These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors

First post First post First post
Author
Kate stark
#1641 - 2013-12-08 13:52:27 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.

Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?


then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#1642 - 2013-12-08 16:13:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Kate stark wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.

Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?


then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant.


It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. A major in game entity was proven to be RMT'ing. Both of these questions/concerns need to be addressed, even if no further action is being taken against the devs or the entity.

For instance, a report that says:

1) Yes this was RMT.

2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them.

3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again.

Is a more than reasonable thing to expect. It'd be the right thing to do from a business and customer relations perspective that's for certain.

Argus
The Legendary Soldier
United.
#1643 - 2013-12-08 20:13:09 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant AND untrustworthy.


Fixed that for you...

Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread

Pinky Hops
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1644 - 2013-12-08 21:37:32 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
What's a fair way of distributing rare items?


Contests/tournaments.

Has there ever been a CCP endorsed lottery of rare items that DIDN'T cause a clusterfuck?

Does anybody remember the T2 BPO Lottery?

When will CCP learn from their mistakes? Probably never.
Octoven
Stellar Production
#1645 - 2013-12-09 04:21:19 UTC
anids wrote:
just saying guys you all just sound like a moany bunch of bitches....SOMER has been around forever to get to the state its in now, most of you people crying more than likely haven't even been around long enough to no what scams happened back in the day.....

I use SOMER just for some fun while in big fleets or station spinning, they will move your ships to a system for you if you so wish and have a good selection to bid on, SOMER one of the few lottos about that hasn't up and jacked all the isk off everyone, I would even go as far as saying that its one of the few things in eve that can be trusted....yes some people of there have dumped tones of cash into it and bid on 90% of tickets increasing there cash and wins like that but if you cant do that then tough welcome to eve

next thing you no you all be ganging up on chribba for having to much rare items and isk

the fact you would say SOMER has done nufing for eve players just goes to show how little you know, pretty much your all saying chribba done nufing ether.......1st and formost thing he has done has installed some trust back into eve, and provides a good lotto system that if you have a brain in your head you can win quite a lot on (myself last I check 1bill payed in 5bill payed out)



Funny enough you should reference Chribba. However, you are indeed wrong in that reference. As such you are trying to compare earning the trust of a swindler compared to a humanitarian. Chribba earned his trust by keeping his word and not scamming. He has done nothing thus far to make the eve community question his trustworthiness and combine that with all the sites and tools he has developed at no cost to the player, his dedication to improving the community is evident. Now let us look at SOMER on the other hand who has been notorious for scamming many people. Their mantra is to make money and while that is the risk of the player they are still nothing but a common gambling operation intent on robbing you of isk.

Just because they move your ships for you and get it there without issue you think this warrants the same level of trust that others like Chribba has cultivated? I dare say you must be mad. As far as rare items are concerned I am certain that any items Chribba posses that are rare were obtained by playing the game and not given to for running a gambling house.
Even rare special edition ships in game like the Cambion for example were given as prizes for participating in in game events. Others like the gnosis were given freely without doing anything but were given by CCP to the players. This notion of giving a third party free limited quantity items and then in turn allowing those items to be sold at insane prices to other players is ludicrous.

If they want to give somer special items for the EVE Vegas hosting as a thank you fine I have no issue so long as they are reskinned and not better in stats. If they wish to give them better stat items well at least make the items locked to that account so they cant be traded or sold. There is no reason anyone should be given superior items in game free that could get them billions of isk.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#1646 - 2013-12-09 06:25:06 UTC
Octoven.

Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.

Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.

TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already.
Opia Munba
mss industry
#1647 - 2013-12-09 08:13:04 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Octoven.

Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.

Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.

TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already.

people with brains didn`t give a flying f%ck about the scorp paintjob, it was about the market value that they had. and the fact it wasn`t disclosed.
Also the people in the know didn`t give a f%ck about the gambling concept... it was the fact that Somer was stretching the eula to make a real life income.
TLDR ... way to dumb post
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#1648 - 2013-12-09 12:16:52 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.

Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?


then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant.


It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. A major in game entity was proven to be RMT'ing. Both of these questions/concerns need to be addressed, even if no further action is being taken against the devs or the entity.

For instance, a report that says:

1) Yes this was RMT.

2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them.

3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again.

Is a more than reasonable thing to expect. It'd be the right thing to do from a business and customer relations perspective that's for certain.

Argus


A corporation admit to it's consumers that it made a mistake and apologise and promise to do better?

But that's the first thing they teach you NOT to do in Business and Management 101!

CCP used to act like that, but now they've got a few new people in sharp suits running things, it's time to clamp down on the whole open, interacting with the consumer thing. It was a total gimmick and wouldn't work in the real world, says Mr Suit. It's best to bury your head in the sand and pretend you are perfect, and hope the dumb plebs who give you money just shut up and forget it.

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1649 - 2013-12-09 14:17:04 UTC
I've unsubbed all 5 accounts due to things like this.

I stated in my unsub, "I am doing this due to greed (things like auto-renewal automatically occuring), and favoritism (The Mittani, SOMER, etc.)"

Let them know how you feel with your wallet. There's no other way. I'd rather grind endless hours in the game, knowing if all of this did it, we''d make a difference.
Gordon Weaver
Doomheim
#1650 - 2013-12-09 17:06:36 UTC
-2 accounts as it's the only language CCP seems to understand.

With blatant favoritism you have devalued your sandbox into not worth playing. Stop pissing in the sandbox CCP. Stop hiding and talk to your paying customers.
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1651 - 2013-12-09 19:25:27 UTC
Dear CCP,

I am deeply concerned.

