These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[MERC] The Marmite Collective

First post First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
flakeys
Doomheim
#5121 - 2015-04-24 14:44:01 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Danalee wrote:
My question is serious yes. you described the fact we will avoid docking rings as putting lipstick on a pig because all we do is low risk pvp... You are way to smart to not see the gaping hole in that reasoning, aren't you?
Actually, I described you guys making excuses for why you boot people for having losses and putting lipstick on a pig. We all know how groups like yours value your killboards and for that reason you all aim to artificially inflate your killboard stats by cracking down on anyone that risks challenging combat or otherwise adds losses, and you aim to kill high value, low resistance targets. Like I said before, we all know this and it's fairly normal, so why not just call it what is is?

Danalee wrote:
And we aren't supposed to shoot pods?
That's new... Once you stop dropping the kitchen sink on an ibis/venture, we'll do that, mkay?
You missed the joke. It's OK, you'll get it eventually.


Tora Bushido wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Is this a serious question? You really need to ask why high sec docking ring PvP is low risk?
High-sec trade hub undocks are higher risk then anywhere else in highsec, as people know where you are and will just wait for you to get aggression, then blob you. Fleet fights you can prepare for, camps you can prepare for....
ROFL. I actually believe that you legitimately think this is true. That's the really sad part about this. Station combat only requires you to survive long enough to de-aggress and redock. 9 times out of 10 you have neutral logi around to help make sure that happens.



A bit like when i was laughing in gevlon's thread when members from SMA where making fun of MOA's pvp ability . You didn't get the clue then but you do now?That's double standards mate ...

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#5122 - 2015-04-24 14:46:07 UTC
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#5123 - 2015-04-24 14:51:26 UTC
Tora Bushido wrote:
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted


Hey Someone has to spend those moongoo/afk ratting iskies those elite pvp duders provide.

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#5124 - 2015-04-24 15:16:57 UTC
Tora Bushido wrote:
If this was true Lucas, would it make sense we just added a rule that forbids being on the trade hubs ? Ahaaa.... P And please dont pretend to think you know anything about my policies.
Yes, because you have some people terrible enough to die on trade hub station undocks. And we all know your policy on people that dare to lose ships in Marmite.

flakeys wrote:
A bit like when i was laughing in gevlon's thread when members from SMA where making fun of MOA's pvp ability . You didn't get the clue then but you do now?That's double standards mate ...
The difference there is that MoA really are pretty terrible. If they weren't, SMA wouldn't exist. We are pretty terrible at PvP and MoA live on our doorstep, and yet still they fail to accomplish their goal of stomping us out of the area, even while being handed ISK to replace their ships.

Tora Bushido wrote:
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted
Just in case you were interested, it's 10857 wars as of last week for a combined total of 20922 weeks of war (256 mutual), with your longest war running for 62 weeks against Steels Front (war ID 290733). It's the anniversary of that war ending on Sunday. The 2nd longest is of course Goons (war ID 333314) for 61 weeks. So yes, indeed a lot of isk removed.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
flakeys
Doomheim
#5125 - 2015-04-24 15:28:09 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Tora Bushido wrote:
If this was true Lucas, would it make sense we just added a rule that forbids being on the trade hubs ? Ahaaa.... P And please dont pretend to think you know anything about my policies.
Yes, because you have some people terrible enough to die on trade hub station undocks. And we all know your policy on people that dare to lose ships in Marmite.

flakeys wrote:
A bit like when i was laughing in gevlon's thread when members from SMA where making fun of MOA's pvp ability . You didn't get the clue then but you do now?That's double standards mate ...
The difference there is that MoA really are pretty terrible. If they weren't, SMA wouldn't exist. We are pretty terrible at PvP and MoA live on our doorstep, and yet still they fail to accomplish their goal of stomping us out of the area, even while being handed ISK to replace their ships.

Tora Bushido wrote:
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted
Just in case you were interested, it's 10857 wars as of last week for a combined total of 20922 weeks of war (256 mutual), with your longest war running for 62 weeks against Steels Front (war ID 290733). It's the anniversary of that war ending on Sunday. The 2nd longest is of course Goons (war ID 333314) for 61 weeks. So yes, indeed a lot of isk removed.



Yup SMA is doing that allllllll by themselves , nothing to do with the largest coalition in the game backening you.Not at all ...


See , that's the thing i am talking about and even when pointed out you still do it.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#5126 - 2015-04-24 15:42:24 UTC
flakeys wrote:
Yup SMA is doing that allllllll by themselves , nothing to do with the largest coalition in the game backening you.Not at all ...


See , that's the thing i am talking about and even when pointed out you still do it.
I'm not saying we aren't, but even when it's just us they don't bust though. If they were the elite PvPers they claim to be, they'd deal significantly more damage. BL were effective enough that they forced the CFC to pay them a ransom to get out of a station during the Fountain war, and they were smaller than MOA. I'll not be dragging this post any more off topic though.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#5127 - 2015-04-24 15:46:24 UTC
Fact of the matter is (and herewith I'll get the thread back on track for sure!);

- Hisec PVP'ers win each and every fight against nullbears.
- Nullbears thus choose to not engage to avoid getting their feelings/epeen hurt.
- Nullbears try to regain some form of cred by calling Hisec pvp'ers "Risk averse"
Ad nauseam, ad infinitum.

