These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Access to EVE

First post First post First post
Author
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#341 - 2016-08-31 18:04:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Nana Skalski
So when new Clone Grades? Oooops I mean States.

You can always monetize the skill capacity they are able to hold and use. Remember, greed is good.
Cookie
Snakeoil Industries Ltd.
#342 - 2016-08-31 18:05:03 UTC
Why trying to fish for new players when there's a problem holding the current ones ?

The term 'bittervet' doesn't come from nowhere, how many times have old characters been hit by a change that left a bitter taste ?

Trained 3 month of learning skills, after removal of them i felt it would have been more beneficial to sit 2 months earlier in a battleship back in 2003, the opportunity costs were pretty high.
Lot of stuff has been dumbed down, e.g. scanning took a bit of skill and maybe also some patience to find something nice, now you get all handed on a silverplatter.
Maybe patience and long term planning are bad attributes, better cater to the yolo crowd i guess :/


I mean .. the alpha account has to be heavily nerfed/restricted to prevent abuse. be it scamspam, neutral reppers, market/mining/industry, scouting*
Not really sure if that's a good idea to present the game to new players who got baited by a f2p advertisement, when it's actually a p2w game.
There are quite a couple free to play games that aren't really p2w but more like money fueled character progress accleration and the 'shopitems' are open to in-game trades.
Those pure pay-to-win games where you basically can only play a fraction of the game with a nerfed character are not really the big love of every gamer out there.
Unfortunately, in EvE you can't hand out an unlimited number of accounts with unlimited gratis playtime which are on par with the paid ones because it will totally wreck the game within weeks.

The dream of restricting people to one login will most likely not become true. Those who want to abuse/loophole a system WILL find a way or two.

Now everybody has an invite to insult and harrass people with throwaway accounts who can't be hurt by banning them.




*= (oh my god, better increase the database by a petabyte or two to hold the 8329 logged off alpha accounts in every system)

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#343 - 2016-08-31 18:05:08 UTC
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
I feel im the only one that sees how this could turn into micro transactions SUPER quick....


You mean like... buying ISK? Oh wait... Uhm... buying SP? No... hang on. Buying too expensive SKINs for your shi... oh.



Im more talking about buying additional access for ur alpha toon. Like allowing to train t2 mods or allowe d to train other races ect ect

Kinda like swtor did. Allow you to slowly purchase yourself to a full access clone without actually subbing

Who gives a **** what they do to the plebs, seriously as long as the sub is the last word in access to content they can do what they like.
Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#344 - 2016-08-31 18:05:46 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Eli Stan wrote:
Interesting.

So far, I cannot think of any major objections.
I will try to think of ways this can be abused, but barring that I don't see it being a bad thing.

I think it'd be fine for unlimited Mega clone clients to run along with a single Alpha clone client on the same computer, but I have concerns about multiple Alpha clone clients.

First possible "abuse":
Train an Alpha clone to 5m SP.
Switch it to Omega state, train Cybernetics to 5, plug in +5 implants, and have an SP farm ready to go without having to pay for the initial 5m SP investment.


From a revenue standpoint...so? So they skip that first month or so, but every month after that they are coughing up the money. If that means more people with paid accounts that otherwise....how is that bad?
Yeah, after thinking about it more I think it will have negligible effect, so doesn't need to be addressed by CCP.
Noga Taranogas
Doomheim
#345 - 2016-08-31 18:05:58 UTC
been asking for something like this for a long time and glad for the alphas focused training and limits to what they can train. Gives the uninitiated the opportunity to come into the game and do more than the 14d trial -hardly an time at all to really see what is possible in EVE. Giving newbies the core skills to do some T1 frig, dessie, and cruiser action can give them the chance to dive into the game and seeing so much more available, the chance to sub to omega or not.

I'm of mixed feelings about

Q: Are there restrictions on simultaneous log on for Alpha Clones?

A: We have not decided whether the simultaneous log on restrictions from the current trial system will apply to Alpha Clones. The decision will partly depend on your feedback, as well as our technical investigations over the coming months.


