These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NULL whiners mantra is getting tedious... and CSM lacks HI SEC representation

First post First post
Author
Frying Doom
#581 - 2012-09-04 08:35:50 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
1) PVE is boring

I'm sure CCP knows. I'm also sure the people who would unsubscribe over "boring PVE" aren't right for EVE anyways, since they're obviously not playing EVE as a sandbox game.

Frying Doom wrote:
2) protecting the status que, to request a balancing and reduction of nerfing

What if balancing means nerfs are needed?

Frying Doom wrote:
3) Help to ease the passage to moving to Lo-sec and Null.

What if this means a need to nerf hisec in certain areas?

You are not seriously asking me if Hi-sec needs nerfs are you?Lol
Yeah PVE is as boring as hell and it is not so much people will leave over it but more might stay if it wasn't so horrible.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#582 - 2012-09-04 08:36:09 UTC
I live in the same country you do.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#583 - 2012-09-04 08:36:24 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Well they should still be lead, then if they don't where is the nearest dog food company?Lol

They have been lead by CCP, by the CSM candidates, by the gaming community, etc etc etc. It didn't help.

Frying Doom wrote:
It never hurts to try and makes us a better community for trying.

No, it makes us ******** for bashing our heads against an impenetrable wall.

Frying Doom wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
They are: they've got Darius III, which seems to match the apathetic playerbase perfectly.

No he just represents apathetic scamers.

No, he represents the apathetic playerbase perfectly: loved to ***** about how **** things were, went completely absent when it actually mattered.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#584 - 2012-09-04 08:40:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Kryss Darkdust
Quote:
Yeah PVE is as boring as hell and it is not so much people will leave over it but more might stay if it wasn't so horrible


Not to switch topics here, but I think the point here is that if your playing Eve for PvE content.... you missed the point of Eve. PvE is there as a filler, not its primary content, unlike most MMO's in which PvP is the filler and PvE is the primary game content.

PvE in Eve is fine and serves its purpose. A little bit of farming to make some ISK to get yourself going, fill out your income a bit or entertain you while you wait for your friends to log in. If its all you do, than yeah, your probably going to get bored, but I don't see how focusing on PvE content in a game designed for Player interaction would improve it. And what we are really talking about here is Solo content, which to me has zero logic in an MMO (Multiplayer) ... say it with me.. if you play Eve alone, your doing it wrong.

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 

Frying Doom
#585 - 2012-09-04 08:42:27 UTC
Kryss Darkdust wrote:
Quote:
So all in all you are saying the apathetic should not vote. Also that we should not bother to educate them further, so that we should be apathetic. Interesting logic.


I'm not sure how you got that from what I said, but NO pretty much the exact opposite of everything you said. I do think they should vote, i think everyone should vote. As for education, the information is out there and readily available. Most of the CSM's that run have their own blogs and liberally share their opinions on the forums not to mention media coverage by the various Eve news publications, Eve Radio., hell they even do meeting minutes!. its all over the bloody place. There is no mystery here. People have to take the initiative on their own however, you can't expect that CCP or anyone else for that matter go out of their way to force everyone to listen to the the issues and force them to vote if they have no interest in it. And if they have no interest in it, why would you expect them to be represented on the CSM? And even if you did, how are we supposed to know what would accurately represent them if they don't vote and share their opinion?

What your basically saying is that "everyone should be represented", but its up to everyone EXCEPT the people who you require to be represented to figure out what would actually represent them? I mean I have no idea what the opinion of these people are because they don't vote or participate in the system.

Quote:
The CSM should be a representation of all the people who play this game not just the huge 3% or lower minorities. There is no excuse for us to be apathetic in trying to educate the rest of the populous.


Again your acting like its some sort of conspiracy. Even if that 3% was accurate (which I don't believe it is, but its irrelevant anyway) the fact remains that YES I do believe that people who vote should be represented and YES I do believe its up to each individual to take the time to educate themselves. The material is available, anyone with any interest in the issue will have no trouble finding thousands of pages of opinions on any given topic and CSM's point of view. If only 3% vote, than only 3% should be represented.

Governments spend fortunes on educating people is stupid crap, All I am asking is that we try harder to educate our own. Oh and no it is not a conspiracy the non-voting are non-voting for what ever there reasons and there is no real rason for us not to try harder to educate them either. Is the current situation to the advantage of the minorities? Yes it is. Is it in there interest to keep it as it is? Yep. So a conspiracy is not a conspiracy if it is just a fact.

