These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM 7 - We Should Not Accept This Behavior!!

First post First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#221 - 2012-03-27 22:57:28 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
How is she doing this exactly?
Read the OP (and most of her other posts): demands of condemnation and guilt-by-association rhetorics.
michaelthered
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#222 - 2012-03-27 22:58:38 UTC
Tergerom Loregeron wrote:
Oh by the way I once told an Assisted Suicide advocate he should kill himself. Maybe some of you white knight moral crusaders could tell me what to think and how to feel about it?



BTW the clothes you wear and the electronics you use are made by people who are frequently forced into conditions where they would WILLINGLY commit suicide as an escape. Maybe you can do something about that for me, or are you guys hypocrites?

Need a hint?



"white knight moral crusaders"....said with such sarcasm and derision as if people being repulsed by someone petitioning people to troll another human being to kill himself for really no particular good reason, can't really think of a good reason but I digress. That's a really irritating sentiment.....mocking being a decent human being. wtf?
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#223 - 2012-03-27 23:03:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
Tippia wrote:
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
How is she doing this exactly?
Read the OP (and most of her other posts): demands of condemnation and guilt-by-association rhetorics.


Ugh, ::threadnought::

But, alright, re-reading OP, and wading through the goonie-dross now...

E: Or, should I just go play SW: tOR? I've only got 2-odd days left in my free trial account they gave me from being a beta-tester. And say what you will about "WoW with lightsabres"--I wouldn't disagree there!--but SW: tOR's PvE component is much more engaging than EVE's is Blink

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Hailey Sunweaver
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#224 - 2012-03-27 23:05:06 UTC
Issler

I believe before you come out calling for Mittens to stand down you should work with your fellow CSM 7 members. At this point it just sounds like your headhunting and trying to push your OWN personal agenda. So how about you get off your soapbox and work with the CSM elect before someone starts a recall thread for you.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#225 - 2012-03-27 23:07:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Ugh, ::threadnought::

Bit, alright, re-reading OP, and wading through the goonie-dross now...
Actually, it's easier than that, so don't sweat it.

At this point, anyone who joins this ridiculous baying-for-blood mob is no better (and in a couple of very explicit cases much, much worse) than the person they're going after. The sheer hypocrisy of the of harassment that has been levelled is just appalling
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#226 - 2012-03-27 23:09:15 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:

As for Issler she looks like being scapegoated at the moment. Understand, I didn't vote for her, I didn't much like her policies. But she is trying to push an agenda of personal responsibility from the current CSM team where we get to see what each of them actually *think* about this crisis rather than disappearing behind a magic curtain and letting the "wizard" tell us how its going to be.

...

Other CSM's seem to closing ranks and trying to laugh it off and tell us how it doesn't matter because the mining barge guy didn't actually die - but that is so not the point.


The only thing that is being consistently asked of Issler is that she participate in CSM discussions before trying to discredit all of us because we didn't all rush to publish scathing remarks alongside her. If that's being scapegoated, so be it. I don't think its too much to ask that we discuss things among ourselves before making public statements.

Especially for those of us that are new to the council, I don't see any value in refusing to listen to every party involved first and foremost. Not just to the players, but to Alex, and to the CCP staff as well. It's a bit unfair to say that because most of us would prefer to get a full 360-degree view of the situation before speaking about it that it means we are somehow "closing ranks", or "laughing it off", or letting "the wizard" tell us what to say.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#227 - 2012-03-27 23:17:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
Tippia wrote:
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Ugh, ::threadnought::

Bit, alright, re-reading OP, and wading through the goonie-dross now...
Actually, it's easier than that, so don't sweat it.

At this point, anyone who joins this ridiculous baying-for-blood mob is no better (and in a couple of very explicit cases much, much worse) than the person they're going after. The sheer hypocrisy of the of harassment that has been levelled is just appalling


That's going to happen regardless, though:

Regardless of whether the OP is trying to make political hay or not, Mittens did cross a line that should never be crossed, IMHO, and did so in an utterly reprehensible manner.

