These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Null sec what chance does the little guy have

First post First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#41 - 2014-02-12 16:57:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Pinky Hops wrote:
If you go back far enough, say 6 or 7 years ago, "small" groups of 50 - 100 actually did hold and keep sov.

Nullsec was better in those days.
Nullsec was horrid in those days because if you tried to cram more than a 100 people into a system, it fell over and died. These days, actual large-scale fights can be had and as a result, you need more people not to lose everything.

Quote:
The state of nullsec in it's current form should be considered an embarrassment.
Why? I mean, yes, sov should have been addressed three years ago and it's a bit silly that it has been left alone for so long, but CCP has been distracted by various irrelevancies so what can you do? And that's more that the mechanics are an embarrassment than null itself.

Quote:
There are only two major entities in all of nullsec at the moment.
…if by two you mean four, which is much the same as it has always been. Well, unless you mean actual alliances, in which case there are dozens, which is much the same as it has always been.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#42 - 2014-02-12 16:59:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:




Then will you join me in a movement to make all resources FINITE?


That's one of those ideas you get stuck in your head (like 'dialing in' a system wasn't that you?) that you think sounds good but you're not looking at the actual behavior of other people when you think about it.

Finite resources sound good, but (like Infinity Ziona's "just get rid of timers" thing) what you end up with is empowering the already powerful to take even more power (because they have the numbers and organization to shut everyone else down).

In other words, your ideas would (if implemented) amke things worse for the people you're trying to make them better for (in the same way that some real life "think of the children" policies actually make things worse).

Respawning resources means that no one group can put a permanent stranglehold on any other group. While you think finite resources would spawn conflict (the same way CCP thought limiting anomalies would spur conflict) what you're more likely to end up with is groups like Goons "OTECing" the hell out of whatever spawns (because Goons follow the American foreign policy tradition of "not fighting over anything you can just buy with money) and everyone else saying **** it and running back to high sec lol.
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#43 - 2014-02-12 16:59:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Hops
Jenn aSide wrote:
]BoB is going to take over all of 0.0 and everyone will quit any second now.[/url]


Oh wait.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20070827.png

Yeah.....Reality is a bit different than your bizarre memories.

Tippia wrote:
if by two you mean four, which is much the same as it has always been. Well, unless you mean actual alliances, in which case there are dozens, which is much the same as it has always been.


By two I mean two. Not four. The only major entities are CFC and N3.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#44 - 2014-02-12 17:01:05 UTC
I like little guys.

There was a movie back in the 80's called Under The Rainbow. It had Chevy Chase and Carrie Fischer in it. And a whole lot of little guys. It was funny.

And those little guys in Willy Wonka (the first one with Gene Wilder) were really smart. Listen to them and you will go far.

And that little guy in the Austin Powers movies? He was funny too!

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Angry Mustache
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#45 - 2014-02-12 17:02:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Angry Mustache
Pinky Hops wrote:


You're exaggerating.

Nullsec was nowhere near in the state that it is now. There are only two major entities in all of nullsec at the moment. What?

There were over a dozen 7 years ago. Maybe more. There was plenty of room to spring up various places.


I'll take you up on that challenge.

This is a verite rendition map from august 2008, 6 years ago.

http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/verite/20080818.png

this is the political map

http://i.imgur.com/Sr0W88o.jpg

At the time, CVA was allied against BOB as well, meaning the only "independent sov alliances" were the soon to be russian renters in the drone regions.

An official Member of the Goonswarm Federation Complaints Department.

Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2014-02-12 17:04:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Speedkermit Damo
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
But the fix is already in.

CCP is providing tools for guerilla warfare and subterfuge


No they're not. It's just another thing added to the ever growing list of things CCP say they might possibly want to do sometime in future, which never actually happens.

Ever bigger blobs is what creates the headlines and gets new subs apparantly, so that's what we'll get.

Unfortunately for CCP you need two blobs to make a battle, and it's just about reached the stage where there's now only one blob left.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#47 - 2014-02-12 17:05:00 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
]BoB is going to take over all of 0.0 and everyone will quit any second now.[/url]


Oh wait.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/20070827.png

Yeah.....Reality is a bit different than your bizarre memories.


I See, the NC+ Goons, BoB and their GBC, the south and a couple of buffer zones. Not very much different from what is going on right now.

