These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NULL whiners mantra is getting tedious... and CSM lacks HI SEC representation

First post First post
Author
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#261 - 2012-09-02 08:18:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Frying Doom wrote:
Andski wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Leaving over 80% of the population out of the voting process makes no sense considering it would be rather easy to know how many are apathetic and how many just don't know.


They're not being left out. They're blatantly being asked to participate and they choose to ignore it.

Already been over the Banners on login ect.. Andski.

If people do not know what a CSM is how do they know what they are not voting for.

Tell us how people blatantly ignoring information which is IN THEIR FACE FOR WEEKS every time they log in, and don't research it if they don't know what it is ... are being "left out", and why that's our problem.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#262 - 2012-09-02 08:27:51 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Andski wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Leaving over 80% of the population out of the voting process makes no sense considering it would be rather easy to know how many are apathetic and how many just don't know.


They're not being left out. They're blatantly being asked to participate and they choose to ignore it.

Already been over the Banners on login ect.. Andski.

If people do not know what a CSM is how do they know what they are not voting for.

Tell us how people blatantly ignoring information which is IN THEIR FACE FOR WEEKS every time they log in, and don't research it if they don't know what it is ... are being "left out", and why that's our problem.

It is our problem as groups with special interests or for that matter vote scammers are able to get members onto the CSM with amounts of a mere 0.361% of the population of eve. 1/3 of 1% to get a seat on the CSM.

That is insane and ridiculous. We are voting to elect the player who represent us to CCP, this is something we should all be involved in not a tiny 16.63% of EvEs population.

The CSM are the player representatives not just the minority representatives. The player base should be educated in-game rather than forcing them to come to the forums or read 3rd party sites.

It is all of our game not just those who want to force minority views on it.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#263 - 2012-09-02 08:31:29 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Andski wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Leaving over 80% of the population out of the voting process makes no sense considering it would be rather easy to know how many are apathetic and how many just don't know.


They're not being left out. They're blatantly being asked to participate and they choose to ignore it.

Already been over the Banners on login ect.. Andski.

If people do not know what a CSM is how do they know what they are not voting for.


Why do you want people who are so indifferent to the process participating in it? What good result do you expect?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#264 - 2012-09-02 08:31:33 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
The CSM are the player representatives not just the minority representatives. The player base should be educated in-game rather than forcing them to come to the forums or read 3rd party sites.

The splash screen is in-game, they ignore that. The forums aren't 3rd party sites, they ignore that. So what, pray tell, must be done to "educate the masses"? Regular evemails (which they'll ignore, and will **** off everyone)? Regular popups in-game (which they'll also ignore, and will **** off everyone)? Beat the knowledge into everyone's brain by sending Chuck Norris to everyone's house?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#265 - 2012-09-02 08:50:17 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
The CSM are the player representatives not just the minority representatives. The player base should be educated in-game rather than forcing them to come to the forums or read 3rd party sites.

The splash screen is in-game, they ignore that. The forums aren't 3rd party sites, they ignore that. So what, pray tell, must be done to "educate the masses"? Regular evemails (which they'll ignore, and will **** off everyone)? Regular popups in-game (which they'll also ignore, and will **** off everyone)? Beat the knowledge into everyone's brain by sending Chuck Norris to everyone's house?

I'm not from the United states so the Chuck Norris thing is kind of bleh.
The spash screen as you call it really had nothing in it to inform players what the CSM was, Just vote for the CSM, the banners were kind of the same with references to irrelevant crap. As to the forums they are part of the game to those of us used to that idea but alot of people would consider them external to the game.

As to the rest the occasional for example quarterly CSM mail would be a good start, so would a blurb on the CSM as well as an abstain and vote button with it. Even mandatory participation in the electon process would not be a bad thing as it would mean players are giving up a minute of game time over an entire year to learn about what the CSM is and if they still do not care they just click abstain and go about there business for another 12 months.