[cynicism]

Yes, he's apologised--although how sincere that is, I couldn't really guess. It's not like he could have done anything else in the name of damage-control, yes?

[/cynicism]

Some posters in this and other threads are right--a statement from the CSM is needed, and/or one from CCP, bearing in mind that this could set an..."interesting" precedent for the future.

Mittens: You should practise and get some experience holding your liquor before the next FanFest!

E: A collective statement, I mean.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#228 - 2012-03-27 23:28:36 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Sir Marksalot wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Jade you are generally regarded as the worst CSM chairman and it is generally accepted every idea you had on how to run the CSM was wrong, why do you feel your input is useful here.


Because pretty much everything I advocated on the CSM is already in the game or about to arrive, because under my chairmanship Eve online had excellent press coverage in the gaming press and mainstream media from New York to London and Paris, because I managed to keep my dignity and temper and didn't get righteously drunk on stage at fanfest and embarrass myself and every decent player of this game by coughing out cod-sadistic nonsense and calling on my fellow players to be trolled into suicide.

Plus I had the good grace to give the next guy a go when my term was up rather than trying to cling on to power like some kind of monomaniac limpet-brained bloodsucker with an desperate need to be loved and feared in equal measure.

That about covers it Big smile


having 10,000 votes is not 'clinging to power'


I wonder how many of those votes are/were alts? Given the not-insignificant percentage of votes from under-30d-old characters and allRoll

That number doesn't mean **** one way or the other without an explicit breakdown of account-vs-RL-player, and of what in-game demographic those accounts represent, and if they are alt-accounts, and for what purpose they are, if they are, among other factors.

Enough with this puerile crap alreadyRollUgh

TL/DR: That number means nothing given the prevalence of alt-accounts in this game. You should find a "meatier" statistic to play with.

Next!



Do your really think you should be weighing in on a debate, if you can't read a simple table? It's really not so hard to understand, so maybe take a good hard look at it again and you may see that 0 players under 30 days voted and the players you refer to were indeed 30-250 days old.

How do you expect anyone to respect your opinion if you are blatantly lieing or too stupid to read.


"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#229 - 2012-03-27 23:32:00 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
[quote=Jade Constantine]
Especially for those of us that are new to the council, I don't see any value in refusing to listen to every party involved first and foremost. Not just to the players, but to Alex, and to the CCP staff as well. It's a bit unfair to say that because most of us would prefer to get a full 360-degree view of the situation before speaking about it that it means we are somehow "closing ranks", or "laughing it off", or letting "the wizard" tell us what to say.


Well I'm referring specifically to CSM's who posted in the apology thread with things like "I completely support Mittani as chair and he has my sword for life!" in advance of any kind of discussion or resolution. If we the players are supposed to have patience and wait for these matters to be discussed (genuinely and openly) within the CSM council then is it too much to ask that the CSM's on the council wait a bit before declaring their eternal loyalty and devotion to the "king of space"?

It does give the wrong impression of when the notion of a serious discussion is prefaced with certain CSM's spoiling the outcome with florid pledges of loyalty and vassal service to their space lord.

Bottom line Hans, if this discussion of the Mittani scandal is swift and has a clear outcome and we get to see who said what to whom and why in the making of any decisions you are empowered to make then thats fair enough.

If on the other hand it ends up like the candy-coated whitewash nonsense of the previous CSM where the intention was to deny us players a view of who was for and against particular proposals then it will be decidedly unsatisfactory and end up wreaking of corruption and responsibility-evasion.


The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#230 - 2012-03-27 23:36:49 UTC
Jade, you've pretty much explicitly stated you're not concerned about condeming what Mitanni said, for you this is about condeming Mitanni's approach to the chairmanship.

Attacking the CSM for being silent and then attacking the many of us who posted stuff.. you dont have to do that. We get it.

