These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Has suicide ganking become a problem? Empty freighters being ganked.

First post First post First post
Author
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#421 - 2014-06-18 15:24:52 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Devs tend to be seasoned Eve players who understand the nature of the game, why would they play Eve in way that goes against everything they know?


My point exactly.

Look at the role of a "freighter" in most any established piece of sci-fi, and you have almost a universal theme going - freighters are huge ships that are great at holding a lot of stuff and getting it from point A to point B, but due to the nature of being a GIANT floating brick who's purpose is transporting goods, freighters tend to rely on convoy style support ships to keep them safe from pirate attacks and make sure the goods get where they are supposed to end up.

People have to remember, this is a sandbox and what the player does with the tools they have is totally up to them. For too long, the players using freighters have built up a long standing tradition of flying totally alone, blind with no advanced scout, and defenseless with no combat or support escort to protect their cargo. CCP gives the freighter player all the tools they need to keep safe - but just fitting bulkheads and calling it good is not going to cut it. This is a social game, and perhaps recent events will result in freighter players actually engaging with friends to provide support, pay others for support, and stop trying to make money while AFK.

I see this all as nothing but a good thing, and a wake up call for the AFK solo player in a multiplayer sandbox.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#422 - 2014-06-18 15:27:38 UTC
KIller Wabbit wrote:
How about the dev's fly freighters for a month. Then we will see if they actually understand.


You might consider checking out the ISD's post earlier in the thread. I think it's actually you lot who don't understand.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#423 - 2014-06-18 15:30:33 UTC
This needs to be repeated.

CCP Falcon wrote:
Some men just want to watch the world burn.

There's space for us all in New Eden.

Linked for convenience.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Antihrist Pripravnik
Cultural Enrichment and Synergy of Diversity
Stain Neurodiverse Democracy
#424 - 2014-06-18 15:37:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
This needs to be repeated.

CCP Falcon wrote:
Some men just want to watch the world burn.

There's space for us all in New Eden.

Linked for convenience.


Knowing full well what the reaction of "victim" side would be after this (dev) post (as it was), that post actually falls within this forum rule:

Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


It didn't add anything valuable to the discussion, did side with only one party without helping the other side realize that their views were wrong (with data, statistics, options,...) and it did add fuel to the fire.Straight
NotTheSmartestCookie
Shooting Blues Everyday
Gimme Da Loot
#425 - 2014-06-18 15:38:04 UTC
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote:
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
KIller Wabbit wrote:
How about the dev's fly freighters for a month. Then we will see if they actually understand.

Most of the tears that I see seem to come from freighters assuming that fitting triple bulkheads = a free pass to disregard sanity, go totally AFK, and just assume that a hour or two later they will arrive at their destination alive and turn a profit.


I'm not entirely sure, but I think he meant to address exactly this (bolded and underlined). Many of the victim posts in this (and many other threads) are simply based on the fact that a tedious, time consuming and ultimately boring "chore" of a hauling is made dangerous and even more hated activity because of the many suicide gankers, while on the other hand fun is involved in ganking. Read the "victim" posts in this light, you'll be amazed of the results Smile


A solution presents itself: if a player really thinks that hauling is tedious, time consuming and boring he should use Red Frog for his hauling needs and join the gankers for fun. Just make sure the collateral is high enough. Two birds with one stone: your profit is assured thanks to the collateral and your selection of targets is also increased.

Making New Eden a better place 8 rounds of Void at a time.

Funny, smartest, pretty and relevant. Pick 3.

Proud shareholder in Halaima MinerBumping

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#426 - 2014-06-18 15:39:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
This needs to be repeated.

CCP Falcon wrote:
Some men just want to watch the world burn.

There's space for us all in New Eden.

Linked for convenience.


Knowing full well what the reaction of "victim" side would be after this (dev) post (as it was), that post actually falls within this forum rule:

Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


It didn't add anything valuable to the discussion, did side with only one party without helping the other side realize that their views were wrong (with data, statistics, options,...) and it did add fuel to the fire.Straight

Dev Troll Best Troll, besides CCP Falcon is renowned for telling it how it is, he's very nearly as blunt as Malcanis.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#427 - 2014-06-18 15:41:15 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Some men just want to watch the world burn.

There's space for us all in New Eden.




Fair enough, but did this event not show that whether you were at the keyboard, carrying no or low value, fully fitted with every possible module pilots still got killed?

All the defences and claims of the ganking profession as to how to survive, and pilots were doing it wrong were shown to be meaningless?

So why are the same arguments being made when they are proven conclusively to be false?

I cannot imagine that his is either good for freighter pilots, or the game in general.

Possibly the world that burns will be your own company CCP falcon, It may be fun now but later on?

Ganking has always been something I am uncomfortable with, but an understandable game choice.

It does seem to have crossed a line, and when the predator prey balance gets disturbed so strongly in favour of the predator, the numbers of prey crash, and one has starving predators. Most predators do not kill wastefully.

