These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Two CSMs of EVE Online

First post First post
Author
Karim alRashid
Starboard.
#21 - 2011-10-14 08:19:57 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:

You claim they are getting an unfair advantage by using an exploit which now, apparently everyone else can and does use.


Except, you know, people who choose not to exploit. Idea

Quote:

How does that give them the advantage ? Everyone can use the same mechanism.


Are you asking here how an exploit gives an advantage over anyone, who chooses to play without exploits? Obvious answer is that this is the very reason one uses and exploit, because it gives him/her advantage, or otherwise he/she wouldn't bother and take the risk of being banned.

Are you suggesting that the proper answer to exploits is to exploit yourself? If yes, ok, we'll leave at that, because apparently there's not point talking with you on any topic whatsoever, if no, why are you then telling that everyone can exploit themselves?

Pain is weakness leaving the body http://www.youtube.com/user/AlRashidKarim/videos

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#22 - 2011-10-14 08:26:44 UTC
I don't mind if they get wardecs, but there needs to be a balence to it. War all the time is a bit much. It wouldn't be easy to train people other things while at war. And I don't believe they should or do have an unfair advantage that other corps don't/can't have.

I just think OP needs to put this pointless grudge to rest. Drama queens need to have breaks, don't they?

On a side note: Goons and Test are big teaching corps? For some reason I never thought of Test and Goons as teaching new players. Maybe they do, but I think ít's a very small part of what they really do and not their main focus.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#23 - 2011-10-14 08:44:05 UTC
Karim alRashid wrote:
Are you suggesting that the proper answer to exploits is to exploit yourself? If yes, ok, we'll leave at that, because apparently there's not point talking with you on any topic whatsoever, if no, why are you then telling that everyone can exploit themselves?


The Op has made it clear the the GM's say it is not an exploit, or am I wrong ? That is how I read the original post in the first thread. No, I am not for exploits but the Op is clearly concerned about this being an exploit. I am saying everyone who can, or needs to, uses the mechanism which has now been pronounced as not being an exploit. Unless CCP rules otherwise, clearly it remains a non-exploit which causes pain to some.

Sounds to me like someone wants to farm many easy kills from a Corp who are not willing to be at war all the time ?

Whatever, I'm done in this thread. It all sounds like a load of butthurt to me.

Peace out.
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#24 - 2011-10-14 08:52:12 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
There are two CSMs in this game.

The one that the players voted for. And EVE University.

The recent wardec policy changes are proof of EVE University, via Kelduum Revaan, being the other de facto CSM. CCP caters to their needs, without any oversight by the players. They've become a carebear haven. They are now effectively impossible to wardec. CCP gave them, in essence, a PvP flag. They can turn it on or off at their whim. Their decshield is 19 corporations strong, and they've been allowed to use an exploit to avoid the CONCORD costs of that decshield.

The only single danger left for them is the suicide gank. Any other method of PvP against them is fruitless.

Have you ever noticed that you are the only person who cares about what E-Uni is doing? And since you got kicked out of the uni for being a huge troll how do you expect anybody to take you seriously?
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2011-10-14 09:24:40 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
The Op has made it clear the the GM's say it is not an exploit, or am I wrong ?

They are avoiding 72 billion ISK per month in CONCORD fees running their 19 corp decshield. That "exploit" is not commonly known, and apparently EVE University wishes that to remain a "sekrit". The exploit was given to them by CCP. EVE University can remain war free at no little cost to themselves (which I would call an exploit, even if CCP has given them special privilege to make use of it.)
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#26 - 2011-10-14 09:25:40 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
I think the warshield mechanic is silly, but it's a waste of the GM's time trying to police accusations involving it.

If the Uni becomes too soft and weak to the point that they aren't adequately training their newbies in the arts of war and murder, larger entities who can afford the fees can simply dec them and cut them to shreds.

There's three major newbie organizations left in this game: GSF, TEST and E-Uni.

