Wormholes

[PVE] Given recent events, it's obvious that the sleepers are becoming more and more active. As such, it only makes sense that they'd start responding to our presence (In a negative way, of course). Would it be impossible for Sleepers to start chasing players that show up in too large of numbers, trigger a certain event, fail a sleeper data/relic site or something in the likes? They obviously do not want us in their space, so it only makes sense that they start making efforts to eject us. I personally love jumping out to High Security space and having to maneuver while the local police chase me, why wouldn't Sleepers respond to outsiders like CONCORD or the Faction Navy to Pirates?

Suppose this does fall a bit under 'roaming sleeper gang' which most people are calling for, and I get why some people are against it. Frankly, though, from a canonical standpoint it doesn't make sense that the Sleepers would just sit back and watch us invade their homes waiting for us to come and salvage their wrecks. J-Space is supposed to be completely inhospitable, and we've all gotten WAY too comfortable. I'd say it's high time the Sleepers showed us who's space this really is.

Will update the list after Rhea has been deployed to TQ.

[UI] It would be really nice if you could drag one of your bookmarks to the overview and interact with it as if it was a beacon.

[ Gameplay ] When i drop probes they are right next to me in space. but if i open the solar system map and scan they go somewhere random on the map. The reason i care is if it was consistent and the probes dropped right on top of me and i scanned, i would be able to scan the wormhole i came thought in 1 second as opposed to 10.

I am still very new to that wormhole thing but I can say that after eight years of doing the same thing it is refreshing to do something completely new (to me).

On the 'green' sleeper sites I have made some odd observations and some of them most of you (wormholers) have already observed.

- Spawn rates

The 'green' sleeper sites should be a little bit closer to a level 5 upgraded sov-space system / region / constallation and come back sooner rather then later.
It must not be a constand green overview but a week of zero sites is a tad long, even in a long term commitment like EVE.
When your buddies are leaving to 'explore' empire space, that unknown part of space might not have the content to keep them busy there.

- Surprise despawns

I do like challenges. I would also have liked to try some things on SiSi way back when but nevertheless, I found out very quickly that some combat sleeper sites disappear by 'magic' before all of them evil sleeper have been forcefully removed from them.

- You already beat me to it but a dot-like thingy in the upper left corner which tells you what might happen to your ship / guns / ship performance

- A map?

Yes I know, it sounds silly. But a wormhole map like the beta-map where we can see all the wormhole system, regions, constallations, just not the connections from where to what and when.
Something like a grouped sphere of sparkly dots, like the New Eden map, just without the jump-lines.

- POS and wh-industry

When or if you get to a point, you fix POS's or ditch them and make a properly working replacement, there are many things that can keep people in wormholes for long times, since there would be stuff to do.

Whilst you may believe your super hardline, HTFU attitude has some validity, the reality is not so much.

The spawn rate DOES have some issues, whether it is due to the sites not despawning as CCP intends, or some other mechanic, there can be an absolute desert of content from time to time. This DOES need correcting, either by changing the spawn rate or correcting the issue of sites not despawning if it exists. (And many believe and witness that it does)

There is NO value in telling people to frack off and go elsewhere, most people want more life and vitality in wormholes.
Rage rolling holes looking for that "magical" static full of sites to warp to them all to force despawn is the proverbial pain in the arse and the answer to nothing.

Tl;dr the original post was a good one.

Dscan Window:

Since we have this filter selection for dscan, I always wanted to have a second one.
So instead of the checkbox to turn the filter on/off there should be a switch to select between 2 filter selections.

[PvE]
Fix the spawn for grav/gas sites. Sleepers should spawn immediately. Let's get rid of that ninja mining...

[Technical]

I would like the low-fuel notifications for POS's to spam Fuel Managers even if the System has NOT been loaded.

Though I have read most everything in this forum and could quote many, most of what I had to say has been gone over anyway so here are my 2 cents in short(ishness);

Yes to reverting ore sites (or splitting them as mentioned). While your at it make gas sites 100% sigs, damn lil Ventures hard enough to catch anyway.

Nomads you say? T2 orcas or a new porta-potty pos stick with sma/cha attached, no other mods sounds good.

Dead pos sticks? Nay I say, let the locals take em down if in their way or an eye sore.

Remote insurance? meh, maybe. At least for pre-insured ships (time frame sensitive) and definitely not those having to be produced in-hole.

Locking bookmarks for directors a big YES.

Alliance, fleet and linkable bookmarks? At least one of those for the next 3 client updates please n thanx. As for the "predefined pattern" thing with bm's, I already thought I could through simple naming and alternate column conventions.

Unique PI? Unique PI? No, fine with what's there.

Removing sleepers in lower class data/relic sites, no, that's what faction sites are for now.

T3 Burner groups, maybe, sounds like fun.

Deploying MTU for corp/alliance? Maybe, but isn't that what fleets are for, aside from unanchoring of course.

If I named a wormhole system it would be called "Get Real" but it is not ever going to happen.

CHA Killmaills include contents? Yes yes.

Personal SMA's are an alternative for possibly reducing power consumption & limiting accessibility though compartmentalizing (tabs) the ones we have now is a better option I think.

T3 assembly? No contest & I thought this was already set in stone though?

Probe analyse hot-key and a refreshable (customizable) auto d-scan rate? Double plus good.

Repackaging ships? Why not add warp bubbles and pos/mods to that list too?

System effects? Sure, but as stated in this post somewhere, just the basic facts ma'am.

Polarization timer? Yes, don't see the harm.

Though Ice has been dealt with I think, I would still like to see it spawn irregularly like ore but more rarely and of a new type specifically for wh space, perhaps one with an omni-isotope that can be used to make all fuel blocks.

Additionally, as noted in this forum; multiple starbase password fields for ease of access would be a bonus.

As for a few of my own unadressed pet peeves:
1) SMA's that don't regen ship shields
2) PI networks are not showing up unless yours, though there's a command for it
3) Can CCP cut down the amount of wormhole entrances/exits in wormholes just a tad? Used to average 2-3 now 4-6, how about a compromise?
4) Re-sizable industry window (yes not wh specific)?
5) d-click ships in SMA to board

And lastly I would like my order with a side of fries & a Venti Ultra-Quafe but with 3 shots. Coming right up? Thank U.

Ice Miners can only be fit to Exhumers. We have ice in frigate-only wormholes. Thus, no way exists to mine that ice. Remove the restriction on Ice Miners so that they can be fit on other ships like a Venture or Prospect.