The fact that 1/3 of 1% of the population can get someone on to our players representatives council is obscene.



Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Josef Djugashvilis
#266 - 2012-09-02 08:54:09 UTC
Chuck Norris? sounds American.

If folk do not avail themselves of the opportuntiy to vote, they are not entitled to an ingame opinion on which direction the game takes.

The act of voting gives one the right to whinge or praise as one sees fit.

This is not a signature.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#267 - 2012-09-02 08:55:45 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
If people can look at the words "Council of Stellar Management" and "your vote is important" and still be too apathetic to figure out what the CSM is and what it means to the player base, what makes you think they'll devote more than two brain cells to picking a candidate that agrees with whatever positions (likely none) they hold about EVE?

I mean, seriously, there's only so much CCP can do, but what we don't want to do is emphasize voting for its own sake at the expense of thoughtful voting.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Frying Doom
#268 - 2012-09-02 08:57:19 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Chuck Norris? sounds American.

If folk do not avail themselves of the opportuntiy to vote, they are not entitled to an ingame opinion on which direction the game takes.

The act of voting gives one the right to whinge or praise as one sees fit.

If they know what they are not voting for. My main want is for the in-game only players to be educated enough to make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to vote.

After they are informed and decide not to vote....Well then they can just shut up and sit down.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

HVAC Repairman
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#269 - 2012-09-02 08:58:25 UTC
an all-high sec CSM would be near the top of the list of THE WORST THINGS HUMANLY POSSIBLE

somewhere between the zombie apocalypse and being roseanne barr's personal butthair shaver
Frying Doom
#270 - 2012-09-02 08:59:18 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
If people can look at the words "Council of Stellar Management" and "your vote is important" and still be too apathetic to figure out what the CSM is and what it means to the player base, what makes you think they'll devote more than two brain cells to picking a candidate that agrees with whatever positions (likely none) they hold about EVE?

I mean, seriously, there's only so much CCP can do, but what we don't want to do is emphasize voting for its own sake at the expense of thoughtful voting.

Given the amount of advertising we are subjected to on a daily basis, I am not surprised people ignore it. Actually I could not tell you what the background ad was about today when I logged in. Frankly no clue what it was at all.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#271 - 2012-09-02 09:00:06 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:

Other than that is pathetic, I really have no way of responding to that. This is a game real life must by its nature take precedence.


Clearly those people would not seek out, nor pay any attention to, information regarding the CSM in the first place. Since they deem it to only be "A game" they would have no interest in such things, so why are they all of a sudden so important to you?

Frying Doom wrote:

So SiSi is not a user to user area then? funny being as I have talked to people on it.


Dear oh dear, you really are struggling with this crutch of yours. SiSi is not, and has not ever been covered by your subscription fee. It is a privilege in every sense of the word and access to it will never be guaranteed in any way shape or form. If SiSi goes down for whatever reason CCP have always stated exactly as I have just done. It is NOT a right.

Now compare that to the forums and TQ. If service to either of those is interrupted CCP take immediate steps to ensure its swift reactivation, as that is what your subscription fee allows you access to. Did I make that clear enough for you? Insisting that people who do not frequent SiSi are the same as those who choose not to use the forums is an asinine and weak argument, one that you had lost before the thought entered your head.

Frying Doom wrote:

Actually you are making the distinction between people who spend time on the forums and other sites compared to those who only want to play the game. As I have stated if you start making distinctions like that it is easy to justify anything.
This conversation feels like I have gone back in time.


People who make a conscious choice to not access the services covered by their subscription have clearly already decided on the level of participation they wish to have in the game. It is they who distinguish themselves, purposely, from the rest of the player base. My highlighting this readily apparent fact only aggravates you because I think you realise the futility of your argument.

Frying Doom wrote:

The people in this game who do not currently know what the CSM is have the right to be educated and then make up there own mind as to whether or not they want to vote. Rather than people just saying that they had the ability to read about the CSM, but why would you want to if you did not know what it was or even that it exists.

