These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security

First post First post
Author
Shadoroth
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#61 - 2016-02-23 19:20:59 UTC
lord xavier wrote:
You're allies bested my alt by having 10 people ready for me. This was an unfair advantage of 1v10. Enjoy your ban.


But anyone could get 9 friends, therefore it is totally fair since any player could just recruit 9 guys...

But wait! I don't have any friends because i'm an *******! Now it's unfair again!

BUT WAIT! I can now LEGALLY multi-box 9 more dudes in pvp since that makes it fair again.

Or something **** I dunno.
drunklies
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2016-02-23 19:22:59 UTC
CCP, if your going to go rules laywering on something as far reaching and massive as this, could you please consider hiring someone to have actual oversight. Maybe a lawyer of some description.

I only ask so that when I get banned for whatever GM 1 considers unfair, that GM 2 might actually agree with him.

Think of it as a trial program, you might get round to expanding it to the rest of the petition system.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#63 - 2016-02-23 19:25:33 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Several of the posted questions should be petitioned instead.

When your account gets banned, it is helpful to be able to refer to GM replies. Make sure to backup any GM replies so they are accessible outside of the game client. Leave the petitions in your inbox too, so CCP can find them if they go missing from their account logs.

Been there. Done that. Have the scars, and I am so paranoid now that I won't even do things CCP has explicitly told me are OK.


Why not help us all by telling us what is illegal and what not, even if its just 'in your experience'?

I understand the legal stuff needs to be vague to cast as wide a net as possible, but 'unfair advantage' is too vague, surely!?

As others have mentioned, some might consider owning two accounts to be unfair, but I'm sure CCP appreciates the additional income.

Quote:
Most of you really need to go back and re-read the devblog. You should also read the EULA and ToS. So many people jumping to conclusions that would be cleared up by actually reading it all properly.

CCP can not comment on individual third party programs. They have no control over them. The majority of third-party programs do not break the EULA themselves, however they can be used to break the EULA and that is a crucial distinction people need to understand.

Asking if this program or that program is in violation of the EULA is a question that can not be answered. Its what you are doing with the program thats important.


Ok I tried, but the link to EULA in the dev blog is broken...

Help us understand! You says it's what we are doing with the program that's important, tell us what actions are illegal and what are not!
Mai Khumm
172.0.0.1
#64 - 2016-02-23 19:30:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Mai Khumm
Quote:
2. A. Establishing a New Account

“<…Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited.”


Does media related websites that have players providing content in the form of articles for ISK then generate revenue in the form of advertising fall under this?

There's other players who don't play the game but use it to generate content on Media websites for the sole purpose of advertising revenue.
Scotsman Howard
S0utherN Comfort
#65 - 2016-02-23 19:31:09 UTC
CCP Phantom wrote:
Team Security comes with interesting news - as always!

This time we clarify the use of third party tools and overlays. Additionally we have an ISK Buyer Amnesty available under certain conditions!

Read more about these interesting news in the latest dev blog from Team Security Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security


I'm sorry but nothing of value was answered here. You just added more questions than you answered.

Bit the bullet and give us a white-list of 3rd party programs that are allowed because with this wording, anything that manages your eve windows is bannable.

HINT: Windows 10 has windows management built in, so by the absolute letter of this blog, those who use multiple clients on multiple screens one Windows 10 (or wine/linus while we are at it), should be banned.

You have basically just told us that the last "legal" feature of isoboxer (window management) is no longer valid, but you have not told us if the program is valid.


DO NOT TELL US JUST TO FILE A PETITION: The petition system does not work for something like this. You tell multiple people different things to the same question. Then those who did get an answer cannot share that fact because you will ban them.
Charit A
Xynodyne
The Initiative.
#66 - 2016-02-23 19:32:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Charit A
so ... RIP Intel Streams? (like http://www.hitbox.tv/mrchillin ) Question
Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
#67 - 2016-02-23 19:35:45 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:


Ok I tried, but the link to EULA in the dev blog is broken...

Help us understand! You says it's what we are doing with the program that's important, tell us what actions are illegal and what are not!


Eve's policies

There are lots of third party programs that can be used in lots of different ways. If you want my opinion you need to give an example.

I will give one from earlier in the thread though. IsBoxer is mention alot and most of it is already covered re; multi-casting etc. In regards to its window management though. It is ok to use to have multiple accounts on the one screen. If you use it to cut out specific sections of a client ie; an overview and then overlay that on top of another client, that violates the EULA.

Petitioning a GM is a good idea but you need to be specific. Just asking if x program is ok will get you a copy/paste of the EULA.

User of 'Bumblefck's Luscious & Luminous Mustachio Wax'

Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#68 - 2016-02-23 19:36:15 UTC
Charit A wrote:
so ... RIP Intel Streams? (like http://www.hitbox.tv/mrchillin ) Question


Intel that you have and I do not is surely an unfair advantage!!

