These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM - Do you think? (... continued)

First post First post
Author
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#321 - 2011-10-25 20:43:46 UTC
And now you've devolved from avoiding the issue right down to not even making sense.

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#322 - 2011-10-25 20:46:01 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
And now you've devolved from avoiding the issue right down to not even making sense.




Can't make a case for yourself then...
next!

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#323 - 2011-10-25 20:49:38 UTC
Rer Eirikr wrote:
A) When some of the major problems with EVE cannot be summed up in a simple survey questionnaire.

B) When you have no one available to sift through said data and tell CCP whats what (huh almost sounds like the CSM huh?)

C) When evidently 80% of the playerbase can't be arsed to fill it out despite claiming the world is out to get them.

If such a system was viable it would have been implemented already.

And most importantly, said system lacks a "No CCP don't do this" feature.



Honestly this thread did get me thinking, and I'll probably through up a post about it in the near future. I don't expect it to amount to anything of course, but the alternative is remaining silent.


For now, I will just say that dating sites do it all the time.
Your thinking a little too linear in terms of check A,B,C,D



[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Rer Eirikr
The Scope
#324 - 2011-10-25 20:50:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Rer Eirikr
Your defense is you have no logical argument .. So no one can make a counterpoint to it.. Therefore you win. :facepalm:

And dating sites hire people to sift through said data while also using a rather mundane matchmaker :P
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#325 - 2011-10-25 21:24:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Rer Eirikr wrote:
Your defense is you have no logical argument .. So no one can make a counterpoint to it.. Therefore you win. :facepalm:

And dating sites hire people to sift through said data while also using a rather mundane matchmaker :P


Simply saying said thing does not make said thing true.
Also: no not really about the dating site thing, at least not all of them anyway.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#326 - 2011-10-25 22:09:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Skunk Gracklaw
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
@Skunk Gracklaw

I like the part where you didn't not infer anything from "keep until the end of the year" after they fired 20% of their real-life labor force.

If CCP ends the CSM project that's fine. We pretty much accomplished what we wanted with CSM6. If they keep the CSM as is we'll keep voting for Mittens. If they try and create some dumb system of breaking the game into factions and having each faction vote a representative in we'll laugh about it and then sit and watch as it fails to get anything done. There is literally no way we lose.

We were content to pretty much ignore the CSM until some evil people got the idea of using it to make nullsec even worse than it already is so Mittens stepped up and prevented that from happening. CCP has a plan for nullsec and while I don't know all the details our people on the CSM sound positive about it so that's good enough for me (and I think a lot of other goons).

The problem you and the rest of the pubbie hordes are having with the CSM is that you don't really understand how it works. The CSM, on its own, has no power to make changes in Eve. It's purpose is to act as a sounding board for the developers and as a conduit for players to give their input. Every other CSM failed to understand this and, therefore, had little impact and we saw CSM members posting open letters, leaking NDA'd information, and quitting the CSM in protest. None of that had any effect on CCP or the game. CSM6 is different because it took the purpose of the CSM and used it as a platform to publicize problems within the game. The Mittani is a well-known Eve personality, has a column on a gaming-related website and most importantly is able to write in complete sentences and not sound like a mouth breather so when he decided to publicize the problems with the game the rest of the gaming media listened. You'll never admit it but Mittens is the best player advocate you have and all of you calling for him to be kicked off the CSM because he likes to blow up miners or you just hate goons in general are idiots.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#327 - 2011-10-25 22:25:19 UTC
And I'd love to see anyone point out a single thing that the current CSM has done that'll be severely detrimental to the game as a whole.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#328 - 2011-10-25 22:37:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Quote:
You'll never admit it but Mittens is the best player advocate you have and all of you calling for him to be kicked off the CSM because he likes to blow up miners or you just hate goons in general are idiots.



I think you are too in love with the goon hate to see anything but that in every post Roll
I get just a sick of hearing it from the Goon(dot) Pubbies as I do from everyone else.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Elson Tamar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#329 - 2011-10-26 00:21:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Elson Tamar
Right im hoping that i have got my point accross without aggro, hey we arnt actually shootinging each other here are we?

I think that most of the concerns are that there seems to be a PERCEPTION that there is somthing nafarious going on, which in my naive noob way i belive to be untrue.
However i think, if i may stray off topic for the moment, that this may be the main problem. We have had a summer of rage, apparently, followed by incarna getting put on the back burner, lots of people being somwhat partisan and then the goons started their tornado or terror (which is very cool and makes me smile, even if i am a potential victim of it/making money off it). I think that with CCP giving into the playerbase at the same time as the goon campain happening has given the impression that the mittani has finally got spies into CCP. Now from what i understand of the history of CCP and corruption is that they are very cocious of it and negative press associated with it since the alleged BoB debarcal. I very much dobt that mittens would get away with anything, he is outspoken and i think in this case a victim of his own mythos.
This is what happens when a player is pecived to have meta power, even if wileded for a percived good.

