days. It was the same group of CODE players each time.
We need gankers, to help keep a good flow of ships through the market.

I'd go for more CONCORD action on players who major negative security statues. At some point in time a player with -10 shouldn't be able to fly through hi-sec. Or when CONCORD blows up their ships, they can kill the pod as well.

Take a few tips from the Mafia. They handle the trash for the big cities. When a dead bodies shows up, some money crosses hands. Sometimes someone goes to jail or dies as well.

--Harsher punishment for ganking, the lower your Security Status is.

Then again. I use red frog, and I don't think anyone attacks them.


Sure but, if you're making highsec safer you need to make highsec less lucrative too. Meaning L4 missions now pay what an L1 mission would pay, incursions pay considerably less and highsec systems get made larger for longer warp times.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#844 - 2014-06-24 14:54:47 UTC
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Then again. I use red frog, and I don't think anyone attacks them.
Hmm... how come Red Frog doesn't get attacked, I wonder???

Maybe gankers are especially nice to them? Nah! Besides, Red Frog uses out-of-corp alts anyway...

Could it be that Red Frog pilots simply know how to safely fly a freighter through highsec? Every day? Multiple times per day?

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#845 - 2014-06-24 14:57:04 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:


Could it be that Red Frog pilots simply know how to safely fly a freighter through highsec? Every day? Multiple times per day?


I'm guessing that there's a correllation happening there.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#846 - 2014-06-24 15:22:49 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Then again. I use red frog, and I don't think anyone attacks them.
Hmm... how come Red Frog doesn't get attacked, I wonder???

Maybe gankers are especially nice to them? Nah! Besides, Red Frog uses out-of-corp alts anyway...

Could it be that Red Frog pilots simply know how to safely fly a freighter through highsec? Every day? Multiple times per day?


I'll tell you straight up that it's not because we're nice to them. I wasted about three months trying to infiltrate them, to no avail. So I switched to EVE Uni, since their opsec is terribad.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#847 - 2014-06-24 15:27:13 UTC
Gank all the things

I don't think that good antibodies descriminate as to which danger to the body-whole they attempt to eradicate

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#848 - 2014-06-24 15:29:08 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Then again. I use red frog, and I don't think anyone attacks them.
Hmm... how come Red Frog doesn't get attacked, I wonder???

Maybe gankers are especially nice to them? Nah! Besides, Red Frog uses out-of-corp alts anyway...

Could it be that Red Frog pilots simply know how to safely fly a freighter through highsec? Every day? Multiple times per day?


I'll tell you straight up that it's not because we're nice to them. I wasted about three months trying to infiltrate them, to no avail. So I switched to EVE Uni, since their opsec is terribad.


Translation: Red Frog knows how to play EVE, unlike very many EVE players.

Maybe is EVE players spent less time blaming gankers/ccp/'bad people' and spent more time thinking "how can I get better", threads like this wouldn't exist.

Then what would we do for entertainment? Big smile


Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#849 - 2014-06-24 15:30:47 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

Then what would we do for entertainment? Big smile


I dunno

But I suspect my ward would have a better mortality rate if there were no terribad threads

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#850 - 2014-06-24 16:25:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Jenn aSide wrote:
Maybe is EVE players spent less time blaming gankers/ccp/'bad people' and spent more time thinking "how can I get better", threads like this wouldn't exist.

Then what would we do for entertainment? Big smile
Shitpost on the foru.... P

The main reason some people think that suicide ganking has increased is that the groups like CODE. and MiniLuv are media savvy.
It's promoted and publicised to attract a wider audience to the places that cover such antics. It's akin to the blatant self promotion you see from youtube "celebs".

