These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Pirate Battleships & Absurd Ganker Arguments

First post
Author
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2017-02-23 11:09:52 UTC
baltec1 wrote:


Ganking is way lower than it used to be.


cool shure doesent feel like it at times i guess there is data suporting this?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#62 - 2017-02-23 11:10:40 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Ransoms and cargo seizing was a thing for a few years until too many spergs decided to kill them anyway. Once that trust went so did the ransoms.

Many low-sec players claim that piracy is alive and well and that ransoms are routinely offered and honored. I contend that this is not the case, and that the prevalence of killmail bragging, joy in shooting blinged ships and pods and extracting as many tears and salt as possible is now standard operating procedure. Or is this perception off?


I'd say that's right, it's been a very long time since I heard of anyone trying to get a ransom.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2017-02-23 11:15:11 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
indeed and now we have rampart HS Ganking as the new baseline piracy.

This isn't piracy so much as it is suicide bombing. I'm not advocating or condeming ganking one way or the other, but calling it "piracy" is really a stretch.



well considering that besides the isk loss for getting concorded and sec loss there is no real loss to ganking its all a calculated risk. is the loss of ships greater then the projected drops? if it is dont gank if the projected drop is greater gank. the only loss is on the part of the ganked.

piracy in a world of imortals.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#64 - 2017-02-23 11:15:25 UTC
That being the case, piracy in EVE seems to be dead while griefing seems to be alive and well. It's too bad there isn't a mechanism to reward piracy. Then again, even if there was I'm not sure it would be as "satisfying" for players without any means of bragging about it...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#65 - 2017-02-23 11:18:02 UTC
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
well considering that besides the isk loss for getting concorded and sec loss there is no real loss to ganking its all a calculated risk. is the loss of ships greater then the projected drops? if it is dont gank if the projected drop is greater gank. the only loss is on the part of the ganked.

piracy in a world of imortals.

Sure, but no more calculated risk than any other aspect of the game (minimize risk and investment - maximize reward).

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#66 - 2017-02-23 11:25:03 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
well considering that besides the isk loss for getting concorded and sec loss there is no real loss to ganking its all a calculated risk. is the loss of ships greater then the projected drops? if it is dont gank if the projected drop is greater gank. the only loss is on the part of the ganked.

piracy in a world of imortals.


Sure, but no more calculated risk than any other aspect of the game (minimize risk and investment - maximize reward).



shurething no argument there. still suicide ganking in hs needs to be treated as the new piracy in hs.
sadly tho there might not be a way to stop it withing reason.
exept perhaps force suicide gankers into a a wardeccable NPC corp ( if they refuce to be in a pc corp...)
sadly tho the odds of the HS corporations acually wardecking a piracy corp is slim... (pkk´s are fairly rare these days)
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#67 - 2017-02-23 11:29:07 UTC
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


Ganking is way lower than it used to be.


cool shure doesent feel like it at times i guess there is data suporting this?


Tippia looked into this the other year and fond the there is noticeably fewer miners getting ganked. Hardly surprising given all of the nerfs and buffs over the last six years. CCP also pointed out a big drop in the number of exhumers getting ganked after the first barge change. There has been a lot of nerfs and more safety buffs since then.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2017-02-23 11:30:59 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


Ganking is way lower than it used to be.


cool shure doesent feel like it at times i guess there is data suporting this?


Tippia looked into this the other year and fond the there is noticeably fewer miners getting ganked. Hardly surprising given all of the nerfs and buffs over the last six years. CCP also pointed out a big drop in the number of exhumers getting ganked after the first barge change. There has been a lot of nerfs and more safety buffs since then.



i see the problem. you count only miners getting ganked. broaden your search to include all of hs and all types of suicide ganking.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#69 - 2017-02-23 11:41:54 UTC
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


Ganking is way lower than it used to be.


cool shure doesent feel like it at times i guess there is data suporting this?


Tippia looked into this the other year and fond the there is noticeably fewer miners getting ganked. Hardly surprising given all of the nerfs and buffs over the last six years. CCP also pointed out a big drop in the number of exhumers getting ganked after the first barge change. There has been a lot of nerfs and more safety buffs since then.



i see the problem. you count only miners getting ganked. broaden your search to include all of hs and all types of suicide ganking.