So as a new player whi is in high sec, although not a carebear (i got told this, so it must be true.) I trust Mittens to do his CSM job correctly and without predjudice and i trust him in game with nothing as he is dodgy IN GAME.

So what concerns do we have left, well from my new player perspective, one hell of a lot. We have two games here and both sides of the game seem to hate each other. Null and empire. Now i am lucky to have 5 year vet friends who have done the null sec thing, so have heard both sides. You know what if you intergrate the game so empire and null have to look to eachother for resources and infrastructure, guess what you'd have a better game, plus piracy, diplomacy and player interactions would be a hell of alot more interesting, plus i think that with travel becoming more prevelent between the two you might get small engagements, casue as a new player i have heard nothing about blob warefare i want to try! (To be fair as i have posted elswhere my PVP skills are weak and i assplode alot).

Things i do have an issue with is that since satrting play i have heard nothing but bad things about new players. We apparently are a wate of space and are an iritation to 'real players'. High sec is for loosers that cant play eve properley..... Um i just started and im finding my feet, i am luck y to have veteren friends who have shown the ropes and intend to move to lowsec once i feel my skills are competative and i can fit a HAC properley, a lot of new players arent lucky and its attitudes like this that leads to the hate.

If the CSM was lead by miners and the majority of players had asked for suicide gankers to be fixed (i know this isnt true but play along) I think the minority of PVPers (this is a fantasy rmember) would be up in arms about the abuses of the miner centric CSM and calling for resignations.

What i want as a new player is a CSM that will represent all the players and thinks what would be cool for everyone, So if Mittens (who isnt the only member, but is the loudest) is going to do that im cool with that, i think however we all need to take a look at how we represent ourselves and how we address each other in the forums, as it will have a larger effect. We need to cool off a little and really think is there corruption in our pew pew spaceship game, CCP may need to talk to us a bit more, and maybe the CSM needs to look at away of making sure everyone is clear of the distinction between character and player (maybe use real names for CSM duties?)

Oh and Mittani (in your CSM role) could you please make insurance payout for criminal activities a no no, it makes sense and makes sucide ganking a calculated risk for reward rather than wahoooo free money. I thik that that is a more EVE kinda thing.



*Sorry if thats abit of a ramble, but i kinda do that when i think about stuff*
Jenshae Chiroptera
#330 - 2011-10-26 00:33:25 UTC
I am going to chose not to respond at this time in order to encourage input from people we haven't heard from yet. Smile

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#331 - 2011-10-26 01:25:53 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
I am going to chose not to respond at this time in order to encourage input from people we haven't heard from yet. Smile

"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."
Jenshae Chiroptera
#332 - 2011-10-26 02:19:52 UTC
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:

"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."

Roll
That desperate for my attention? Really?

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#333 - 2011-10-26 03:50:03 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:

"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."

Roll
That desperate for my attention? Really?


huh... it got dumped in a corner of the forums where itll die quietly lol

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#334 - 2011-10-26 04:04:09 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Skunk Gracklaw wrote:

"I've run out of ways to rephrase my lame arguments so I'm going to wait for somebody to do it for me."

Roll
That desperate for my attention? Really?

Well you're the one that responded to the thread by saying you weren't going to respond to the thread so you tell me who needs attention.
Desudes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#335 - 2011-10-26 04:23:31 UTC
Faction Warfare is a stupid-easy way to get introduced to low sec. A similar mechanic allowing players to get into null, where old and new players alike would be, would be great.

In FW you've got automatic enemies and more importantly, automatic friends. You'll experience piracy as well.

Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.

Excuse me, but what the f*ck are you desu?

Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#336 - 2011-10-26 04:27:45 UTC
Desudes wrote:
Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.

I didn't realize we were the only alliance in nullsec.
Desudes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#337 - 2011-10-26 04:35:00 UTC
You aren't. Just an easy example.

Excuse me, but what the f*ck are you desu?

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#338 - 2011-10-26 05:08:11 UTC
Desudes wrote:
Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.

Recruitment scams are idiot filters.

Do you want idiots who fall for recruitment scams in your corp?

If so, I have a bridge for ya

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Desudes
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#339 - 2011-10-26 05:20:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Desudes
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Desudes wrote:
Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.

Recruitment scams are idiot filters.

Do you want idiots who fall for recruitment scams in your corp?

If so, I have a bridge for ya


You're missing my point, and reinforcing it: there is no clear path to 0.0 unless you already know your way around.

That is why 0.0 is not going to be populated.

Excuse me, but what the f*ck are you desu?

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#340 - 2011-10-26 05:22:03 UTC
Desudes wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Desudes wrote:
Seriously, wheres the on-ramp to null? Seeing people try to join the goons and get scammed out of 500mil is funny, but unproductive.

Recruitment scams are idiot filters.

Do you want idiots who fall for recruitment scams in your corp?

If so, I have a bridge for ya


You're missing my point, and reinforcing it: there is no clear path to 0.0 unless you already know your way around.

I came out here without knowing, and my corp just ended a recruiting drive aimed mainly at new players and getting them out to nullsec. Shocked

Next falsehood? Lol

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.