These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Can we do something about the idiots in highsec already CCP?

First post First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#281 - 2013-11-06 04:38:34 UTC
Clyde Belvar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Good Posting wrote:
Do like me. When you see a tornado gang camping a station, switch to your ceptor, split guns and ***** kill mails like a baws.


Confirming that this is why hauler ships have turret slots.


lol and what,since haulers have gun slots they should fight against ganks,dude from which planet did you came from?


No, dirt-for-brains.

The guy I quoted said that he *****s on killmails with an interceptor.

I said I ***** on killmails even with a hauler, because I put guns on them in the event that someone near me is ganked, so I can fire on the gankers and get on their CONCORD killmail.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Clyde Belvar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#282 - 2013-11-06 04:38:44 UTC
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:
Clyde Belvar wrote:

Yes most of the goods are made by players,but why only ones who make profit should be veteran players ,alliances,why can't newer players make isk too.So why make industrial, trader career in eve if its not available to newer players?
New indies are just ganked straight on undock,while big alliances profit on that,if it will continue like that eve will be left with dude with 100 chars.

EVE needs isk sink,ganking,but make it more hard to do.You are talking about miners hitting back to gankers,lol dude wake up imagine what will happen if miner corp will go attack some big ass gank alliance.


I'm curious where this station is where new indies are ganked straight on the undock? I only fly T1 haulers and have never been ganked in Jita or Dodixie, or any where between the two. I think you are perhaps either using hyperbole or have had your views tainted by pilots who are, charitably, not very good at Eve.

Ganking has been nerfed, nerfed hard, and nerfed some more over the years. The only way to nerf it any more would be to just turn off the safety switch and make everyone's set to Green in hisec.

Would you like to know what would happen if a miner corp attacked a "big ass gank alliance?" They'd win. Defeating miner gankers is easy, its just no one wants to do it because *effort*. They'd rather complain to CCP on the forums while watching Youtube videos and AFK'ing the ice.


Jita sir last time i was ganked in jita,is there anything i can do to transport my goods safely without gank?No,since i was ganked in empty freighter too.Dude take your pink glasses off and take a look at killmails,or even just eve map statistics see how many ships were destroyed last 24 h,more then half of them are ganks.And miners vs big alliances,yes you live in fairy land if you think miners would win.
You talk about effort,then why gankers not going to null and push out goons from half the null,they won't because it takes too much effort its much more easyer to gank noob in hisec.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#283 - 2013-11-06 04:43:09 UTC
Quote:
,is there anything i can do to transport my goods safely without gank?


Depends on the kind of gank.

If you wish to defend against a "for profit" gank, then I advise not putting more than 2 billion isk worth of goods in your freighter. I also recommend escorts with double webs, it works wonders.

If you want to be immune to a "spite" gank, or a "I want person X dead" gank, then you really can't. If they want you dead, you die. No one should really be able to survive multiple people fighting you from surprise with one character anyway.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Violet Crumble
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#284 - 2013-11-06 04:47:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Violet Crumble
Clyde Belvar wrote:
Jita sir last time i was ganked in jita,is there anything i can do to transport my goods safely without gank?No,since i was ganked in empty freighter too.Dude take your pink glasses off and take a look at killmails,or even just eve map statistics see how many ships were destroyed last 24 h,more then half of them are ganks.And miners vs big alliances,yes you live in fairy land if you think miners would win.
You talk about effort,then why gankers not going to null and push out goons from half the null,they won't because it takes too much effort its much more easyer to gank noob in hisec.


It's a dog eat dog world and all that; and it's always easier to pick on a smaller dog than a bigger one.

Just so happens that the smallest dog in the game at the moment is the lone highsec miner or noob highsec hauler.

Most gankers aren't that much higher up the food chain and can be beaten (on a range of different levels) fairly easily. Go and look at the C&P where there are a couple of threads providing good advice on that, directly from gankers.

But in the end, you as a player make the choices about how you play the game; and you have the accept responsibility for all apects of game play that result from those choices.

I agree that it should be less safe for gankers, but that is nothing to do with stopping them from ganking you. You are playing the same game as everyone else and have the same tools available to you to avoid being ganked. It's not someone else's role (eg. CCP) to take responsibility to fix your problems when solutions already exist.

