These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Team Avatar and the future of our prototype

First post First post First post
Author
Flamespar
WarRavens
#1921 - 2013-09-22 10:28:46 UTC
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1922 - 2013-09-22 10:30:35 UTC
Flamespar wrote:
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.

Well, yea, I'm sure it will not go entirely unnoticed... but still, I think there could be done more.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#1923 - 2013-09-22 10:34:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Shalua Rui wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.

Well, yea, I'm sure it will not go entirely unnoticed... but still, I think there could be done more.


It isn't unnoticed. I've personally pointed it out to CCP employees. They're just ignoring it.

Rhes wrote:

I haven't seen a single person discredit anything I've posted. Can you find some links for me?


Well you haven't had your eyes open then. An example;

Rhes wrote:
The last time they tried WiS the game's subscribers nosedived.


You've used this a lot as an argument, over and over and over. And I have said the same thing to you and others, over and over and over. CCP never tried WiS. The one and a half year period of really low expansion content that came before Incarna (which released a single room, not WiS) was spent developing the Carbon engine. You know the one right? The one that powers TiDi, the V3 textures, the new nebula, turrets, moving ship parts, and probably the new FW, Bounty System, and new exploration.

CCP never dedicated even one expansion cycle to WiS. The Carbon engine was integrated with Eve in the Incarna expansion. The Incarna expansion was basically CCP trying to make an expansion out of integrating Carbon. The CQ probably took up a tiny fraction of their development time on the Incarna expansion. Testament to this, the following expansion (Crucible) released the other three CQs, more clothes and optimizations, as well as TiDi, the biggest contribution to ship rebalancing, V3 textures, new ships and all the other things you rant about being more important than any expansion since.

Now, I know what will happen now. You'll ignore these facts (I rarely use that word), and carry on trolling, or focus on something irrelevant in the hopes that you can move away from the argument. And at the end of it you'll act all victorious, despite the fact that it's clear to everyone else in this thread that you don't know what your talking about.

Below, if you using the same argument again in different words, basically referring back to the Incarna expansion like that's the only argument you have.

Rhes wrote:

Your problem is asserting that WiS would increase subs when past history indicates, rather clearly, that it has the opposite effect.

The only time in the history of Eve that subscription count went down was when WiS was released.


And this below, is me shooting you down (again) with the same argument that I have had to repeat over and over. (In a lot less detail than I have previously admittedly)

"That's not true. There was an almost identical drop in subs following Tyrannis*. Also, I would like to say, we never got Walking in Stations. We got 1 crap room. We also got ridiculously over-priced micro transactions, a massive amount of controversy and almost no other content from that expansion because they spent the entire time developing Carbon (which, by the way, we have been reaping the benefit of ever since)."

You then, predictably ignored it and moved onto something completely different. It's just not worth arguing with you. You obviously feel like your winning because you have questions that we have to answer. You don't care what the answer is. So why should we care to answer you?

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Flamespar
WarRavens
#1924 - 2013-09-22 10:54:16 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.

Well, yea, I'm sure it will not go entirely unnoticed... but still, I think there could be done more.


Tweet/email Hilmar?

Send CCP door keys in the mail?
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#1925 - 2013-09-22 11:00:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Flamespar wrote:
Shalua Rui wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.

Well, yea, I'm sure it will not go entirely unnoticed... but still, I think there could be done more.


Tweet/email Hilmar?

Send CCP door keys in the mail?


Emailed Seagull, Deddawn, and Hilmar. Got a reply from Seagull a while ago.

CCP Seagull wrote:
Thanks for the email!

CCP has always been excited about avatars in the EVE Universe, but it is currently not on the roadmap. And when we do put it on the roadmap, it is unlikely to go directly into EVE Online as you know it now, for a number of technical and practical reasons. But we now of course have the "EVE Universe" that can host more than one game - so what you want to look for is game announcements in the future rather than full avatar gameplay crammed into EVE Online the spaceship game - and CCP Hellmar is the guy to poke about it! :)

/Seagull


No response from Hilmar. Reddawn's response was significantly better, but that was some time ago now.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Broker Agent
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1926 - 2013-09-22 11:07:02 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
You don't care what the answer is. So why should we care to answer you?


