Test Server Feedback

If by balanced you mean still sucking at tracking and still not putting out dps and still not having a range advantage then you are correct sir.

Thanks for pointing this out. The Rokh gets to deal 10% less damage per second with about 33% less volley damage than the next ship up (a ship that is considered so weak as to not be flown) for the glorious advantage of 10 extra km range? That's hardly worth those trade-offs. Caldari ships need to be re-evaluated to even be somewhat viable. When was the last time you saw someone flying Caldari into combat for something other than ECM (something that was considered the only advantage of Caldari right up until it got pummeled with the nerf bat) or POS bashing (an activity CCP acknowledges as being unfun)?



Okay, this is just comedic. The Ferox does 33% less damage per second than a similarly fit Hurricane with greater than 66% less volley damage? With a range difference of 6km? I knew the Ferox was severely underpowered, but I've never actually dug up the numbers before.

The Eagle is...lacking, the numbers above show that it either needs a DPS increase or a serious volley increase, but the real problems with the Eagle are the ship's speed, agility, and fitting.

This is ridiculous, CCP. Fix Caldari. If these numbers are correct, I can choose to try and contribute to a fight, and not actually matter, or I can choose to not be able to apply damage, because in the 20 - 30 seconds it takes my damage to reach a target the fight's over. Outside of ECM, there is no reason to bring Caldari into a combat scenario. This is bad design.



You have got to be joking.

I'm not trying to be rude, but seeing everything get buffed up around Caldari for about 5 years now has been extremely grating. The torpedo change, the Falcon nerf, almost every Caldari ship that's been introduced being sub-par or irrelevant, the introduction of explosion velocity. It's all added up and taken it's toll. Caldari is far and away the weakest race for any given combat scenario, outside of about two ships which play a support role instead of a direct combat role. Please fix Caldari.

This could actually be an elegant way to fix railguns, provided the breakdowns extended to faction and T2 ammo. Still needs some work, but it's a good place to start.

i am still hoping they will consider this. i only care about rails at this point; blasters are a lost cause.

Remove the tracking penalty from Void ammo. Replace it with a penalty to the WEAPON'S sig radius. Give Null ammo more range.

Fixed that for you.

The basic range from autocannons is *still* considerably higher than blasters.

The different T2 ammo and optimal/falloff on tracking mods bring it out of line.

I dont know if that is the solution, but its damn fine anyway. Thank you.

we're in the exact same boat. i resubbed cuz Gallente have my favourite ships. and why should 20% of the combat ships in game be useless? i want to be able to use my Deimos like people have been using the Zealot. Why the hell not? i cannot connect with any other race's ships for some reason (even though i've most of them trained up)...if i cant play Gall properly, wont play at all heh.

reason #2 FW, reason #3 AF's. im willing to continue my sub if hybrids and Gall ships are balanced properly. i dont mind waiting a little bit longer for 2 & 3, but the hybrid buff must be successful for Winter expansion in my eyes.

CCP Tallest best Tallest.