EVE General Discussion

hehe hehe

gankers, content creators

hehe good joke, really

one advice to OP - if he is clearly as new as he claims - burst dpsing down a ship that has barely any tools apart from certainity that the guys who are killing him will loose their ships as well IS NOT a content

bumping a freighter to deny it enter a warp in which case he does not even have THAT quarantee is also NOT a content

and hence - however you will put it up - the guys who engage it just for the sake of griefing and or big isk killmail are NOT content CREATORS because what they "create" - even assuming thats the proper word here IS NOT a CONTENT.

even on first few pages of this thread you could see quite a few of examples of actuall high-sec content creators.

and no actuall content creators in high sec are in no way "castrated" from the ability of creating the content

Holy **** now you even proved him right. *facepalm*
Is that really what you call a proper comeback?
Are you really that useless?

Isn't there ANYONE who is actually a skilled smack-talker?


Do we really have to deal with all these low class, low education, low ability manchilds??

The butthurt is shown from the language you use, not what the subject is about.

Your language shows all the signs of being butthurt.

It is not the fault of the gankers that you are a risk seeker.

How long have you or did you work for CCP? Seems like you know what data their servers collect, please share how you acquired such knowledge or admit it's your opinion/ guess and not an actual fact. My guess is the server that can uncloak my ship when it gets to within 2000 meters of a frozen dead body could be programmed to determine whom accelerated towards a stationary or orbiting ship to case a collision. Considering the calculations that it takes daily right now to determine damage effectiveness of ordnance based on angle, distance, and speed I suspect the servers might be up to the task.

The undock at Jita is one of the worst immersion breaks in the game, ships passing thru each other, a total mess. I wish CCP would do something about that, an orderly departure even if it meant delay would be far better. When Jita is over crowded access to enter the entire system is slowed at gates and login, undocking should be handled the same.

Sadly a ball of twisting writhing ships is a hallmark of CCP large battles so I don't see them changing that mechanic anytime soon.

While it is my opinion, it is also the opinion of people far more knowledgeable about the code than either you or I

If it could be done, which is doubtful, and more importantly if it was possible and CCP wanted to do so, it would have been implemented long ago.

Bumping has been a contentious subject for years and my best guess is that the forthcoming solution that allows ships to eventually warp regardless of being bumped is the best that they can do given the lack of documentation on old code.

Your example is fairly simple trigonometry and the basic formulae in existence for centuries, who'dathunk that computers were good at fairly simple maths; anyone that's halfway decent at hitting a moving target with a gun or bow does it in their head without even realising it.

To make it a criminal act CCP would have to make the code look at how the collision was initiated, decide whether it was deliberate or not etc etc; and they'd have to do it without breaking something else because a good portion of the code is probably a decade or more old and completely undocumented as to what else it's hooked into. The only calculations it does now is to compare mass, speed and trajectory, again simple math.

Detecting collisions isn't the problem, that already happens, deciding whether it was deliberate or not is the problem; Eve players being Eve players we'd figure out ways to use the decision making process to our advantage.

I believe Baltec1 said it best, we'd build a wall of freighter wrecks on the Jita undock, and we'd do it without firing a shot; be careful what you wish for.

So CCP should limit the functionality of the major trade hub in the game to be aesthetically pleasing? Get real.

So tell me.. why do you play this game? You clearly dislike pretty much everything about it.

Because they don't like you. Next question.

Are you less sexually threatened if I reply with a male character? The fact that you think I'm pretending to be female because some of my characters are, I think says something pretty weird about you.

P.S. Your tears are nectar.

And here you see the lazy ass, who chestbeats about how he ...
... sits in station all day until he undocks for 30 seconds.
... needs an alt to find targets, because his ganking char needs to be safe.

You still haven't learned that you have no arguments against me ...
... and still try to go ad hominem, indirectly giving me an advantage every single time.


When will you learn?

When?


When will you drop the ego and attitude and realize that your hubris only damages you?


You morons do nothing but ganking and chest beating, all creamed up with propaganda.

The stats from CCP tell that you FAIL at converting miners to skiffs and procurers!


WHEN?

i dont think they mean to castrate them .. they just dont want them living in a safe little bubble in their own little world. socialization is one of the best parts of this game for good and bad.