-to have omega players creating alphas for quick attack fleets that no one can id will be a problem. 600 players in an alliance create 600 alphas all in cruisers even with skill limits is still 600 untraceable players back to the alliance. These 600 alphas who are really alliance X can be used to harass alliance X blues without alliance X being exposed. Keep the system in place that if you have an Omega logged in, you can't have an Alpha running -great and all, but you just don't have your Omega running...

To prevent abuse of meta-alpha'ing -restrict the amount of isk that an alpha can receive through player donations. Permit up to 100 million isk donation for the life of the Alpha. Once the 100 million isk limit is reached, player cannot be donated to. If alliance X wants to create 600 alphas and give them 100 mil as suiciders or harassers that's fine, but then the alpha must earn isk to buy their ships. If you see tons of alphas created, donated to, and then deleted, it will give you a fair idea that it's being abused.

might want to consider that alphas cannot receive 'omega' items in trade -could just trade battleships to them to sell on the market and get isk that way.

Is it possible to restrict their ability to sell ships? they should not be able to receive cruisers to put up for sale as a way to fund harassment or suicide fleets. Sure, give them 20 fitted ships, but they can only use them, not sell them.

Good luck with this. glad that newbies will have a chance to see a bit more of the game.


Blastil
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#346 - 2016-08-31 18:06:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Blastil
For all the hallabalu about mining multiboxers -


  1. To add up to just 1 T2 fit procurer, you will need to fly 3 t1 fit mining frigates
  2. To add up to just 1 hulk, you will need to fly at least 4 T1 fit mining frigates


I know we all like to **** on multiboxers, but even the best of them would have a hard time managing a fleet 4x the size of their current hulk fleets (not to mention the LAG this would cause on clients. Not to mention that this game play mechanic isn't a terrible thing for EVE, since resources in eve ARE limited substances. Go try to find an asteroid in some highsec mining hubs, I dare you.

I for one would welcome a multi-boxed fleet of mining ships out in 0.0 space trying to make a buck. It would certainly add to the diversity of the game. Material input in eve will NOT (as some have predicted) lead to inflation, but rather deflation as mineral prices plummet and people react to that issue. This in turn will increasingly make multiboxing veldspar hoovering alts unprofitable, and force them to relocate to more lucrative areas of space with higher risks.

In no conceivable way is more players bad for the game. Especially if these players are limited in scope.

I will say that however I'm an advocate of safety locking these players while in highsec to eliminate the exploitation of the ganking mechanic entirely. Yellow safety should be sufficient, so they can still do shady PVP, but not outright Concordoken violence. If you want a lore reason for this, why would empires provide free clones that could cause havoc in their empires? Its all subliminal conditioning, or fluoride water, or something.

I also think the suggestion of limiting one alpha client per computer is a good one as well. Free players shouldn't get to multibox the way paid players do. This should eliminate problems with an account in every plex ruining faction warfare.

Lastly I think Alpha characters should be deleted if they show inactivity over a long period of time (and have never been at any time Omega characters), which should help to eliminate extra characters cached in key systems to be logged on at a moments notice for some activity like scouting or logon traps
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#347 - 2016-08-31 18:06:12 UTC
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
I feel im the only one that sees how this could turn into micro transactions SUPER quick....


You mean like... buying ISK? Oh wait... Uhm... buying SP? No... hang on. Buying too expensive SKINs for your shi... oh.



Im more talking about buying additional access for ur alpha toon. Like allowing to train t2 mods or allowe d to train other races ect ect

Kinda like swtor did. Allow you to slowly purchase yourself to a full access clone without actually subbing


I doubt that will ever happen in that way, as that would open up all the abuse scenarios they're trying to avoid right now. Buy access to Cyno skill, never pay again, free cyno alt forever. Nope.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Arkoth 24
Doomheim
#348 - 2016-08-31 18:07:46 UTC
Nana Skalski wrote:
So when new Clone Grades? Oooops I mean States.

You can always monetize the skill capacity they are able to hold and use.

Soon.

As usual: tons of negative feedback - CCP doesn't give a drek.

Yeah, i'm still pissed off 'bout Evelopedia.
Cytherea Deesse
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#349 - 2016-08-31 18:07:49 UTC
Why no heavy drones for gallente?

Like vexor main bonus is to drones and has 75 mb so can field 2 heavy, 2 medium and 1 light drone.