Tadaaa! Cool

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Samwise Everquest
Plus 10 NV
#5128 - 2015-04-24 16:09:49 UTC
Cool

Pras Phil.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#5129 - 2015-04-24 16:10:18 UTC
Danalee wrote:
Fact of the matter is (and herewith I'll get the thread back on track for sure!);

- Hisec PVP'ers win each and every fight against nullbears.
- Nullbears thus choose to not engage to avoid getting their feelings/epeen hurt.
- Nullbears try to regain some form of cred by calling Hisec pvp'ers "Risk averse"
Ad nauseam, ad infinitum.
I'll agree that when you only fight the idiots who fly to highsec, more often than not in industrial ships, you win, well done! Fly out to nullsec and see how well you do.

And the end of the day, both sides are low risk PvP for different reasons. You may not want to admit it like we are willing to, but that's the way it is.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Torpedo Tammy
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5130 - 2015-04-24 16:25:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Torpedo Tammy
Danalee wrote:
Fact of the matter is (and herewith I'll get the thread back on track for sure!);

- Hisec PVP'ers win each and every fight against nullbears.
- Nullbears thus choose to not engage to avoid getting their feelings/epeen hurt.
- Nullbears try to regain some form of cred by calling Hisec pvp'ers "Risk averse"
Ad nauseam, ad infinitum.

Tadaaa! Cool

D.

Bear


The true fact of the matter is most 'Nullbear PvPers' can't enter High Sec, because they've long since sank their security status. Keep patting yourself on the back though, somebody, somewhere really cares deep down.


Fybs wrote:
When I fly around in HS I use the best implants, mods and sub cap ships. and because I don't mission or rat evey loss I take hurts a lot more then any ship a null bear loses. plus being an established member of marmite I'm sure there are many who would love to have my kill mail (mainly other Mercs). so in my eyes there is a lot of risk everytime I undock hench why I use every trick I know to limit taking a single loss.


I somehow doubt it, less than a year ago you could barely fit a cruiser without going full ****** (last time I bothered looking that is). It's pretty easy to avoid losing a pod in lowsec, and only slightly more annoying in Null.

Then there's that other small detail, you know- where all the wars, all the campaigns. all the trivial 'merc fees' changed exactly nothing- the big empires are still going, hell even the little ones.

Now's about the time Tora pieces together who I am.
Samwise Everquest
Plus 10 NV
#5131 - 2015-04-24 16:42:25 UTC
Torpedo Tammy wrote:

Now's about the time Tora pieces together who I am.


A nerd?

Pras Phil.
Torpedo Tammy
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5132 - 2015-04-24 16:43:48 UTC
Samwise Everquest wrote:
Torpedo Tammy wrote:

Now's about the time Tora pieces together who I am.


A nerd?


This is a space ship spread sheet simulator; I'm pretty sure everyone interested that has either played or still continues to play EVE falls into that category...
Samwise Everquest
Plus 10 NV
#5133 - 2015-04-24 16:46:41 UTC
Torpedo Tammy wrote:
Samwise Everquest wrote:
Torpedo Tammy wrote:

Now's about the time Tora pieces together who I am.


A nerd?


This is a space ship spread sheet simulator; I'm pretty sure everyone interested that has either played or still continues to play EVE falls into that category...


naw I play sports and lift weights.

Pras Phil.
Torpedo Tammy
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5134 - 2015-04-24 16:47:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Torpedo Tammy
Samwise Everquest wrote:
naw I play sports and lift weights.


Playing Wii in your mother's living room doesn't count.

Playing Sports and Working Out doesn't exclude you from being a nerd.
Saeger1737
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#5135 - 2015-04-24 17:12:18 UTC
Tora Bushido wrote:
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted

Most of those were gelvon funded, so stop your gloating.

MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#5136 - 2015-04-24 17:13:04 UTC
Torpedo Tammy wrote:

Now's about the time Tora pieces together who I am.

Good sir. I think you fail to see the simple truth

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#5137 - 2015-04-24 17:27:48 UTC
Saeger1737 wrote:
Tora Bushido wrote:
We've started 12000+ wars with Marmites the last 2-3 years. Some of them were 500M/week and went on for more then a year. It made the war histo of Marmites lag when you open it.

CCP Isk sink must be happy. Twisted

Most of those were gelvon funded, so stop your gloating.
I know at your age you cant count yet, so I'll keep it simple. About a dozen (12) of them were paid by Gevlon. And so what ? Stop acting as a jealous Marmite wannabe.

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Brolen Amacar
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5138 - 2015-04-24 17:42:37 UTC
It is a good thing Marmite doesn't venture into NULL space, because what would all the null bears do? They'd have to find a new place to live.
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#5139 - 2015-04-24 17:51:06 UTC
Brolen Amacar wrote:
It is a good thing Marmite doesn't venture into NULL space, because what would all the null bears do? They'd have to find a new place to live.

Look at my KB mr ns alt Lol. I go to ns but when Marmite shows up to take a r64 everybody runs scared Blink

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#5140 - 2015-04-24 17:59:53 UTC
Brolen Amacar wrote:
It is a good thing Marmite doesn't venture into NULL space, because what would all the null bears do? They'd have to find a new place to live.
It's clear you do not know our alts/mains Twisted. Let's keep it that way...

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.