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#231 - 2012-03-27 23:43:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
Doctor Eezee wrote:
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Sir Marksalot wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Jade you are generally regarded as the worst CSM chairman and it is generally accepted every idea you had on how to run the CSM was wrong, why do you feel your input is useful here.


Because pretty much everything I advocated on the CSM is already in the game or about to arrive, because under my chairmanship Eve online had excellent press coverage in the gaming press and mainstream media from New York to London and Paris, because I managed to keep my dignity and temper and didn't get righteously drunk on stage at fanfest and embarrass myself and every decent player of this game by coughing out cod-sadistic nonsense and calling on my fellow players to be trolled into suicide.

Plus I had the good grace to give the next guy a go when my term was up rather than trying to cling on to power like some kind of monomaniac limpet-brained bloodsucker with an desperate need to be loved and feared in equal measure.

That about covers it Big smile


having 10,000 votes is not 'clinging to power'


I wonder how many of those votes are/were alts? Given the not-insignificant percentage of votes from under-30d-old characters and allRoll

That number doesn't mean **** one way or the other without an explicit breakdown of account-vs-RL-player, and of what in-game demographic those accounts represent, and if they are alt-accounts, and for what purpose they are, if they are, among other factors.

Enough with this puerile crap alreadyRollUgh

TL/DR: That number means nothing given the prevalence of alt-accounts in this game. You should find a "meatier" statistic to play with.

Next!



Do your really think you should be weighing in on a debate, if you can't read a simple table? It's really not so hard to understand, so maybe take a good hard look at it again and you may see that 0 players under 30 days voted and the players you refer to were indeed 30-250 days old.

How do you expect anyone to respect your opinion if you are blatantly lieing or too stupid to read.




So I spoke imprecisely--I meant plus-30d.

But the question still stands:

How many of those are alts, whose alts are they, and for what purpose were they created?

E: I really couldn't ******* care less if you think I should be weighing in on a debate or not, by the way. This is the Internet: HTFU and deal with it!

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#232 - 2012-03-27 23:46:01 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Jade, you've pretty much explicitly stated you're not concerned about condeming what Mitanni said, for you this is about condeming Mitanni's approach to the chairmanship.


I've said I don't believe his actions are appropriate for the chair of the CSM in Eve Online and he's brought the game into disrepute on a significant out of character level. I think its also quite arguable that he has breached eula/tos and there is a real danger of him being treated differently to another player who did these things.

Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Attacking the CSM for being silent and then attacking the many of us who posted stuff.. you dont have to do that. We get it.


I'm not attacking you guys for being :silent: while you discuss who the new chair is and how to announce the outcomes. I'm attacking you for coming out of a gate and declaring your loyalty and support to Mittani as the csm chair before you even have any kind of discussion about this.

If you can't see how those statements pretty much make a sham out of the current "discussions" then *shrug* really. It looks damned fishy.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Ender Black
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#233 - 2012-03-28 00:05:54 UTC
ITT Issler Dainze proves to be an absolute and unmitigated disaster. You obviously don't play well with others, so GET OUT. Holy crap, do you have any sense of leadership, political acumen, or even common sense. I don't believe you do? You seek attention like ghetto trash seek crack.

I would expect more political acumen from a middle school class council.

The Pod Goo Podcast http://www.podgoo.com

Pod Goo also publishes editorials, guest blogs, and guides for free.  Just email ender@podgoo.com your material.

Wolodymyr
Breaking Ambitions
#234 - 2012-03-28 00:10:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Wolodymyr
OK first things first.

It's pretty obvious that Issler doesn't give a damn about The Wis, this whole thread is just some weird soap boxing power play. Maybe she thinks the CSM works like The Highlander and if she can take out all the CSMs above her she gets to be chairman v0v


Second. If this was just eve players beefing with one another in our own little enclosure then I'd say go for it. Run around the monkey house hooting as loud as you want flinging poo at one another. But I don't know if you've looked at The Escapist or Massively this morning. It's not just us, we are in the spot light now, try to act like adults.

Maybe if your politically motivated rant is loud enough you'll attract the attention of that one lady on Fox News. Who I am sure will treat Eve with the same level of respect and nuance as she did Mass Effect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKzF173GqTU

This is probably the best reason to present a unified message. Something like, "Eve is a good game full of good people. It is also a harsh game and we have some harsh people. We have one bad guy. He has done some bad things. He's very sorry for doing bad things. And steps have been taken to make sure bad things never happen again."

Also an "I'm not dead" statement from The Wis would help too.


Third, Fanfest will probably never be the same. You'll probably see two things out of this. People's power point slides will be more heavily screened before they are let on stage to cut out anything that could be offensive to anyone. And the hard alcohol will probably be downgraded to beer. Also the broadcast might be delayed by a few minutes from the event so that CCP can censor out anything embarrassing.


Fourth, depending on what we sacrifice on the altar of the PR Gods to appease their wrath, the entire eve social landscape will be very different. You could ban all of The Mittanni's accounts, take him off the CSM, and take away all the GSF tech moons or whatever. Then you create an environment where butthurt becomes an effective tactical strategy.

Every petition CCP gets will be prefaced with a tale of woe and suffering that will make "Precious: a book by Sapphire" look like an episode of "Spongebob Squarepants". Every Jita scammer will be Goldman Sachs, and every suicide gank will be 9/11.

Go back and watch the rest of the alliance panel. It was 90% smack-talk. People were being ransomed and forced to sing over comms under the threat of losing something expensive. Then they were publicly shamed on a public broadcast for their awful singing voices. I thought this bit was pretty funny and kind of cute, but hypothetically if one jilted player was enraged about his forced karaoke, and the forum butthurt got OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAND!!! Then Mr. Wormhole could find himself in the same hot water.

I honestly think PoCo based sov is a good idea https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1417544

Vorlain
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#235 - 2012-03-28 00:18:55 UTC
One does not have to consult any other members of the CSM to make a statement condemning what happened, **** I expect any decent representative to come out and quite clearly say it was wrong and is in no way condoned by the CSM.

Personally I have no issue with Issler’s statement and think it is quite welcome and if the other CSM members have an issue with that and won’t work with Issler over it they need to take a good hard look at their own ethics.

We have asked for more Transparency from the CSM and they seem to want to hide away behind closed doors, the CSM is not meant to be some private boys club.
Karsa Egivand
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#236 - 2012-03-28 00:21:52 UTC
Sigh, this thread now adds a 2nd CSM-member to the list of trying-their-best-to-****-over-CSM8.

Issler Dainze, go silent for a few days and talk to CSM/CCP. Do you think this self-righteous stand over The Mittani's fuckup on the evo-o-forums is going to help anybody?
Nair Alderau
The Blessed Chains of Freedom
#237 - 2012-03-28 00:24:54 UTC
Nair Alderau is not amused.

Why don't we all take a collective breath - those responsible start talking it through, not slinging posts on the forums - and then you try to clean up the mess in a few days when heads have cooled off some?

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#238 - 2012-03-28 00:27:39 UTC
Vorlain wrote:
Personally I have no issue with Issler’s statement and think it is quite welcome and if the other CSM members have an issue with that and won’t work with Issler over it they need to take a good hard look at their own ethics.

While The Mittani made a drunken mistake and will undoubtedly pay for it, no matter how idiotic the entire situation is, Issler is using it for political grandstanding. The issue is not that Issler made a statement, the issue is that she threw her teammates under the bus while doing so.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Golar Crexis
Donald Trump Real Estate
#239 - 2012-03-28 00:30:03 UTC
Wolodymyr wrote:
OK first things first.

It's pretty obvious that Issler doesn't give a damn about The Wis, this whole thread is just some weird soap boxing power play. Maybe she thinks the CSM works like The Highlander and if she can take out all the CSMs above her she gets to be chairman v0v


Second. If this was just eve players beefing with one another in our own little enclosure then I'd say go for it. Run around the monkey house hooting as loud as you want flinging poo at one another. But I don't know if you've looked at The Escapist or Massively this morning. It's not just us, we are in the spot light now, try to act like adults.

