CSM Campaigns

Cap Stable Interview:

http://capstable.net/2015/01/24/jayne-fillon/

Just woke up Hendrick, I'll respond to your questions after breakfast. Seems there is a lot to catch up on. :P

Will you pay for my sec tags so I can fight you? or will you be coming to lowsec?

That's not representative of what I said in the interview. Wars have their place in highsec, as I stated.

EDIT: On the same note as Koz, if you'd actually like to fight just let me know and I'd love to organize something. It'll have to be in lowsec tho, since the majority of us are pirates and can't even go to highsec in the first place.

That is what wars are about, right? Fights?

And thats exactly my point. You are clueless when it comes to high-sec, but still want to destroy it. How about you stick with something you do know, like the NPSI fleets. That part I did like about your interview, as it was based on facts, not feelings.

I think there is something very telling about the way you phrase this question. When you say "instead of dealing with the problem," you are referring to the problem as it was defined in game: we were consistently losing fights, and were bleeding towers. The problem - from my perspective - was that the members of my corporation were not enjoying flying with the alliance... and that's putting it nicely. What you see as avoiding "the problem" and taking the easy way out, I see as dealing with our problem in the most immediate way possible - that is, the problem of my corpmates not enjoying the game. I enjoyed flying with OE while it lasted, but my loyalty remains to those who fly with me in SASH.

We were not the first to leave, and you were compensated appropriately. I'm fine with being the scapegoat for the current state of your alliance, but you should temper your disdain.

Yes.

Eve is a game that we play to enjoy, and no one is under any obligation to do anything at anytime for anyone.

CSM, on the other hand, is a serious undertaking that was purpose built to solve difficult problems. I'm not running for the CSM because I want trip to Iceland or because I think it will be fun to sit in meetings during my free time. I'm running for the CSM because I truly believe I can make this game better.

CSM members have a responsibility to those who vote for them, and I will fulfil that responsibility.

Removed an off topic post.

I want to preface my questions by saying that I was in SASH for 2 months with Jayne as the CEO. My questions will relate to his actions during this time and how they apply to his CSM candidacy.

While I was in SASH Jayne you were absent for long periods of time, and basically the directors were forced to do much of the day to day running of the corp. If you cannot commit time to running a corp, how can you have time to take on the "second job" that is CSM? Please don't quote some Mittani style delegation response.

Will you be as poor the facts in your statements while you are a member of the CSM? For example - after stealing and selling approximately 13 cadmiums(R32) moons and 1 dyspro(R64) moons do you really consider 5 billion to be "compensated appropriately"?. To hide your theft, that funded your recently acquired titan, you have tried to paint Overload Everything as a dying and bitter alliance. However, DOTLAN (http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Overload_Everything) shows that we have recovered in numbers to the same amount before you took SASH from the alliance. This wouldn't be complete without the mandatory killboard post (https://zkillboard.com/alliance/99004536/stats/) showing that our ISK killed and efficiency have both risen sharply without your corp. How can you convince us that in the future you will share true information both with us and with the developers?

What makes you a leader in the community? Other than creating Spectre fleet which you rarely FC (I don't think I've ever seen you FC it, let alone do any leadership with it for that matter) what credentials do you have? After talking in depth about starting a freeport in Nullsec for PVP you sat on your hands and instead Coelomate & co did all the hard work to make a freeport happen. Are you just going to be a talking head on CSM or do you actually have it in you to see a project from start to finish?

Last year you were on the Goons ballot for CSM (#5 I believe). Why did they pick you as their first non-goons (first 4 were in CFC) member on the ballot? What is in it for them? For you? How does your friendship with Nonnak Severin play into this?

You have a poor relationship with a significant number of people you encounter. As a potential voice on CSM, don't you need to be inclusive and (hopefully) even-tempered when dealing with views that may not match your own?

I don't see the humor in destroying a part of Eve. And if you want to make a point, you might want to explain it to the readers, otherwise it's pointless. You are like the baker telling the butcher how to do his work, without even knowing how to handle a knife. Just think about this and you'll understand why I think you are clueless when it's comes to high-sec.

Focus on NPSI, you at least have some experience with that.

Jayne:

Congratulations on what I consider among the top three interviews so far on Cap Stable. It was good enough that, from not knowing you at all, I've just gone through your whole campaign thread, finishing up with impressive thoughts.

You are well spoken, logical, and you present your ideas well.

Some of those ideas are completely new to me. Before your interview my entire knowledge of the NPSI community was being able to parse the name. Now I can see NPSI as a possible alternative, constructive gaming style that can stand on its own, or be an interesting adjunct to regular corp-style play, enabling you to have your cake and eat it, too.

We very much agree that the Wardec mechanic is broken, and why, although you're the first person I've encountered that I've heard say it. I also loved your thoughts on making wars a part of a narrative, instead of just using a mechanic to randomly shoot people.

While I think your ideas may well benefit the NPSI community, I see them as having a larger scope as well, and could be very interesting in a CSM that will be concentrating on corporations and NullSec.

You are on my high list for voting for CSM-X. I'll probably write a bit later with some specific questions, but, nice job on the interview!