Crime & Punishment

Ok now that you like to play the quoting game i will try it :)
Lets see if i do better with actually reading the things that you wrote than you did with mine.



I didnt call the critics retards. I had many interesting and open discussion with people opposing the code.
But i call people retards who sperg and rage about things without beeing able to make a reasonable chain of reasoning and start to bring up that silly austrian that killed a big bunch of jews back in the 40s.



All i did here is providing proof for my following argument which you and other "retards" (and not self proclaimed "critics" ) didnt ever do. I never had the itention to feel badass. Also a medal is unececcary. All i need is my pledge to the code.




So you are criticizing that James is compressing the sometimes very long storys (and we all know james sometimes really writes waaaaaals of text) so the readers can directly get to the interesting parts without having to go through uninteresting informations that are not helping to understand the ongoing situation etc?
That basically means that in your perfect world journalism would be completely impossible as every story must be posted with all details and in full length. Like when a cat gets stuck on a tree, you also need to cover that its claws havent been cut for a while and that the tree looked dry etc...

As i mentioned before. If you have troubles believing some posts feel free to contact James or one of the involved parties. We will be happy to show you chatlogs and pictures in full length.
The new order is and will always be a open book community that has nothing to hide.
Just ask and dont instead start unproven rumours like most anti new order people do.




Nope we dont and again you fail to provide any proof as always. Again everything unbacked assumptions.

Try harder please.

P.S. This partiall quoting thing is a pain in the ass.... you must be really butthurt to do it over and over without ever having any evidence for anything you say...

please do so. but you dont need to as i believe there are and will be black sheep. the new order is a very big community. you find idiots in every subculture, but trust me that fellow you are describing will probably never be supported by the other agents.

a true agent does no wrong. you see the problem is here that that person described by you can hardly be a true agent.
i mean, everyone can go around and claim to be one, it is a totally different step to actually be one.
you are one by your actions and words.
so could you please link me the post in this thread where you wrote that stuff, or could you send me the logs ingame, pastebin or whatever, so i can investigate further.

Agent Selina

You clearly have a misunderstanding of the term "gallant."



Stop pretending like you know what you're talking about and actually read the Code. I know, words, but you can do it.



The rebels call themselves rebels. Are you new around here?



It's okay if James does it, but he doesn't.



This response has absolutely nothing to do with my statement. You are simply regurgitating words to support your second point.

On the topic of the occasional Agent who falters in their adherence to James's great vision: only James 315 is perfect. The rest of us muddle along as best we can.

The New Order is by its nature an open organisation and accepts Agents from all walks of life. All they require is a passion for the Code. Naturally some require mentoring and guidance in the finer arts of local conversation, and senior Agents regularly take them under their wing. Imagine an infant lion cub - all wide eyes and teeth and unconstrained enthusiasm - but with the innate potential to be a proud king or queen of the jungle. These are adorable newbies to be nurtured, not pariahs.

Sadly also there are those who impersonate New Order Agents in flagrant disregard of the TOS. I have myself noticed the vast majority of Code violating "Agents" are in fact these, attempting to dscredit the New Order with their outlandish noncompliant behaviour. Again we see the sandbox at work, and the subtle ways the Code operates to keep highsec interesting.

You (gankers maybe not you in special) *do* lie
Check your won webside, check your own forums, check this forum, heck check this Posting and check this link.
http://gankerbumping.blogspot.de/2014/04/code-lies-part-third.html

Here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4465663#post4465663


Ok, check this:


I love it, when i was right!
See you agree that you are butthurt, as i said.
So your small attention span makes it difficult to read and gives you headaches.


You obviously don't realise that *you* started others calling liers.
Like this butthurt stuff when i already wrote that my sweet miner butt is virgin, you wanna implie that i lied.

You guy do often start accusing others of lying, happily forgetting / ignoring that its even documented on your mb.com webside.

No i just like calling bullies bullies and clowns laughingstock.
Kill more lowfit orcas, retrievers and lowfit exhumers.
But you realy can't expect any respect when you only hit the weakest.

If you read the Code, you would have been able to ascertain that an Agent can correspond with a miner the way he/she believes best represents said Code. Perhaps you skimmed through it, yes?



You didn't know the moon was made out of cheese?

What do you think we should get it for its birthday?

A lock

Once again I'd like to take this opportunity to thank the CODE representives who have responded in a well worded and civil manner.

Capt Starfox you covered the same ground as Admiral Root and though I feel there are still some grey areas I am happy to see that both your posts were consistent with one another.

Clara Pond as you should be well aware that this is a public forum, do you think it might be possible to keep the James 315 booty kissing in minerbumping chat? Also I dont want to tell you how to do your job but with hardly a CODE compliant miner
to be found between gamis and rens your time might be better spent attending to your CODE enforcement duties.

To the rest of those who have posted and claim to be "supporters" of CODE I feel I even have something in common with you.
Sadly over the years I have supported Wigan Athletic knowing full well that its highly unlikely my support will ever be acknowledged.