Test Server Feedback

Thats awesome :)

You contridicted yourself more than once in a couple of lines, ROFL congradulations, that is a special skill for your CV XD

Exactly as you say "changing a few fighters or fighterbombers is so damn hard" easiest thing in the world to rightly ammend the drone bay to 20/20, yes you are correct. & if I wanted it to be easy I sure as hell would be complaining that there is now a pinging aggro timer & that all my sentrys & other drones are gone.
Quite the opposite, I actually want the best for all area's of the EVE community, not just in your instance, your damn self! ( heres some lego, go play child )
You go onto saying "You just want superecap logistics dumbed down and made easy for you" omg didn't know you where such a tard, do you even think before you speak, I guess not, you would rather make yourself look a fool. I can guess many things about you, that you have a very limited/basic (lol) idea about the mechanics in question is evident, that you do not use a Super capital, that you only care about your Subcap area of interest, & that garbage comes out your gob when its open. All this has been proven. Its a wonder I reply to such nonescence, but I can't help myself when what you say is soo stupid. & I point out yet again that you fail as always to supply an actual reason for why Supers shouldn't have 20/20 drone bay! Is it really customary for you to literally always fail!

Agreed

don't try to call me out when you won't post with your main yourself.

Oh, this is only one of my characters. My other flies a supercap.





You haven't said why they should, except saying that they should be solo ships and able to fight if tackled, or whinking if someone bombs your fighters.


Eveything else you wrote is moronic dribble that a McDonald's clerk with Down's Syndrome would laugh at.

You once again are just an embarassment.


POST WITH YOUR MAIN.


Here's what I think.. you don't even fly a super. I don't even think you have carriers V. You're just a whiny little troll.

Yes. Of course. He thought he'd switched character to an alt. He's been astroturfing this entire thread, posting replies to himself and even liking his posts to give the idea of popular support.

I agree, hail Svennig.

He did on the last page.



I had my money on him being NCdot too, as he didn't bite on the ev0ke comments I made. +1 to me!

However at this point I'm going to have to ignore his posts. Him self-quoting above without even realising he forgot to switch alts means either;
a) Phunnestyle is a master troll feeding off this thread - who doesn't care about supercaps so much as our replies to his posts, or
b) he is actually serious, and therefore so mentally deficient he doesn't realise how bad his posting is. In which case any continued prodding is just plain cruel.

The problem isn't the Hel and Chimera CPU, it's a general problem with capital shield boosters and shield transfers of all sizes. They really need to be looked at.

Then you're missing the point.

First of all, every carrier has a problem with shield. This points to a problem with the mods, not the ships.

Secondly, supercapitals don't tend to fit large numbers of remote reps or transfers. One or two maybe, but not a full rack. And they already have absolutely no ******* problem whatsoever fitting them. And as for CSBs, don't make me laugh.

Consider it an occam's razor of EVE. If you have two possible ways of balancing something, the one that results in the fewest changes is the one that you should take.

Let's say that we forget about CSBs for a moment (as these are mired in problems associated with CPR IIs). We could boost the CPU of the chimera, the nidhoggur and the thanatos to make them more shield-rep friendly. That's three changes. Or we can reduce the CPU usage of module that is common to these ships - the CST. That's one change.

You think that if these mods get reduced CPU cost you're going to see shield tanking archons? You're mentally damaged.