That's the point, people have been screaming about "stagnant" null and power blocs gonna take over for ever and forever it's never really been true.. Everyone seemed to think the Norther Coalition is some unmovable object when I was in Raiden fighting them with the russians.

The map you just linked (if done in 2014 "link everyone who is slightly blue" style) would have maybe 3-4 different groups.
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#48 - 2014-02-12 17:09:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Hops
Speedkermit Damo wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
But the fix is already in.

CCP is providing tools for guerilla warfare and subterfuge


No they're not. It's just another thing added to the ever growing list of things CCP say they might possibly want to do sometime in future, which never actually happens.


Siphons were specifically added for this purpose - so yeah, it really is happening.

IIRC "Team Superfriends" of CCP is specifically tasked with creating tools that allow guerrilla warfare (among other things).

I mean did you even see the thread where siphons were announced? Half of goonswarm flipped out - they were whining and moaning like none had ever seen. Why? Because it's a tool that you can use to hurt them without risking much yourself.

If they weren't a threat, alliances wouldn't be making handshake deals to not use them against eachother.

I'm sure there will be more tools like this to come, no matter how much the big nullblocs whine and complain.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#49 - 2014-02-12 17:09:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Pinky Hops wrote:
By two I mean two. Not four.
Then maybe you should look at the map. It's the same as always: roughly one per cardinal direction.

Since the number of cardinal directions hasn't changed in the last decade, it's still four, same as back in the day.

Quote:
Siphons were specifically added for this purpose - so yeah, it really is happening.
Not really, no. Siphons were added as a means of ninja:ing a bit of income, not as a warfare mechanism (since it doesn't particularly work for that purpose). For guerilla warfare in particular, they're pretty much completely useless.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#50 - 2014-02-12 17:09:45 UTC
Angry Mustache wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:


You're exaggerating.

Nullsec was nowhere near in the state that it is now. There are only two major entities in all of nullsec at the moment. What?

There were over a dozen 7 years ago. Maybe more. There was plenty of room to spring up various places.


I'll take you up on that challenge.

This is a verite rendition map from august 2008, 6 years ago.

http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/verite/20080818.png

this is the political map

http://i.imgur.com/Sr0W88o.jpg

At the time, CVA was allied against BOB as well, meaning the only "independent sov alliances" were the soon to be russian renters in the drone regions.


Exactly.

Where i'm from, old folks say "there is nothing new under the sun" and that's a way of saying that people's 'current and modern' perceptions are usually off. Some folks want to believe that "things were better in the past as a way to justify thier dislike of certain aspects of the present.

Things weren't better in the past, they just seemed 'newer' to people experiencing them for the 1st time. That's not saying null is in a good state, but these brilliant people who always think "oh , if you just do this or that things will be fine" are imo a bit delusional.


Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#51 - 2014-02-12 17:14:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Not really, no. Siphons were added as a means of ninja:ing a bit of income, not as a warfare mechanism (since it doesn't particularly work for that purpose). For guerilla warfare in particular, they're pretty much completely useless.


Now I have heard it all.

Drastically reducing the income generated by a moon or even turning it off outright isn't a form of warfare?

Roll

Tippia, please.
Thead Enco
Domheimed
#52 - 2014-02-12 17:19:08 UTC
try harder, if "one man" pubbie corps are looking to **w til their hearts content try renting...
Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#53 - 2014-02-12 17:21:25 UTC
Pinky Hops wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Not really, no. Siphons were added as a means of ninja:ing a bit of income, not as a warfare mechanism (since it doesn't particularly work for that purpose). For guerilla warfare in particular, they're pretty much completely useless.


Now I have heard it all.

Drastically reducing the income generated by a moon or even turning it off outright isn't a form of warfare?

Roll

Tippia, please.


Afrer the initial novelty wore off, Siphons seemed to fall into to disuse. I haven't seen any for weeks and weeks. I doubt if even 0.01% of the CFC's moons have a Siphon on them right now.

At best theyre a very very minor irritant.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#54 - 2014-02-12 17:23:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Hops
Speedkermit Damo wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Not really, no. Siphons were added as a means of ninja:ing a bit of income, not as a warfare mechanism (since it doesn't particularly work for that purpose). For guerilla warfare in particular, they're pretty much completely useless.


Now I have heard it all.