Every barge that was ganked in highsec was included.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#70 - 2017-02-23 11:44:03 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
baltec1 wrote:


Ganking is way lower than it used to be.


cool shure doesent feel like it at times i guess there is data suporting this?


Tippia looked into this the other year and fond the there is noticeably fewer miners getting ganked. Hardly surprising given all of the nerfs and buffs over the last six years. CCP also pointed out a big drop in the number of exhumers getting ganked after the first barge change. There has been a lot of nerfs and more safety buffs since then.



i see the problem. you count only miners getting ganked. broaden your search to include all of hs and all types of suicide ganking.


Every barge that was ganked in highsec was included.


industrials, freighters, orcas (not that they are easally ganked anymore), blinged out ship of everytype. you get what i am aiming at right ?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#71 - 2017-02-23 12:04:41 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:


industrials, freighters, orcas (not that they are easally ganked anymore), blinged out ship of everytype. you get what i am aiming at right ?


Feel free to put in the same amount of effort we did with the barge data. You will still finding ganking levels are lower than six to seven years ago.

We worked out that the chances of having your freighter ganked stands at something like less than 0.2% over 1.7 million gate jumps.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#72 - 2017-02-23 12:22:49 UTC
yea id need to get the data from ccp on howmany gatejumps are done by freaighters each day and then correlate that with how many freighters get ganked each day. then do that for all ship types in eve in HS.


i have acual research projects going on atm but if i ever get bored with those i might look into this.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#73 - 2017-02-23 12:26:55 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
yea id need to get the data from ccp on howmany gatejumps are done by freaighters each day and then correlate that with how many freighters get ganked each day. then do that for all ship types in eve in HS.


i have acual research projects going on atm but if i ever get bored with those i might look into this.


Or you can use the data from the largest shipping organisation in EVE, Red Freight.

I'll be frank, over the years we have amassed a mountain of evidence that shows ganking is not just on a downward trend but is also far harder, more expensive and easier to counter than ever before. It has also been show that if anything ganking keeps players in game rather than drives them away. There is no evidence at all that ganking is either easy, risk free, harms EVE in any way or is at record highs.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#74 - 2017-02-23 12:28:13 UTC
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
yea id need to get the data from ccp on howmany gatejumps are done by freaighters each day and then correlate that with how many freighters get ganked each day. then do that for all ship types in eve in HS.


i have acual research projects going on atm but if i ever get bored with those i might look into this.




https://zkillboard.com/group/513/


this coulld be a basis for an intresting basis for statistics one where ppl loose frieghters.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#75 - 2017-02-23 12:28:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
industrials, freighters, orcas (not that they are easally ganked anymore), blinged out ship of everytype. you get what i am aiming at right ?
A quick look at the CONCORD kill data shows that not to be the case.

At least as far back as I trust the killboard data (end of 2012 when the API was implemented), there has been a continual downward trend in the number of CONCORD kills. In fact, CONCORD is only killing about half the number of ships they were 4-5 years ago.

You can easily see that in a chart of the above numbers:

https://puu.sh/ugdOo/9fc9e9d60f.png

All evidence says suicide ganking is at or near all time lows. Which makes total sense, given highsec safety is at an all-time high after years of continual and near constant buffing.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#76 - 2017-02-23 12:31:09 UTC
@op
HTFU
your little mach won't get back above 500m anytime soon ;)

it's called "market evolution" Lol

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#77 - 2017-02-23 12:34:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcorath Sacerdos
Black Pedro wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
industrials, freighters, orcas (not that they are easally ganked anymore), blinged out ship of everytype. you get what i am aiming at right ?
A quick look at the CONCORD kill data shows that not to be the case.

At least as far back as I trust the killboard data (end of 2012 when the API was implemented), there has been a continual downward trend in the number of CONCORD kills. In fact, CONCORD is only killing about half the number of ships they were 4-5 years ago.

