These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

why don't minerbears just fly with logi?

Author
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#101 - 2012-05-31 10:27:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
RubyPorto wrote:
No, but it's fairly easy to get if you have a hundred people working for it.


Would take 5+ years. Even if you get lucky with X-Type drops.

Velicitia wrote:
T2 ships in hisec are just easy targets.


Haven't lost any of my cloakies or interceptors yet.
DeBingJos
Undignified Herbal Infusion
#102 - 2012-05-31 10:27:25 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
And this want meant to be and heavily advertised as sandbox? With butterfly effect showing the lil guy changing the universe in a rifter and everything?
He didn't think the risk was unacceptable.


It's not about risk.

Today I am risking 17 billions in an investment and I am totally OK with it. Investments in EvE are vastly less safe than mining in low sec.

But it's about the tedium. Imagine a guy who just wants to / can login for 30 minutes before dinner and wants to dig a rock for his reasons.

Now he's supposed to hire a logistic pilot who will actually stick there for 30 minutes?
Please sent me the email of such a moron, I want to make him mow my lawn.

And at the end his prices will not be competitive at all. First he lost yield because he had to def-tard-tank his ship, then he loses more because he has basically to feed 2 people with the income of 1.

This is not about risk, this is a stupid scenario that won't happen.

Ah, of course the guy is free to biomass, reroll another pilot with combat stats and go shoot people around. Because he is paying a sub to obey to some unknown pr!cks who decided today you will dance to the right and tomorrow to the left.


Mining is not as risky as you make it seem.

I see plenty of groups mining in highsec (yes even close to jita), even with hulkageddon going on you do not have much change to become a victim of a suicide gank. There are a lot of ways to minimize risk. Don't make it look as if it is impossible to mine these days.

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#103 - 2012-05-31 10:34:54 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Why do you mine? I don't know. That's your call.

If you want a Tech moon, go take it. Dotlan's got them pretty well mapped out.


Yeah, very easy task to take moon from Goons or PL when they have supercap gatecamps everywhere.



aaahh so what seems off here? You complain that you need to spend 1 battleship to protect a few miners and work in a group, while complaining that alliances have tech moons with huge income.. that you cannot get exaclty because they are not lazy as you and use a LOT of people and resources to protect them?


Read your own sentences and perceive how you defeated yourself!




On my view concord is even too fast already. The only thing I thing Would need adjustment is that the criminal countdown should be longer when concord kills you and you should get a bit more drawbacks from being a criminal in high sec. ONLY that. The protection is more than OK nowadays. Just the consequences might be a bit on soft side.



This whining on miner ganking is becoming pathetic really. Want high sec too dangerous? get into a real corp and go low sec..

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#104 - 2012-05-31 10:37:08 UTC
DeBingJos wrote:

I see plenty of groups mining in highsec (yes even close to jita), even with hulkageddon going on you do not have much change to become a victim of a suicide gank. There are a lot of ways to minimize risk. Don't make it look as if it is impossible to mine these days.


This is only and exclusively because their Messiah has not ordered to proceed to scorched earth.
I was there (in a 'cane) when Bat Country did their job, they systematically wiped whole systems clean.

Don't understimate experienced teamwork PvPers (I play in such groups in other games, I kind of know), they can be totally effective just at the snap of the right fingers.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#105 - 2012-05-31 10:38:37 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
And this want meant to be and heavily advertised as sandbox? With butterfly effect showing the lil guy changing the universe in a rifter and everything?
He didn't think the risk was unacceptable.


It's not about risk.

Today I am risking 17 billions in an investment and I am totally OK with it. Investments in EvE are vastly less safe than mining in low sec.

But it's about the tedium. Imagine a guy who just wants to / can login for 30 minutes before dinner and wants to dig a rock for his reasons.

Now he's supposed to hire a logistic pilot who will actually stick there for 30 minutes?
Please sent me the email of such a moron, I want to make him mow my lawn.

And at the end his prices will not be competitive at all. First he lost yield because he had to def-tard-tank his ship, then he loses more because he has basically to feed 2 people with the income of 1.

This is not about risk, this is a stupid scenario that won't happen.

