These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Phoebe] Stealth Bombers

First post First post First post
Author
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#501 - 2014-10-17 17:49:33 UTC  |  Edited by: PotatoOverdose
Mike Azariah wrote:
Capqu wrote:
the csm may indeed be doing its job, but noone on the csm has any actual experience with bombing fleets / isbombing. in fact i looked up all the csm members and the only one with any appreciable background using bombs is Ali Aras, and he isn't the most active of pilots with no activity since june and sub a hundred bombing kills before that.



couple of corrections

1) do you assume that all csm fly only on their mains?
2) Ali is female
3) When time and duties allow, I fly and keep in touch with the Bombers Bar. When this dev blog went out the first thing I did was go in channel with them and talk about the changes . . . with people it directly effected. I do NOT talk from a position of inexperience, I talk to the people who ARE experienced and try to represent them.

m

How many fleets has bombers bar wiped with their bombing runs over the past month? And how many fleets have ammzi, space, oodell, or any of the numerous other well-known isboxing bombers killed?

The problem with these changes is that they don't have a pronounced effect on the most prolific source of bomb related issues. It's a question of throughput.

It just looks like your ignoring the salient issue (isboxer, and how it applies to bombers in particular) because it also touches on an issue (isboxer as a whole) that probably represents 2%-3% of CCP's revenue. Or maybe that is the salient issue...
Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#502 - 2014-10-17 17:49:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Capqu
Mike Azariah wrote:
Capqu wrote:

3) i appreciate that you did that, but after the devblog has come out is often too late, which i pretty much am resigned into believing this time around too. i am aware that is not your fault and not in your control. as for speaking from a position of inexperience, maybe you don't, but you are not the only csm and its not unheard of for people to push their own agendas at a detriment to the greater good.

basically im depressed and disappointed as heck because this isn't the first time ccp has ignored minority player base when they destroy some niche of the game. first they came for the rat ai changes, mission flipping etc. etc.



Well, the NDA kind of forbids me from asking folks ahead of dev blogs. Sometimes I try to find a way around it but most times I try to be fast on the response and see how well I can shift the position from the original. That is why you see me asking for input and top two things you would like chenged.

Sorry to hear about the depression but weren't you normal bomber folk depressed if all the bombing in your corp was being handed to the isbox guy? or did I misread that?

m


nah i understand about the nda, i'm not blaming you. main priority for change would be ANYTHING that makes bombs apply damage equally to shield/armor doctrines instead of a soley a power-level nerf, and secondary priority would be something to discourage isboxer

yea we hate it, that's life
it's like knowing you're on a team with 7 of your bestest pals, but if you ditch all of them and just play by yourself instead you'll amount to more than you could ever achieve together. a couple of those pals i used to bomb with / fc bombers with decided to go down that route, and i can't blame them for it. the power of friendship doesn't work in video games, only anime.
when you have 3/4 squads of isboxed bombers, there really isnt any point in adding more human bombers - the combination of diminishing returns and massively increased effort takes away any illusion of enjoyment
Lord Xyon
Team Hemi
#503 - 2014-10-17 17:51:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Xyon
My issue with this is the decloaking part. This is just plain stupid. I am ok with the rest of it. However, your already nerfed wormholes to where people are moving out. Now you take away pretty much most of our life and quite frankly I am getting pretty fed up with some of the stupid decisions. People in wormholes fly mainly cloaked.

Since Fozzie so so clueless as to how cloaking is used elsewhere.

PVP gang fleets in wormholes. Since you still won't put in temp bookmarks or fleet bookmarks or linkable bookmarks and bookmarks also take forever to go out to all toons in a corp. We hunt, we scout we find a targets. We have to fleet warp to 10 on a wormhole. Can't do that anymore we all decloak. You pretty much screw most Wspace travel. Using a covert ops ship as a scout, Warp to scout? Can't do that anymore decloak the covert ops.

Hunting and seeing traffic on a wormhole everyone cloaks up orbiting at 5k from the hole so we can jump in as soon as they do. Nope not anymore we will all decloak each other.

How about rolling holes. Well we already know you hate rolling holes after what you did to us in the last patch. We cloak waiting our timers, we don't warp off. Cloak and orbit the hole. We now will run into each other.

The cloak thing does nothing to an isboxer fleet it only harms everyone else. It harms PVP elsewhere and this stupid idea just generally pisses people off.

So by changing cloaking to somehow try to fix stealth bombers you affect the entire gameplay of:
Recon Ships
Strategic Cruisers
Covert Ops Frigates
Expedition Frigates
Transport Ships
Some Faction Cruisers
Some Faction Frigates
And then Stealth bombers

Then you also affect every single other ship that has a fit where they can put a cloaking device on. I have put them on dictors and even Battlecruisers before. Heck I have one fit on a Noctis for farming wormholes it floats in space safely cloaked until needed. Admittedly as safe spots which should still keep him safe but still. This is pretty stupid change.