Funtime Factory - We put the fun back in funtime

Clyde Belvar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#285 - 2013-11-06 04:55:07 UTC
Violet Crumble wrote:
Clyde Belvar wrote:
Yes most of the goods are made by players,but why only ones who make profit should be veteran players ,alliances,why can't newer players make isk too.So why make industrial, trader career in eve if its not available to newer players?
New indies are just ganked straight on undock,while big alliances profit on that,if it will continue like that eve will be left with dude with 100 chars.

EVE needs isk sink,ganking,but make it more hard to do.You are talking about miners hitting back to gankers,lol dude wake up imagine what will happen if miner corp will go attack some big ass gank alliance.


Look at the profile of this character I'm posting with. New and making 400-500 mil ISK per month through PI and trading.

It's not at all about being a veteran or part of a major alliance. It's about having a clue to go find and absorb the information that's there and to try different things.

As to what would happen if you attacked a ganking alliance. You'd probably get wardecced, killed, podded and rage quit. But that seems to be what you'd do, not everyone. Others might find another aspect of play they enjoy.

Go to lowsec and mine. Lowsec is no more of a risk than you seem to think highsec is and more variety in mining too.


First off lady this newb char makes triple amount of isk what you do in month by doing same stuff,second is why the hell ccp implemented trading and mining as career choice if you can't play it because ganking?Lets just make 3 careers in eve explorer,pvp'er and ganker.Then all will be set then.
My point is not to eliminate ganking completely,make it harder,why one must work week for several h a day for something and then someone comes in and destroys it all in 10 secs without consequences.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#286 - 2013-11-06 04:58:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
I agree. Something needs to be done about the idiots in highsec.

I say CCP should relax some of the many many CONCORD buffs that have happened through the years, or tone down the consequences of killing people, and make ganks a much more commonplace and worth-while practice. That should weed them out in short order.

As it is, the chances of being ganked are pretty much zero, so the idiots are allowed to maintain their idiotic ways and have no reason or incentive to adapt or adopt more clever practices. Bring back some proper risk to highsec and get rid of this silly notion that have grown that it is somehow a “safe” part of space.
Clyde Belvar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#287 - 2013-11-06 05:03:46 UTC
Violet Crumble wrote:
Clyde Belvar wrote:
Jita sir last time i was ganked in jita,is there anything i can do to transport my goods safely without gank?No,since i was ganked in empty freighter too.Dude take your pink glasses off and take a look at killmails,or even just eve map statistics see how many ships were destroyed last 24 h,more then half of them are ganks.And miners vs big alliances,yes you live in fairy land if you think miners would win.
You talk about effort,then why gankers not going to null and push out goons from half the null,they won't because it takes too much effort its much more easyer to gank noob in hisec.


It's a dog eat dog world and all that; and it's always easier to pick on a smaller dog than a bigger one.

Just so happens that the smallest dog in the game at the moment is the lone highsec miner or noob highsec hauler.

Most gankers aren't that much higher up the food chain and can be beaten (on a range of different levels) fairly easily. Go and look at the C&P where there are a couple of threads providing good advice on that, directly from gankers.

But in the end, you as a player make the choices about how you play the game; and you have the accept responsibility for all apects of game play that result from those choices.

I agree that it should be less safe for gankers, but that is nothing to do with stopping them from ganking you. You are playing the same game as everyone else and have the same tools available to you to avoid being ganked. It's not someone else's role (eg. CCP) to take responsibility to fix your problems when solutions already exist.


We are playing same game its sandbox,thats why i love eve,but lets make it same for everyone.It is only in ccp hands to fix it,in every game if there is a fault, group of people will exploit it.We are playing the same game,what tools do i have to not being ganked,i see killmails where faction fitted hulks getting ganked by catalyst gang,i see killmails where freighters getting ganked,what tools did eve gave me to defend against that?Indies are completely useless now too since they can be one shotted by tornados.So give me tools gainst that lol
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#288 - 2013-11-06 05:09:54 UTC
Clyde Belvar wrote:
We are playing same game its sandbox,thats why i love eve,but lets make it same for everyone.
It already is the same for everyone.

