Wormholes

This isn't a terrible idea but it doesn't sound very practical to me...

In my opinion we need a wormhole primary that is very active in the community and regularly gets feedback from the community regarding certain issues. We also need someone that has there own beliefs and an opinion on how the future of wormholes should be shaped.

I feel that i would be wasting my vote on someone that doesn't have a real understanding or opinion about the part of eve i care about the most.

Good luck non the less.

hmm you seem to have missed the reference to how this system was used in ancient times, but the voting was restricted to males with military backgrounds only. By that same ideal the people who were on the floor were almost entirely ex military or members of military families. Pointing to a lack of "military" activity is just a shot at he is suggesting a system that would have, in the time it was used in reality disqualified himself from being able to participate in.

As for my titles, yes they do need updating . Though I still do collect for the children's fund it is more of an inside joke then anything, and I should probably start trolling more outside of our own forums. Though I do need to remove that last one, I have not gassed in months since I cashed out back at around that 180k/unit 320 sweet spot .

also eve-kill abnd zboard seem to be having some issues with their kill track history.

http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Phaderift

more accurate, but my own KB is nothing special. Nor have I said i was any different then night. just poking and raising some things i want answers to ..

PS i redact my previous statement after seeing that the boards are a little messed up at the moment

http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Night+Beagle

runs about the same as i do.

While i think there are to many flaws in this system and not enough knowledge or back round presented for me to consider you , i wish you luck on your endeavour

Agree or Disagree the fact of the matter is that many other w-space based CSM candidates come from sizable groups and alliances. Emphasis on the word sizable, it means that besides their very own player base they also happen to have a number of allies / friendlies / sympathetic entities that are willing to back up their candidate. Basically they are starting a little bit ahead of square one, where you are right now. So the question is how do you plan to overcome this handicap?

The lack of any KB is one thing but what concerns me more for someone running for this post is to have very little post history that concerns me more.

How can the OP say he will represent the WH community when he never gets involved in any discussion about Wh's?

Is it your alt?

Well it smacks of alt, just sayin.

It was right about there you lost my attention. If you actually want votes, why would you admit that?

RENGAS for CSM, we can give him that magic computer that takes in peoples opinions and sorts them. then he can make them all reflect this new level of bitter

Excellent point. So, Mr. Beagle, what is your position on self-destructing ships inside a pos?

I find that my candidacy raised some interesting issues. I will not comment on sings and grudges, although I will on what causes them and how this is preventing better gameplay for everyone.

It was said repeatedly that candidates should come form large alliances, with various degree of motivating this claim.
It is my opinion that a null sec carebear mentality is beginning to infiltrate the WH way of life. I concur to the opinion that being at some point in large organizations, experiencing c5-6, but also living in smaller class WH, are necessary step in acquiring first hand knowledge.
I have that. I've been there, and I've been silent, listening, watching, learning how to enjoy the game and how to use the numbers for that. Maybe I was unknown when I posted the topic, but now I believe my killboard and employment history is common knowledge. Weather one considers it enough or not, that is a matter of personal taste and opinion, and everyone is entitled to have and express its opinion.
This brings me to the "large alliance issue".
Can one group of players no matter how large claim that it is in possession of the absolute and unique solutions?
Can one claim that candidates must absolutely come from those alliances? Can one contest the right of any player, even from a one man corp to candidate and present its opinions?
All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others. George Orwell, Animal Farm (1945)
As I see it the whole thing with WH representative is becoming a a** kis***g contest ... and while we have our share of people playing competently playing this game, I am in for another trip.
I was expecting this: to judge the man even before looking at the idea, grandeur dreams about controlling others thoughts and actions, refusal to accept responsibility and preference for the all knowing leader figure.
I was not disappointed.
However, I am here to fight and win with a platform based on Liquid Feedback.
Therefore, my comment on preventing highjacks of votes on the platform is the following: API verified, WH corp identity check.


Rocking the boat,

Night Beagle

PS> I'm no alt :)