These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suicide Ganking: coming to an end?

First post
Author
Jenshae Chiroptera
#361 - 2011-11-07 05:21:12 UTC
Tippia wrote:
quote=Naari TalvanisHighsec was designed as the area's for casual players, industrialists, new players, etc, etc./quote
Debatable… and even if it were, why does that mean that cheap ganks should have come to an end 7 years ago?

Does
Tippia wrote:
quoteAt the very least it should not be easy and relatively effortless to destroy what players not as far into the game as yourself, new guys or casual players have worked very long to attain./quote
Why not? Everything should be relatively effortless to destroy, or it will stifle demand.

no one
Tippia wrote:
quoteBut just hanging around unchallenged untill you can blow something up..? Kinda cheap way of play, and can hardly be described as PvP./quote
It most certainly is PvP — it's another player that gets blown up after all. It just isn't fair, but that is kind of the whole point of doing it (and very much in line with how the game works in general). Moreover, if you can “just hang around unchallenged“, then a fair amount of work has gone into that, so the cheapness isn't really there.

else
Tippia wrote:
quoteThink the rewards in highsec are too high and people shouldn't be safe there?
Buff low and 0.0 and give people a reason to go there, like it used to be. /quote
That's a particularly bad solution for an economy that is already out of whack. Nerfs are often a far better solution than buffs, and people need to stop being so afraid of them.

find this
Tippia wrote:
quoteI'm really unable to believe that gankers actually believe there is some art to ganking when it's this easy./quote
If it is as easy as that, how come people are so utterly unable to uphold the consequences of ganking, in especially since it's made even easier by not even having to take CONCORD into consideration when doing so?

absurd?

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#362 - 2011-11-07 05:26:31 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Does no one else find this absurd?
Do you mean your quoting style or what I said?
If it's the former, then yes.
If it's the latter, what is it you find absurd about it?
Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#363 - 2011-11-07 05:29:58 UTC
This simply makes solo-ganking impossible, and encourages, yet more blobbing style attacks.

Even with an isk penalty implemented, people will still suicide thrashers/rifters etc to kill people.

The only way to solve this problem is to ether make highsec completely safe, (ie: no players can damage another player) or we debuff concord and teach the newbies how to play eve like it was made to be played.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DBVH6IVxas

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Jenshae Chiroptera
#364 - 2011-11-07 05:30:20 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Does no one else find this absurd?
Do you mean your quoting style or what I said?
If it's the former, then yes.
If it's the latter, what is it you find absurd about it?


You see a difference between our quoting styles? Shocked

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

yumike
Doomheim
#365 - 2011-11-07 05:41:41 UTC  |  Edited by: yumike
Tippia wrote:
So, who is crying?
yumike wrote:
Well then, let me assure you - suicide ganking is fine and frankly needed this.
How so? Why do they need this? Because it will give people an even more false sense of security?


Because as it stands now, If something drops more then 15ish mil depending on my module drop from my wreck - I made money.

At least after this i'll have to hit things that are worth 50mil or more (aka be a bit more intelligent about my ganks.) to pull a profit.
(Which, to be honest I already did. If it isn't worth more then 200mil that's in 2 or more seperate items, I didn't gank it.)
Now it's a little bit more rolling the dice then it was before, and that's not all bad. (Hell I popped a nearly 5bil isk cnr raven and only saw 25mil module drop, was slightly annoyed but I only lost ~20 mil on the two t1 bs trade for it)

There's no reason they should take that much risk when i'm virtually risk free (I go into every fight knowing I will die.)
It doesn't make sense.

If your arguement is "they shouldnt be using autopilot" then I do agree, but intelligent people isn't what this topic is about.

I risk giving kill rights to a bear for 30 days (And only ever had one drake pilot actually come hunt me down to try, which I applauded him for)

They risk.. Their ship + whatever isk is in their cargo hold.
As it stands right now on tq, I risk 10/20mil isk usually depending on my module drop/salvage (bc/bs).
When my potential earnings are in the billions (Got a geddon BPO my third week of suicide ganking, I was pretty pumped!)

Risk vs reward, They have all the risk already - all I have is potential and people are whining about 30mil insurance payouts being taken away?

It's mind blowing to be honest.

edited to add:

Tippia wrote:

Quote:
But just hanging around unchallenged untill you can blow something up..? Kinda cheap way of play, and can hardly be described as PvP.
It most certainly is PvP — it's another player that gets blown up after all. It just isn't fair, but that is kind of the whole point of doing it (and very much in line with how the game works in general). Moreover, if you can “just hang around unchallenged“, then a fair amount of work has gone into that, so the cheapness isn't really there.


I agree to the point it's pvp that im firing on another player, But honestly the accuracy of my shipscanner/cargo scanner is the real deal breaker (I try to make a habbit of scanning twice when I can, its important to be on the landing gate in the next door system, rather then the incoming gate they are warping from).

It's really interesting reading your thoughts on it tippia, and I mean in a perfect world I think there is better ways for ccp to deal with this too - The only real difference is I see why this change is necessary it seems.