Leaving over 80% of the population out of the voting process makes no sense considering it would be rather easy to know how many are apathetic and how many just don't know.


As I and many others have made abundantly clear, the information is readily available to those who choose to seek it out. It is not as if details concerning the CSM are kept locked in a safe buried under a mountain on an asteroid on the outer edges of the solar system. You are complaining about "educating" a proportion of the player base who have already decided that they wish to have no dealings in such matters.

No one here is saying that it wouldn't be nice if more people voted in the elections, of course that would be good, but to insist that CCP are somehow at fault and that they could "do more" is laughable at best, not to mention insulting to those who have clearly decided upon the level at which they wish to interact with the community.

Do you see yourself as a missionary of some sort, bringing the gospel of the CSM to the unwashed tribesmen?

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#272 - 2012-09-02 09:00:51 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Chuck Norris? sounds American.

If folk do not avail themselves of the opportuntiy to vote, they are not entitled to an ingame opinion on which direction the game takes.

The act of voting gives one the right to whinge or praise as one sees fit.

If they know what they are not voting for. My main want is for the in-game only players to be educated enough to make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to vote.

After they are informed and decide not to vote....Well then they can just shut up and sit down.

How do you propose we forcefully educate those who really just don't care enough to figure things out for themselves?
At the very least, they could, I don't know, ask someone else what the CSM is. There's a Help chat in game that I hang out in, for example, and last election cycle we got a lot of questions as to what the CSM was. Who knows how many of those people voted once they found out?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#273 - 2012-09-02 09:01:41 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Jesus Christ, stop making excuses.


What else is Issler "Frying Doom" Danze supposed to do? She got utterly creamed in the CSM voting, made an absolute ass of herself over Mittan's behaviour at fanfest and spectacularly failed to deliver on promises to tear down walls, bend CCP to her will and ensure cupcakes for everyone as per all the election blurb. Now she's mostly posting on her alt so that we think it's someone else and, I suspect, writing her own version of Mein Kampf, detailing how the evil goons stopped her being the CSM chair and weilding the power to make everyone in nullsec run level 4 missions all day. Come the next CSM election, this garbage will no doubt be spewed forth in a desperate attempt to gain a new personal best of 3 votes.

Obviously, the answer is to come to the forum and cry foul because none of the people who knew what the CSM elections were about were carebears. Or, perhaps, they were carebears but they'd trained getting a clue V and voted for someone else.

Oh, and I lied about the cupcakes.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Frying Doom
#274 - 2012-09-02 09:02:36 UTC
HVAC Repairman wrote:
an all-high sec CSM would be near the top of the list of THE WORST THINGS HUMANLY POSSIBLE

somewhere between the zombie apocalypse and being roseanne barr's personal butthair shaver

I will admit I agree, well with the first bit the second is completely disgusting.

A representative council is what we should have, so not all Hi-sec but representatives and not one made of minority and interest groups.

That was a really sick image you gave me bluck.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#275 - 2012-09-02 09:03:49 UTC
admiral root wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Jesus Christ, stop making excuses.


What else is Issler "Frying Doom" Danze supposed to do? She got utterly creamed in the CSM voting, made an absolute ass of herself over Mittan's behaviour at fanfest and spectacularly failed to deliver on promises to tear down walls, bend CCP to her will and ensure cupcakes for everyone as per all the election blurb. Now she's mostly posting on her alt so that we think it's someone else and, I suspect, writing her own version of Mein Kampf, detailing how the evil goons stopped her being the CSM chair and weilding the power to make everyone in nullsec run level 4 missions all day. Come the next CSM election, this garbage will no doubt be spewed forth in a desperate attempt to gain a new personal best of 3 votes.

Obviously, the answer is to come to the forum and cry foul because none of the people who knew what the CSM elections were about were carebears. Or, perhaps, they were carebears but they'd trained getting a clue V and voted for someone else.

