These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP - Did you miss the fanfest round table for FW?

First post
Author
CCP Spitfire
C C P
C C P Alliance
#61 - 2011-09-16 12:24:02 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:


Well, I will be the first to acknowledge the responses, but I will also say that I hope the FW will continue to make their feelings known and make noise as we do want the attention given to FW that it deserves.

Bring on the results of the planning sessions so we know if we should be justly upset or happy...


A fair and very valid point. All I would personally ask is to keep the feedback in a civil and constructive vein.

Would it be too much to ask that FW can have input in the same way that Soundwave has asked for input into 0.0???


No, not too much. I will ask Soundwave if we can organize something along those lines, but I personally think it would be good to have a solid basis for discussion first (similar to the "0.0 design goals" blogs that started the discussion), and that would take time.

CCP Spitfire | Marketing & Sales Team @ccp_spitfire

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2011-09-16 12:39:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Har Harrison
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:


Well, I will be the first to acknowledge the responses, but I will also say that I hope the FW will continue to make their feelings known and make noise as we do want the attention given to FW that it deserves.

Bring on the results of the planning sessions so we know if we should be justly upset or happy...


A fair and very valid point. All I would personally ask is to keep the feedback in a civil and constructive vein.

Would it be too much to ask that FW can have input in the same way that Soundwave has asked for input into 0.0???


No, not too much. I will ask Soundwave if we can organize something along those lines, but I personally think it would be good to have a solid basis for discussion first (similar to the "0.0 design goals" blogs that started the discussion), and that would take time.

There are a number of people who have ideas and have posted. However I think that we can agree the following are major topics of discussion

1) NPC balance
2) Plex spawning mechanics
3) Lack of consequences to sov in FW
4) Mission farming vs PvP (PvP is the best part of FW, but gets you no rewards...)
5) Lack of militia uniforms for WiS Cool (ok, this one maybe not so important... though some people might like to have Corellian Bloodstripes or the equivilant)

Not sure we can do much about it, but 0.0 blobs in low sec is also an issue - e.g. PL in Amamake atm

Bengal Bob
Slymsloot Enterprises
#63 - 2011-09-16 12:57:31 UTC
Thank you for the responses on FW. Even if you guys can't promise action quickly, it will be enough for many of us that had started to truly believe that it was an abandoned area.

PLEASE don't do the silent treatment/thread avoid regardless of which way things are going. No news is bad news as far as many players are concerned. Many of the players that were active and enjoyable to play with or against have unsubbed or gone idle as they have felt that 12months or so of silence indicated a complete lack of interest.

Just knowing that it is still a subject that has someone pushing it means that I won't be unsubbing alts so I can afford Perpetuum - although I will still keep a main there just in case Hilmar makes CCP bankrupt.

Just throw us some bones and we will make the soup.

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2011-09-16 13:15:50 UTC
Bengal Bob wrote:
Thank you for the responses on FW. Even if you guys can't promise action quickly, it will be enough for many of us that had started to truly believe that it was an abandoned area.

PLEASE don't do the silent treatment/thread avoid regardless of which way things are going. No news is bad news as far as many players are concerned. Many of the players that were active and enjoyable to play with or against have unsubbed or gone idle as they have felt that 12months or so of silence indicated a complete lack of interest.

Just knowing that it is still a subject that has someone pushing it means that I won't be unsubbing alts so I can afford Perpetuum - although I will still keep a main there just in case Hilmar makes CCP bankrupt.

Just throw us some bones and we will make the soup.


Confirming minnie bones DO make the best soup Evil

uredo
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#65 - 2011-09-16 13:26:15 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:

There are a number of people who have ideas and have posted. However I think that we can agree the following are major topics of discussion

1) NPC balance
2) Plex spawning mechanics
3) Lack of consequences to sov in FW
4) Mission farming vs PvP (PvP is the best part of FW, but gets you no rewards...)
5) Lack of militia uniforms for WiS Cool (ok, this one maybe not so important... though some people might like to have Corellian Bloodstripes or the equivilant)

Not sure we can do much about it, but 0.0 blobs in low sec is also an issue - e.g. PL in Amamake atm


I heartily agree!

Come on CCP, I can't believe that a little bit of effort in FW wouldn't bring you massive rewards especially for new players..