We (GSF and TEST) train our youth in deep null because they grow up hard and the fear of loss is bled out of them immediately. Presumably the Uni will learn to have 'war weeks' where they intentionally drop their war-shield such that the combat aspect of EVE isn't denied to their students.


There's a difference between GMs having to deal with edge cases, and making it legal to create corps and alliances, blatantly, to simply drive up the cost of wardecs.

You also seem to think that if someone DOES pay the exorbiant costs of the wardec, then the corp won't just hop alliances to remove the wardec within 24 hours. Which is now within the rules.

This isn't a change whose only impact is making the wardec costs less, it is a change that makes PVP opt-in within highsec.

As for thinking the Uni will "drop their dec shield for a wardec week" - hah. Really.

I almost wish E-Uni WERE given special treatment, because this change has allowed every carebear corp in highsec to use the same exploits.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Goddess Ishtar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2011-10-14 09:27:04 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
EVE University can remain war free at no little cost to themselves

Good for them. Any corp that puts that much effort into helping newbies should get the same protection.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2011-10-14 09:29:26 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:
And since you got kicked out of the uni for being a huge troll how do you expect anybody to take you seriously?

Apparently a lot of people are peeved that high sec is now a PvP-free zone (minus suicide ganking), all because EVE University lobbied hard for some sort of change to the wardec mechanics to make their lives easier.

This is what CCP gave them (and the rest of high-sec benefits as a side-effect) -- exploits are now legal.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2011-10-14 09:33:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Goddess Ishtar wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
EVE University can remain war free at no little cost to themselves

Good for them. Any corp that puts that much effort into helping newbies should get the same protection.

You think all of this is so that the Uni can run a few tackling and d-scan classes?

No. It's about being able to run missions and incursions without interruption. It's about mining and industry. Avoiding wars has little at all to do with training newbs (less than a quarter of their classes have a practical component.) It's for the benefit of their mission/incursion runners and their industrialists. More than half their membership is well beyond the newbie stage of their careers.
Darian Reymont
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2011-10-14 09:33:23 UTC
Deary me, it's getting hard to keep track of all these threads of yours, Poetic!

As much as I like the sound of being a part of the shadow CSM, I feel the need to once again clarify some of the misinformation Poetic is spreading.

Firstly, we never asked for these policy changes. We have pressured CCP to look at wardec mechanics for many years now, but to put it frankly we're just not that important. It's possible that these policy changes were intended as a bone to distract us, or perhaps CCP truly did mean it as a favour to us, but we weren't directly consulted and would much rather see an improved wardec system than have to use a decshield.

Secondly, the idea that we dislike PvP is flat out ridiculous. Our desire for wardec improvement does not come from wanting to be immune to PvP, it comes from war in Empire space being pointless and terrible, as well as our being consistently wardecced for the majority of a year by people who have no intention of fighting. We are constantly PvPing both in the traditional UniBlobs and small gangs in low and NPC nullsec, and have recently completed the first of what should hopefully become regular wardec events that provide actual fighting for everyone involved. We will also be using our decshield corps, which are now operated by what I consider to be official E-UNI Best Friends, to run wargames with our students. PvP training has never been a focus for E-UNI (due to there being several corporations out there who already offer excellent PvP training), but if anything it is currently on the increase, not the opposite.

With regards to our player base, yes we have a sizeable group of experienced pilots, most of whom function as staff in some form (be it administrative, teaching, mentoring or military). Poetic is correct (for once) in that we are not solely a "newbie" corp, but train anybody and everybody who has a desire to learn, so we also have many experienced pilots who are actively taking part in classes and events. Finally, even with the decshield, the NPC corps are still the best "carebear haven" available.

I understand that you're angry, Poetic. I'm genuinely sorry for the hurt we clearly caused you, but this is going beyond silly now. Do you even believe what you're writing?

Former E-UNI Director, station pilot and snoob. https://twitter.com//DarianReymont

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2011-10-14 09:36:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Darian Reymont wrote:
Our desire for wardec improvement does not come from wanting to be immune to PvP, it comes from war in Empire space being pointless and terrible, as well as our being consistently wardecced for the majority of a year by people who have no intention of fighting.

These non-fighting enemies do not force you to remain docked. Your own rules force you to do that. Don't blame the war mechanics because of your own WSOP. Your rules are your own worst enemy. And then you use those rules that you inflict upon yourselves as a reason for CCP to develop more rules to satisfy your needs.
Karim alRashid
Starboard.
#32 - 2011-10-14 09:38:01 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
The Op has made it clear the the GM's say it is not an exploit, or am I wrong ?


What GMs say is that they do not consider this an exploit as far as their work is concerned, all they say is that they will not punish the exploit.

It's still an exploit, a use of game mechanics in unintended ways in order to gain an advantage and this is the truth.

And truth is not decided by majority vote.

Pain is weakness leaving the body http://www.youtube.com/user/AlRashidKarim/videos

Darian Reymont
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2011-10-14 09:52:58 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Darian Reymont wrote:
Our desire for wardec improvement does not come from wanting to be immune to PvP, it comes from war in Empire space being pointless and terrible, as well as our being consistently wardecced for the majority of a year by people who have no intention of fighting.

These non-fighting enemies do not force you to remain docked. Your own rules force you to do that. Don't blame the war mechanics because of your own WSOP. Your rules are your own worst enemy. And then you use those rules that you inflict upon yourselves as a reason for CCP to develop more rules to satisfy your needs.


But the WSOP has nothing to do with why we don't like the current wardec mechanics. We can scrap the WSOP whenever we like so it's hardly "inflicted" upon us, we choose to operate it. We can't do anything about the mechanics besides ask CCP to look at them, which is all we've been doing for years now.

Former E-UNI Director, station pilot and snoob. https://twitter.com//DarianReymont

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2011-10-14 09:56:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Darian Reymont wrote:
But the WSOP has nothing to do with why we don't like the current wardec mechanics. We can scrap the WSOP whenever we like so it's hardly "inflicted" upon us, we choose to operate it. We can't do anything about the mechanics besides ask CCP to look at them, which is all we've been doing for years now.

The WSOP has everything to do with all of the whining about faildecs coming from the University. Why would you even care about faildecs if it wasn't for your overly restrictive WSOP? If a wardeccer wasn't attacking you, that would be great and fantastic, no? But it's not, because of your WSOP.
Darian Reymont
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2011-10-14 10:08:33 UTC
If somebody decs us and doesn't turn up at all then we don't use the WSOP. It's more often than not the kind of war where they will turn up just enough to be a threat to solo students still learning the ropes, but with no intention of actually fighting capable pilots. The whole exercise is pointless, as there are no win conditions or consequences for either side. It's a sort of harassment, which in a game like EVE would be fine, if there were mechanics in place for us to harass them back.

I'm not sure what your point is here, Poetic. You're saying we dislike wardec mechanics because of our own WSOP, which we have total control over? That we've pressurised CCP into changing their policies because that was... easier than changing our own, which we have subsequently changed anyway?

Former E-UNI Director, station pilot and snoob. https://twitter.com//DarianReymont

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2011-10-14 10:12:12 UTC
Darian Reymont wrote:
If somebody decs us and doesn't turn up at all then we don't use the WSOP.

What a load of complete BS. Have you taken over as Propaganda Minister from that tool Irdalth? (You are better at it then he is. You should consider switching Director roles with him.)

You use the WSOP for every wardec (minus this last month). If a wardec turns into a faildec, you simply use a slightly less restrictive version of the WSOP known as the R-WSOP. But it's still pretty restrictive.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#37 - 2011-10-14 10:13:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
The WSOP has everything to do with all of the whining about faildecs coming from the University. Why would you even care about faildecs if it wasn't for your overly restrictive WSOP?