Ah, of course the guy is free to biomass, reroll another pilot with combat stats and go shoot people around. Because he is paying a sub to obey to some unknown pr!cks who decided today you will dance to the right and tomorrow to the left.


Nobody has to do anything. He can mine in whatever thing he wants. The risk tables have simply changed.

One way to mitigate the risk is to pay attention to D-Scan/Local
Another way is to mine aligned
Another way is to mine aligned with Webs
Another way is to mine in a Rokh
Another way is to tank your shit
Another way is to tank your shit with logi
Another way is to mine in a quiet LS system
Another way is to mine in Null
Another way is to mine in mission pockets
Another way is to mine in Grav sites
Another way is to mine in a Covetor and expect some losses
Another way is to mine in a Wormhole

There are 12 ways to mitigate the risk of getting ganked right there. A Dozen. Off the top of my freaking head. All of them are simple to implement and fairly effective. Miners aren't being persecuted, they're just too stupid and lazy to keep themselves alive.

All of these are options in a game about player agency. You can do whatever you want and so can anyone else. We have been offering up OPTIONS for the past MONTH for players who wish to mine to mine more safely in HS. Every time, the miners CHOOSE to spend time whining that the option takes effort or reduces yield instead of DOING something to reduce the risk of being ganked.

If you call logging in to mine "Tedium;" WHY THE HELL ARE YOU LOGGING IN TO MINE?

Anyway, before you blurf about "I'm not a miner, I just play one on TV so I can talk about it," I really don't give a flying what you do. You've positioned yourself as speaking for the miners, and I'm speaking back at them. Pronouns aimed at you are simply easier.

Suggesting someone has to biomass to train skills other than mining? LOLWUT?Roll

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#106 - 2012-05-31 10:38:49 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Sarah Schneider wrote:
supercap gatecamps in null eh?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDME4zZdMQ&t=3m55s

If those aren't titans I'm Santa Claus.

I like how many of those titan heavy alliances in that fight are now dead, or effectively dead, because of a coalition that doesn't use caps in fleet fights.

Supers may win fights, but they do not win wars.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#107 - 2012-05-31 10:39:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
Seishi Maru wrote:
You complain that you need to spend 1 battleship to protect a few miners and work in a group


It takes 20+ seconds to target destroyer. Gank is over before BS pilot gets destroyer locked. Ganker warps around happily ganking rest of miners in op.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#108 - 2012-05-31 10:41:08 UTC
Seishi Maru wrote:



On my view concord is even too fast already. The only thing I thing Would need adjustment is that the criminal countdown should be longer when concord kills you and you should get a bit more drawbacks from being a criminal in high sec. ONLY that. The protection is more than OK nowadays. Just the consequences might be a bit on soft side.



Concord is useless in this "war" and should be optional.

You could use an evolution of today's wardec engine and hire allies. They'd completely replace Concord (i.e. you totally lose Concord defense everywhere) and like Concord they can kill inbound known hostiles who already shot to their protegees.

THIS is sandbox, THIS is player driven, not some stupid NPCs.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#109 - 2012-05-31 10:42:16 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
No, but it's fairly easy to get if you have a hundred people working for it.


Would take 5+ years. Even if you get lucky with X-Type drops.

Velicitia wrote:
T2 ships in hisec are just easy targets.


Haven't lost any of my cloakies or interceptors yet.


Mining in Null earns about 60m/toon/hr. Ratting in Null earns a little more, but call it the same.

90billion (a fit and rigged Titan) divided by 100 people is million per person. 900 million divided by 60million is 15 hours.

If you can't play more than 15 hours in 5 years, why are you still subbed?

(If you mined it up solo, that's 1500 hours. Assuming 10h a week (an hour and a half a day, pretty casual) that's still only 3 years.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#110 - 2012-05-31 10:43:17 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Yeah, there are tons of small alliances with Supers. There not all that expensive.


60/90 billion is pocket money for everyone.



noot for everyone. But If you join 20 pilots that are not absurdly cowards, you can make that money in 2 months. Either way those peopel risked themselves and worked for those. You want to do neither. that is why you have none
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#111 - 2012-05-31 10:44:50 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Seishi Maru wrote:
You complain that you need to spend 1 battleship to protect a few miners and work in a group


It takes 20+ seconds to target destroyer. Gank is over before BS pilot gets destroyer locked. Ganker warps around happily ganking rest of miners in op.