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#66 - 2011-09-16 14:15:50 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:


Well, I will be the first to acknowledge the responses, but I will also say that I hope the FW will continue to make their feelings known and make noise as we do want the attention given to FW that it deserves.

Bring on the results of the planning sessions so we know if we should be justly upset or happy...


A fair and very valid point. All I would personally ask is to keep the feedback in a civil and constructive vein.

Would it be too much to ask that FW can have input in the same way that Soundwave has asked for input into 0.0???


No, not too much. I will ask Soundwave if we can organize something along those lines, but I personally think it would be good to have a solid basis for discussion first (similar to the "0.0 design goals" blogs that started the discussion), and that would take time.

There are a number of people who have ideas and have posted. However I think that we can agree the following are major topics of discussion

1) NPC balance
2) Plex spawning mechanics
3) Lack of consequences to sov in FW
4) Mission farming vs PvP (PvP is the best part of FW, but gets you no rewards...)
5) Lack of militia uniforms for WiS Cool (ok, this one maybe not so important... though some people might like to have Corellian Bloodstripes or the equivilant)

Not sure we can do much about it, but 0.0 blobs in low sec is also an issue - e.g. PL in Amamake atm



I think when people say that fw is "broken" they are mainly refering to the occupancy plex mechanics. FW missions are working pretty well. (I actually think they are brillant and the model should be used for other low sec missions)

NPC balance could be improved I suppose but all the factions can run missions. Even if one factions missions are harder to run this can be made up for by giving each faction more items unique to their faction.

Here is a list of ideas that have been kicked around about occupancy plexing over the years that I wrote up as sort of a skeleton outline:

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1564233&page=1#1


I strongly beleive that the most important thing for occupancy plexing is that it be an activity people can take some pride in being good at. In EVEthat almost always means pvp and not shooting npcs. IMO, the focus on fighting npcs in the current FW plexing mechanic was really the biggest downfall of the mechanic.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Amun Khonsu
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#67 - 2011-09-16 17:56:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Amun Khonsu
Cearain wrote:
[quote=Har Harrison]

I think when people say that fw is "broken" they are mainly refering to the occupancy plex mechanics. FW missions are working pretty well. (I actually think they are brillant and the model should be used for other low sec missions)

NPC balance could be improved I suppose but all the factions can run missions. Even if one factions missions are harder to run this can be made up for by giving each faction more items unique to their faction.

Here is a list of ideas that have been kicked around about occupancy plexing over the years that I wrote up as sort of a skeleton outline:

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1564233&page=1#1


I strongly beleive that the most important thing for occupancy plexing is that it be an activity people can take some pride in being good at. In EVEthat almost always means pvp and not shooting npcs. IMO, the focus on fighting npcs in the current FW plexing mechanic was really the biggest downfall of the mechanic.


FW being broken isnt only referring to plexing. It also refers to 0.0 alliances (as well as pirate alliances) bringing in supers (that need desperately to be rebalanced and made more vulnerable in low sec) as a trump card (and hordes of their alliance corps) to annihilate any FW corp it can, preventing FW corps from engaging in FW against each other at all.

Also, preventing FW corps from forming alliances under the faction they serve that would better help balance the politics of these third parties who would interfere with FW in the warzone systems.

FW is broken. Fix it pls :)

Fight them until turmoil is no more and strike terror into their hearts. www.ross-fw.net

Super Chair
Project Cerberus
Templis CALSF
#68 - 2011-09-16 18:31:12 UTC
Amun Khonsu wrote:
Cearain wrote:
[quote=Har Harrison]

I think when people say that fw is "broken" they are mainly refering to the occupancy plex mechanics. FW missions are working pretty well. (I actually think they are brillant and the model should be used for other low sec missions)

NPC balance could be improved I suppose but all the factions can run missions. Even if one factions missions are harder to run this can be made up for by giving each faction more items unique to their faction.

Here is a list of ideas that have been kicked around about occupancy plexing over the years that I wrote up as sort of a skeleton outline:

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1564233&page=1#1


I strongly beleive that the most important thing for occupancy plexing is that it be an activity people can take some pride in being good at. In EVEthat almost always means pvp and not shooting npcs. IMO, the focus on fighting npcs in the current FW plexing mechanic was really the biggest downfall of the mechanic.