You can easily see that in a chart of the above numbers:

https://puu.sh/ugdOo/9fc9e9d60f.png

All evidence says suicide ganking is at or near all time lows. Which makes total sense, given highsec safety is at an all-time high after years of continual and near constant buffing.



i see your point. the numbers are at or near 2012 -2011 numbers but an all time low i would say no to.

make that 2012 the average kills in hs per month in 2016 was 2845. 2012 the same number was 2272.

no year previous had had those numbers no no year since has been lower then it.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#78 - 2017-02-23 12:36:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Spenser for Hire wrote:
And the reason why the price of Pirate Battleship is going down is because they are being OVER-PRODUCED in Low and Null Sec! Because it is in Low Sec and Null Sec where there is NO competition! Low Sec and Null Sec players are greedily, voraciously farming LP with the pirate factions then turning that LP into Pirate ships which they are literally flooding the market with. I bet they don't even notice the steady drop in price!!!


correct me if im wrong here but there is no pirate lp stores in lowsec and 800k lp is not an easy amount of lp to gain for a machariel bpc in npc curse, however nobody buys battleship bpc's in null they have more profitable items available for lp, these are overfarmed from ded's in nullsec by ratters, not lowsec.

on another note, people in low and nullsec use these ships in pvp and also lose them then have to buy again, that contributes to the economy, what exactly does a solo mission runner contribute to the economy apart from hoarding lp while never losing a ship

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Black Pedro
Mine.
#79 - 2017-02-23 12:49:45 UTC
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
i see your point. the numbers are at or near 2012 -2011 numbers but an all time low i would say no to.
I don't have the numbers to say that, and yes, suicide ganking rates were probably lower early on immediately after CONCORD was made invincible and and for freighters, before they even dropped loot, but there is no evidence that suicide ganking is increasing, out of control, or even a problem which is the usual carebear narrative. CCP Quant's numbers show that total destruction (from all sources, not just suicide ganking) makes up less than 0.1% of all goods transported in highsec, and ganking of barges shows a similar decrease in recent years, which is off true all time lows in 2012 when Dr. Eyjo reported that Exhumers were blowing up at "historically low rates" (pg. 104).

Highsec is extremely safe. CCP has buffed safety so much it is near impossible to make a living as a pirate there. The cost to attack is so high, only when another player makes a mistake and undocks in an overloaded hauler or blinged out ship is it even possible.

CCP always intended you to be at risk in highsec, and always intended for you to be able to attack another player if you were willing to accept the consequences.

Everything is working as intended. The only problem here, and it isn't probably one worth discussing, is that the OP is playing the wrong game. He is not willing to accept loss in his gaming experience, either from suicide gankers or from a changing market that has devalued his battleship. He probably should just move on and let us all get back to playing in our competitive PvP sandbox together.
Malcorath Sacerdos
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#80 - 2017-02-23 12:56:56 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Malcorath Sacerdos wrote:
i see your point. the numbers are at or near 2012 -2011 numbers but an all time low i would say no to.
I don't have the numbers to say that, and yes, suicide ganking rates were probably lower early on immediately after CONCORD was made invincible and and for freighters, before they even dropped loot, but there is no evidence that suicide ganking is increasing, out of control, or even a problem which is the usual carebear narrative. CCP Quant's numbers show that total destruction (from all sources, not just suicide ganking) makes up less than 0.1% of all goods transported in highsec, and ganking of barges shows a similar decrease in recent years, which is off true all time lows in 2012 when Dr. Eyjo reported that Exhumers were blowing up at "historically low rates" (pg. 104).

Highsec is extremely safe. CCP has buffed safety so much it is near impossible to make a living as a pirate there. The cost to attack is so high, only when another player makes a mistake and undocks in an overloaded hauler or blinged out ship is it even possible.

CCP always intended you to be at risk in highsec, and always intended for you to be able to attack another player if you were willing to accept the consequences.

Everything is working as intended. The only problem here, and it isn't probably one worth discussing, is that the OP is playing the wrong game. He is not willing to accept loss in his gaming experience, either from suicide gankers or from a changing market that has devalued his battleship. He probably should just move on and let us all get back to playing in our competitive PvP sandbox together.



im looking at the concord numbers as we speak i copied over the zkill stats to an exell cheat quite intresting really.

yea ppl will cry over all sorts of things and they will have opinions. ever since 2013 the number os concord kills in HS has been dropping akording the the zkill data so i guess ill have to amend my own opinions to better suite the facts in this case. i would love to do this on crest data straght from ccp if possible tho :)