Quote:
We are playing the same game,what tools do i have to not being ganked,i see killmails where faction fitted hulks getting ganked by catalyst gang,i see killmails where freighters getting ganked,what tools did eve gave me to defend against that?Indies are completely useless now too since they can be one shotted by tornados.So give me tools gainst that lol
EVE gives you modules, maps, local and other in-game chat channels, support ships, market windows and cost estimates, and other players — the exact same tools the gankers use.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#289 - 2013-11-06 05:23:01 UTC
Quote:
why one must work week for several h a day for something and then someone comes in and destroys it all in 10 secs without consequences.


Mostly because you fools refuse to fit a tank or remain at your keyboards?

Yeah, in fact, not even mostly, that's pretty much entirely why.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#290 - 2013-11-06 05:24:31 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
*long conversation about a dev quote, which wasn't about autopilot, or pos's, or timers, or convenience, or siphons, or AFK'ing.*

This is untrue. My expectation of using autopilot is analogous to others expectations that "they shouldn't have to log on at x time to defend a POS so a timer is needed to be convenient". If the latter is correct and true than the former is correct and true.

Autopilot is in the game as a convenience and its reasonable to expect that one can use it to autopilot a newb in a velator with no cargo without that newb being killed and podded for lols.

Additonally recently the alliances whined to CCP regarding the siphon units, their argument was "we shouldn't have to log on when we're not playing just to check if a siphon unit has been deployed" which is analogous to the expectation that their POS should not be siphoned while they're AFK. CCP changed the mechanics to make siphons more expensive and take up more space.

What is the difference between:

1: Not having your ship destroyed in high sec by cheap ships for lols while AFK.
2: Not having your POS siphoned by cheap siphons for profit while AFK.
3: Not having your POS destroyed while AFK?

The only difference is the first is very possible and the 2 and 3 have mechanics in place to protect the AFK.

I think I win this thread (again)


Non sequitur.
Ryhss
#291 - 2013-11-06 05:31:21 UTC
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Grrrrrrrr [insert entity here].











Possibilities at this point...

-Goons
-SOMER
-Gankers
-Low-SP pilots.....from a vet, I might add.
-Trolls
-The New Order

Who?! Who should it be?!

THE NEW ORDER

I just turned into an egg, did I level up? I spent an hour trying to salvage a wreck, when in local a guy said "Stop it, this is my Tempest, I was AFK"

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#292 - 2013-11-06 05:34:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Diomedes Calypso
I started to respond but I've taken a vow against walls of text.

I"m ssoooo confused though.
I can't even understand enough to begin to reply in a way that could sway your thinking to a place of more inner peace with the status quo:

"I haven't got ganked because I pay attention but I'm afraid if I don't pay attention I might get ganked. A game shouldn't require you pay attention"

and more or less:
~Some places should be dangerous and some not but I don't want to take steps to go to the safer parts of high sec and I shouldn't have to think about staying out of corridor systems and knowing people in a system of high sec industiralists and there shouldn't need to be any advantage of actually joining together with people in high sec to report on stuff and know each other because high sec shouldn't require interaction between players because people should be able to play an mmo like it were a single person campaign game if they felt like and shouldn't feel more safe if they made friends...~

and

more or less:
~" I make 3 times as much as you do but there needs to be a way I can make isk because that's part of the game and you can't make isk if you get ganked all the time but I make three times as much isk as you do anyway .. enough to buy plexes for gametime and still get richer every month BUT it is insane CCP doesn't have a way where traders can make isk"~

It would take me a book and I'd get called a pompous ass (well this character is a pompous ass but still) if I tried

I'm so confused.

.

Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#293 - 2013-11-06 05:59:47 UTC
To the OP, I lost a billion isk when I was ganked while hauling T2 modules in an untanked T1 industrial a few years ago. At the time I was pi$$ed off, so I left and tried a few themepark MMOs out there and got quickly bored of them. Every time I go back to Eve. Why? Because Eve rewards intelligence, and punishes laziness.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#294 - 2013-11-06 06:06:29 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
To the OP, I lost a billion isk when I was ganked while hauling T2 modules in an untanked T1 industrial a few years ago. At the time I was pi$$ed off, so I left and tried a few themepark MMOs out there and got quickly bored of them. Every time I go back to Eve. Why? Because Eve rewards intelligence, and punishes laziness.

No it used to punish laziness and reward intelligence. Now it simply allows lazy unintelligent gamers to sit at gate and kill anything they want for no reason other than they can.