Oh, and I lied about the cupcakes.

Perhaps I'm too new/too oblivious, but I actually don't know anything about her.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#276 - 2012-09-02 09:05:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Frying Doom wrote:
The spash screen as you call it really had nothing in it to inform players what the CSM was, Just vote for the CSM, the banners were kind of the same with references to irrelevant crap.

"Hmm. What is this CSM thing we need to vote about? Maybe I should check the wiki?"

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/CSM

Frying Doom wrote:
As to the forums they are part of the game to those of us used to that idea but alot of people would consider them external to the game.

So I'll ask you again: why, pray tell, should we care about people who can't be arsed to spend even a minimum of effort in keeping up with current affairs in a game where the metagame is the premiere feature, where what other players do have the possibility to affect everyone else?

Frying Doom wrote:
As to the rest the occasional for example quarterly CSM mail would be a good start, so would a blurb on the CSM as well as an abstain and vote button with it.

A blurb on the CSM and an abstain and vote button? They'll ignore that, and they'll press abstain so they can get into the game quicker. Why should we care about such people?

Frying Doom wrote:
Even mandatory participation in the electon process would not be a bad thing as it would mean players are giving up a minute of game time over an entire year to learn about what the CSM is and if they still do not care they just click abstain and go about there business for another 12 months.

So in other words, you want to add more things which these guys can ignore, and still keep on whining about how they're not being heard/represented?

Okay, then.

Frying Doom wrote:
The fact that 1/3 of 1% of the population can get someone on to our players representatives council is obscene.

The fact people can blatantly remain ignorant about something as important as the CSM, when the information is in their face for weeks, then whine up a storm when some minor change isn't banned by the omnipotent CSM which they didn't vote for, is what's obscene.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#277 - 2012-09-02 09:08:06 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Chuck Norris? sounds American.

If folk do not avail themselves of the opportuntiy to vote, they are not entitled to an ingame opinion on which direction the game takes.

The act of voting gives one the right to whinge or praise as one sees fit.

If they know what they are not voting for. My main want is for the in-game only players to be educated enough to make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to vote.

After they are informed and decide not to vote....Well then they can just shut up and sit down.

How do you propose we forcefully educate those who really just don't care enough to figure things out for themselves?
At the very least, they could, I don't know, ask someone else what the CSM is. There's a Help chat in game that I hang out in, for example, and last election cycle we got a lot of questions as to what the CSM was. Who knows how many of those people voted once they found out?

I have pretty much answered this but it is rather simple once a year force up a blurb with 2 big buttons abstain and vote if they abstain, well they abstained with at least the knowledge of what they abstained about. so about 1 minute interruption once a year at voting time.

As to helping them selves, I have seen people in this thread who do not have a clue what the CSM is and that is in this thread.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#278 - 2012-09-02 09:10:20 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
I have pretty much answered this but it is rather simple once a year force up a blurb with 2 big buttons abstain and vote if they abstain, well they abstained with at least the knowledge of what they abstained about. so about 1 minute interruption once a year at voting time.

Are you sure about that? What about the EULA that says "you must scroll to the bottom to accept". Did you read it? Cause I admittedly did not.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#279 - 2012-09-02 09:10:38 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
I have pretty much answered this but it is rather simple once a year force up a blurb with 2 big buttons abstain and vote if they abstain, well they abstained with at least the knowledge of what they abstained about. so about 1 minute interruption once a year at voting time.

Do you, seriously, assume that a large majority of people will look for anything other than the button which'll get them into the game the quickest?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Frying Doom
#280 - 2012-09-02 09:11:37 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:

The fact people can blatantly remain ignorant about something as important as the CSM, when the information is in their face for weeks, then whine up a storm when some minor change isn't banned by the omnipotent CSM which they didn't vote for, is what's obscene.

Ok I am not saying the forums are not powered by whine.

If after all that they ignore it then they ignore it and it at least we will know for a fact that we have a peasant class in EvE.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!