Oh and 3% is actually over stating it its 2 point something but close enough to 3%. The material is available if people did not have real lives that might interfere and they have to be aware there is something they need to know about.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#586 - 2012-09-04 08:43:30 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
You are not seriously asking me if Hi-sec needs nerfs are you?Lol

I'm not asking if hisec needs nerfs, I'm asking you "what if hisec does need nerfs, in the name of balance?"

If something is overpowered, sometimes the way to fix it isn't to boost everything else, but to nerf the thing which is overpowered.

Frying Doom wrote:
Yeah PVE is as boring as hell and it is not so much people will leave over it but more might stay if it wasn't so horrible.

And more might stay a lot longer if low/nullsec was more enticing than it is to live in right now, both areas have severe sucking chestwounds of a magnitude which hisec does not.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#587 - 2012-09-04 08:44:31 UTC
Kryss Darkdust wrote:
Quote:
Yeah PVE is as boring as hell and it is not so much people will leave over it but more might stay if it wasn't so horrible


Not to switch topics here, but I think the point here is that if your playing Eve for PvE content.... you missed the point of Eve. PvE is there as a filler, not its primary content, unlike most MMO's in which PvP is the filler and PvE is the primary game content.

PvE in Eve is fine and serves its purpose. A little bit of farming to make some ISK to get yourself going, fill out your income a bit or entertain you while you wait for your friends to log in. If its all you do, than yeah, your probably going to get bored, but I don't see how focusing on PvE content in a game designed for Player interaction would improve it. And what we are really talking about here is Solo content, which to me has zero logic in an MMO (Multiplayer) ... say it with me.. if you play Eve alone, your doing it wrong.

From my perspective anything that will make things more interesting and expand the player-base (without totally destroying the flavour of EvE) is a good thing. More player=More Money=More developers=More fixes and fun expansions.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#588 - 2012-09-04 08:51:01 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
You are not seriously asking me if Hi-sec needs nerfs are you?Lol

I'm not asking if hisec needs nerfs, I'm asking you "what if hisec does need nerfs, in the name of balance?"

If something is overpowered, sometimes the way to fix it isn't to boost everything else, but to nerf the thing which is overpowered.

Unfortunately that leads down the road called Montyhaul, never a good thing. Done in stages small nerfs to Hi and small increases to the others this would work and it looks like it might be the road they will take.

Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Yeah PVE is as boring as hell and it is not so much people will leave over it but more might stay if it wasn't so horrible.

And more might stay a lot longer if low/nullsec was more enticing than it is to live in right now, both areas have severe sucking chestwounds of a magnitude which hisec does not.

The biggest problem to changing Null is the amount of resources that have occurred so far, we could spend more resources trying to fix null and end up with a nother pile of trash to throw on the heap.

I am not saying Null does not suck the big one because it does.

Also on top of everything else you now have Alliances with more money than can be dreamed of (Except Test "Just about Bankrupt" Alliance) after the whole tech fiasco, where they decided the top down method of funding was better instead of bottom up so any new alliance going to Null has to kiss butt or just get exterminated by blobs in continuously replacing ships.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#589 - 2012-09-04 08:51:50 UTC
Quote:
From my perspective anything that will make things more interesting and expand the player-base (without totally destroying the flavour of EvE) is a good thing. More player=More Money=More developers=More fixes and fun expansions.


It may seem logical, but from a perspective of "realism" the best way to expand your game is to build on its existing success, or do I need to remind you of the Star Wars Galaxies "NGE"?

Eve is a game about player vs. player competition. 90% of all mechanics in the game function on some form of conflict and all conflicts can be resolved with a blaster. To create some sort of Theme Park embedded gameplay in the middle of that is a waste of money and resource and would do nothing to increase numbers, quite to the contrary, CCP has already tried to make this more like "other MMO's" and people quit this game by the thousands as a result (WIS anyone?).

This games focus should be on what it does best... and the CSM represents that opinion, the opinion of the most passionate, most educated and most involved players.

Now regarding the 3%... again this is 3% of people that voted, it does not by a long shot mean that everyone else in the game is of opposite opinion of those 3%. Its more likely that people do not vote because their interests are already represented whether they vote or not because I believe that the majority of all players in Eve play this game because of its current design (A PvP Focused Game) and not because of some hope that it will one day be some sort of PvE theme park playground.