BAN
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#69 - 2016-02-23 19:38:22 UTC
Papa Django wrote:
After reading again it is pretty clear :

Quote:

We do consider overlays using elements of a second or multiple other EVE clients to be against the rules. It changes the way the game is played and grants the player unfair advantages over other players. For example, having overviews from other EVE clients as overlays on one EVE client would allow a player to get real time intel from all those other game instances without having to switch to the other windows. Similarly, overlays using elements from a second or multiple other EVE clients to allow the player to activate modules etc. on those other game instances without switching to the other client windows are clearly in violation of our rules. - See more at: http://evenews24.com/2016/02/23/devblog-overlays-isk-buyer-amnesty-and-account-security/#sthash.jOtNQ97p.dpuf


So ISboxer is effectively banned.

A last question, is your detection methodology takes account about pvp or not ? I do not do pvp anymore. I do industry and trade. What kind of "unfair advantages" could i have in this case ?

Viewing markets in multiple regions at once.

Ah but you say, evecentral....

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

RoCkEt X
Hostile.
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#70 - 2016-02-23 19:42:37 UTC
IcedGuardian
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#71 - 2016-02-23 19:46:46 UTC
CCP Phantom wrote:
Team Security comes with interesting news - as always!

This time we clarify the use of third party tools and overlays. Additionally we have an ISK Buyer Amnesty available under certain conditions!

Read more about these interesting news in the latest dev blog from Team Security Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security


No you do not clarify, unfortunatelly. Theres just an mention on being a) 'fair to everyone' and b) 'enforced at our own discretion'. Both of those comes highly subjected to one's judgement and hence not standardized and at constant change.

One of the most appealing things about EVE is to play the way one player likes it to be.

Why not, instead of tossing up random rules and worsening everyone's gameplay you guys don't team up to make the game actually more enjoyable? Its not wise to do that to a game with aging (but loyal) playerbase.
Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
#72 - 2016-02-23 19:47:39 UTC
RoCkEt X wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/47800w/soooo_is_this_an_exploit_now/

cba to rewrite n' ting.

tia


Yes, that breaks the eula and always has.

User of 'Bumblefck's Luscious & Luminous Mustachio Wax'

lord xavier
Rubbed Out
#73 - 2016-02-23 19:51:29 UTC
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:
RoCkEt X wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/47800w/soooo_is_this_an_exploit_now/

cba to rewrite n' ting.

tia


Yes, that breaks the eula and always has.
Then there are so many products here on the forum you can download from players that has always been breaking the EULA.Roll
I can do the same thing with six clients in windowed mode, and just maximize it when something of interest comes on the overview.
Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
#74 - 2016-02-23 19:55:59 UTC
lord xavier wrote:
Then there are so many products here on the forum you can download from players that has always been breaking the EULA.Roll
I can do the same thing with six clients in windowed mode, and just maximize it when something of interest comes on the overview.


Its not the program thats breaking the eula. Its the way the program is used that can lead a player to break the EULA. and that video shows a player breaking the EULA.

User of 'Bumblefck's Luscious & Luminous Mustachio Wax'

Dart Aurel
Space Roar
#75 - 2016-02-23 20:22:36 UTC
Asinae Antaelis wrote:
Not that it should be prohibited, but the client should be designed to render only the (last) active one at least if it detects multiple clients running on the same computer!


There are 2 problems with this (again two, hehe, there're always two):
1. It's really difficult to implement. I.e. in linux (+wine ofc) it's not always even possible at all to detect whether window is active or not.
2. If only 1 client can be rendered at once then there will be no reason to have 2 monitors for EVE. -1 point to karma
Knitram Relik
State War Academy
Caldari State
#76 - 2016-02-23 20:26:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Knitram Relik
"For your honesty and cooperation, which is sincerely appreciated, you will not be banned. Other actions will be determined on a case by case basis."

I doubt you'll get many people to tell on themselves for RMT unless they are 110% guaranteed no ban, negative account balance, etc. I figure they've already taken the risk and gotten away with it (or so they think). Why take a chance and tell on themselves unless they KNOW nothing bad will come of it?

"The problem with quotes on the internet is that it's really hard to verify their authenticity." - Abraham Lincoln

Dart Aurel
Space Roar
#77 - 2016-02-23 20:27:37 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
When your account gets banned, it is helpful to be able to refer to GM replies.


Offtopic: heh man when/if accounts get banned I'll at last complete this game and can go on next one :))))
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#78 - 2016-02-23 20:28:09 UTC
Team Security wrote:
As we receive questions about overlays and EVE Online every now and then we want to use this opportunity to further clarify our Third Party Policy on the topic (http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/third-party-policies/).

The link appears to be broken.

Quote:
Policies
Can't find item

Sorry, we could not find the item you were looking for.

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#79 - 2016-02-23 20:31:06 UTC
You know with the emphasis on alts and all this grey area stuff why don't you just toss out an "official" client manager.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#80 - 2016-02-23 20:32:59 UTC
Interesting observation: CCP wants to remove the IGB and suggests that people should use overlay browsers systems such as Overwolf, however, browsers offer a lot of benefits and advantages that you could easily consider unfair. Kinda blurry guidelines there.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.