FW being broken isnt only referring to plexing. It also refers to 0.0 alliances (as well as pirate alliances) bringing in supers (that need desperately to be rebalanced and made more vulnerable in low sec) as a trump card (and hordes of their alliance corps) to annihilate any FW corp it can, preventing FW corps from engaging in FW against each other at all.

Also, preventing FW corps from forming alliances under the faction they serve that would better help balance the politics of these third parties who would interfere with FW in the warzone systems.

FW is broken. Fix it pls :)



More importantly allowing alliances into FW would be another way to increase the population, there are people in alliances out there that would join FW in a heartbeat if they didn't have to leave their alliance.
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2011-09-17 07:08:49 UTC
Super Chair wrote:
Amun Khonsu wrote:
Cearain wrote:
[quote=Har Harrison]

I think when people say that fw is "broken" they are mainly refering to the occupancy plex mechanics. FW missions are working pretty well. (I actually think they are brillant and the model should be used for other low sec missions)

NPC balance could be improved I suppose but all the factions can run missions. Even if one factions missions are harder to run this can be made up for by giving each faction more items unique to their faction.

Here is a list of ideas that have been kicked around about occupancy plexing over the years that I wrote up as sort of a skeleton outline:

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1564233&page=1#1


I strongly beleive that the most important thing for occupancy plexing is that it be an activity people can take some pride in being good at. In EVEthat almost always means pvp and not shooting npcs. IMO, the focus on fighting npcs in the current FW plexing mechanic was really the biggest downfall of the mechanic.


FW being broken isnt only referring to plexing. It also refers to 0.0 alliances (as well as pirate alliances) bringing in supers (that need desperately to be rebalanced and made more vulnerable in low sec) as a trump card (and hordes of their alliance corps) to annihilate any FW corp it can, preventing FW corps from engaging in FW against each other at all.

Also, preventing FW corps from forming alliances under the faction they serve that would better help balance the politics of these third parties who would interfere with FW in the warzone systems.

FW is broken. Fix it pls :)



More importantly allowing alliances into FW would be another way to increase the population, there are people in alliances out there that would join FW in a heartbeat if they didn't have to leave their alliance.

I sometimes wonder what FW would be like if people could achieve a rank and have an impact based on their rank. Being a mega supreme xyz would actually allow you to do something, including command others etc... as per a normal military.

Of course, with all the spy alts etc..., I am not sure how this could be implemented without leaving it open to mass infiltration by the opposing militia...

StarRanger 2ndClass
Comms Black
Pandemic Horde
#70 - 2011-09-17 08:11:38 UTC
i had some nice ideas but the post-button thought differently about it and nothing was posted, thanks ccp for this wonderful forum function Evil
hope i make the effort again What?
Pr1ncess Alia
Doomheim
#71 - 2011-09-17 09:16:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Pr1ncess Alia
CCP Spitfire wrote:



I won't list all the things that need attention, that information has been stated and distributed and spammed ad nauseum.

Please understand that my current and previous negative comments are directed at the company and it's direction/priorities not you.


I have truly resigned myself to believing you have abandoned this part of the game. Even if you prove me wrong CCP will need to go a long ways for me to not consider it too little too late.

At this point, while I do very much appreciate you at least posting in a thread on the topic (yes! it makes all the difference in the world!), I've moved on to "watching what you do vs what you say" as someone we all know would put it.

The lengths that FW has been neglected is inexcusable. As a person that renewed my interest in the game solely for the release of FW (all those years ago), I very much believed the promises that this part of the game would continue to receive attention and be fine tuned. You may not remember how talked up and promoted it was, but many of us do.

It might just be business to people within CCP for the company to shelve it for a later date (apparently a waaaaay later date. years later), the neglect is received as a very personal betrayal and slap in the face for those of us that invested so much of our own time into it. I don't say these things because I hate CCP or the game, I say them because I genuinely give a crap about the game and don't want to have to walk away.

Enough about the past, let's talk future:

Those that feel as I do may not be as numerous as other demographics in eve, but we are out there. I hope people in CCP seriously consider that current activity in FW may be attributed more to the neglect paid to it's mechanics and development by CCP as opposed to those interested in participating.