I think most people have just ignored him. Life lesson for you; Don't feed the trolls.
Flamespar
WarRavens
#1927 - 2013-09-22 11:10:15 UTC

CCP should come forth and say what their plans are for avatars. Stop this endless tease.



Arduemont wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
Shalua Rui wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
What sort of action?

I would've thought an almost 12 month old thread largely in support of meaningful avatar gameplay would be enough.

Well, yea, I'm sure it will not go entirely unnoticed... but still, I think there could be done more.


Tweet/email Hilmar?

Send CCP door keys in the mail?


Emailed Seagull, Deddawn, and Hilmar. Got a reply from Seagull a while ago.

CCP Seagull wrote:
Thanks for the email!

CCP has always been excited about avatars in the EVE Universe, but it is currently not on the roadmap. And when we do put it on the roadmap, it is unlikely to go directly into EVE Online as you know it now, for a number of technical and practical reasons. But we now of course have the "EVE Universe" that can host more than one game - so what you want to look for is game announcements in the future rather than full avatar gameplay crammed into EVE Online the spaceship game - and CCP Hellmar is the guy to poke about it! :)

/Seagull


No response from Hilmar. Reddawn's response was significantly better, but that was some time ago now.

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1928 - 2013-09-22 11:29:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Another game removed/disconnected from EVE? Thanks, but not thanks...

I'm starting to feel more and more excited that other companies are willing to take the "complete scifie experience" route from the beginning... under the current "plan" CCP has, it's becoming quite obvious that they are no longer able (or willing) to do that... within one game, that is.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1929 - 2013-09-22 11:32:14 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
(...)Got a reply from Seagull a while ago.

CCP Seagull wrote:
Thanks for the email!

CCP has always been excited about avatars in the EVE Universe, but it is currently not on the roadmap. And when we do put it on the roadmap, it is unlikely to go directly into EVE Online as you know it now, for a number of technical and practical reasons. But we now of course have the "EVE Universe" that can host more than one game - so what you want to look for is game announcements in the future rather than full avatar gameplay crammed into EVE Online the spaceship game - and CCP Hellmar is the guy to poke about it! :)

/Seagull
(...)


So, essentially, the door will not open never and our avatars/characters will never be of any use in this game.

Way to go, CCP. Way to go.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1930 - 2013-09-22 11:34:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Way to go, CCP. Way to go.

Indeed... whoever thought that thinning "one Universe" over multiple games and platforms was a good idea, will have to answer a few question in 2-3 years... when SC and E D made avatar and spaceship content happen within one game. Roll

Of course, I'll be gone by then...

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Flamespar
WarRavens
#1931 - 2013-09-22 11:43:49 UTC
Well. It also seems crazy to put avatar tech into a game and then not use it.

Talk about wasted effort.
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1932 - 2013-09-22 11:46:17 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Another game removed/disconnected from EVE? Thanks, but not thanks...

I'm starting to feel more and more excited that other companies are willing to take the "complete scifie experience" route from the beginning... under the current "plan" CCP has, it's becoming quite obvious that they are no longer able (or willing) to do that... within one game, that is.


Frankly, CCP Seagull's mail just has cooled my interest on World of Darkness too. I hoped that WoD would open a door to have avatar gameplay in EVE, but apparently CCP's top brass have abandoned that. So why bother with CCP's products at all?

I've got a massive investment in this game, but if I have to start up from scratch in order to *use* human avatars, thanks but not, I will rather go elsewhere.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1933 - 2013-09-22 11:47:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Flamespar wrote:
Well. It also seems crazy to put avatar tech into a game and then not use it.

Talk about wasted effort.