Your argument is stupid, given the context.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#295 - 2013-11-06 06:06:54 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
To the OP, I lost a billion isk when I was ganked while hauling T2 modules in an untanked T1 industrial a few years ago. At the time I was pi$$ed off, so I left and tried a few themepark MMOs out there and got quickly bored of them. Every time I go back to Eve. Why? Because Eve rewards intelligence, and punishes laziness.


I would simplify it even further.

There is a feeling of reward beyond that of merely getting the next level of gear. Accomplishment that has nothing to do with whether your headpiece is blue or purple.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#296 - 2013-11-06 06:08:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Omar Alharazaad
I've had a couple haulers ganked over the years... oddly it only seemed to happen in lowsec and null. This was mostly due to me taking foolish risks by operating solo in dangerous territory. My fault. I've had a few lock-ons happen in hisec either while hauling or mining, but no successful ganks. I think the actual risk of being ganked in hisec is being greatly exaggerated as of late in truth... many of us carebears REALLY don't like the idea, and tend to scream bloody murder about it rather than take measures to prevent it from happening.
Speaking of measures, I really do like the escort idea for haulers. It's a nearly ubiquitous notion in space sci-fi movies/series... the convoy. Having someone riding shotgun improves the chance of the cargo getting to it's destination intact. Pay a friend or corpmate to ride along to help you get there... if you are short on either or both of those, hire a couple newbie mercs looking for a leg up in the business to help. Just visibly having guards will help deter possible hostiles... actually having guards that know how to defend can be a nasty discovery for those they don't deter.
Your enemies are using teamwork and intel to make this happen, you have access to the same toolbox they do. Not gonna touch on the popping of miners, as there are already numerous threads regarding that and the antics of the New Order.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#297 - 2013-11-06 06:15:16 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
No it used to punish laziness and reward intelligence. Now it simply allows
…people to not learn how highsec works and pretty much get away with it. No-one takes any precautions or learns how to deal with adverse sitautions because, by and large, there's just no need for it.

So on the extremely rare occasions when something does happen, it comes as a shock and they incorrectly diagnose it as a fault with the system rather than with their own behaviour.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#298 - 2013-11-06 06:24:41 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
No it used to punish laziness and reward intelligence. Now it simply allows
…people to not learn how highsec works and pretty much get away with it. No-one takes any precautions or learns how to deal with adverse sitautions because, by and large, there's just no need for it.

So on the extremely rare occasions when something does happen, it comes as a shock and they incorrectly diagnose it as a fault with the system rather than with their own behaviour.


Interesting. I have also put forth this hypothesis, after my first few days as a suicide ganker.

It's due to incorrect expectations of what is or is not supposed to happen.

Incorrect expectations lead to reality slapping you in the face. No one likes to get slapped in the face by reality, so rather than accept that their expectations were wrong in the first place, they seek to justify this by campaigning to have the game changed to match their (incorrect) expectations of it.

Sound about right?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#299 - 2013-11-06 06:36:43 UTC
[incursus - afk newbie]
[high]
[mid]
[rigs]
[low]

400mm reinforced rolled tungsten plates I
experimental energized adaptive nano membrane I
experimental energized adaptive nano membrane I
experimental energized explosive membrane I

something like 7x the EHP of a velator as supplied to a new character.

Should be beyond a T1 destroyer to kill before the gate guns kill the destroyer (those pilots rarely have perfect application either). That should have enough fitting left over to only need hull 3 to fit, and a newbie could use some lower meta to get it past the wallet (and a true newbie gets given an incursus in missions, and an alt can get given isk for it).
Don Purple
Snuggle Society
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#300 - 2013-11-06 06:36:56 UTC
Dear OP

You literally only need to be at your computer to survive MOST ganks. A properly fit ship will survive MOST ganks. You spit on a lifestyle that is an extremely active play style, most gankers I know just fly as -10 in highesc because there's no point to having a positive sec status. You can not sit still or afk or you die before you make your hit. You are blatantly stating that a player not even at his computer should have a chance to survive against someone actually clicking their mouse? Tell me when in this game, a PVP game, will any pilot survive a fight they are not at their computer for? And if you have an answer or a defense to this then maybe THAT needs fixed.

I am just here to snuggle and do spy stuff.