It seems that you are starting to depend more on PLEX / GTC sales, than on maintaining / increasing subscriptions, so as to maintain your profibility.

As such, I ask you :-

- Will CCP continue to focus on developing / maintaining Eve into the future, or will you just create new "shinnies", ( and give them to third party entities ), so as to maintain the lottery enterprises that exist, that help spur on the PLEX /GTC sales, ( possibly in a manner that actually violates your own TOS / EULA ) ?

- Do you really want to turn Eve, from a game to a Casino ?

- CCP, are you giving up on Eve, the game ?

Come on CCP, a clear transparent clarification on this Somer debarcle, and its many issues, would be nice and much appreciated.

Please CCP, stop ignoring this important thread and the issues that have been mentioned.

Dark Magni
The Church of Awesome
#1652 - 2013-12-09 19:48:44 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.

Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?


then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant.


It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. A major in game entity was proven to be RMT'ing. Both of these questions/concerns need to be addressed, even if no further action is being taken against the devs or the entity.

For instance, a report that says:

1) Yes this was RMT.

2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them.

3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again.

Is a more than reasonable thing to expect. It'd be the right thing to do from a business and customer relations perspective that's for certain.

Argus


This strikes me as being extremely reasonable.

Unfortunately someone at CCP has issued the order to snub this debate and its paying customers.

It is foolish, because the strategy isn't working.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#1653 - 2013-12-10 12:25:44 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Octoven.

Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.

Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.

TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already.


To be fair there have been a number of people who bought somer credit when the possible prize was guardian vexors. Somer were saying "give isk, and you have a chance for a guardian vexor". Then CCP changed the reward to something else - at least one user tried to then get the isk back from somer. He had paid for a chance at a guardian vexor, not at the other thing, so he wanted his isk back. They refused. He contacted CCP, since it was their doing, and they basically said that even though they were involved, tough luck.

It's the ol' bait and switch. A scam. A bit odd since CCP themselves were involved, but a scam none the less.

And lets not forget the even more numerous people who've put money in, and then somer have turned round and banned them for nebulous reasons from taking part in the lottery draws.

Somer is a scam and an RMT operation.
Dark Magni
The Church of Awesome
#1654 - 2013-12-10 20:24:11 UTC
The thing that annoys me most is how Somer is clearly influencing CCP in some way.

Lots of people in this debate are attacking Somer, but as Somer has influenced CCP to be in the same boat as them, CCP has to defend Somer in defending itself.

For example this strange 7 day grace period for Somer to RMT. The strange 'dead silence' approach CCP has taken to this debate. Also the hands off approach when the guardian-vexor prize was changed and Somer wouldnt refund isk.

There are so many more examples of where CCP are biased.
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1655 - 2013-12-10 23:13:03 UTC
Bobby Frutt wrote:
I've unsubbed all 5 accounts due to things like this.

I stated in my unsub, "I am doing this due to greed (things like auto-renewal automatically occuring), and favoritism (The Mittani, SOMER, etc.)"

Let them know how you feel with your wallet. There's no other way. I'd rather grind endless hours in the game, knowing if all of this did it, we''d make a difference.


"Auto-renewal" happens in every game. In fact, it says when you go to add game time via credit card that it is going to happen, and it says that with World of Warcraft, Rift, Star Wars, etc. Don't act like it's only EvE Online and it's greed making them do it. That's just childish.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Tsobai Hashimoto
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1656 - 2013-12-10 23:43:53 UTC
Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.


Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players
. all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.

I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship
Tweek Etimua
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#1657 - 2013-12-10 23:46:59 UTC
I find most of the complaints are based on WHO received the gift. This frankly is sad.


You can say "It's not right right to reward a gambling site" But the same could be argued about any "Community" group. It could be said that organizations like the folks who run the New Eden Open shouldn't get any special treatment cause at any point they could just take the prizes for them selves. The truth is that's true about any one. The other thing that's true is that people who got rewarded "BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL)" Didn't get any sort of grief from the community.
" Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or they’ve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, Collector’s editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc."

So this is just a GREAT example of how selfishness combined with the loudest complaint/biggest riot can ruin a good thing.
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1658 - 2013-12-10 23:57:42 UTC
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:
Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.


Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players
. all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.

I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship


Only in EvE Online is lack of communication considered "open and honest".

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Kate stark
#1659 - 2013-12-11 06:35:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Kate stark
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:
Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.


detailed and open?

they have said **** all of substance even when asked directly, several times. then ignored the thread for nearly two months.

i'm going to assume english isn't your first language.

edit: also the outright lies about "surveys" that have yet to be produced and i doubt ever will be...

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

The Legendary Soldier
United.
#1660 - 2013-12-11 09:41:37 UTC
Tweek Etimua wrote:
I find most of the complaints are based on WHO received the gift. This frankly is sad.


You can say "It's not right right to reward a gambling site" But the same could be argued about any "Community" group. It could be said that organizations like the folks who run the New Eden Open shouldn't get any special treatment cause at any point they could just take the prizes for them selves. The truth is that's true about any one. The other thing that's true is that people who got rewarded "BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL)" Didn't get any sort of grief from the community.
" Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or they’ve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, Collector’s editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc."

So this is just a GREAT example of how selfishness combined with the loudest complaint/biggest riot can ruin a good thing.


A lottery site exists to enrich the people who run it - not to contribute to the community.

People who actually DID contribute to the community (as opposed to CCP's bank balance) DO deserve to be rewarded.

This is actually a great example of how the "loudest complaint" can be TOTALLY ignored.

It is also a GREAT example of completely missing the point.

Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread