Player Features and Ideas Discussion

ok I've been baited.

cruisers are a mixed bag ranging from too good to too bad, please don't fix my vexor, please do fix my rupture
combat inties are trash
recons are all hitlers, how about more usable gang ewar ships, less anti-solo
battleships are a mixed bag, lol tempest lol rokh
marauders lol why do they exist, and why do asbs use 0 cap and not have a 1 per ship limit
black ops eh idk, no complaints, but the bonuses are a bit funky for some people.
hacs the infinite mwd cap thing is silly, and the kiting sig bonus is silly, why does my vagabond have a shield bonus and only 4 mids
t1 destroyers lol try bringing one other than a cormorant or linked talwar to any kind of fight with ships other than frigs and cruisers in it
interdictors are alright, they're like destroyers but with a load of concessions so they're not totally unusable in combat
heavy interdictors, how about letting them receive reps so you don't need like 20 of them to tackle a super
command ships, yeah, active tanking is exactly what you want on a fleet command ship. and what's up with the strange damage bonuses to make up for the obvious difference in power between different weapon systems? dual rate of fire bonuses? ok I didn't want to be able to overheat or have any volley damage anyway.

Ok. Good.
Please, tell me, why i should fly wolf or jag instead of svip? Srsly. What is assaults do better then t3d?
I forced to fly wolf becuase cost? Nope. 20kk different. Even 30 or 40 kk is nothing.
People fly t3d (and certainly they fly svip) becuase of safe pvp. SAFE. Svip forgives many mistakes for nothing.
"Oh god, he god me with web and scram. Well better to turn on my 10mn ab and get 1,5 km/s and fly away."
'Oh god, cruiser in range! Well i have 400 shield/s passive tank with 70m sign."

All stats better then any analogue in frig or destr size.

I want to remind CCP their picture: BALANCE

So, tell me which destr or frig have more dps/tank and even speed then svip.
If i thinks correct - assault ships is spec in damage deal. Sooooo....?

perhaps reduce the 50% damage role bonus a little too say 25%? .. versatility over high power levels is meant to be the point afterall, along with resists to T1 default level. and a little less base speed is needed too balance them.

Why not just delete assaults from game? We have t3d! Better in all ways! Its a balance!

Destroyers can already kill AFs with ease so i dont see the issue

you cant compare a frig to a destroyer t2 to t3 , honestly all they need to do is put a restriction on the hull so it cant fit 10mn because it makes the ship too unstable and may.... whatever. and maybe add more skill reqs to fly it like t3 cruisers. i don't see why they should be nerfd into the ground because people are crying over them. making poor arguments as to why they should be nerfd in the first place. they are easy to kill 2 med neuts or 2 webs to get dps down and its dead

its a destroyer...... it kills frigs. its not that hard to figure out. and having flown them and killed quite a few of them i know how easy they are to kill. but trying to kill them with a frig is not that smart.

Isn't it supposed to be the opposite? T2 is supposed to better at their thing than T3, T3 gets advantages by being able to do a lot. You can have a Loki that has guns and webs, but it isn't supposed to be as good at brawling and chasing as a HAC or as good at webbing as a Recon. CCP hasn't always done the best at this but this is the goal as far as I know.

Assault frig is a frig...so what do you expect when going against a T3 destroyers when destroyers are designed to kill frigs? I never cried because i can´t solo a titan in my dread...

Yes, the new T3Ds are a hit. Excellent monthly stats. CCP must be doing something right-right.

Would buy again.

Soon, the other two metastases will be developed, and the assembled family can then vote to delete every other ship below T3Ds.

Great success.