This is for the gankers to sort out in their own best interest, burning the fields and salting the earth does not lead to a full and rich hunting ground.


I still find it amusing that people are yelling at CCP that their game and company will die if they don't drastically change the game to protect clueless carebears and prevent their dumb ships from exploding. Ships killing other ships has been part of this game for ten years, how long until you realise that this wont change and that it isn't the game for you?
Kalon Horan
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#428 - 2014-06-18 15:41:18 UTC
Xaldafax Caerleon wrote:
Kalon Horan wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:



For what purpose, by the time they warp in the target is already history? And concord are already destroying the gankers One cannot target the scouts haulers etc etc that make it possible as a mechanic.

So how does that inconvinience the gankers in any way?


As stated before... little me alone prevented quite a few suicide kills yesterday by shooting the gankers b4 they can blow up their target.

What stops other people to do the same? I can tell you what stops them... they can not fatten their wallet by doing it.



Did you take a security hit for shooting the ganker before they attacked the victim?


No... i just shoot first when they are outlaws and you do not get sec hits for that.
Antihrist Pripravnik
Cultural Enrichment and Synergy of Diversity
Stain Neurodiverse Democracy
#429 - 2014-06-18 15:42:19 UTC
NotTheSmartestCookie wrote:
Antihrist Pripravnik wrote:
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
KIller Wabbit wrote:
How about the dev's fly freighters for a month. Then we will see if they actually understand.

Most of the tears that I see seem to come from freighters assuming that fitting triple bulkheads = a free pass to disregard sanity, go totally AFK, and just assume that a hour or two later they will arrive at their destination alive and turn a profit.


I'm not entirely sure, but I think he meant to address exactly this (bolded and underlined). Many of the victim posts in this (and many other threads) are simply based on the fact that a tedious, time consuming and ultimately boring "chore" of a hauling is made dangerous and even more hated activity because of the many suicide gankers, while on the other hand fun is involved in ganking. Read the "victim" posts in this light, you'll be amazed of the results Smile


A solution presents itself: if a player really thinks that hauling is tedious, time consuming and boring he should use Red Frog for his hauling needs and join the gankers for fun. Just make sure the collateral is high enough. Two birds with one stone: your profit is assured thanks to the collateral and your selection of targets is also increased.

If only I could "Like"this a thousand times.
By the way you would be amazed if you knew how many players don't even know that the freighter services exist What?
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#430 - 2014-06-18 15:45:40 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
I have always said that hi-sec ganking should be possible just not profitable. There should be a higher price to pay to gank just for the lolz or the tears.

When you can quickly train disposable toons to throw away with a negative 10 sec status, or use a ship that has high dps and minimal cost you will always have the imbalance of ganking favoring the ganker over the gankie.



Quick FYI, rolling disposable toons for ganking will get you banned by CCP. They frown on people biomassing neg sec status characters, then rolling new.

I'm pretty sure not being able to fly anything much bigger than a cruiser, getting chased by facpo wherever you go, and being a legal target for anyone to shoot at is a pretty high price.

Yea I am sure getting banned on a free disposable account really stops them from from biomassing.

The price needs to be in line with the target and its not. Some one flying a multi billion isk freighter that took several months to train should not be able to get ganked by toons that get bio massed and made over and over in high dps low cost ships.

There is no price.
Quinn Hatfield
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#431 - 2014-06-18 15:52:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Quinn Hatfield
I'm relatively new to Eve so I may be misunderstanding something really basic. From what I can gather Eves economy at the basic level revolves around the destruction and construction of assets.

So why are the people who are doing the dying and complaining not making space money hand over fist from the opportunities an activity like ganking provides?

The way I see it is that if stuff explodes there is a need to replace it, minerals need to be mined, stuff needs to be made, hauled to market and sold to other players to do so.

Miners, haulers, manufacturers and traders should be rubbing their palms together with glee at the oodles of space money to be made from it. Sure they'll suffer the occasional loss, which can be got around with planning and forethought, but overall if they grabbed the opportunity with both hands they should be able to profit considerably.

I don't burn bridges, I merely steal a bolt a day.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#432 - 2014-06-18 15:53:32 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
I have always said that hi-sec ganking should be possible just not profitable. There should be a higher price to pay to gank just for the lolz or the tears.

When you can quickly train disposable toons to throw away with a negative 10 sec status, or use a ship that has high dps and minimal cost you will always have the imbalance of ganking favoring the ganker over the gankie.



Quick FYI, rolling disposable toons for ganking will get you banned by CCP. They frown on people biomassing neg sec status characters, then rolling new.

I'm pretty sure not being able to fly anything much bigger than a cruiser, getting chased by facpo wherever you go, and being a legal target for anyone to shoot at is a pretty high price.

Yea I am sure getting banned on a free disposable account really stops them from from biomassing.

The price needs to be in line with the target and its not. Some one flying a multi billion isk freighter that took several months to train should not be able to get ganked by toons that get bio massed and made over and over in high dps low cost ships.

There is no price.


The concept you're talking about - that is, the higher the price on your ship, the higher the price it should take to kill it - is an incredibly flawed and unworkable idea. ISK Tanking is not even worth discussing
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#433 - 2014-06-18 15:57:13 UTC
I mean if you honestly think "I spent more isk / spent more time pouring skill points into a thing therefore I should win" is a valid design, then you really don't understand balance or the ethos of this game.

Smarts, effort and teamwork win, it's always been that way. The good news is there is nothing that prevents freighter pilots from using smarts, effort and teamwork. The bad news is they dont WANT to, they just want to cry on the forums
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#434 - 2014-06-18 16:02:53 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:

Yea I am sure getting banned on a free disposable account really stops them from from biomassing.

The price needs to be in line with the target and its not. Some one flying a multi billion isk freighter that took several months to train should not be able to get ganked by toons that get bio massed and made over and over in high dps low cost ships.

There is no price.


Wow, every sentence is a lie.

Recycling gank alts is against the game rules, you can and will be IP banned for doing it. Stop spreading the lie that this actually happens, it's just a smokescreen your side uses when it's pointed out just how far in the wrong you all really are.

Pricetag is not a balancing factor. You should not be immune to new players just because your ship costs more than theirs, which is what you are suggesting. You are suggesting that new players be completely handcuffed.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#435 - 2014-06-18 16:07:58 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:


The price needs to be in line with the target and its not. Some one flying a multi billion isk freighter that took several months to train should not be able to get ganked by toons that get bio massed and made over and over in high dps low cost ships.

There is no price.


I don't care how much it costs, how much SP you put into it, or how long you took to get it - if you insist on flying it alone and AFK and take no time to even bother to scout ahead when moving hardware of this value - you deserve to lose it. You have proven you should not be trusted with shiny things, as you have no respect for their value.

SP and ISK do not provide a free pass for players to make poor choices and not have to suffer the consequences of their actions. It never has, and it never will.

In the words of CCP: "Working as Intended."
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#436 - 2014-06-18 16:12:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Quinn Hatfield wrote:
I'm relatively new to Eve so I may be misunderstanding something really basic. From what I can gather Eves economy at the basic level revolves around the destruction and construction of assets.
Pretty much on the money there.

Quote:
So why are the people who are doing the dying and complaining not making space money hand over fist from the opportunities an activity like ganking provides?
They don't see it that way, most of them seem to want to "play" Eve as a single player game, and they think that they should be left alone.

Quote:
The way I see it is that if stuff explodes there is a need to replace it, minerals need to be mined, stuff needs to be made, hauled to market and sold to other players to do so.

Miners, haulers, manufacturers and traders should be rubbing their palms together with glee at the oodles of space money to be made from it. Sure they'll suffer the occasional loss, which can be got around with planning and forethought, but overall if they grabbed the opportunity with both hands they should be able to profit considerably.
Some are, they tend not to be the ones exploding regulalry or complaining though, because they understand that Eve is a PvP oriented multi-player game and plan accordingly. They may lose the occasional ship while mining and hauling or they buy their minerals and use 3rd parties to haul for them. They accept it as a cost of doing business in the Eve universe, just like taxes.

Eve needs more players like the latter, and less of the former TBH.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#437 - 2014-06-18 16:12:26 UTC
Apparently miner bumping leads to miner ganking, and miner ganking leads to freighter ganking. Kind of like AFK mining is supposed to lead to bot mining.
Seems Eve players just have no self-discipline or control over themselves. Cry
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#438 - 2014-06-18 16:16:50 UTC
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Quote:
It's stupid that concord would allow this to happen.


Actually, CONCORD would not allow this. They would forbid capsuleers with less than -5 security status to use gates that lead to high sec, same as gates that are located there, and same as clone jumping to a station in high sec. They could still go thru wormholes to a systems in High sec.

Please tell me you don't actually believe this is a good idea.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#439 - 2014-06-18 16:21:15 UTC
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Quote:
It's stupid that concord would allow this to happen.


Actually, CONCORD would not allow this. They would forbid capsuleers with less than -5 security status to use gates that lead to high sec, same as gates that are located there, and same as clone jumping to a station in high sec. They could still go thru wormholes to a systems in High sec.

Please tell me you don't actually believe this is a good idea.

His idea is pretty much a big FU to anybody who does faction warfare or lowsec PvP. It locks them out the market hubs and highsec in general. They can get round it using alts but they shouldn't have to unless they want to.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Evei Shard
Shard Industries
#440 - 2014-06-18 16:26:19 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
They can get round it using alts but they shouldn't have to unless they want to.


..but freighter pilots should be required to have alts.

Profit favors the prepared