These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships

First post First post
Author
HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#821 - 2012-02-10 22:27:40 UTC
Shadowsword wrote:
Draconus Lofwyr wrote:
really, all it takes is one hictor and a super is dead eventually, just hold it in place till the kill fleet arrives.


"All it takes", eh?

You have a strange definition of those words, when you mention a killer fleet in the same sentence.

Pray tell, what are the supercap's friends doing while that kill fleet is on it's way? Sipping tea somewhere?


"I botted for 2 whole months to buy this supercap! I shouldn't have to worry about things like support fleets, or tactics, or fittings!"
Sarrein Razor
RazorEnterprise
#822 - 2012-02-13 06:37:28 UTC
HELIC0N ONE wrote:
Shadowsword wrote:
Draconus Lofwyr wrote:
really, all it takes is one hictor and a super is dead eventually, just hold it in place till the kill fleet arrives.


"All it takes", eh?

You have a strange definition of those words, when you mention a killer fleet in the same sentence.

Pray tell, what are the supercap's friends doing while that kill fleet is on it's way? Sipping tea somewhere?


"I botted for 2 whole months to buy this supercap! I shouldn't have to worry about things like support fleets, or tactics, or fittings!"


Just because you and your friends get your ISK by botting, that doesnt mean that everyone else does. Most of the supercaps where earned through moon mining or reactions anyway.

Stop asking CCP to change the game to favour your playstyle. How about adapting to the game instead?
EmmerTemp
State War Academy
Caldari State
#823 - 2012-02-15 08:46:29 UTC
Shaak Ti
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#824 - 2012-04-04 06:52:58 UTC
CCP Tallest wrote:
We are here and we are reading your feedback.

We will be iterating on our balancing efforts based on the feedback in this and other threads and will release some more balancing in early 2012.


Any news on this?
MastahFR
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#825 - 2012-04-04 19:35:27 UTC
Shaak Ti wrote:
CCP Tallest wrote:
We are here and we are reading your feedback.

We will be iterating on our balancing efforts based on the feedback in this and other threads and will release some more balancing in early 2012.


Any news on this?



Yea, were is the promise CCP made about re-balancing minmatar capitals (all of them) ? That does include the Hel. The Hel is still a useless flying brick. When is that gonna change ?
They said they were looking at Shield capitals... Were are the implants ? Were are all the other stuff they spoke about to re-balance them ?
Nazowa
Resilience.
The Initiative.
#826 - 2012-04-05 13:08:07 UTC
MastahFR wrote:
Shaak Ti wrote:
CCP Tallest wrote:
We are here and we are reading your feedback.

We will be iterating on our balancing efforts based on the feedback in this and other threads and will release some more balancing in early 2012.


Any news on this?



Yea, were is the promise CCP made about re-balancing minmatar capitals (all of them) ? That does include the Hel. The Hel is still a useless flying brick. When is that gonna change ?
They said they were looking at Shield capitals... Were are the implants ? Were are all the other stuff they spoke about to re-balance them ?


Should be interesting.
GeneralDouchbag
Apocalypse Lancers
Hole Tanking
#827 - 2012-04-16 18:39:33 UTC
Isbariya wrote:
Naomi Knight wrote:
Caldari capital fix

Phoenix:
Caldari Dreadnought Skill Bonus: 10% bonus to missile damage and 5% bonus to Capital Launcher rate of fire per skill level
+
10% bonus to Capital Hybrid Turret optimal per level
5% bonus to Capital Hybrid Turret rate of fire per level
+2 turret slots
+5 scan resolution

so it can choose between missiles or hybrids

Chimera+Wyvern:
5% resist bonus changed to 7,5% /lvl
+200 base cpu
+5 scan resolution




first, the Phoenix change won't happen as it takes too much time to generate a new model with turret-hardpoints.
The other dread changes seem quite fair to me, though I don't have a dread and don't care about them much either.

What i do care about is the wyvern. To be honest, I would rather have a slave implant for shields as well as the change how shield buff were added then those 2.5% more base resist.
Scan resolution, well as long as supers don't have a full flight off fighters and bombers the wyvern does not need it, and the 200 base cpu, well don't need it either.

Regarding the chimera though I would appreciate those changes, it really does need a cpu boost or cap shield transfers need a reduction in cpu need. Either way it's definitely needed.


So CCP, give us a heads up !
'


the phoenix already has a Turret hardpoint.

balls 2 u good sir