These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

WiS pledge fundrising

First post First post
Author
Jonas Xiamon
#441 - 2014-05-18 20:06:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonas Xiamon
Someone should run for the CSM on the platform of WiS Rep/Advocate.

I usally write one of these and then change it a month later when I reread it and decide it sounds stupid.

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#442 - 2014-05-18 20:57:07 UTC
Jonas Xiamon wrote:
Someone should run for the CSM on the platform of WiS Rep/Advocate.

This has come to mind quite a few times for me. Personally though I'd rather see a CSM not only for avatars/WiS but for immersion in a broader sense - avatars, live events, roleplay and immersion. Someone who'll try to inject some life and enthusiasm into all the immersive areas of EVE's community and gameplay, that each on their own are somewhat niche.

Was rather dissapointing to see almost none of the current CSM's candidates show any interest in avatars/WiS at all. From memory I think there was barely one who gave it a very slight mention (Asayanami Dei) and they were primarily a wormhole rep so I doubt much effort would have been put into pursuing avatar-stuff even if they were elected at the time.

The biggest hurdle I'd foresee for a "WiS / Immersion CSM" rep though would simply be a) Knowing where the **** they stand to begin with and b) actually getting any answers or info from CCP. Right now as it stands we pretty much have no clue what CCPs short or long term plans are for avatar based gameplay or development in any sense. They aren't talking, so I really don't know where a CSM would stand when trying to do their job in the face of a silent-CCP...

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Jonas Xiamon
#443 - 2014-05-18 21:27:19 UTC
Erica Dusette wrote:
Personally though I'd rather see a CSM not only for avatars/WiS but for immersion in a broader sense - avatars, live events, roleplay and immersion. Someone who'll try to inject some life and enthusiasm into all the immersive areas of EVE's community and gameplay, that each on their own are somewhat niche.


That makes sense, WiS might be a it too narrow anyhow? Then again it has fairly huge possibilities. Eitherway I'm down for whatever, as long as it gets them a seat. I think due to eve's lack of avatar gameplay that the RP community is fairly stunted however, and it's sort of a chicken/egg delima where each are fairly dependant on each other. (Not that Eve doesn't have RP, just that I feel it would have significantly more if there were avatars and interaction and such.


Quote:
The biggest hurdle I'd foresee for a "WiS / Immersion CSM" rep though would simply be a) Knowing where the **** they stand to begin with


I'm not sure what you mean by this?

Quote:
b) actually getting any answers or info from CCP. Right now as it stands we pretty much have no clue what CCPs short or long term plans are for avatar based gameplay or development in any sense. They aren't talking, so I really don't know where a CSM would stand when trying to do their job in the face of a silent-CCP...


I'm sure that a CSM answers could get answers... I just don't think they'd be allowed to share them. The real hurdle would be getting information for the public?

I usally write one of these and then change it a month later when I reread it and decide it sounds stupid.

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#444 - 2014-05-18 21:42:10 UTC
Jonas Xiamon wrote:
Quote:
The biggest hurdle I'd foresee for a "WiS / Immersion CSM" rep though would simply be a) Knowing where the **** they stand to begin with


I'm not sure what you mean by this?

Quote:
b) actually getting any answers or info from CCP. Right now as it stands we pretty much have no clue what CCPs short or long term plans are for avatar based gameplay or development in any sense. They aren't talking, so I really don't know where a CSM would stand when trying to do their job in the face of a silent-CCP...


I'm sure that a CSM answers could get answers... I just don't think they'd be allowed to share them. The real hurdle would be getting information for the public?

You pretty much answered your question with your own remark to the second paragraph I think. Smile

It's been a long time since CCP have said anything official about the future of avatar development, or the fate of WiS (or otherwise). It's the elephant in the room that (aside from a reddit comment here, forum post there) no Dev seems willing to speak about openly.

