Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Zim I don't die unless I choose to. Its that simple. And anyone with a IQ over 100 could say the same thing if they wanted and it would be true. Wormholes the exception.

Okay then. Take the same fit you'd use to PVP or do WH sleeper rats with, and go up against a plex, then. Let's see how well that goes for you.

PS: warping out is for pussies.

So high end pve in one area of the game means the rest of the game has to suck so they won't feel gimped?

The answer to your convoluted question zim is how many of my ships and friends would I take along with me to do it.

Shocker, PVE environment in a PVP area is meant for more than one guy and in having the requirement you too can succeed!

And If you can't you suck!. It's thats simple. Its not a balance issue it's a lazy ass incompetent player issue. And EVE should punish those cretins accordingly.

So secure the space, bring support and succeed, or dont and fail. But that doesn't mean local doesn't need to go!

you must think you are inteligent do you? Too bad your post do not reflect any else but the sociopath in you
WWOOOOOSSSSAAAA

Yeah thats why the OP likes keep going up and you're still bravehearting behind an alt.

I support idea that local should not register people via wormholes or atleast get delayed. Now every time you jump in, all farmers park before you move fromsession cloak. Should same mechanics apply for cov ops cyno. This would add so much fun and null with low would actually have risk involved.

after reading this thread, i know support the idea of closing down WHs permanently, moving the players to crowded nullsec-places ( --> food for the animals) and dropping the T3-loot in 10/10 with a much lower droprate from now on. It would be marvelous ...

So let's see if I've got this right. Most people who are running plexes in nullsec (at between 50 and 75m/hour) are currently running them in PVE-fitted ships (which according to you isn't necessary). But to do the same job in a PVP-fitted ship, you'd have to bring more people, which splits the reward between two (or more) people, so we're down to less isk/hour than L4s. Which means we'd both be better off having a L4 char in empire for when we need to do some isk-making.

Then we add your local changes (or rather just the removal thereof, since you never come up with anything other than "REMOVE LOCAL EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!!"), and we have to add a char or a guy on each gate to watch for roaming gangs, which further degrades the isk/hour figure, making L4s even more attractive.

Which brings me back to my assertation of a few days ago: just removing local will depopulate null and lowsec even further, and make the use of NPC corps or neutral alts even more prevalent in hisec during warsdecs. Which'll mean less people to shoot out in null and lowsec, and even less effective wardecs in hisec.

Unless, of course, you're going to keep harping on about how "I'm wrong" and "the population would increase", in while totally ignoring all the empiric evidence which has been shown just the last year or so alone, f.ex through what happened in null after the anom buff (people moved out to nullsec), after the anom nerf (people moved back to hisec to do L4s), and also given what happened to incursions after the incursion nerf (incursions are apparently somewhat deserted now, compared to when they were choc full, just because the isk/hour went down).

Lol check my kill board. Been in wh low and most frequently null. With small gang action not blobbing. I'm actually in hi sec atm to give this new merc stuff a try. But I find myself roaming low sec to fill in the gaps (check yesterday). Killing noob gankers solo. Especially those who chronically run MWDs.

there is only 1 place for people who want to get rid of local : highsec, asteroid-belts ... in the role of gankerkiddies, that is