With limits you put in gallente alpha clone that is not possible it will only be allowed to field 5 medium drones.

Overall I think idea is oki, but fear that it will be abused, eve players have a habit of pushing the boundries.

Like others have pointed out I think, FW, industry/PI, and market are the areas that has most potentiel of abuse AND hurting the eco system in NE.

With eve players history of finding loop holes in the mechanincs and the areas ppl have already pointed out in the thread, I hope that alpha clone system doen't go live, before it has all been thought thrugh, so the risk is small of abuse to happen. So don't rush things, cause some of the idea can have big impact on eco system.



Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#350 - 2016-08-31 18:08:08 UTC
Hmm, Alpha is the first letter, Omega the last....
CCP, what are you planning for all the letters in between?
I know at one time you were planning on allowing us to use the same character for different games, like Valkyrie or Gun-jack. Is that still on the table? I get into my Gamma clone when I want to play Valk, or something like that?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Solecist Project
#351 - 2016-08-31 18:08:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
I want free alts for everyone.

It's definitely preferrable to allow a free Alpha for every Omega ....

... and by that i mean two clients at the same time running.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Eli Stan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#352 - 2016-08-31 18:09:05 UTC
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
I feel im the only one that sees how this could turn into micro transactions SUPER quick....
You mean like... buying ISK? Oh wait... Uhm... buying SP? No... hang on. Buying too expensive SKINs for your shi... oh.
Im more talking about buying additional access for ur alpha toon. Like allowing to train t2 mods or allowe d to train other races ect ect
Purchasing access like that already exists. It's called "PLEX" or "subscription."

Quote:
Kinda like swtor did. Allow you to slowly purchase yourself to a full access clone without actually subbing
I don't see the distinction...?
Kilarya Amarri
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
#353 - 2016-08-31 18:09:15 UTC
I my self would prefer that anyone at ccp made an effort and made it more deeper than clones A and B for gameplay sake...

Say new clones are empire breakthrough in pod tech it allows any human to achieve pod pilot like capabilities in attempt to close gap we currently enjoy and exploit oh so much.

Below all of that i see it for what it is FTP and i am not and probably never been fanboy enough to talk **** about it when other games do it but somehow justify it when eve gets it,

it will be exploited by ppl that are already in game most and due to fundamental problems this game suffer from new ppl will not stick around....my opinion of it anyway

not much left to sell off and soup youd **** in is getting cold...bon appetit.
Henry Plantgenet
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#354 - 2016-08-31 18:09:49 UTC
I'm fine with some free access for eve under 2 conditions:
1) Plex remains affordable
2) This doesn't devolve into one of those crappy incarna shituations where CCP is trying to milky milky the new and existing client base through micro transactions.
"How many greek letters can we squeeze between alpha and omega? As many as we can divise payment schemes for muahaha"
Drazz Caylen
Team-Pyro Industries
#355 - 2016-08-31 18:11:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Drazz Caylen
Joia Crenca wrote:
That's a thought, although one computer these days could have multiple virtual computers running on it, so blocking via computer will have to really be worked out.
EULA Section 7 D (Monitoring) : You agree that CCP may remotely monitor your Game hardware solely for the purpose of establishing whether in playing the Game and accessing the System you are using software created or approved by CCP, or whether you are using unauthorized software created by you or a third party in contravention of Section 6."

It comes down to the question, can they detect Virtual Machines and VPNs when someone tries to bypass login restrictions imposed to Alpha accounts as they are imposed on trial accounts, or can't they.
My answer is; multiboxing is allowed and encouraged. Not abusing of the system. ISboxing was banned a while ago.

Furthermore, if you see someone exhibit suspicious bot-like swarm behaviour and you're not sure if they are one person or many? I'd say just submit a ticket. Then CCP can set some feelers out.

I don't think CCP will allow more than one Alpha account be online at the same time with another Alpha or Trial.
It's either going to be one Alpha per computer, like the trial, or it's one Alpha + as many Omegas as you want.


Missy Bunnz wrote:
Beware the Gnosis Alphaswarm.
That'd be fun, not gonna lie Lol
...but I doubt it will happen. You've seen how they can restrict modules based on Alpha and Omega clone state. They can easily make exceptions for ships.