Why are you complaining about something that has no impact on your gameplay, unless you're one of the corps who wardecs the Uni simply to grief them by having them hoist themselves on their own WSOP petard?

If you can't afford the half-billion ISK a week to maintain a warded on the Uni, find someone else to wardec. Is it really that hard?

If your complaint is that anyone can now effectively insulate themselves from cheap griefers by having all their alts form corporation and then establish mutual wardecs, just say so. It's not an exploit anymore, so you're allowed to discuss it. Once it's discussed in open conversation, we* can start discussing possible "solutions" to the "problem" (or in fact, whether there is a "problem" at all).

While these problems are referred to in closed conversations between shadowy people in quiet corners of the grungiest establishments of the world, nothing will change.

So talk, shout, let it all out. Secret exploits are the things we can do without.

* by "we" I mean the sane players of EVE Online, which rules out Poetic Lag and Fix Stanziel.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2011-10-14 10:18:48 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
The WSOP has everything to do with all of the whining about faildecs coming from the University. Why would you even care about faildecs if it wasn't for your overly restrictive WSOP?


Why are you complaining about something that has no impact on your gameplay, unless you're one of the corps who wardecs the Uni simply to grief them by having them hoist themselves on their own WSOP petard?

If you can't afford the half-billion ISK a week to maintain a warded on the Uni, find someone else to warded. Is it really that hard?

First of all, the Uni griefs itself. No one is forcing them to use their WSOP. They do that to themselves. I cannot force them to use their own WSOP, so how do you figure that's me griefing them?

Secondly, thanks to EVE University's lobbying of CCP, wardeccing any corporation is a complete waste of time now. All exploits to avoid wardecs are now legal.
Vachir Khan
Rugged Ruff and Ready
#39 - 2011-10-14 10:22:28 UTC
This is not about EVE-Uni, it's a precedent and pandora's box.

Per usual, it'll need a lot of abuse of this mechanic (previously called exploit) and a lot of whining before this gets turned around by CCP. So all this posting and shouting is a GOOD thing. The more we shout about it, the more people reply to it how it's "not at all a bad thing" the more coverage it gets and the more people start to use it.

And once corporations start mass using this mechanic (previously called exploit) then finally CCP, the lumbering hulk that it is, will wake up, give it 2 seconds of attention and nerf it into the ground. So please, do keep posting, shouting and replying in threads like this and please, PLEASE, every corp should start using this mechanic (previously called exploit). That's the fastest way to get it taken care of.

And yes, the GM who allowed EVE-Uni to do this in the first place should be fired.
Darian Reymont
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2011-10-14 10:23:39 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Darian Reymont wrote:
If somebody decs us and doesn't turn up at all then we don't use the WSOP.

What a load of complete BS. Have you taken over as Propaganda Minister from that tool Irdalth? (You are better at it then he is. You should consider switching Director roles with him.)

You use the WSOP for every wardec (minus this last month). If a wardec turns into a faildec, you simply use a slightly less restrictive version of the WSOP known as the R-WSOP. But it's still pretty restrictive.

No, we use the RSOP when there is a threat but it isn't deemed very serious, which is the majority of the faildecs we get these days. The full WSOP is only used during wardecs where there is a very real threat. If there is no threat at all, then we don't use any of the WSOP options and remain at a non-war but high alert status. This happens vary rarely, but it does happen (the last time was the recent war with Personal Training that started a week or two before the NSOP event and is currently ongoing). Furthermore, we're in the process of making more changes to the way we deploy the WSOP following the success of the recent NSOP event that should see even less use of the WSOP in future.

Also please stop insulting Irdalth, it's making you look even worse than you normally do. Irdalth is one of the nicest people in this game, not to mention one of the hardest working, and anybody who has spoken to him will tell you the same. That you somehow managed to fall out with him really speaks volumes.

Former E-UNI Director, station pilot and snoob. https://twitter.com//DarianReymont