Let look at another scenario. Your huffing gas in a wormhole in a fleet in expedition frigates or lets say mining ore in null sec for what ever reason. Bomber comes in drops combat probes, fleet leader sees it on dscan, warps the fleet to a safe spot. No one can cloak in warp, too close, no one can cloak when they land, too close, the combat probes now have a huge target of frigates all at the same spot. Warp to 30 and throw bomb on landing. They don't even need to cloak. Everyone is trying to get away from everyone else and trying to cloak, getting decloaked by others that are cloaked, like clowns doing a chinese fire drill. Your pretty much render fleets of prospects useless now they can't cloak or warp cloaked.
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#504 - 2014-10-17 17:52:20 UTC
El Space Mariachi wrote:
Adrie Atticus wrote:
wheniaminspoce wrote:

*Accidentally dropping some RAM into a tractor unit


I'm here just to point out that the velocity which the hamburger left my mouth at when reading this caused permanent damage to the drywall.


it could happen to anyone

don't act like you've never dropped anything only to see a tractor unit instantly grab it and pull it away from your grasp leaving you no recourse but to shoot it


Yes, but not multiple times in a row in the same system and same spot.
Obil Que
Star Explorers
Solis Tenebris
#505 - 2014-10-17 17:56:40 UTC
Komi Toran wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
I call BS. How many ISboxers do you think are paying for their subscriptions in cash vs how many PLEX via ISK?

Makes absolutely no difference. People who pay via ISK make the PLEX->ISK exchange more attractive, and so increase real-world sales. Either way, CCP gets their money. If you didn't have ISBoxers buying PLEX off the in-game market, the price would crash (drastically, as PLEX would no longer be seen as a safe investment) and fewer people would want to plunk down $20 for 400 million ISK.


People bought PLEX at 400
People buy PLEX at 800

So ISBoxer is single handedly responsible for the PLEX market price now?
Sbrodor
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#506 - 2014-10-17 18:17:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Sbrodor
Aram Kachaturian wrote:
I checked all your killboards one by one, killmail by killmail and as I thought a large part of you has no ******* idea how bombing worked prior to 2012 and didnt bomb intensively at all before and after.

You are just complaining to ruin CCP Fozzie weekend and that's not cool.



http://oscurasimmetria.eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=186748

http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=7476

http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_ext_id=98091868&view=ships_weapons
over 16000 kills in purifier , over 5700 kills in manticore.


before 2012 u don't had the each-other damage of bombs so u can have clacking problem but u had only to manage a single volley.

ccp will introduce a tons of nerf much more than "before 2012". and i think they buffed the bomber to allow people to use them so was a problem and a solution. if they now want to lower use of bombers they have to put the bomber difficult level between "prior 2012" and "now".

with this feature we go in a new level of difficult much more than 2012.

in prior 2012 u dont had:

12 sec flight
smart bomb defense
higher signature
antibomber bubbles
lower agility.
damage each other bombs.

this is the death.
Heinrich Rotwang
Spectre Fleet Corporation
#507 - 2014-10-17 18:20:59 UTC
When I was watching that announcement at fanfest, where Mr. Fozzi was talking all that crap about how he wanted to make SBs more fun to fly and improve them and whatnot, I already said thats code for rendering them useless due to nulltears. I stopped putting bomber and blackops related skills in, unsubbed covops/blackops alts, awaiting the nerfbat.. So, it's not like I didn't see the nerf coming.

I gotta say, the extent to which this happens now, still surprises me. The effiency of nerfing every single aspect that made them work is almost German. This isnt a rebalance. This is making sure bombers are utterly useless and ineffective in pvp, especially fleet operations. This is eleminating one of the last remaining ways of asymmetrical warfare and at the same time dealing a maximum of collateral on the game experience of totally unrelated players (eg me - never isboxing, to start with). Good job in once again rigging the dice in favor of the winning party. It's one thing to HTFU and adapt to changing rules. It's a completely different thing to adapt to rules that are changed on demand of the other team.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#508 - 2014-10-17 18:22:49 UTC
Sbrodor wrote:
Aram Kachaturian wrote:
I checked all your killboards one by one, killmail by killmail and as I thought a large part of you has no ******* idea how bombing worked prior to 2012 and didnt bomb intensively at all before and after.

You are just complaining to ruin CCP Fozzie weekend and that's not cool.



http://oscurasimmetria.eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=186748

http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=7476


before 2012 u don't had the each-other damage of bombs so u can have clacking problem but u had only to manage a single volley.

ccp will introduce a tons of nerf much more than "before 2012". and i think they buffed the bomber to allow people to use them so was a problem and a solution. if they now want to lower use of bombers they have to put the bomber difficult level between "prior 2012" and "now".

with this feature we go in a new level of difficult much more than 2012.

in prior 2012 u dont had:

12 sec flight
smart bomb defense
higher signature
antibomber bubbles
lower agility.
damage each other bombs.

this is the death.



I'm from a time when bombers were paper thin, bombs were utterly useless and they launched cruise missiles. They are far from useless after these changes. The only problem here is the same problem that every ship has after it gets changed, people cant think for themselves. In less than a month people will swap to using new bomber fits and tactics that others who can and do adapt to change will come up with and all will be well again.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#509 - 2014-10-17 18:24:44 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.