PvE content has been relatively unchanged in Eve over the course of its lifespan and its population has increased year by year for most of its life span... So the draw to this game is not PvE. I bet if everyone voted, their would still be no representation of PvE players on the CSM panel.

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 

Frying Doom
#590 - 2012-09-04 08:53:52 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Well they should still be lead, then if they don't where is the nearest dog food company?Lol

They have been lead by CCP, by the CSM candidates, by the gaming community, etc etc etc. It didn't help.

Frying Doom wrote:
It never hurts to try and makes us a better community for trying.

No, it makes us ******** for bashing our heads against an impenetrable wall.

Frying Doom wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
They are: they've got Darius III, which seems to match the apathetic playerbase perfectly.

No he just represents apathetic scamers.

No, he represents the apathetic playerbase perfectly: loved to ***** about how **** things were, went completely absent when it actually mattered.

If Darius III is not a good reason why the majority need to vote bugger all will be, he wasn't there for CSM 6 and got re-elected by so few votes I think a Hi-sec newbie could have gotten more if they tried.

Although it might be a wall we still need to try and bash it down to educate them.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#591 - 2012-09-04 08:58:03 UTC
Kryss Darkdust wrote:
Quote:
From my perspective anything that will make things more interesting and expand the player-base (without totally destroying the flavour of EvE) is a good thing. More player=More Money=More developers=More fixes and fun expansions.


It may seem logical, but from a perspective of "realism" the best way to expand your game is to build on its existing success, or do I need to remind you of the Star Wars Galaxies "NGE"?

Eve is a game about player vs. player competition. 90% of all mechanics in the game function on some form of conflict and all conflicts can be resolved with a blaster. To create some sort of Theme Park embedded gameplay in the middle of that is a waste of money and resource and would do nothing to increase numbers, quite to the contrary, CCP has already tried to make this more like "other MMO's" and people quit this game by the thousands as a result (WIS anyone?).

This games focus should be on what it does best... and the CSM represents that opinion, the opinion of the most passionate, most educated and most involved players.

Now regarding the 3%... again this is 3% of people that voted, it does not by a long shot mean that everyone else in the game is of opposite opinion of those 3%. Its more likely that people do not vote because their interests are already represented whether they vote or not because I believe that the majority of all players in Eve play this game because of its current design (A PvP Focused Game) and not because of some hope that it will one day be some sort of PvE theme park playground.

PvE content has been relatively unchanged in Eve over the course of its lifespan and its population has increased year by year for most of its life span... So the draw to this game is not PvE. I bet if everyone voted, their would still be no representation of PvE players on the CSM panel.

The 3% is 3% of the populous, so lets get that out of the way. Eve is so much more than PvP if this was just PvP I would not be here, I prefer world of tanks for that. EvE is a lot of different players all within the same sandbox, not it is a sand box not a boxing ring. Making PVE better would make the game better, so please don't just throw around a catchy fraze like theme park, because I believe you can play paint ball at some theme parks.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#592 - 2012-09-04 08:59:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom

Well thank BoB you are not from the United states of Americans Lol
But 57.37% is not to bad a turn out, so I presume this would mean parties and the government its self are encouraging people to vote with adverts and scare tactics.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#593 - 2012-09-04 09:01:38 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Unfortunately that leads down the road called Montyhaul, never a good thing. Done in stages small nerfs to Hi and small increases to the others this would work and it looks like it might be the road they will take.

Except I haven't seen as many nerfs to hisec as I have seen to nullsec the past 2-3 years, and the one nerf I've seen to hisec has been made for exactly the same reason as the one made to anoms: it was too much isk. I still think hisec has too much isk available to it, especially given the complete lack of effort needed to gain it, otherwise most nullsec people wouldn't be running around with a hisec alt (or more) specifically just to make money to feed their PVP habit.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#594 - 2012-09-04 09:03:17 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
If Darius III is not a good reason why the majority need to vote bugger all will be, he wasn't there for CSM 6 and got re-elected by so few votes I think a Hi-sec newbie could have gotten more if they tried.

And you think throwing more votes at the problem, by people who don't give a **** about the process, would solve this?