Glad to see your not falling for all the troll bait!
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#366 - 2011-11-07 05:43:41 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Does no one else find this absurd?
Do you mean your quoting style or what I said?
If it's the former, then yes.
If it's the latter, what is it you find absurd about it?


You see a difference between our quoting styles? Shocked


I dont in some cases... Big smile thats what i thought when i looked up to your post from Tippia response.

Seriously i got my smile for the morning.
Alxea
Unstable Pirate Sharks Of The Damed Sea
#367 - 2011-11-07 05:54:48 UTC
If you believe this will effect suicide ganking, you would be sadly mistaken. Suicide ganks will increase prob more with the ones who are -10.0. Because people are under the impression they are safer in highsec space and think people will not fork over the money to do it. Oh they can and they will. If not for profit but for the tears.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#368 - 2011-11-07 06:01:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Ladie Harlot
Naari Talvanis wrote:
Ofcourse ganking should still be possible, but only if there are genuine motivationspowering the effort such as;

-Extremely valuable loot in 1 fragile ship.
-Wanting to hurt a certain corporation that you've been clashing with, either in highsec or outside of highsec. (improve wardec mechanics.)
-Wanting to be a dangerous enough group of pirates to actually fight your way into protected empire territories and organise raids there. (People can actually anticipate and defend against that. )
-Wanting revenge bad enough for some reason.

So is economic warfare by denial of resources a good enough reason or motivation?

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#369 - 2011-11-07 06:08:05 UTC
It's better than (ugh, I just noticed I have only one like...bleh....anyway) nothing, but it's not quite what is appropriate, which is all pirates are enemies of any sovereignty where they commit their crimes, and are shot on sight. C'mon. Blackbeard had to deal wivvit. So should you wannabee Blackbeards out there. Until that's a feature in this game, ganking is a child's enterprise carried out by children clomping around in their daddy's shoes trying to look like big guys. Smear that on your thumb and suck it diapered tough guys.

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

Handsome Hussein
#370 - 2011-11-07 06:11:08 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:
This simply makes solo-ganking impossible, and encourages, yet more blobbing style attacks.

Please explain this. I can solo-gank all day in Thrashers from money I make on my alt doing L3s (he's not in an L4-capable boat yet) WITHOUT insurance.

Leaves only the fresh scent of pine.

Handsome Hussein
#371 - 2011-11-07 06:12:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Handsome Hussein
Handsome Hussein wrote:
Terminal Insanity wrote:
This simply makes solo-ganking impossible, and encourages, yet more blobbing style attacks.

Please explain this. I can solo-gank all day in Thrashers from money I make on my alt doing L3s (he's not in an L4-capable boat yet) WITHOUT insurance.


Hell, I can go out an run a single anom in 0.4 and get enough off bounties to buy and fit a gank Thrasher. Ten minutes tops, if I'm being lazy.

Quote button right next to edit... Stupid.

Leaves only the fresh scent of pine.

Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#372 - 2011-11-07 06:15:35 UTC
Handsome Hussein wrote:
Terminal Insanity wrote:
This simply makes solo-ganking impossible, and encourages, yet more blobbing style attacks.

Please explain this. I can solo-gank all day in Thrashers from money I make on my alt doing L3s (he's not in an L4-capable boat yet) WITHOUT insurance.

I should have chosen my words better... it doesnt make it impossible, just much more costly.

I could gank a hulk in a single tempest, but without insurance im not very likely to do this. Instead, i'll use thrashers, and be forced to team up with a bunch of other people to gank what my tempest could have done alone

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Handsome Hussein
#373 - 2011-11-07 06:18:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Handsome Hussein
Terminal Insanity wrote:
I should have chosen my words better... it doesnt make it impossible, just much more costly.

I could gank a hulk in a single tempest, but without insurance im not very likely to do this. Instead, i'll use thrashers, and be forced to team up with a bunch of other people to gank what my tempest could have done alone

It really depends on what the target is. If I want to gank a Hulk, I get the gang together in Thrashers. If I want to gank a Retriever, I do it myself. Sometimes I get to can-clip and lose nothing. Twisted

Insurance changes nothing, except to create a false sense of security.

But then, by now in this conversation, everyone should know that.

Leaves only the fresh scent of pine.

Mistah Ewedynao
Ice Axe Psycho Killers
#374 - 2011-11-07 06:21:43 UTC
You guys actually WORK for a living in Eve?

Might wanna spend a little more time thinking about how to make iskies easy instead of ganking badgers.

Buncha tards.

Nerf Goons

Nuke em from orbit....it's the only way to be sure.

Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#375 - 2011-11-07 06:21:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Terminal Insanity
Handsome Hussein wrote:
Terminal Insanity wrote:
I should have chosen my words better... it doesnt make it impossible, just much more costly.

