Jita Park Speakers Corner

Ok, I can see this is moving away from where it should be.

Refer to post 767 to get back on track.

James315 has experience dealing with highsec mechanics, and additionally has run a successful business model that has substantial community participation.

Since people can't vote in enough highsec representatives, let's just put some in. James315, will you do this for the good of highsec?

I'd vote for him with my hisec alt.

I can't blitz incursions all day every day for infinite money abloobloo.

Joke's on you, I guess.

Yeah, me too. My highsec alt which sits in an NPC corp even. And it even hardly undocks from jita 4-4, and is all by itself on the account.

And there's a bunch of parallel-training accounts (train a character then transfer it over) that are also in NPC corps in Jita 4-4 for easy access to skillbooks and the like. I'd vote for you a lot ~~

(Obviously the rest is all for the GSF bloc candidate, wonder who that'll be.) (I should also donate to the scotch campaign fund.)

-I think some miners' representatives wouldhave brought up the easy gankability we got in Hulkageddon past and more recently in the great Gallentee Ice interdiction. I don't recall anyone breaking a sweat about it in the previous CSMs. Here it was CCP with the new ship buffs that were supporters of HI SEC ( so CCP is the defacto HI SEC representatives because the CSMdoesn't have one )not the CSM since it really has no such representation. Right now the only balance is CCP whom I often doubt does much in game playing in HI SEC ( I often wonder how much gameplay they also do in NULL especially with POS's with that UI fiasco )

-The Incursion nerf killed null & lo sec communities & decimated HI SEC communities too which I didn't see anything but cheering of in CSM7 minutes.

-They did talk about Crimewatch & new Wardeck system but from a mostly NULL SEC perspective with anotableexception about howthe mercenary contract system needed srt time expirations instead of being in perpituity

-Right now we're hearing about a proposed HI SEC nerf too to help lo sec ( I sort of like the immersive parts of the proposed NERF myself but I assume many a HI SEC Industrialist will howl about it like a few did about the increased HI SEC taxes with Inferno )

-What I really thing any HI SEC representative worth his salt should bring up is CCP Soundwaves comments in the Ten Ton Hammer interview propsing a 10% across the board cut in bounties which I don't recall CSM7discussing except maybe in the part where they were saying all EVE is space rich.

1. An issue that apparently didn't need any representation.
2. This seems to suggest that more nullsec representation could be needed.
3. …and how does that differ from a highsec perspective?
4. Where are we hearing this?
5. Bounties is the life-blood of individual players across all sectors. This is not a highsec issue.

I don't see any of these requiring any special representation beyond what we already have. The two latter, in particular, are new issues afaik, so we have no idea if or how CSM is taking the players' voice to CCP yet. That only leaves the wardecs, where there is supposedly some undefined special highsec perspective…?

You are totaly wrong there Tippia CCP took way too long to address the issue that is why HI SEC represention on the CSM is needed: Too bring up issues affecting consituants in a timely manner.
Instead of depending on CCP in its shell to pop up & realize there may be an issue the CSM should have a HI SEC voice
Representation delayed is representation denied for the lenght it isn't heard or seen.

The whining started in earnest in May; the patch when live three months later… the CSM had one meeting between the two. That's pretty darn timely.

My point is, none of the things you listed seem to require any special representation beyond what we already have.