It's be interesting to see how the figures for how many hits Minerbumping gets, as well as related articles on TMC.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

xXFreshnessXx
Segmentum Solar
#851 - 2014-06-24 16:53:51 UTC  |  Edited by: xXFreshnessXx
I would have to agree with the OP and players of similar views. I have ganked freighters, blingtastic mission runners in highsec even with my negative sec status in a cheap ship in a 15+ man fleet. I do it because it's allowed, I do it not to profit, but just to blow something up because I'm bored, the bitter vet in me has nothing else to do but that because I've already done it all. Ruining someone else game also sometimes gives me a chuckle but not all the time. It's griefing no matter which way you split it and we all do it or have done it because CCP allows us to.

With that said I do think CCP needs to revisit sec status permission/access to empire systems. They should make it harder but fair for ganking comparable to the risk a freighter pilot has when gankers are around. Right now gankers are the only ones who prosper in this playstyle.
A few things I'd like to see implemented:

  • -5.0 to -10 can travel still thru all systems be it in a pod or ship but may only dock with pods. This will allow us to still travel and dock up to do market stuff.
  • Once in station we cannot use the stations ship boarding process.. depending on high sec level of system to the players sec status.
  • If we wanted to use a ship in systemm we can undock and board a ship while in space just not in the station where we can just sit and wait, wait and wait for ganks.


This would make ganking active and harder instead of just having neut alts at gate or scouting route while we have a fleet of negative sec pilots docked watching a movie stream waiting to undock and gank. You could make new alts specifically for ganking but negative status will rise again and as per CCP you aren't allowed to just delete characters after the neg status is too high. Instead it would force us to have to actively travel from low sec to whatever empire system together to gank something rather than having the instant win routine of staying docked in highsec until there is something to gank. This allows the pilot being bumped time to get away or have back up traveling to try and save him. Or have pods docked up or in a safe spot waiting to warp to a location where ships may be waiting to board to perform the gank. This gives gankers risk involved with ganking. The reason behind all of this.. there is no way you can punish us or get back at us. Wow concord kills us in a 15mil destroyer. Oh my sec status just went down, oh wait I'm already -10. Wardec a thousand man null alliance.. goodluck. Wardec an alt corp only logged in for ganking.. gl. There are truly no real risk for us unlike our targets who really have no protection other than being a space pinata.

Now the only reason I don't see CCP doing anything about this is because this type of game play allows CCP to make money from people buying plex to replace ganked ships or forcing these players to burnisk/use plex they have stored at a very alarming rate. Over the years I've also seen my fair share of many players unsubbing and quit the game because of this playstyle.

That is fact of the matter, something needs to be looked at and maybe my options are not the right ones. BUT anyone who doesn't feel the same about the situation are just bored, wants to see the world burn and/or ruin other peoples game.. all the time. just my .02
Follow me on Twitter @FR3SH0PShttps://twitter.com/FR3SH0PS
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#852 - 2014-06-24 16:57:33 UTC
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
BUT anyone who doesn't feel the same about the situation are just bored, wants to see the world burn and/or ruin other peoples game.. all the time.


You dont think that showing people why its a bad idea to AFK Autopilot is even remotely a possibility?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

xXFreshnessXx
Segmentum Solar
#853 - 2014-06-24 17:03:19 UTC  |  Edited by: xXFreshnessXx
Ramona McCandless wrote:
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
BUT anyone who doesn't feel the same about the situation are just bored, wants to see the world burn and/or ruin other peoples game.. all the time.


You dont think that showing people why its a bad idea to AFK Autopilot is even remotely a possibility?


After ransoming freighter pilots for safe passage and they deny offer we kill them. Whether active or AFK doesn't matter, they die regardless. Nobody said it would stop us from ganking AFK pilots, we can still travel to AFK ship or board ship in space to gank AFK pilot if truuuly AFK we'll catch em. Right or am I right? Also if you don't like AFK piloting so much and that's your real reason for ganking and not for the tears, profit or out of boredom. THEN maybe CCP should get rid of autopiloting because that's what it's used for AFKing big ass ships.

The current way of things it's too easy to gank, and like OP said ganking things of little to no value "just cause" has because the thing to do.

Let's be real.
Follow me on Twitter @FR3SH0PShttps://twitter.com/FR3SH0PS
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#854 - 2014-06-24 17:06:03 UTC
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
A few things I'd like to see implemented:

  • -5.0 to -10 can travel still thru all systems be it in a pod or ship but may only dock with pods. This will allow us to still travel and dock up to do market stuff.
  • Once in station we cannot use the stations ship boarding process.. depending on high sec level of system to the players sec status.
  • If we wanted to use a ship in systemm we can undock and board a ship while in space just not in the station where we can just sit and wait, wait and wait for ganks.


It took me all of about 3 seconds to make all of your suggestion useless, and I can do it in 3 words.

Neutral Orca Alt.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#855 - 2014-06-24 17:12:28 UTC
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
THEN maybe CCP should get rid of autopiloting because that's what it's used for AFKing big ass ships.


Sure

Want them to wipe your butt for you too?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

xXFreshnessXx
Segmentum Solar
#856 - 2014-06-24 17:13:30 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
A few things I'd like to see implemented:

  • -5.0 to -10 can travel still thru all systems be it in a pod or ship but may only dock with pods. This will allow us to still travel and dock up to do market stuff.
  • Once in station we cannot use the stations ship boarding process.. depending on high sec level of system to the players sec status.
  • If we wanted to use a ship in systemm we can undock and board a ship while in space just not in the station where we can just sit and wait, wait and wait for ganks.


It took me all of about 3 seconds to make all of your suggestion useless, and I can do it in 3 words.

Neutral Orca Alt.


Not useless, just makes the logistics of ganking less easy. Find the alt orca, get the ships and fits, put in ship go to safe kick out, have pods waiting. etc etc. Fine but it adds complexity and time to the operation that may help our target get away(not rreally). Maybe there should be a rule like bumping freighters and ransoming.. that you can't pop empty freighters or jf with anything less than 50 mil of value in cargo requiring scans of all freighter/jfs before shooting?
Follow me on Twitter @FR3SH0PShttps://twitter.com/FR3SH0PS
xXFreshnessXx
Segmentum Solar
#857 - 2014-06-24 17:15:04 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
THEN maybe CCP should get rid of autopiloting because that's what it's used for AFKing big ass ships.


Sure

Want them to wipe your butt for you too?


Nah you seemed to be butthurt about AFK piloting players my friend, maybe they need to wipe yours. Let's stick to the true problem here.
Follow me on Twitter @FR3SH0PShttps://twitter.com/FR3SH0PS
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#858 - 2014-06-24 17:16:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
xXFreshnessXx wrote:


Nah you seemed to be butthurt about AFK piloting players my friend, maybe they need to wipe yours. Let's stick to the true problem here.


And once again back to "There should be more rules and commandments from the gods to make ganking harder"

Why the resistance to those who are the targets actually protecting themselves with the tools they already have, hmm?

Why should those without the wit to think be protected and coddled?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Organic Lager
Drinking Buddies
#859 - 2014-06-24 17:19:42 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Amarisen Gream wrote:
Then again. I use red frog, and I don't think anyone attacks them.
Hmm... how come Red Frog doesn't get attacked, I wonder???

Maybe gankers are especially nice to them? Nah! Besides, Red Frog uses out-of-corp alts anyway...

Could it be that Red Frog pilots simply know how to safely fly a freighter through highsec? Every day? Multiple times per day?


Maybe they buy permits from CODE? Roll
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#860 - 2014-06-24 17:20:13 UTC
xXFreshnessXx wrote:
Maybe there should be a rule like bumping freighters and ransoming.. that you can't pop empty freighters or jf with anything less than 50 mil of value in cargo requiring scans of all freighter/jfs before shooting?


Why? If we do that, they'll be crying for more ships to be immune in mere weeks. And before you know it, Trammel.

So why can't they just be asked to defend themselves like everyone else?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.