A CSM rep cannot try to promote development of a feature if we have no idea if that feature even exists anymore.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#445 - 2014-05-18 22:33:08 UTC
People at CCP don't even know what they want for the game, let alone what to tell to the players. The company is adrift. I've said this before and I'll say it again - the management lacks leadership and vision for development and it is reflected in the current state of the game and the patches that were recently released. It's easier to hide behind the curtain and pretend to be working on something than to show the development supporters what exactly is being worked on.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#446 - 2014-05-18 22:38:10 UTC
raven666wings wrote:
People at CCP don't even know what they want for the game, let alone what to tell to the players. The company is adrift. I've said this before and I'll say it again - the management lacks leadership and vision for development and it is reflected in the current state of the game and the patches that were recently released. It's easier to hide behind the curtain and pretend to be working on something than to show the development supporters what exactly is being worked on.

Well I don't know about that. Putting your Star Citizen stuff to one side for a moment, I do think CCP have a vision. Or at least they used to have a vision that they enjoyed talking about and showcasing - making EVE the very best Sci-fi simulator. That's sci-fi in a very broad sense, not just "spaceships".

But it's true that since our last major piece of avatar development they've been deathly quiet. While it's obvious that it's still alive (we're still getting new avatar items, etc, albiet recycled stuff) we have no idea what their ultimate vision is right now and so many things remain unanswered sources of contention, trolling and arguing among the community.

I'd like to know where us avatar gameplay and WiS supporters stand, what CCPs current overall vision now is, and where avatar development fits into that.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#447 - 2014-05-18 23:17:22 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Erica Dusette wrote:
Well I don't know about that. Putting your Star Citizen stuff to one side for a moment
Sorry, but this is not Star Citizen. That is EVE and all of its mis-managed and under-delivered projects over 11 years.
Erica Dusette wrote:
I do think CCP have a vision.
I think they have many, and they are constantly changing. Which equals to having none as far as I'm concerned. Someone at CIG has written this Henry Ford quote in a board in one of their videos: "Vision without execution is just hallucination".
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#448 - 2014-05-18 23:25:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Erica Dusette
raven666wings wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
Well I don't know about that. Putting your Star Citizen stuff to one side for a moment
Sorry, but this is not Star Citizen. That is EVE and all of its mis-managed and under-delivered projects over 11 years.

No, I meant your post - it's obvious that SC influences your thinking heavily judging by the terms and language you tend to use, even when speaking about something unrelated to SC itself. Blink

And why would you link that post? It was laughable tbh, which is why I didn't respond seriously to it at the time.

raven666wings wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
I do think CCP have a vision.
I think they have many, and they are constantly changing. Which equals to having none as far as I'm concerned. Someone at CIG has written this Henry Ford quote in a board in one of their videos: "Vision without execution is just hallucination".

I've only ever heard CCP broadcast one major, official "vision" - to be the ultimate sci-fi simulator in existance.

They used to say it quite a lot. But not anymore.

I think it's time for an update. In fact I believe we as a community deserve an update.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#449 - 2014-05-18 23:45:13 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Erica Dusette wrote:

No, I meant your post - it's obvious that SC influences your thinking heavily judging by the terms and language you tend to use, even when speaking about something unrelated to SC itself. Blink
And why would you link that post? It was laughable tbh, which is why I didn't respond seriously to it at the time.
Excuse me, but I think what's obvious here is that you're trying to use "Star Citizen" as a strawman argument in an attempt to counter what I've written without using a valid argument. Now that's laughable Blink

Erica Dusette wrote:
I've only ever heard CCP broadcast one major, official "vision" - to be the ultimate sci-fi simulator in existance.

They used to say it quite a lot. But not anymore.

I think it's time for an update. In fact I believe we as a community deserve an update.
Heres my update for them: https://secure.eveonline.com/CancelSubscription.aspx
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#450 - 2014-05-18 23:51:43 UTC
You're awfully touchy this morning, Mr Wings!

I wasn't trying to argue anything. Just making an observation is all.

Not sure what else to say other than "your stuff?"

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#451 - 2014-05-18 23:57:52 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Erica Dusette wrote:
You're awfully touchy this morning, Mr Wings!