Drastically reducing the income generated by a moon or even turning it off outright isn't a form of warfare?

Roll

Tippia, please.


Afrer the initial novelty wore off, Siphons seemed to fall into to disuse. I haven't seen any for weeks and weeks. I doubt if even 0.01% of the CFC's moons have a Siphon on them right now.

At best theyre a very very minor irritant.


If they were only a minor irritant there wouldn't be agreements to not use them against each other.

Edit: also your logic is terrible anyways. Blowing a few ships up is technically only a minor irritant unless they are carriers or greater, and as far as I know blowing ships up is a form of warfare.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#55 - 2014-02-12 17:23:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Pinky Hops wrote:
Now I have heard it all.

Drastically reducing the income generated by a moon or even turning it off outright isn't a form of warfare?

It would be, but siphons don't really do that. Again, it's a personal ninja-income generator, not something that will affect an alliance in any major way. It certainly doesn't work for guerrilla warfare since it's so trivial to neutralise.

Quote:
If they were only a minor irritant there wouldn't be agreements to not use them against each other.
If they were anything other than minor irritants, they'd see a massive use from all kinds of entities that have no interest in such agreements because they'd like to hurt the moon holders in any way possible.
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#56 - 2014-02-12 17:27:15 UTC
Tippia wrote:
If they were anything other than minor irritants, they'd see a massive use from all kinds of entities that have no interest in such agreements because they'd like to hurt the moon holders in any way possible.


This would be true only if they had an incentive to do it.

Siphons suck for ninja-looting, they are better for harassment/destruction of income.

And for that incentive, the only parties with that incentive have mostly agreed to not do it to eachother.

I wonder why? Roll

Tippia logic is weak today.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#57 - 2014-02-12 17:31:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Pinky Hops wrote:
This would be true only if they had an incentive to do it.
…which they obviously do since they'd like to hurt the moon holders in any way possible.

Quote:
Siphons suck for ninja-looting, they are better for harassment/destruction of income.
Which is why they're not seeing much use: because they suck at the thing they're good for and slightly better at something that makes no difference for either side.

Quote:
And for that incentive, the only parties with that incentive have mostly agreed to not do it to eachother.
…which are meaningless in a world of alts, and would be used en masse if they actually worked for what you imagine they work for. Which they don't. As shown by their lack of use. It's really that simple, you know.

Tippia logic is based on logic and actual usage patterns rather than rhetorical and conspiratorial questions.
Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#58 - 2014-02-12 17:36:41 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Pinky Hops wrote:
This would be true only if they had an incentive to do it.
…which they obviously do since they'd like to hurt the moon holders in any way possible.


At their own expense. Since siphons suck for ninja looting, you'd essentially be paying to hurt somebody else.

This would only be worth it if you were an enemy of the party, rather than just a guy looking to get some ISK.

So, the only people with an incentive to do it are the people who agreed not to do it to eachother.

Tippia wrote:
Which is why they're not seeing much use: because they suck at the thing they're good for and slightly better at something that makes no difference for either side.


Incorrect.

They aren't used much because the parties with the biggest incentive to use them have agreed to not use them via a handshake deal.

Tippia wrote:
which are meaningless in a world of alts, and would be used en masse if they actually worked for what you imagine they work for. Which they don't. As shown by their lack of use. It's really that simple, you know.


Nothing has shown their lack of use. CCP has stated they don't want to reveal numbers because they don't want to spoil usage for the people using them. It

Tippia wrote:
Tippia logic is based on logic and actual usage patterns rather than rhetorical and conspiratorial questions.


Tippia logic seems to be based on fictitious fantasy lands that don't exist within EVE.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#59 - 2014-02-12 17:38:50 UTC
But guys remember, it was 245 billion isk and you could build 20,000 interceptors, with the mins that were stolen. We should look in awe at those numbers. Apparently.

I personally laughed at the amount, but hey what do I know?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#60 - 2014-02-12 17:41:29 UTC
Mag's wrote:
But guys remember, it was 245 billion isk and you could build 20,000 interceptors, with the mins that were stolen. We should look in awe at those numbers. Apparently.

I personally laughed at the amount, but hey what do I know?


Thats just in two months.

So 120b/month is being siphoned atm.

It does seem low, but siphons are also pretty damn new. We also getting two new ones, which are obviously going to increase that number.