Battleships are good for things aside from shooting things.

Try something that I suggested that you pooh poohed as ::effort:: Use a Rokh to Rep tanked Hulks. Nobody's going to bother killing a Hulk that takes 12 destroyers or 4 tornadoes to kill.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#112 - 2012-05-31 10:48:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
RubyPorto wrote:
Mining in Null earns about 60m/toon/hr. Ratting in Null earns a little more, but call it the same.

90billion (a fit and rigged Titan) divided by 100 people is million per person. 900 million divided by 60million is 15 hours.

If you can't play more than 15 hours in 5 years, why are you still subbed?


Yes, that's correct IF you don't lose any of your ships there. Just not going to happen. 100 mining/ratting... You will need a lot of systems. Again, not going to happen.

RubyPorto wrote:
Try something that I suggested that you pooh poohed as ::effort:: Use a Rokh to Rep tanked Hulks. Nobody's going to bother killing a Hulk that takes 12 destroyers or 4 tornadoes to kill.


Someone will do that eventually for lulz.

And I didn't say it's too much effort. No one is going to sit there in Rokh doing nothing for hours.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#113 - 2012-05-31 10:53:32 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Mining in Null earns about 60m/toon/hr. Ratting in Null earns a little more, but call it the same.

90billion (a fit and rigged Titan) divided by 100 people is million per person. 900 million divided by 60million is 15 hours.

If you can't play more than 15 hours in 5 years, why are you still subbed?


Yes, that's correct IF you don't lose any of your ships there. Just not going to happen. 100 mining/ratting... You will need a lot of systems. Again, not going to happen.


One system with upgrades can support any number of miners and about 15-20 ratters (assume ratters are not on 23/7, for miners it doesn't matter). With 2* systems and 100 people working together (assume 8 hours a day), you can buy a Titan every other day. Or a super about 4 times a day.

If you don't like 8 hours a day, take 1.5 hours a day, that's a Titan every 10 days or a super every other day (or so).

If you lose a ship in Null while ratting or mining, you're bad and you should feel bad.

*Since the Hidden Belt buff and the Drone poo nerf, mining and ratting have started to approach parity for income, so you could also do this all in one system.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#114 - 2012-05-31 10:57:16 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Seishi Maru wrote:
You complain that you need to spend 1 battleship to protect a few miners and work in a group


It takes 20+ seconds to target destroyer. Gank is over before BS pilot gets destroyer locked. Ganker warps around happily ganking rest of miners in op.



Did you even READ what others have been possting? DO not fit weaposn in Battleship. Fit a rokh with 8 shield transfers. Keep 7 hulks LOCKED while they mine. When destroyers arrive and lock someone you start sending reps. You reduce your income by 14% if you split it evenly with the rokh pilot. Not bad to be almost 100% safe in any 0.7 and above system and be safe in 0.5 from any solo ganker.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#115 - 2012-05-31 10:57:31 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:


RubyPorto wrote:
Try something that I suggested that you pooh poohed as ::effort:: Use a Rokh to Rep tanked Hulks. Nobody's going to bother killing a Hulk that takes 12 destroyers or 4 tornadoes to kill.


Someone will do that eventually for lulz.

And I didn't say it's too much effort. No one is going to sit there in Rokh doing nothing for hours.


Well shoot my bricks and jam my britches, I though you were OK with the *occasional* gank, given that you have logged in to a game that explicitly endorses such behavior. I thought the problem was the constant stream of them from HAG.

Why wouldn't a miner sit in a Healing Bat? It's no less interesting than mining.

Anyway, if you don't like that method of reducing your exposure to risk, pick one of the other 11 that I listed.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

DeBingJos
Undignified Herbal Infusion
#116 - 2012-05-31 11:00:25 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
And I didn't say it's too much effort. No one is going to sit there in Rokh doing nothing for hours.


What? We are talking about a mining op. Everybody else is sitting there doing nothing for hours!

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#117 - 2012-05-31 11:02:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
RubyPorto wrote:


Nobody has to do anything. He can mine in whatever thing he wants. The risk tables have simply changed.


