Player Features and Ideas Discussion

For crying out loud CCP! Not only your 4km\s speed limit doesnt change anything but you've made it easier to troll station services! You can still do it in a ceptor, you can still do it in a cruiser with some webs \ target jammers... When and who decided that this kind of soverenity worth anything?! ISK\hour for most 0.0 players is now lower than ever cince you can't now delegate control over figthers, running unrated sites with your carrier is also an issue, logistics is crap (it takes about hour of wathing REALLY ENTERTAINING SHINY COLORED CIRCLES to get something from Jita to most 0.0 space), you don't even get massive fights couse capitals are now nearly useless and it takes 5 characters in crappy ships up to 24m to disable your station. Exitement without a need to play 23/7!

No, it states "certain groups who always want to avoid fights are abusing the system by using uncatchable entosis ships and since they aren't interested in maintaining sov or any space assets because they are not willing to fight, they just dabble in entosis stuff for trolling".

However, if we actually proceeded and went through what your... 'posts'... meant, we'd have to agree on calling social services and placing you under their stewardship depending on whatever jurisdiction you somehow managed to establish your presence under.

Only one or two corps within MoA are truly ESL, the rest are led by native speakers. The only exception is that the fact that Gen Eve is a sucker for a certain Serbian war criminal, but he pointed out before that he lives overseas in a English native country for higher education.

Other than that, my good friend MASSADEATH has publicly stated before that English is his native language.

Agreed. Besides Punkturis, there are other team five-o team members that I personally believe in their excellence in their specialty tasks. I personally appreciate their work very much.

that's the only difference you can see?
how about, for example one big difference is that shooting things give you a killmail while entosing things give you nothing; a killmaill in a pvp game, how about that difference?
should i go on?

Another delicious gewn tears sample! I will quote the gem:


You may not realize it (being gewn you don't have much thought going on usually) but that's the core reason it is a most welcome change.

My suggestions.

1) Limit the entosis module to battle cruiser and above.

This would make it remain accessible to smaller low SP groups while removing the troll interceptor's

2) increase the manufacturing cost of entosis modules, add a irreparable damage to them like T2 crystals but with a lower durability.

That will make spamming systems costly to the attacking alliance and discourage sov trolling for the sake of sov trolling. If someone wants to take someones space away there should be a cost involved, and this wont prevent you from burning an entities sov to the ground it will just attach a price to it.

3) Add a new capital entosis module that will entosis all free nodes in the current system, smaller entities could stop this by manually attacking nodes. Keep the capital penalty.

This gives us a chance to use cap ships in fozzie sov, it also puts those ships on the field to be attacked. I would much rather escort an expensive ship with the chance of a fight than have to sit on a node watching a timer while 10 other pilots do the same thing.

4) Add decay to the nodes based on the index of the system.

The whole point of fozzie sov is to occupy the space you own, if you can lock down the area then you have proven that this is the case. I think most players would rather go on a roam or set up a gate camp than watch timers tick down on magical space beacons. If a hostile activates a beacon then this timed decay should be extended/stopped for a set period so that the attacker has to put effort into taking space. As it stands someone can fly through your space entosising random systems and creating work for the sov holders with no further input from them.

i don't know why. you said defender has to pay whole of 1b to create alliance to hold sov, which is a disadvantage.
i'm just explaining you that attacker has to wear same costs. probably even more if you calculate cost vs member number ratio

it doesn't really matter what SP that alt has. if he only has 1m sp then you can fend him off with a 1m sp toon. but you won't even know how much SP the attacker has if you dont turn up

lets change a few numbers from 10 o 4 and we make a new patch guys ),yeaaaa lets gooo

Right, except no one was close to doing that nor trying to for over a year before the sov changes came out anyway.

Fozziesov isn't the sole reason those battles aren't occurring. The players have to be willing to throw their fleets at one another, and presently it appears that's not happening because of a lack of value in winning whatever systems or regions. Since the current sov system is less than 8 weeks old, I'm willing to give CCP time to implement changes to make the systems valuable enough in terms of natural resources.

That should have been done first before this tweak to Fozziesov though.