EVE General Discussion

Never mind your choosing to bring forth a conclusion you reached where emasculating someone and feeding his genitals to a dog is even a POSSIBILITY worth considering, which you've proven you did by bringing it into the conversation of your own volition.

I think the eaelier comment by someone, that much uneccessary and unfounded disgruntlement is actually rooted in some peoples inability or unwillingness to accept or understand the nature of this game as compared to many other MMOs, rather than the "toxiccommunity", is very true.

Its not the behavior of other people towards them that is the problem, the problem is their own attitude.

If I walk around in life with unrealistic expectations both of the way the world works and of the nature of my fellow mankind, I will be repeatedly dissappointed and angry, not because of what other autonomous people are doing in it, but because I am so stupid as to assume I am responsible for, or capable of controlling, anyone else except myself.

These people dont seem to understand the fundamental link between the ability to control an outcome, and being responsible for it.

I am not responsible for how others view my actions. Why? Because I have no business or auspice to control how they view it.
That is their own prerogative, purview and privilege and one I cannot determine or define. Its in their own head to which I have no access or business.

Reciprocally, this also means that though they are free to view my actions as they wish, their views have NO control over my own autonomous choices in my own life. Their views are their own, and not mine, and do not define how I choose to live my life, no matter how they try to claim that theirs is the "right" way.

But many people dont understand this. They think because they dont "like" something, that somehow means they are entitled to judge and restrict those who do like that.

How does this translate in EVE?

As some people who expect others to behave according to how THEY demand and perceive they should, according to their own internal system of beliefs. Is that fair towards the other person? Hell no. Does that entitle them to dictate how others should behave or think? Absolutely not. Why not? Becuase the same rationale could be levelled right back at them, and they, in return, be expected (against their own autonomy and self-determination) to act as those other people whom they presume to dictate to, dictate right back to them.

Its a ridiculous arrangement, premise and approach to interaction with others.

Its also extremely offensive and socially reprehenensible to even THINK you are in somekind of position to dictate to others how they should behave. It is none of your business. You have no control over how others behave, only over how YOU yourself behave.

I am not responsible for how you feel about something.
I am not responsible to your personal view on how "things should be".
I am not beholden to act as you in your head think I should.
You dont, and cant, control me, nor I you.

Its abhorrent to even think or attempt otherwise, and yet that is exactly what this thread is trying to defend.

Stop trying to dictate how others live their lives and how they choose to conduct themselves.

---

Actually no, that was someone else's volition. Goe Rilla was the person who initially brought into being, the scenario based around sleeping with one's wife.

But you don't seem to care about actuality.

Also, why do you feel that cutting off the genitals of a man and feeding it to an animal is an appropriate response to infidelity?

I agree. The man didn't do anything but nail a woman. She was the one that cheated, so you should cut her genitals off and feed them to your dog. You should take the dude out and buy him a beer for showing you what a whorin' b**ch you married.

Are you an alt of those very people?

Ethics and morality can generally be understood by children, who lack only wisdom from experience that guides choices.

D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They´re wired differently. Their moral pragmatism (which is a form of mild autism) is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon.

And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It´s absolutely pointless.