Sure and part of your suggestions are non functional to mediate between changed risk tables and a decent desire to do menial stuff without committing like a guy whose name begins with "A", in a Mega in Amamake.

Some of the "options" are just impractical. Game needs huge amounts of low ends and your "go mine in WH" won't work on a game wide scale.
The "go mine to null" is just getting at 90 degrees and getting butt drilled, because you have to give up and OBEY to the zerg overlords whose agenda is exactly to get more drones to do their work in 0.0. If anything low sec is better. At least there's no saccent overminds telling you what you are MEANT to do in this oh-so-sandbox.

I have been invited in grav sites, they ALWAYS had an average of 3 probers a day get there in a cloakie and then try warp in gank ships. Still it's possibly one of the best choices along with missions pockets. Mission pockets are super for hi sec mining since they have some tasty features.

Neither of the above is viable to someone with some limited amount of time though. Nor is the logistics thing, I am sure that some very trivial math could reveal mining in a battleship is FAR more cost effective and can be done by somebody with limited time.


RubyPorto wrote:

All of these are options in a game about player agency. You can do whatever you want and so can anyone else. We have been offering up OPTIONS for the past MONTH for players who wish to mine to mine more safely in HS. Every time, the miners CHOOSE to spend time whining that the option takes effort or reduces yield instead of DOING something to reduce the risk of being ganked.


You TOOK AWAY options for the past month. You imposed YOUR options. Tell things straight.
The past options were stupid? OK, but don't say you did not take them away, because you did.


RubyPorto wrote:

If you call logging in to mine "Tedium;" WHY THE HELL ARE YOU LOGGING IN TO MINE?


I have no idea, but many people want to pay to do it and nowhere they signed they had to stay online for a minimum amount of hours in order to play hard core enough, organize logistics possibly in another sec 10 jumps away and whatever.

In the end the only options you give is to have to buy 2 accounts (max tank Hulk / battleship hold little so need hauler / need 2 accounts for logistic if you obviously won't find an idiot to sit there repping you...). This is also not a clause to be found when a player subs to EvE.

Basically this grand initiative is adding tedium, RL cost and inconvenience. That's some great achievement.
Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#118 - 2012-05-31 11:02:44 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
[quote=RubyPorto]

And I didn't say it's too much effort. No one is going to sit there in Rokh doing nothing for hours.


Can you realize that people DO that? And that is why they have titans and stuff like that? And You never even tied any of those things because you would know that you can mine and rat in null sec for weeks without loosing a single ship. Jsut use your brains.

You can get into worm space to make isk, you can go into a not populated lwo sec and mine in hidden belts for a reasoanble income and with more safety than high sec. You have option.. you have the sand.. but you decided that only way you want the sand is a massive ammount of it shoved in all your orifices and then complain that is not fun.
Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#119 - 2012-05-31 11:04:51 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Seishi Maru wrote:



On my view concord is even too fast already. The only thing I thing Would need adjustment is that the criminal countdown should be longer when concord kills you and you should get a bit more drawbacks from being a criminal in high sec. ONLY that. The protection is more than OK nowadays. Just the consequences might be a bit on soft side.



Concord is useless in this "war" and should be optional.

You could use an evolution of today's wardec engine and hire allies. They'd completely replace Concord (i.e. you totally lose Concord defense everywhere) and like Concord they can kill inbound known hostiles who already shot to their protegees.

THIS is sandbox, THIS is player driven, not some stupid NPCs.



that is an interestign concept that might be worth writing in more details and presenting at the correct suggestion forums. WOudl be a niec idea to forego concord rights to get selleble kill rights on gankers for like 1 week :)
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#120 - 2012-05-31 11:04:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jorma Morkkis
RubyPorto wrote:
Why wouldn't a miner sit in a Healing Bat? It's no less interesting than mining.


Problem is that it's less interesting task than watching the door in w-space.

Seishi Maru wrote:
Can you realize that people DO that? And that is why they have titans and stuff like that? And You never even tied any of those things because you would know that you can mine and rat in null sec for weeks without loosing a single ship. Jsut use your brains.


Goons protect their bo... I mean miners with Rokhs. I want to see this. Big smile

Single dread can destroy all barges in belt. And when there is one there is usually a lot more of them and fleet supporting them.