...and there is that, of course. If the plan really is to never actually use it, why not remove it right now? To keep the people playing that actually want more avatar gameplay, and only stick with EVE because they think it will come?

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
I've got a massive investment in this game, but if I have to start up from scratch in order to *use* human avatars, thanks but not, I will rather go elsewhere.

Exactly... I dunno how old this e-mail is, but I feel the same way after reading that... Straight

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1934 - 2013-09-22 11:50:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
Flamespar wrote:
Well. It also seems crazy to put avatar tech into a game and then not use it.

Talk about wasted effort.


Amateurism can only float your boat drakkar so far, apparently. These are the guys we are giving our monies to and putting our hopes on...

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#1935 - 2013-09-22 12:00:26 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
Well. It also seems crazy to put avatar tech into a game and then not use it.

Talk about wasted effort.


Amateurism can only float your boat drakkar so far, apparently. These are the guys we are giving our monies to and putting our hopes on...


Holy ****. Those are some bad employee reviews.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1936 - 2013-09-22 12:16:09 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
Well. It also seems crazy to put avatar tech into a game and then not use it.

Talk about wasted effort.


Amateurism can only float your boat drakkar so far, apparently. These are the guys we are giving our monies to and putting our hopes on...


Holy ****. Those are some bad employee reviews.


I've been checking that site for almost 3 years (each 6 months or so) and there's a trend of bad habits that surface almost with every additional review. Some are expectable (Icelanders first, friends-of-friends, booze is good) but others are worrysome as they relate to the actual work being done.

But, on topic: if they're selling the game because of the ships, they should make that clear and stop teasing new players with the CQ. It would be a terrible blow to us, but they really should be honest about avatars, if their plan is to not use them never.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#1937 - 2013-09-22 12:42:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Now there is so little tease, that somewhat abysmal (for avatar gameplay lovers) Hilmar answer "maybe next year" when talking about the door and avatar gameplay, was expected as a joke, and invited as such in general.

Rhes and the others don't need to be be afraid. Lol
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1938 - 2013-09-22 12:49:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
But, on topic: if they're selling the game because of the ships, they should make that clear and stop teasing new players with the CQ. It would be a terrible blow to us, but they really should be honest about avatars, if their plan is to not use them never.

My thoughts exactly... but I guess they don't want to risk lossing subs over that, so they leave it in... no use/no harm.

Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Rhes and the others don't need to be be afraid. Lol

Yea, atleast not of us "evil roleplayers"... but they could start to be afraid for the game, if competition really ramps up like it seams to be in the next couple of years. No matter where EVE goes from here, but come next year, their status as "only real online sandbox spaceship game" will be gone for good soon.

...I've been to the SC and E D forums, and you'd be suprised how many EVE players run around there. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Flamespar
WarRavens
#1939 - 2013-09-22 12:50:31 UTC
Just got this from CCP Seagul on twitter.

"This is not the focus for EVE online the game, but CCP still holds the vision. Both me and Hilmar expressed this at fanfest."

Souns like a "no, but we are too afraid to be honest about it".
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1940 - 2013-09-22 13:11:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
Flamespar wrote:
Just got this from CCP Seagul on twitter.

"This is not the focus for EVE online the game, but CCP still holds the vision. Both me and Hilmar expressed this at fanfest."

Souns like a "no, but we are too afraid to be honest about it".


Yay, sounds like "no avatar gameplay in EVE online the game". But then, if I can't take Ishtanchuk (THIS Ishtanchuk, 4 years, 7 months and 13 days old, 66 million skillpoints) to a walk in EVE Online, the game I've given 5 years and 900+ euros, what's in it to me?

No matter if they made EVE Fuckingawezome: Walking in New Eden, my commitment/attachment is to my EVE characters, and in case I looked for other games to use these or other characters, for f*ck's ake! Those would not be any games from a company that cheated on me! Lol

It's CCP nonsense to the point of absurd.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you