You're sitting on a gold mine of quick, easy pvp that can appeal to both new and old players alike without all the strings that are attached to say piracy, empire war decs or 0.0. All you need to do is give it attention.


I play other games now. My subscription is a matter of whatever time is left on what I already paid for and it's out of nostalgia and hope that I remain active on the boards. Again, I don't want to leave but as with any perceived abusive relationship, there is a point where you just have to get out. I know many of my FW friends already have.

If you fix FW, it will go a long way towards me and others actually wanting to play the game again (give you money). I'll never buy a monocle or pair of pants, but I may buy another subscription one day if given the motivation.

I hope you would be so kind as to relay these thoughts and emotions along the line.
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2011-09-17 10:51:11 UTC
Unfortunately I know of a number of people who feel as P1ncess Alia do - got bored of chasing Stealth Bombers and went to be mercs or off to 0.0 due to the lack of quality PvP vs hunting cloaked mission runners.

KFenn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#73 - 2011-09-17 10:56:36 UTC
Shaalira D'arc wrote:
Next Fanfest, attending FW pilots should find a dev and orbit him endlessly until either he responds or we win occupancy of Iceland.


I ******* lol'd Lol

Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade

Amun Khonsu
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#74 - 2011-09-17 18:10:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Amun Khonsu
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:



I play other games now. My subscription is a matter of whatever time is left on what I already paid for and it's out of nostalgia and hope that I remain active on the boards. Again, I don't want to leave but as with any perceived abusive relationship, there is a point where you just have to get out. I know many of my FW friends already have.

If you fix FW, it will go a long way towards me and others actually wanting to play the game again (give you money). I'll never buy a monocle or pair of pants, but I may buy another subscription one day if given the motivation.

I hope you would be so kind as to relay these thoughts and emotions along the line.


I know quite a few people that feel this way also. Many have quit EVE and are logging on to World of Tanks :( I know a few currently who are feeling and talking of doing the same :/ One of them (a long time EVE player) I talked to just a couple days ago as he expressed this sentiment.

I try to encourage my friends to hang in there, but ultimately its them paying for their subscriptions. :(

*Beginning to feel lonely, heh.

Fight them until turmoil is no more and strike terror into their hearts. www.ross-fw.net

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2011-09-18 08:05:14 UTC
Well, just had a great roam with Amarr Militia - killed heaps for little lost - that is what FW is supposed to be about ppl!!!!

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#76 - 2011-09-18 08:10:48 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
Well, just had a great roam with Amarr Militia - killed heaps for little lost - that is what FW is supposed to be about ppl!!!!

Tsk, Tsk .. Amarr does not roam, we are not animals you know. We Patrol!
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#77 - 2011-09-18 09:33:37 UTC
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
Well, just had a great roam with Amarr Militia - killed heaps for little lost - that is what FW is supposed to be about ppl!!!!

Tsk, Tsk .. Amarr does not roam, we are not animals you know. We Patrol!


I may not be in FW but I tend to fight amarr FW a lot simply because of where I fly and I can tell you I wish that we had more players from your faction round here that actually gave a s*** about FW rather than just using it as a defensive cover+isk machine. I see loads of decent people posting on the forums but those that set up shop in low sec minmatar really don't give two hoots (in general, there are some cool people rarely).

I fight for minmatar militia even though i am not in FW simply because I can't join in without leaving my corp. I even go so far as to leaving minmatar militia alone unless they attack me. I can honestly say that the whole cloaky SB LP farmers are basically just taking the **** out of the whole FW thing. I've had to go to pretty extreme lengths to actually kill them in there SB's/Inty combo's and if they roll with T3's then I can't even touch them. Boredom sets in and you can have 8 of the little bastards running FW missions in perfect safety in a busy low sec system. I don't even get any satisfaction stopping them by just bouncing between missions anymore :(

Still..... it's very, very satisfying getting a kill on one of them heheh.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#78 - 2011-09-18 13:23:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Amun Khonsu wrote:
Cearain wrote:
[quote=Har Harrison]

I think when people say that fw is "broken" they are mainly refering to the occupancy plex mechanics. FW missions are working pretty well. (I actually think they are brillant and the model should be used for other low sec missions)

NPC balance could be improved I suppose but all the factions can run missions. Even if one factions missions are harder to run this can be made up for by giving each faction more items unique to their faction.

Here is a list of ideas that have been kicked around about occupancy plexing over the years that I wrote up as sort of a skeleton outline:

http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1564233&page=1#1


I strongly beleive that the most important thing for occupancy plexing is that it be an activity people can take some pride in being good at. In EVEthat almost always means pvp and not shooting npcs. IMO, the focus on fighting npcs in the current FW plexing mechanic was really the biggest downfall of the mechanic.


FW being broken isnt only referring to plexing. It also refers to 0.0 alliances (as well as pirate alliances) bringing in supers (that need desperately to be rebalanced and made more vulnerable in low sec) as a trump card (and hordes of their alliance corps) to annihilate any FW corp it can, preventing FW corps from engaging in FW against each other at all.

Also, preventing FW corps from forming alliances under the faction they serve that would better help balance the politics of these third parties who would interfere with FW in the warzone systems.

FW is broken. Fix it pls :)



While I certainly agree the plexing mechanic is not the only thing broken, I do believe it is the main thing that is broken. I think the original intended purpose of faction war was to fight for occupancy. I and many others don't bother to do this core aspect of fw because the rats are a hassle and it is not worth caring about. (not just because of no consequences but because by proving you can shoot rats endlessly is certainly not something to be proud of.)

And yes I agree the supercaps are a problem but I think that is problem thoughout new eden not really a FW problem. Moreover if they actually make occupancy something fun and worthy of doing (again: not shooting rats but helping the players get quality small scale pvp) then alliances can bring as many super caps as they want. they will only be able to enter the unrestricted plexes.

And I also agree with super chair that mechanics should be made for alliances to join. However, I do not agree that this is anything close to as important as fixing the plexing mechanic. Sure more people will join fw if you can join with an alliance but just adding numbers to the list of enrolled is not the solution. Especially if that meas fw becomes the blob warfare we can already find in low sec.

To properly fix FW, it should allow players to find a style of pvp you can't find elsewhere in eve. I suggest that if it allowed players to find frequent, quality, small scale or solo pvp, it would accomplish that task. The clear way to do that is to fix the plexing mechanic.

I just have this sinking feeling that ccp will continue with the npcs or even make them stronger by adding sleeper ai or something very stupid like that. ("because it sounds cool") Then the last great hope for small scale and solo pvp will be killed off.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#79 - 2011-09-18 14:20:25 UTC
Over two years ago there was Dev who made a pretty damn good suggestion that would allow alliances to participate as full members of the militias: To be a member the alliance must forfeit all sovereignty.

It is so damn simple but has such impact that the mumbling about "why can't we join!?!" went away rather abruptly. With no fall-back plan or safe hidey hole/cash-cow it seems the support for it vanished.

Supers in low-sec (includes FW) is solved by making their immunity dependent on sovereignty, outside ones own they lose immunity.
Fits perfectly with supers supposedly being alliance assets and when combined with whatever nerf they are slated for , anything but proper super blobs would be very vulnerable to FW fleets
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#80 - 2011-09-19 01:48:49 UTC
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Over two years ago there was Dev who made a pretty damn good suggestion that would allow alliances to participate as full members of the militias: To be a member the alliance must forfeit all sovereignty.

It is so damn simple but has such impact that the mumbling about "why can't we join!?!" went away rather abruptly. With no fall-back plan or safe hidey hole/cash-cow it seems the support for it vanished.

Supers in low-sec (includes FW) is solved by making their immunity dependent on sovereignty, outside ones own they lose immunity.
Fits perfectly with supers supposedly being alliance assets and when combined with whatever nerf they are slated for , anything but proper super blobs would be very vulnerable to FW fleets


Another nice post Hirana. Your first suggestion seems to make sense. Certain role play alliances have been cut out of fw which is really dumb. Some of these are some of the very first alliances in eve and should be able to take part in this war without the stupid mechanics involved with war deccing individual Faction war corps. (Hirana you made an excellent suggestion on how that should be handled in your ultimate faction war vision post.)

As for the super caps I'm not sure if that would give the party defending sov too much of an advantage. Sov warfare is not my interest. So I don't really care what the "serious business" folks do as I sit in a minor or medium waiting for some pew pew. They can't blob me there.
Big smile

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815