Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Seeing as my freighter pilot has been in far less risk than Mag's ever has, I tend to agree. Many trips, never a loss.

So going by the risk table used by the AG crowd, shouldn't webbing and hauling get nerfed?

Don't forget mining and exploration.

And yeah, my freighter alt has never lost her ship, nor come in any danger of it. But then I use webs and scout my gates, and I also bought her a handy dandy permit from an approved agent of the New Order of Highsec. The best tank that isk can buy.

You know, I'm fine with somebody who wants to be a "white knight" and is willing to put together a gang to gank a bumping ship. In fact, I'd say, "Awesome look at the beauty of emergence and players who are willing to do things that people wouldn't normally expect." Instead we get these whiny puss buckets who think they should be lauded for their behavior instead of deriving satisfaction from simply having fun and making the game more competitive.

Want to be a white knight? All you have to do is get a gang together that can gank the bumping ship. HS carebears should have the sec status and the skills to get into a T2 gank catalyst and make this totally viable...but HS carebears are, in the end, sh**lers who cannot abide the notion of doing something where CONCORD might destroy their ships.

It is not unreasonable for some players to regard these HS players as contemptible as they are not willing to do what their opponents are wiling to do, even in a limited sense.

Hell even if you are not willing to gank other players at least have the balls and the willingness to get into repping fleets...but no, you are too damn greedy to give up your own personal ISK harvesting to help a fellow HS player.

So we look at CODE. and other ganking groups and we see a high degree of cooperation, coordination an teamwork. We look to the HS victims of ganking and we get whining, crying, and complaints about how unfair things are...when there clearly exist in game solutions to their problems.

My only conclusion is: **** the HS victims of ganking groups.

Does their gameplay have any risk in it that doesn't come from other players?

Well I must saying going on past personal experience, the most vitriolic communications tends to come from those claiming to play the 'Good Guy'. But I digress.

I would still like to know about that post. You've not really answered the question tbh.

It's a fairly typical carebear fallacy, this time of totalitarianism.

In this, they accidentally reveal their true goals, because they view any safety that isn't 100% as worthless. So long as there is any risk whatsoever, they will never be satisfied.

That is it? You can't do anything better than "LOL"....how completely pathetic.

No I'm not. Mag suggested it, I have nothing against it, but I'm not asking for it. Clearer now?

You did. You claimed it was alts used for ganking with negative sec status.

All you proved was one character in Doomheim, which means nothing.




Nope. Not "other groups", I get along well with a lot of people, actually.

YOUR group, on the other hand...

So now you're a liar again.