Teckos Pech wrote:
Mining ships are not part of any faction/race, so I'd guess most of those will be unavailable to them.

Look at the devblog. They can only fly Mining Frigates, not Mining Barges and not mining exhumers. They still can get creative and mine in a crui- ohwhoamikidding.

Roenok Baalnorn wrote funny stuff which Eli Stan answered followed by Winter Archipelago as well, both delivering the bullet of reason expertly.
Can't add anything more but thumbs ;)

Cookie wrote:
*= (oh my god, better increase the database by a petabyte or two to hold the 8329 logged off alpha accounts in every system)
Do you know how many dozen of million characters already are in the database where some of them have not seen the light of day for a decade?

Furthermore for everyone else fearing this will be a hostile Alpha takeover;, likely you do not know or remember the times when simultaneous Trial accounts online on Tranquility were limited to 1500. It's easy to put a limit.


Henry Plantgenet wrote:
"How many greek letters can we squeeze between alpha and omega? As many as we can divise payment schemes for muahaha"
You mean, as many as there were medical clone grades? Lol
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#356 - 2016-08-31 18:11:43 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
I feel im the only one that sees how this could turn into micro transactions SUPER quick....


You mean like... buying ISK? Oh wait... Uhm... buying SP? No... hang on. Buying too expensive SKINs for your shi... oh.



Im more talking about buying additional access for ur alpha toon. Like allowing to train t2 mods or allowe d to train other races ect ect

Kinda like swtor did. Allow you to slowly purchase yourself to a full access clone without actually subbing


I doubt that will ever happen in that way, as that would open up all the abuse scenarios they're trying to avoid right now. Buy access to Cyno skill, never pay again, free cyno alt forever. Nope.

They'd lose the usage of the skill once the sub lapsed, if for instance you were to stop payment, the only effective so on your main would be that in the skills listed in the blog.
Iowa Banshee
Fenrir Vangard
#357 - 2016-08-31 18:12:34 UTC
Neva Second wrote:
In an effort to increase players I think its a great concept, if I hadn't purchased a 6mo subscription out of the gate I would not still be playing years later. Eve takes time to wrap your head around and see how the game differs from other MMO's. Having time to train up some basic skills and experience it without hitting your wallet is a good thing for everyone.

*However: As a bitter vet who uses capitals pretty frequently I would love CCP to reconsider the Cyno skill exclusion. Many players like me have 1-2 accounts with nothing but cyno alts to help move their caps around the board.




So with free accounts you could have 30 or 40 Cyno alts logged off in every system in your region.

On the bright side hunting capitals would become a thing again ... although much much easier
Grookshank
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#358 - 2016-08-31 18:12:54 UTC
Please restrict the Alpha Clone accounts like the trials, so that only one can be launched and not on top of an omega one. It is *not* about the ganking and restricting their safety in high-sec. It is about people having free scout alts in many systems, on wormholes, etc.

Please do not let this happen.

If you want to give players free to play access, they don't need multiple accounts to try out the game and eventually upgrade to an Omega Clone, but it would be massively abused to enable players to log in an army of free alts at the same time.

Please do not let this happen.
Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#359 - 2016-08-31 18:14:03 UTC
Quality product almost always sells.

Why not focus all these efforts on making the product better, rather than simply opening up more avenues to selling it?

I can't say this is wholly a terrible idea, but CCP isn't simply aren't addressing attrition enough, thus it leaves a terrible suspicion in the player base that you are just hoping to burn out the life of this game in an ungracious manner, milking it for all the worth that is left in it.

Yes, this may get new blood in, but the past years have just had terrible and sweeping changes which leave left persistent subscribers scratching their heads as to why they are even subbing any more. Hilariously emotional balancing on capitals, draconian changes to jump drives, a gutting of sov mechanics and content seeds, a stale and brittle ship meta, etc.

Work on the NPE driving players to seek other players. Make holding space actually worth something. Fix the dinosaur standings mechanics so joining FW isn't a life long 90s MUD era grind to fix.

Throw a bone to the veteran, persistent subscribers, and soon.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#360 - 2016-08-31 18:16:45 UTC
Lunarstorm95 wrote:
I feel im the only one that sees how this could turn into micro transactions SUPER quick....



That's the entire purpose of this.


There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.