Thread re-opened.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
#510 - 2014-10-17 18:58:58 UTC
at this rate of nerf incoming, we should finish 2015 (yes next year) with all ship like 1HP and only civilian modules?

there's so many thing to fix in eve.... and they fix forum ! GJ! but ok i like it !

CCP Fozzie : AFK cloaking, however, is an entirely social form of power

Lugh Crow-Slave
#511 - 2014-10-17 19:06:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Lugh Crow-Slave
Almethea wrote:
at this rate of nerf incoming, we should finish 2015 (yes next year) with all ship like 1HP and only civilian modules?


well that's a bit harsh what this nurf looks like is they got together talked about it and some people had a few good ideas so they implemented them however they forgot that each idea was independent so when implemented together it went over kill


But CCP listened with the jump drives so i'm sure they are now(even if they haven't shone it) and a few of the CSM members are also taking feedback so i'm sure we will have some revision in a few days
Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#512 - 2014-10-17 19:23:54 UTC
Obil Que wrote:
People bought PLEX at 400
People buy PLEX at 800

So it's established that you are clueless about basic economics. Unfortunately, this isn't the place for the course, and I don't see you offering to pay for a tutor.
Obil Que
Star Explorers
Solis Tenebris
#513 - 2014-10-17 20:06:42 UTC
Komi Toran wrote:
Obil Que wrote:
People bought PLEX at 400
People buy PLEX at 800

So it's established that you are clueless about basic economics. Unfortunately, this isn't the place for the course, and I don't see you offering to pay for a tutor.


You're the one claiming that touching ISB will crash the PLEX market
Alexis Nightwish
#514 - 2014-10-17 20:13:44 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
I'm from a time when bombers were paper thin, bombs were utterly useless and they launched cruise missiles. They are far from useless after these changes. The only problem here is the same problem that every ship has after it gets changed, people cant think for themselves. In less than a month people will swap to using new bomber fits and tactics that others who can and do adapt to change will come up with and all will be well again.
Way less than a month. I already know what tactics will be used.


Also, this.

CCP approaches problems in one of two ways: nudge or cludge

EVE Online's "I win!" Button

Fixing bombs, not the bombers

Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#515 - 2014-10-17 20:32:41 UTC
Lord Xyon wrote:


The cloak thing does nothing to an isboxer fleet it only harms everyone else. It harms PVP elsewhere and this stupid idea just generally pisses people off.

So by changing cloaking to somehow try to fix stealth bombers you affect the entire gameplay of:
Recon Ships
Strategic Cruisers
Covert Ops Frigates
Expedition Frigates
Transport Ships
Some Faction Cruisers
Some Faction Frigates
And then Stealth bombers



Someone in NULL tears up about losing a few ships. Fozzie to the rescue.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#516 - 2014-10-17 20:53:19 UTC
CCP Fozzie wrote:

New 10km Dictor Bubbles:


Are these half the size (m3) of the others?
Ghaustyl Kathix
Rising Thunder
#517 - 2014-10-17 21:35:29 UTC
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Fozzie to the rescue.
Actually, one of the CSM members said that most of these changes were proposed by the CSM members themselves. P

While you guys are changing stealth bombers, can you switch the Purifier to use the Tormentor hull instead of the Inquisitor? It makes no sense as-is, since the others are based off of combat frigates (Kestrel>Manticore, Tristan>Nemesis, Breacher>Hound) while the Amarr bomber's based off of the logi frigate.
FunGu Arsten
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#518 - 2014-10-17 22:02:23 UTC  |  Edited by: FunGu Arsten
lol at cloak changes...

good job removing all competition, in favor of multiboxers..
less real people doing bomber runs - less standard anti-bomberfittings - more tears when multiboxer bomber-fleets log in

box 1 warp to 0 - box 2 warp to 5 - box 3 warp to 10 - etc... ( pretty easy to setup at 1m/s speed)

does anyone play this game when changes are beeing proposed... or is it still listening to the biggest whiners first?


** CCP you are making multiboxer fleets stronger! Thank you **
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#519 - 2014-10-17 22:03:13 UTC
Ghaustyl Kathix wrote:
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Fozzie to the rescue.
Actually, one of the CSM members said that most of these changes were proposed by the CSM members themselves. P



Oh yea, DEV's taking the advise of a few self serving CSM's.

That will make the game better.
Momiji Sakora
Omni Galactic
Central Omni Galactic Group
#520 - 2014-10-17 22:15:34 UTC
progodlegend wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:

Those who argue that bombers are the counter to n+1 . . . really? The big groups are precluded from flying them and I wasn't told? Bombers are a way to make a fleet nervous and allows the little guy to punch above his weight, agreed. But do not try to tell me that the blobs cannot just as easily field the bombers


I've been bombed by a 100 man bomber fleet before. It sucks, we were low sig and armor tanked :(.

I would pay to see the video of 100 bombs going off on a fleet, 10-20 bombs already looks amazing :D