Do pigs fly?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#595 - 2012-09-04 09:03:33 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Unfortunately that leads down the road called Montyhaul, never a good thing. Done in stages small nerfs to Hi and small increases to the others this would work and it looks like it might be the road they will take.

Except I haven't seen as many nerfs to hisec as I have seen to nullsec the past 2-3 years, and the one nerf I've seen to hisec has been made for exactly the same reason as the one made to anoms: it was too much isk. I still think hisec has too much isk available to it, especially given the complete lack of effort needed to gain it, otherwise most nullsec people wouldn't be running around with a hisec alt (or more) specifically just to make money to feed their PVP habit.

I agree completely but I think hi-sec needs nerf while the others are boosted, not to much from column A and not to much from B. Especially with the amount of whining that seems to occur with any nerf or buff.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#596 - 2012-09-04 09:05:23 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
If Darius III is not a good reason why the majority need to vote bugger all will be, he wasn't there for CSM 6 and got re-elected by so few votes I think a Hi-sec newbie could have gotten more if they tried.

And you think throwing more votes at the problem, by people who don't give a **** about the process, would solve this?

Do pigs fly?

If the pigs were more educated then we might have a situation where all pigs are equal, while some still being more equal than others of course Lol

I think better education might actually remove the problem if more people decide to follow it further.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#597 - 2012-09-04 09:17:28 UTC
Quote:
The 3% is 3% of the populous, so lets get that out of the way. Eve is so much more than PvP if this was just PvP I would not be here, I prefer world of tanks for that. EvE is a lot of different players all within the same sandbox, not it is a sand box not a boxing ring. Making PVE better would make the game better, so please don't just throw around a catchy fraze like theme park, because I believe you can play paint ball at some theme parks.


Point is that even if you pursue PvE, most of these activities ultimately lead you to PvP by design as this is the focus of the game. whether your are trading, mining, building, researching, mission running or anything else for that matter, if you want to function at its highest level, you must expose yourself to the dangers of PvP and in many ways even these activities are competitive in their own right which while not combat is still a very firm form of PvP, by design.

There is very little you can do in this game without infringing on someone else's game play. Put up a PI base and your syphoning resources from a competitor, put products for sale, and your underselling a competitor, run Level 4 missions and by selling loot on the local market you are lowering the income of other mission runners, go out and mine, and you suck up asteroids another player would have profited for it. All these situations can be resolved through direct conflicts and very efficiently I might add.

So while you can pretend like you live in the comforts of a little bubble of safety and solo PvE content, you don't and anyone who has played this game for any length of time quickly discovers that while this "PvE" content can earn you some ISK and has its entertainment value, by and large the focus on the majority of the design and focus of this game is on the PvP element of this game so while it is more than PvP, its only so for the unmotivated and uncreative, people who effectively play in a sandbox and don't know what to do with it.

Any venture worth doing in Eve will put you in conflict with other players, at the heart of Eve is this design and it is the heart and soul of the game.

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 

betoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#598 - 2012-09-04 09:17:33 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
[quote=DarthNefarius]
Who would be a "hisec representative", then? What issues, other than "PVE is boring :( :( :(" should they push for you to accept them?


You keep asking the same question despite the fact its been answered several times by several people....
Frying Doom
#599 - 2012-09-04 09:18:31 UTC
betoli wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
[quote=DarthNefarius]
Who would be a "hisec representative", then? What issues, other than "PVE is boring :( :( :(" should they push for you to accept them?


You keep asking the same question despite the fact its been answered several times by several people....

I missed that one but welcome to normal eve online tactics.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Signal11th
#600 - 2012-09-04 09:19:34 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
If Darius III is not a good reason why the majority need to vote bugger all will be, he wasn't there for CSM 6 and got re-elected by so few votes I think a Hi-sec newbie could have gotten more if they tried.

And you think throwing more votes at the problem, by people who don't give a **** about the process, would solve this?

Do pigs fly?

If the pigs were more educated then we might have a situation where all pigs are equal, while some still being more equal than others of course Lol

I think better education might actually remove the problem if more people decide to follow it further.



Why waste time and money? You can use this as a snapshot of life, some people are more likely to educate themselves to rise above their current circumstances, some people will just remain what they are no matter how much time effort and money you throw at them.

It's not like people aren't aware of the elections when they come around, Christ it's plastered everywhere. If people don't even understand the basic concept of voting I don't think any amount of education will make much difference.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!