Maybe if your politically motivated rant is loud enough you'll attract the attention of that one lady on Fox news. Who I am sure will treat Eve with the same level of respect and nuance as she did Mass Effect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKzF173GqTU

This is probably the best reason to present a unified message. Something like, "Eve is a good game full of good people. It is also a harsh game and we have some harsh people. We have one bad guy. He has done some bad things. He's very sorry for doing bad things. And steps have been taken to make sure bad things never happen again."

Also an "I'm not dead" statement from The Wis would help too.


Third, Fanfest will probably never be the same. You'll probably see two things out of this. People's power point slides will be more heavily screened before they are let on stage to cut out anything that could be offensive to anyone. And the hard alcohol will probably be downgraded to beer. Also the broadcast might be delayed by a few minutes from the event so that CCP can censor out anything embarrassing.


Fourth, depending on what we sacrifice on the altar of the PR Gods to appease their wrath, the entire eve social landscape will be very different. You could ban all of The Mittanni's accounts, take him off the CSM, and take away all the GSF tech moons or whatever. Then you create an environment where butthurt becomes an effective tactical weapon.

Watch the rest of the alliance panel. It was 90% smack-talk. People were being ransomed and forced to sing over comms under the threat of losing something expensive. Then they were publicly shamed on a public broadcast for their awful singing voices. I thought this bit was pretty funny and kind of cute, but hypothetically if one jilted player was enraged about his forced karaoke, and the forum butthurt got OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAND!!! Then Mr. Wormhole could find himself in the same hot water.



I completely agree.

I understand that some people don't get eve's dark humour or how things said on the internet shouldn't be taken seriously.
What mittens said was in front of an internet spaceship nerd audience and I found it to be funny. I was also concerned for the wis and attempted to contact him about 4 months ago when the original chatlogs were posted on kugu, but I did not get though to him.

I also agree that Isller is displaying frankly disgraceful behaviour on top of mittens already "disgraceful" behaviour. I find her whole take on this to be highly insulting to all parties involved (ccp, wis, mittani, the csm and the eve playerbase as a whole.)
To be fair I did not expect much out of a hi-sec candidate (especially one who served on the more irrelvant csm's) but I'm saddened to have my prejudices completely justified.

Finally I voted for the mittani (I'm not in goons and I'm red to test) simply because he was an effective communicator and represented my style of gameplay. I'd rather not see mine and 10000 other people's votes thrown away by people like Pissler and Darius 3.




Also a message to the CSM. If/When the mittani is replaced please continue the good work of CSM 6 and encourage future CSM's to do the same. I admire most of you and I love the dedication you guys put into this game.

Tergerom Loregeron
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#240 - 2012-03-28 00:35:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Tergerom Loregeron
michaelthered wrote:
Tergerom Loregeron wrote:
Oh by the way I once told an Assisted Suicide advocate he should kill himself. Maybe some of you white knight moral crusaders could tell me what to think and how to feel about it?



BTW the clothes you wear and the electronics you use are made by people who are frequently forced into conditions where they would WILLINGLY commit suicide as an escape. Maybe you can do something about that for me, or are you guys hypocrites?

Need a hint?



"white knight moral crusaders"....said with such sarcasm and derision as if people being repulsed by someone petitioning people to troll another human being to kill himself for really no particular good reason, can't really think of a good reason but I digress. That's a really irritating sentiment.....mocking being a decent human being. wtf?


I'm mocking people who are using this stupid ******* holier than thou attitude to get back at Mittani. They don't give a **** about The Wis, they only care about using him as a tool and once they get what they want they'll forget about him.


Fact is, no one really gives a **** about the guy at this point, people just want vengeance. You want to know who the monsters are? I suggest some of these people look in a mirror, then we'll have our answer.