EVE General Discussion

Remember what game we play, them ships will get nerfed and be crap very soon.

There are several issues with your idea.

First, most people solo pve content, they should not be forced into high sec in order to get the best out of it. Equally high sec should not be offering the same or better rewards as null sec, 0.0 needs to be rewarding people for taking the added risk.

Second, very few people in null have access to level 4 mission areas, forcing them to go to these areas would simply turn them into warzones and make running missions a near impossiblility. This would also do nothing to fix the near uselessness of the vast bulk of nullsec and prople being forced to earn their isk outside of their own empire.

Third, CCP have stated that null will not be seeing greater rewards as it would harm the games economy. This is why we are not asking for more isk but for nerfs as it is the only option we have.

So you think 0.0 should give alliances enough ISK to fund things like Burn Jita, personal Titans, capital ships, SRPs, PLEX-funded spy accounts, vacation homes for its leaders AND have the best solo PVE payout?

ISK for grunts in 0.0 is only an issue because alliance leaders chose to make it an issue.

No they are not.

Runaway inflation is very bad and is why incursions were nerfed. CCP cannot give away more reward in null, the only way of dealing with this imbalance is to nerf high sec income to the same degree that null has been nerfed over the years.

Equally solo pve pilots should not be punished in null sov, everyone should have a reason to live out in null sec and have access to greater rewards for taking greater risks.

HS income is good in terms of balance

- Incursions are 150-200m/h including LP but it's hard to get always in fleet and you need to have pimped ship and skills, there are almost no breaks if You'r in fleet
- lvl4s are max 120m/h solo (don't listen silly OP and others saying "im getting 180-200m/h) but it's almost impossible to earn so much hour by hour every day, many players don't do them for pure isk/h, many have low skills etc., so most of players doing them earn 60-100m/h and it's nothing but pure boring grinding same and same missions that's important too


But not even this, just why peps have problems with HS income?
"Because they do money in HS instead LS/Null which could give more targets" - eeeee fail if someone is carebear and he just play solo for playing You won't force him to go in dangerous place even if HS income would be cutted by 70%, and what kind of target is noob doing missions in mission fitted ship? rly pvpers are so bad?
And i meet lots of incursion or mission runners in HS who do safe PVE just to get money for PVP, and if they wont have that opportunity they just wont pvp at all.

tbh HS is now the best balanced and have best design, problem is with LS and Null, they're broken, CCP knows that and know that if they nerf HS badly they will lost lots of subs, that's why they think good in this case and they don't listed to peps who have "a(rrr)ss pain"

Is this a stealth 'nerf afk cloaking' post?

Apart from the delicious irony, your post is however missing an argument as to why those rank and file pilots should earn more.

They did PvP in 0.0 so their alliance could rake in ISK, the fact that that ISK is distributed in a way, that they feel the need to do PvE for ISK is not the games fault.

But be sure to tell all those renters about the huge risks and downtime they pay for in 0.0. I'm sure they'd love to skip the rental bill and go back to hi-sec, if only they knew about those facts.

The system effects aren't why null incursions are terrible source of isk (their movement is the primary reason), but they certainly make incursions irritating when they land in your space.

Only when they came out. They are magnets for small gangs so nobody bothers anymore.

I wouldn't have thought that small gangs would be much of an issue for a HQ fleet to deal with.

Fair enough.