I wasn't trying to argue anything. Just making an observation is all.
That's what I thought. No arguments against hard facts.
Erica Dusette wrote:
Not sure what else to say other than "your stuff?"
My stuff eh? Lol You think you can handle it? I bet it's bigger that your stuff Shocked
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#452 - 2014-05-19 00:06:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Erica Dusette
raven666wings wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
You're awfully touchy this morning, Mr Wings!

I wasn't trying to argue anything. Just making an observation is all.
That's what I thought. No arguments against hard facts.

Arguments? Facts? Is this a SC thing again?

Honestly I think it's silly to compare EVE and SC in the manner that people were in the thread/posts you linked. It's like comparing a camel to an unborn horse, and arguing which is best at carrying stuff through the Amazon. Roll

Quote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
Not sure what else to say other than "your stuff?"
My stuff eh? Lol You think you can handle it? I bet it's bigger that your stuff Shocked

I like my stuff petite and have never had any complaints sir.

But as for acommodating yours? I'm sure my little hanger could manage it, if not I'll just anchor a second.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#453 - 2014-05-19 00:08:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
raven666wings wrote:

Ah, the belated ragequit posts, enduring, timeless. Takes me back to the days of black prophecy. Yum, the tears that ensued. Just yum. Keep up the fine work, it'll pay off, well for some of us anyway.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#454 - 2014-05-19 00:20:38 UTC
Webvan wrote:
Ah, the belated ragequit posts, enduring, timeless. Takes me back to the days of black prophecy. Yum, the tears that ensued. Just yum. Keep up the fine work, it'll pay off, well for some of us anyway.


Don't worry this is not a ragequit. It's only a yawnquit. When WiS is integrated in the client I'll sub the account back.
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#455 - 2014-05-19 07:48:19 UTC
Webvan wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Webvan wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:


changing numbers in a database and calling it ship balancing is not an expansion of game play, it's the same old game play re-presented in a different way. When you can do new things in the client that's an expansion, which is why I pointed out PI as the rather obvious example of doing new things in the client.

http://www.eveonline.com/rubicon/
Rubicon
According to you didn't qualify as an expansion? hah!
Why, because for you - you weren't interested in the updates and new features so doesn't count?
Orbital bombardment to interact with dust bunnies and kill 'em - not interested so doesn't count P
ISIS - not interested so doesn't count P
Ghost Sites - not interested so doesn't count P
Mobile Structures - not interested so doesn't count P
New faction ships - not interested so doesn't count P
Cert overhaul - not interested so doesn't count P
Graphics improvements to space environments - not interested so doesn't count P
Ship balancing and seeing old ships fixed and usable finally - not interested so doesn't count P
FW fixes where years ago it was so broken it was a joke - not interested so doesn't count P
So much more - not interested so doesn't count P
not interested so doesn't count P - not interested so doesn't count P - not interested so doesn't count P
"Where are my WiS updates!!!" Cry

And somehow you say you can see the future, that development like this basically stops and only player gates are all that's left? uh-huh.


now you are being silly. I didn't say not interested, but I did say 'not an expansion of game play', I am of course interested in the goings on within the client otherwise there would be no point playing, hence the desire to see expansions of game play that allow new activities within the client.

But I did list additional content. ISIS. ghost sites, mobile structures, faction ships, orbital bombardment, new space environment features +etc etc added new content. In addition reiteration of old content, and in that being new... such as the stupid mini-game to hacking for example and those nasty little rigs and modules, which is new content. you are falling on a two edged sword here, on the one hand you say only new content is an "expansion" yet you are dismissing a whole lot of new content at the same time. So to me, 'it doesn't count not interested' is the obvious explanation.


new content is not the same as new gameplay.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#456 - 2014-05-19 11:04:35 UTC
Jonas Xiamon wrote:
I think due to eve's lack of avatar gameplay that the RP community is fairly stunted however, and it's sort of a chicken/egg delima where each are fairly dependant on each other. (Not that Eve doesn't have RP, just that I feel it would have significantly more if there were avatars and interaction and such.


But, you see, this is where the vision falls down. How would better avatar play help roleplay? You are aware how many stations exist in New Eden? Providence is the epitomy of a roleplay haven, and it alone has 72 stations, across 9 different Alliances (Disclaimer - I know how station-addicted you Providencians are, so i'm well aware you might have dropped three more while I'm writing this post).

