EVE General Discussion

If this is true, empty freighters being ganked, then it shows there is a significant imbalance.

The bill for my now coffee-filled keyboard and monitor will be in the mail, k?

No, it's not, lol.

Carebears cry all the time about how they want to get back at gankers. Telling them the way to do it is not forcing them to do anything. It's just answering an open aired question. Granted it's just like a carebear to cry about getting the answer they wanted, but still.

For crying out loud, knock off this narrative. It just makes you look stupid.

Miners have been trying to get the gankers' playstyle banned or legislated out of existence for years. The miners literally are trying to force people to play a certain way.

Meanwhile, when they cry about wanting to get back at gankers, they get told that if you want to get back at them, just shoot them.

And somehow, that is too hard. Are you kidding me? It's too hard to actually just do what you lot constantly, incessantly claim that you want?

**** it, you're all a lost cause then. Do you even wonder why people treat you like nothing better than destructible terrain?

Nooooononononono he doesn't.

What he does is telling you how to play the game properly.

It's not "his way". It's how the game works.


There is no "PvE" way of playing EVE. There's also no "PvP" way of playing EVE.
This is just a typically human andd absolutely stupid way of thinking about things.

EVE is a game that works, because it is based on the concept of player vs. player interaction.

You may be able to play with reduced contact to others,
but you can not expect this as a right for how you want to play.


When people tell you to defend yourself, it is because they want you to defend yourself.
If you don't want to do that, you will get your ass kicked, because that's how the game works.


People are daft, see? When they say "It's a sandbox I play how I want" they often ignore that this
applies to everybody else and that interaction is something one can not always opt out of.


The ideas of "mission running" playstyles and "mining playstyles" are disconnected from actual reality.
People play a game. They play it in whatever way they want, yes,
but EVE transcends this, forcing people into reality bubbles they might not want to be in.


That's how it works.



So ... again.

Nobody is forcing you to do anything. People who use this "argument" don't realize that their POV simply
is distorted, because of all these lesser gamers out there, or because you somehow believe that "PvP"
has something to do with a playstyle.

It hasn't. People are just daft and use words and acronyms incorrectly,
while not even understand them properly.



Hope I helped.

James 315 put it well.

"just one more nerf", over and over again. They'll never stop until highsec is Trammel and the game is ruined. They are the literal enemy of everyone who actually loves EVE.

We knew this years ago, James isn't saying anything that hasn't already been said by others.

I know, this thread ,Now, makes about as much sense as this does.
I don't get how now that you have additional versatility in the class its all of a sudden more vulnerable .

The thing about the new found tankability of freighters is the existence of people who just don't care about things like cargo value, EHP or the ratio of the 2.

When triple bulkhead freighters die practically empty it makes it a rather moot point to bring up the ability to fit bulkheads. You've already proved it's useless when someone wants your freighter dead, regardless of the reason.

Which is why Jita and all other hubs are constantly busier than they have ever been and there is no such thing as an empty icebelt...

Oh wait