EVE General Discussion

Idk about you, but I honestly do not think the entire playerbase is incapable of objectivity. A large amount, certainly, but not all by any means.

But then, a thief will always be willing to believe that another man will steal, as it were.

Whoosh.

Now I remember you. You're the fake lawyer, right? I had forgotten, for a moment I wasn't sure if you were actually this lacking in self awareness, or if I was just being trolled.

I am now no longer unsure.

Just FYI, we have adapted. That's why we continue to own space. That doesn't stop us from pointing out how insanely boring the game mechanics we've had to adapt to are though. That's how developers get feedback to improve their game. If we all just got on with it in silence they'd never know the mistakes they make until it's too late to fix. It's not that we can't deal with trollceptors, but repeatedly doing so is dull.

And oh yeah, I remember you. Didn't you ragequit or something?

Lucas Kelly after reading that Space Monkeys have come to some kind of "let's fight but don't threaten sov" type agreement with your new small alliances neighbours in Cloud Ring your complaints about Fozziesov are meaningless.

hypocracy and then complain why they are not having fun

Swing and a miss. Once again we are not talking about space we don't live in. Fozziesov is boring in space we do live in too. I'm guessing either english isn't your native language or you have sever memory issues, since we've covered this at least 10 times now.

*shrug* These things have always and will always happen. It's how we ensure there's content with groups when we don't want to mutually destroy each other or waste each other's time lasering structures back and forth. The other option of course would be we go full blue and then you lot would cry even more about the blue doughnut. You'd know that if you weren't led by someone with the social skills of a demented squirrel. It doesn't make the sov system any less terrible. If anything it's a sign that sov is a failure because we're having to go around it to create content.

The entosis mechanic has just been blue ball after blue ball. Not yet had a single fight as a result of someone using an Entosis link. Pvp characters in fleet whilst i go off ratting with another alt. Hasn't slowed the isk making. Has just meant I've had to log on another character and fly him to a system to afk at a gate. And yes, lots more World of Warships.

If you want more high-sec players to come out to null, then i think you need to make null a greater place to live than high-sec. If your worried about vast groups owning too much space, then may some sort of limits on the amount of space a set number of accounts( not characters for obvious reasons) can hold - that being said, could mean more unused space so JB's can remain in place.

I don't think making Sov holders irritated by trolls is the way to create movement.

Albeit, it has been something to log on for, e.g. when Moa goes on a little roam, it gives the evil Goonies something to log on and play with. Ironically, i think Moa would do more damage to the CFC if they just stopped providing content.

I'd like to see a new power to grow to create another great war. Maybe creating an incentive to form new coalitions without benefiting the CFC.

Good to hear you've adapted. Good for you, son.
Im sure you personally had a lot to do with that rather than whining on forums.

Cos whining repeatedly about a disposable frigate annoying and upsetting an organisation of thousands of players in control of most of known space sort of gave an opposite impression, if you know what I mean.

No, I didnt ragequit.
Returned to studies warm with victory for a bit.

Thought you did, though.

People moved to wormhole cos its easy isk. Also a lot of isk and they do provide a lot of pvp too. So you get best of both. In null you have to abide by all the blue donuts. I think soon you may have the same with whs. There are a lot of wh entities that are setting each other to blue now.