I could gank a hulk in a single tempest, but without insurance im not very likely to do this. Instead, i'll use thrashers, and be forced to team up with a bunch of other people to gank what my tempest could have done alone

It really depends on what the target is. If I want to gank a Hulk, I get the gang together in Thrashers. If I want to gank a Retriever, I do it myself. Sometimes I get to can-clip and lose nothing. Twisted

Insurance changes nothing, except to create a false sense of security.

But then, by now in this conversation, everyone should know that.


I completely agree insurance changes will do absolutly nothing to the number of ships suicide ganked. Infact i'd bet there will be an increase for a while, just out of spite.
But It does change the methods used to gank. I would much rather use a team of cheap thrashers then my lone tempest. I'll actually be saving isk by being forced into this method.

And the encouragement of these blob techniques in additional gameplay areas, is only going to make it that much harder for new players to get into it on their own, or in their small corps.

I'm just a bit saddened that i cant use my tempest anymore (not cant, but... for price reasons, wont)

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#376 - 2011-11-07 06:24:52 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:
Handsome ******* wrote:
Terminal Insanity wrote:
I should have chosen my words better... it doesnt make it impossible, just much more costly.

I could gank a hulk in a single tempest, but without insurance im not very likely to do this. Instead, i'll use thrashers, and be forced to team up with a bunch of other people to gank what my tempest could have done alone

It really depends on what the target is. If I want to gank a Hulk, I get the gang together in Thrashers. If I want to gank a Retriever, I do it myself. Sometimes I get to can-clip and lose nothing. Twisted

Insurance changes nothing, except to create a false sense of security.

But then, by now in this conversation, everyone should know that.


I completely agree insurance changes will do absolutly nothing to the number of ships suicide ganked. Infact i'd bet there will be an increase for a while, just out of spite.
But It does change the methods used to gank. I would much rather use a team of cheap thrashers then my lone tempest. I'll actually be saving isk by being forced into this method.

And the re-inforcement of these blob techniques in additional gameplay areas, is only going to make it that much harder for new players to get into it on their own, or in their small corps.

I'm just a bit saddened that i cant use my tempest anymore (not cant, but... for price reasons, wont)
boo hoo

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

Renturu
In Glorium et Decorum
#377 - 2011-11-07 06:53:16 UTC
I posted about this in another forum, er... post. I feel insurance, period, is dumb. If you have been playing for more than a year and cannot figure out how to properly fit ANY ship, nor afford to replace it, you should not play this game. I think for players less than a year old, would be fine... Scratch that... ACCOUNTS less than a year old (to avoid alt isk sinks).

I tell all of our noobs: "If you cant afford to lose it, don't use it."

By the orders of PlunderBunny: ☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

Michael Holmes Holmes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#378 - 2011-11-07 07:08:44 UTC
Renturu wrote:
I posted about this in another forum, er... post. I feel insurance, period, is dumb. If you have been playing for more than a year and cannot figure out how to properly fit ANY ship, nor afford to replace it, you should not play this game. I think for players less than a year old, would be fine... Scratch that... ACCOUNTS less than a year old (to avoid alt isk sinks).

I tell all of our noobs: "If you cant afford to lose it, don't use it."



The insurance system is a way to know that the loss of your very pricey Machariel (sp?) will not be such a heavy burden because you will get something to compensate for the loss, will it cover the whole ship? no, but it will help you get yourself in another in less time.

I love how everyone has this really funny idea that this game should not be fun, but work. I do not play this game to feel like I have to juggle another stressful career or to have more money issues than I already have. I play this game for fun and prefer that I can lose a ship and get back in the saddle pretty quick with a platinum policy payout.

The problem with your attitude and the attitude of many on this thread is that you have some funny idea of how EVE "should be played". You think that unless they use your favorite fits and ships that they are just being dumb. I even have seen some (cough, cough, Tippia) who seem to think that this game should only be played a certain way and that you should be punished for trying anything else.

What do you think this is? Different people take different things from the game and sometimes they don't do what you want everyone to do, you just gotta relax and get over it.
Michael Holmes Holmes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#379 - 2011-11-07 07:21:25 UTC
Before I go to bed for the night.

Does anybody else find the whole thread utterly absurd?

I mean, some are really loudly complaining because they won't get a payout from a insurance organization in EVE when they get blown up by the INGAME POLICE for doing things that are illegal INGAME.

Are we not supposed to consider the fact that New Eden is NOT some sort of savage post apocalyptic wasteland but more along the lines of a Mafia controlled city during the 20's and 30's. The ingame universe gives us a structure of law and order that cannot keep up with the demands that Capsuleer's put on it, we can go round and round about the who "gets EVE" more but in the end we cannot deny that concord is the police in the game and if they destroy you for breaking the law than it makes perfect sense to not expect your insurance company to give you a payout blindly.

I don't care if you gank, but don't act like that is the only thing you should be doing in EVE and that doing anything else makes you no better than a target.

besides, I doubt you would have much to shoot at if carebears could not build your ships and ammo for you.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#380 - 2011-11-07 07:24:32 UTC
Michael Holmes Holmes wrote:


besides, I doubt you would have much to shoot at if carebears could not build your ships and ammo for you.


Thats what alts are for.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden