EVE General Discussion

Of course! Ever since I've subbed, I've had a slew of people tell me this and that and how I should play. Even this thread is someone telling me how I should play. Now I've started telling people too!

Literally that would be 'telling them what to tell and what not to tell' (not sure if i constructed second part properly)

I'm so risk averse that I just warped away when a guy brought his Slicer AND A ROOK to fight my Executioner.

#riskaverse #mayonnaise #2015 #amarr #caldari

And so...for him..it goes to this point..

"And yet, will we ever come to an end of discussion and talk if we think we must always reply to replies? For replies come from those who either cannot understand what is said to them, or are so stubborn and contentious that they refuse to give in even if they do understand." - Augustine of Hippo

Hehehe..

Except all the evidence supported my point and all the logic did well to back it up.

As long as you keep throwing evidence which supports my (kinda obvious) point, what do you expect?

I am "ignorant" at the maximum to every "because I said so" and "lalala I can't hear you" class arguments, and aside from that, none has been brought against my claim to even dent it. The whole stupidity went cycles around the "old miner vs new ganker" so-called argument (as if old miners EVER get caught), which is the corner case of corner cases to begin with (there is just not enough SP in mining to get close to SP wall height in the first place). This type of argument deserve a lot more ignorance than an intelligent person like me could ever show, I'm sorry for lacking it.

Then they call me wrong because I contradict something they want to believe.

Well, not like I know it's cozy in the pink glasses thinking that your game is so easy not because you have all that SP over the wall but because you're oh-so-skilled F1 monkeys. I know that between truth and feeling, the emotional types would choose a good feeling, that's practically what being stupid is - but every time I try to seek a limit of stupidity, there seems to be none - people would still pledge what they like rather than what is real.

Once again, I repeat my claim, so you can try again and bring actual arguments instead of bla-bla you brought on me all these pages:

The rule: SP is the biggest force multiplier, which makes all other force multipliers irrelevant, unless mitigated first. Or, in oversimplified form for birdbrain ad hominem addicts in this thread: more sp always reliably wins.
The exceptions:
1) Being 5th wheel in a fleet which is over SP wall. In this situation, even something outside of human species could feel "useful" even going harlem shake in process of fleet doing the fighting. The reality is that the fleet doesn't need that 5th wheel but decided to help it pass SP wall anyway, which is why it is an exception - even though a dog can probably achieve the same level of usefulness in this situation.
2) Bringing SP cloud to "out-SP" the enemy. Hardly efficient, because you're going to lose a lot more than you win with it, but still, allows SP wall leaping, and thus qualifies as the exception.
3) Enemy's self-destruction by not using his SP at sufficient capacity. In this case, once again, even a dog could manage, because it's enemy's self-destruction and everyone on the killmail just happened to be there when it happened.

The basis of this claim is also simple - it is hard undeniable numbers that character with less SP is very severely less efficient. It is not so obvious for people who can't do more than feeling, but this means that every move you make can be trivially countered by having more SP, as long as there is a field of deficiency, exploiting it is incredibly simple. That, in turn, means, that every other force multiplier will have a very hard time (if possible at all) to influence a fight fought over SP deficiency field, which brings us to the initial claim - SP will make all other force multipliers irrelevant. There are no flaws, and exceptions are well marked.

To date I have not received even a single sample of (at least theoretical) input that contradicts the rule and not lies within exceptions. In fact, the theory is so solid people would rather try to dent me instead of it, which just shows how desperate they are at protecting their false beliefs and their comfort zone of being oh-so-imaginary-skilled leet peeveepeers.

Keep the "Basil is wrong" tears coming, your crying is welcome addition to my tear bucket.

Repeating a claim ad nauseam is not an argument. It is just boring and tiresome.

No. He's right.

Does not work for me for some reason....

Targets fit up to 4+ stabs + good tank. And faction NPC hurts!

I can only guess you are talking about some special kind of 'pvp' where using point on somebody automatically gets you the kill.....

Actually it's not the case. I'm hunting farmers where it hurts more: in Nourvukaiken. And i'm doing it solo.

My God...Basil reproduced!

Non-arguments repeated over and over.