How does walking in FX-7EM help when you are talking to two guys 14 jumps away in Y9-MDG, and another 4 jumps away in LF-2KP (who is 11 from the guys in FX)? In truth, the roleplayers will stick to their channels; they will have to, they will be too diffused otherwise by affiliation and politics. Sure, a few hubs may spring up for the truly dedicated, but then you are still restricted to chat channels when talking to those who are barred from those stations, and it would then negatively effect your ability to play the rest of EvE (sorry, cant join fleet, I am in the RP hub 10 jumps from my combat ships).
Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#457 - 2014-05-19 11:09:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Aralyn Cormallen
Ryunosuke Kusanagi wrote:

On the Incarna front, WiS was in development for...18 months or so (citation needed)


The "18 months" was taken from the responses to CSM 5 at their first Iceland meeting, where every question about developement on EvE was met with a flat "there is no EvE developement for the next 18 months while we work on Incarna". I'm not sure whether Incarna developement was that long in truth (although, as the summer of rage was during CSM 6, it sounds about right), but its what made "18 months" the slogan it is.

EDIT - getting my CSM terms wrong Oops
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#458 - 2014-05-19 11:11:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Jonas Xiamon wrote:
I think due to eve's lack of avatar gameplay that the RP community is fairly stunted however, and it's sort of a chicken/egg delima where each are fairly dependant on each other. (Not that Eve doesn't have RP, just that I feel it would have significantly more if there were avatars and interaction and such.


You are clearly spending far too much time with normies and heretics.

We are the New Flesh

We are Capsuleers

Our ships are an extension of our being

Our blood is the blood of beings that are like UNTO GODS to the mortals of the Old Flesh

Avatars? Give me the avatars for the Thukker crew removed from the Tribal Defense ships that cross my path which are to be processed through my exsanguinators and perhaps you will have a point.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#459 - 2014-05-19 11:24:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Erica Dusette
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Jonas Xiamon wrote:
I think due to eve's lack of avatar gameplay that the RP community is fairly stunted however, and it's sort of a chicken/egg delima where each are fairly dependant on each other. (Not that Eve doesn't have RP, just that I feel it would have significantly more if there were avatars and interaction and such.


But, you see, this is where the vision falls down. How would better avatar play help roleplay? You are aware how many stations exist in New Eden? Providence is the epitomy of a roleplay haven, and it alone has 72 stations, across 9 different Alliances (Disclaimer - I know how station-addicted you Providencians are, so i'm well aware you might have dropped three more while I'm writing this post).

How does walking in FX-7EM help when you are talking to two guys 14 jumps away in Y9-MDG, and another 4 jumps away in LF-2KP (who is 11 from the guys in FX)? In truth, the roleplayers will stick to their channels; they will have to, they will be too diffused otherwise by affiliation and politics. Sure, a few hubs may spring up for the truly dedicated, but then you are still restricted to chat channels when talking to those who are barred from those stations, and it would then negatively effect your ability to play the rest of EvE (sorry, cant join fleet, I am in the RP hub 10 jumps from my combat ships).


It's all about immersion, if we're talking about role play. Smile

Simply put it's one thing to describe your character walking into a room, another entirely to actually watch them do it.

The added immersion would be enormous for those into RP - although in saying that, WiS/avatar play certainly isn't just about role play(ers).

Anyway, you mention distances and the impracticality of actually meeting. Thats not a new obstacle for RP'ers, even now there is maybe half of the RP community that would physically travel to a location in game to partake in a RP event or scenario (I personally insist upon it with my characters). Although while doing so is a sign of good RP and added immersion it's ultimately just symbolic - so many RP'ers use things like the fictional 'Interbus Shuttle' service to attend RP without actually having to attend.

With something the likes of WiS these kinds of things cease being merely symbolic or purely RP.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Solecist Project
#460 - 2014-05-19 13:36:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
*smiles* Still waiting for our meeting to happen, Erica! :D

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia