These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Balancing bumping and looting mechanics

First post
Author
Mag's
Azn Empire
#941 - 2016-02-05 18:36:31 UTC
Bella Jennie wrote:
Mag's wrote:

Seeing as that is already the case, what's the problem?

Oh and since when we're facts and figures a trap?


Seriously? Are you for real? WTF?

you know damn well what we are discussing here:
BUMPING is currently NOT a crime; it has no consequences from the POLICE.


I'm discussing facts, not what you deem as facts. Try being a little clearer on future, as it seems you know it's not a crime.
I'm still asking for evidence from your side, as to why this needs changing. Balance and fundamental changes to the game, should not be based on specific special circumstances, viewed alone. We need to look at the whole to understand if it is indeed a problem.

So please, provide that evidence. I'm sure we'll all be glad to see it.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Bella Jennie
Doomheim
#942 - 2016-02-05 18:38:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Bella Jennie
Mag's wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
These are reasonable expectations for people who prefer to play "casually"..
- and don't give me the BS about I shouldn't be playing THIS game or I'm playing it wrong..
No they really are not reasonable. You're asking for the game to change for you, instead of adapting to it.

If you play soccer then decide you don't like just kicking the ball, pick it up and run with it, you will not succeed. Same as with Chess. You may not like how certain pieces move, that doesn't mean you can change the rules to suit. Or playing CoD and wanting to be left alone and not shot, because you want to investigate the map.

The point is you don't play soccer and expect rugby. You don't play Chess expecting checkers and you don't play CoD for a local tourist site.

Quite frankly your stance in this regard, is ridiculous.


I'm "asking the game to change for me" - OMFG!!!!!

You are yes. You're asking for the core of the game to change, because you don't want to play the game. The whole 'your way my way' stance, doesn't mean the core of the game should change. Highsec is already reasonably safe. If you don't want to use the tools and options currently available, that doesn't mean the game has to change. That figure you and others hate so much, 99.9%, is based on factual evidence and directly concerns this topic. So again I ask, when the odds are so high in your favour, just what is reasonable to you?


Unless you took part in the development of Eve or you work at CCP now, please don't preach to me about "the core of the game".

And besides that, ALL things are subject to change.

And YES, I want to play Eve.

My experience in gaming and my strength of logic convince me that CCP will adjust the BUMPING mechanic when they are able to.. Unless they are truly catering to the harassers.

this game currently favors the DOUCHEBAGS

Mag's
Azn Empire
#943 - 2016-02-05 18:42:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
@Bella Jennie , please don't let them derail the thread , it is their intention to get it locked by disrupting the discussion as much as possible. stay on topic and let us hear any thoughts you have on the topic

sorry , cross posted ^^ Smile
So discussing the topic and providing evidence, is derailing it?
Unlike wrecks, which your side tinfoilded over and which was removed?

I know your argument is weak, but those types of posts only highlight it more. Try staying on topic please.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Bella Jennie
Doomheim
#944 - 2016-02-05 18:42:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Bella Jennie
Mag's wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
Mag's wrote:

Seeing as that is already the case, what's the problem?

Oh and since when we're facts and figures a trap?


Seriously? Are you for real? WTF?

you know damn well what we are discussing here:
BUMPING is currently NOT a crime; it has no consequences from the POLICE.


I'm discussing facts, not what you deem as facts. Try being a little clearer on future, as it seems you know it's not a crime.
I'm still asking for evidence from your side, as to why this needs changing. Balance and fundamental changes to the game, should not be based on specific special circumstances, viewed alone. We need to look at the whole to understand if it is indeed a problem.

So please, provide that evidence. I'm sure we'll all be glad to see it.


You must be a liberal Big smile

What you call "facts" are merely your opinions. Same as mine..
Equal to mine but only opinions.

I'm going to add:
I don't have to show you anything
I don't have to prove anything - to YOU

I'm merely posting here to petition CCP
YOU can't do anything for me but mock me.
You're not even a sincere debater.

this game currently favors the DOUCHEBAGS

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#945 - 2016-02-05 18:44:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Bella Jennie wrote:
Is there really NO OTHER WAY to play Eve without engaging in PVP, joining a large corp and becoming a "pirate".
You can't play Eve without engaging in PvP of one form or another, that is by design and is the considered opinion of the Devs.

New Player FAQ wrote:
Furthermore, as we mentioned previously, once you enter New Eden you must consider every action you take as a form of PvP since this is the core game concept.


Quote:
I mean judging from the responses here, if you want to be a miner you're stupid, lazy scum to be harassed at every opportunity; EVEN in HISEC. (I had asked: why even have HISEC then?)

Indeed; why even have mining then?
That's a hyperbolic falsehood. Miners are treated according to how they act, a miner who is afk in a max yield barge or exhumer is treated as being dumb and lazy; because this is a PvP game where going afk is dumb and lazy. A miner who is at the keyboard, packing a tank and aware of their surroundings is generally treated with more respect.

Quote:
I stated that I wanted to play in HISEC and just be reasonably safe. This caused heads to explode and the hate posts went through the roof! (well, those are your jerk players I referred to)
If you want to be safe in hisec, take steps to ensure your safety.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Bella Jennie
Doomheim
#946 - 2016-02-05 18:48:15 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
Is there really NO OTHER WAY to play Eve without engaging in PVP, joining a large corp and becoming a "pirate".
You can't play Eve without engaging in PvP of one form or another, that is bt design and is the considered opinion of the Devs.

New Player FAQ wrote:
Furthermore, as we mentioned previously, once you enter New Eden you must consider every action you take as a form of PvP since this is the core game concept.


Quote:
- I mean judging from the responses here, if you want to be a miner you're stupid, lazy scum to be harassed at every opportunity; EVEN in HISEC. (I had asked: why even have HISEC then?)

Indeed; why even have mining then?
That's a hyperbolic falsehood. Miners are treated according to how they act, a miner who is afk in a max yield barge or exhumer is treated as being dumb and lazy; because this is a PvP game where going afk is dumb and lazy. A miner who is at the keyboard, packing a tank and aware of their surroundings is generally treated with more respect.

Quote:
I stated that I wanted to play in HISEC and just be reasonably safe. This caused heads to explode and the hate posts went through the roof! (well, those are your jerk players I referred to)
If you want to be safe in hisec, take steps to ensure your safety.




you've added nothing new..
you're just being contrary while merely making the discussion circular.

this game currently favors the DOUCHEBAGS

Mag's
Azn Empire
#947 - 2016-02-05 18:48:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Bella Jennie wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You are yes. You're asking for the core of the game to change, because you don't want to play the game. The whole 'your way my way' stance, doesn't mean the core of the game should change. Highsec is already reasonably safe. If you don't want to use the tools and options currently available, that doesn't mean the game has to change. That figure you and others hate so much, 99.9%, is based on factual evidence and directly concerns this topic. So again I ask, when the odds are so high in your favour, just what is reasonable to you?


Unless you took part in the development of Eve or you work at CCP now, please don't preach to me about "the core of the game".

And besides that, ALL things are subject to change.

And YES, I want to play Eve.

My experience in gaming and my strength of logic convince me that CCP will adjust the BUMPING mechanic when they are able to.. Unless they are truly catering to the harassers.
Please read the new player FAQ and other such related info from CCP, then you can tell me if I'm wrong. There is also a famous Falcon punch post, that will say the same. Most of which have already been posted in this thread. But seeing as facts are not your bag, I won't be holding my breath for when you admit being wrong.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#948 - 2016-02-05 18:48:59 UTC
bumping in it's current form is like going down the street , seeing an overweight old lady walking home with her groceries , repeatedly running into her at high speed to prevent her getting home for several hours , till your large gang of criminally minded associates come by to murder and rob her .

at which point the police show up to take down the individuals who killed and robbed her, but ignore you totally . Pirate

and it's also all her fault because she didn't bring 15 strapping blokes to protect her every time she went shopping....Big smile

Mag's
Azn Empire
#949 - 2016-02-05 18:52:47 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
bumping in it's current form is like going down the street , seeing an overweight old lady walking home with her groceries , repeatedly running into her at high speed to prevent her getting home for several hours , till your large gang of criminally minded associates come by to murder and rob her .

at which point the police show up to take down the individuals who killed and robbed her, but ignore you totally . Pirate

and it's also all her fault because she didn't bring 15 strapping blokes to protect her every time she went shopping....Big smile

Please stop with the ill conceived RL comparisons. They always fail and do not add to the discussion. Thank you.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Bella Jennie
Doomheim
#950 - 2016-02-05 18:55:06 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
bumping in it's current form is like going down the street , seeing an overweight old lady walking home with her groceries , repeatedly running into her at high speed to prevent her getting home for several hours , till your large gang of criminally minded associates come by to murder and rob her .

at which point the police show up to take down the individuals who killed and robbed her, but ignore you totally . Pirate

and it's also all her fault because she didn't bring 15 strapping blokes to protect her every time she went shopping....Big smile



Spot on!!

this game currently favors the DOUCHEBAGS

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#951 - 2016-02-05 18:55:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Bella Jennie wrote:
you've added nothing new..
you're just being contrary while merely making the discussion circular.
I'm not being contrary at all, you asked if there was a way to play Eve without engaging in PvP, I answered your question; complete with a quote from the New Player FAQ that states everything you do in New Eden is to be considered a form of PvP, because that's the core concept of the game.

That quote is not disputable, and I can provide others from the same official CCP document that further reinforce what it says.

You stated that miners are treated as stupid and lazy, I pointed out that's what generally happens to people who are being stupid and lazy in a PvP environment such as Eve; just as it's what happens to people who are stupid and lazy in real life. I also pointed out that a miner who knows that Eve is a PvP environment and plans accordingly is often treated with respect.

Your last point was that you wanted to be safe in hisec, I pointed out that your safety in hisec is your responsibility and that you should take steps to fulfil that responsibility.

Nowhere was I being circular, nor have I stated anything that is false or misleading.

Try harder.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Mag's
Azn Empire
#952 - 2016-02-05 18:56:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Bella Jennie wrote:
you've added nothing new..
you're just being contrary while merely making the discussion circular.
So showing evidence to back up claims you dispute, is adding nothing new?

Do you mean you are aware of those facts already? If so, why are you disputing them?
Or are you simply and deliberately choosing to ignore them?

I'm not sure which is worse tbh.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Mag's
Azn Empire
#953 - 2016-02-05 19:01:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Bella Jennie wrote:


Spot on!!
Facts you claim don't add anything, but poor RL comparisons are 'spot on'. Really?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#954 - 2016-02-05 19:11:29 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
bumping in it's current form is like going down the street , seeing an overweight old lady walking home with her groceries , repeatedly running into her at high speed to prevent her getting home for several hours , till your large gang of criminally minded associates come by to murder and rob her .

at which point the police show up to take down the individuals who killed and robbed her, but ignore you totally . Pirate

and it's also all her fault because she didn't bring 15 strapping blokes to protect her every time she went shopping....Big smile



...and not only that, any good samaritans who try to intervene will get shot by the police , who will then stand by doing nothing till the act of murder takes place ...
Mag's
Azn Empire
#955 - 2016-02-05 19:15:58 UTC
Bella Jennie wrote:


You must be a liberal Big smile

What you call "facts" are merely your opinions. Same as mine..
Equal to mine but only opinions.

I'm going to add:
I don't have to show you anything
I don't have to prove anything - to YOU

I'm merely posting here to petition CCP
YOU can't do anything for me but mock me.
You're not even a sincere debater.
You're now starting to get personal. The last resort of a failed argument.

Not facts? Please, do tell. Oh and proving you wrong, isn't mocking you. Please try to stay on topic.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#956 - 2016-02-05 20:08:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
under my proposal for the fleet engagement timer against bumpers, the freighter pilot would be best advised to have a fleet with him to engage the bumper if flag is obtained,

And this comes right back to the current situation, where without evidence of a significant problem existing, many of us say exactly the same thing, except that a fleet is not required. Just one other ship using webs.

So under the current mechanics, the freighter pilot is best advised to have webbing support and he can avoid any issue to begin with.

So why change mechanics only to make a similar recommendation to freighter pilots as what many of us that regularly fly freighters recommend now?

I suspect (but assumption is bad) that it's because a freighter pilot might not have a fleet with them, so they should be given another way to escape. So my follow on question is back to what I've been trying to understand for a while - at what point do we accept that the freighter pilot has a responsibility to prepare appropriately before he even undocks?
Iain Cariaba
#957 - 2016-02-05 20:15:13 UTC
Bella Jennie wrote:
What you call "facts" are merely your opinions. Same as mine..
Equal to mine but only opinions.

I'm going to add:
I don't have to show you anything
I don't have to prove anything - to YOU

I'm merely posting here to petition CCP
YOU can't do anything for me but mock me.
You're not even a sincere debater.

Oh, please do save us from the hypocrisy.

You claim you don't want to play like the gankers. Well, don't. Use the tools already available to protect yourself from them, like I do, and you won't be playing like them. Let those who fail to play the game as if it's an open PvP world suffer their consequences, and go about your business with 99.9% safety.

Where the hypocrisy comes in is that, based on your stance that you don't want to play the game like someone else does, then everyone needs to play the game like you do. Neither of these options will work. Just simply do what I do, play the game the way you want to, all while keeping in mind that it's entirely possible for someone to come along and try to ruin your day.

Oh, and before you sperg off about you talking about highsec again, even in highsec you should be actually playing the game. AFK mining, AFK hauling, AFK missioning, none of that is actually playing the game. Anyone doing those is actually worse than an NPC. At least the NPC has some intelligence, even if it is artificial.

To continue on. One of the biggest draws of the game is that you can do pretty much anything you want, that includes being a jerk. If you don't want to be a jerk, you don't have to. You will, however, have to deal with them at some point.

In closing, having seen that you still don't get it, I'm going to ask you those dreaded questions you've still yet failed to answer.

How much more than 99.9% safety does it take for you to consider it reasonable?
Why should you not be responsible for your own safety in EvE?


Oops, almost missed this one, and that would've been a shame as it's so telling.
Bella Jennie wrote:
I even want you banned from HISEC if you're a habitual criminal.

So, contrary to some of your earlier statements, you do indeed want total safety in highsec. Those "habitual criminals" as you call them are quite literally the only threat freighters face in highsec. Banning them from highsec will simply ensure total 100% safety for any freighter in an NPC corp.

Gotta watch what you say in those times when you're spewing venom all over the forums. Your real agenda slips out when you do.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#958 - 2016-02-05 20:38:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
I even want you banned from HISEC if you're a habitual criminal.

So, contrary to some of your earlier statements, you do indeed want total safety in highsec. Those "habitual criminals" as you call them are quite literally the only threat freighters face in highsec. Banning them from highsec will simply ensure total 100% safety for any freighter in an NPC corp.

Gotta watch what you say in those times when you're spewing venom all over the forums. Your real agenda slips out when you do.
What she fails to realise is that banning "habitual criminals" from hisec detrimentally impacts people who have earned their negative sec status in other areas of space, as well as those that prey on people with negative sec status or criminal flags; which is short sighted at best.

It's either that or she doesn't care about the potential impact on others so long as her wants are fulfilled; which is incredibly selfish. Either scenario makes her the worst possible kind of person to discuss or dictate balance.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#959 - 2016-02-05 20:46:47 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
you've added nothing new..
you're just being contrary while merely making the discussion circular.
I'm not being contrary at all, you asked if there was a way to play Eve without engaging in PvP, I answered your question; complete with a quote from the New Player FAQ that states everything you do in New Eden is to be considered a form of PvP, because that's the core concept of the game.

That quote is not disputable, and I can provide others from the same official CCP document that further reinforce what it says.

You stated that miners are treated as stupid and lazy, I pointed out that's what generally happens to people who are being stupid and lazy in a PvP environment such as Eve; just as it's what happens to people who are stupid and lazy in real life. I also pointed out that a miner who knows that Eve is a PvP environment and plans accordingly is often treated with respect.

Your last point was that you wanted to be safe in hisec, I pointed out that your safety in hisec is your responsibility and that you should take steps to fulfil that responsibility.

Nowhere was I being circular, nor have I stated anything that is false or misleading.

Try harder.


Jonah is exactly correct. Even mining has a PvP aspect to it. Since the belts are open to anyone if somebody comes into the belt then they can take some of the more valuable ore before I do. That is a type of competition, a type of PvP. When I sell something on the market and undercut the current lowest price seller I am going to take sales he might have otherwise gotten. Competitionā€¦PvP.

To say one wants to play the game and not engage in behavior that does not impact other players that person is just being silly. Hell, when I buy something off the market, it has an effect. Players participating in the market is what generates prices which in turn tell inventors and/or builders information on what to build. Prices inform miners on what are the best rocks to mine. Etc.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Bella Jennie
Doomheim
#960 - 2016-02-05 21:03:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Bella Jennie
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Bella Jennie wrote:
What you call "facts" are merely your opinions. Same as mine..
Equal to mine but only opinions.

I'm going to add:
I don't have to show you anything
I don't have to prove anything - to YOU

I'm merely posting here to petition CCP
YOU can't do anything for me but mock me.
You're not even a sincere debater.

Oh, please do save us from the hypocrisy.

You claim you don't want to play like the gankers. Well, don't. Use the tools already available to protect yourself from them, like I do, and you won't be playing like them. Let those who fail to play the game as if it's an open PvP world suffer their consequences, and go about your business with 99.9% safety.

Where the hypocrisy comes in is that, based on your stance that you don't want to play the game like someone else does, then everyone needs to play the game like you do. Neither of these options will work. Just simply do what I do, play the game the way you want to, all while keeping in mind that it's entirely possible for someone to come along and try to ruin your day.

Oh, and before you sperg off about you talking about highsec again, even in highsec you should be actually playing the game. AFK mining, AFK hauling, AFK missioning, none of that is actually playing the game. Anyone doing those is actually worse than an NPC. At least the NPC has some intelligence, even if it is artificial.

To continue on. One of the biggest draws of the game is that you can do pretty much anything you want, that includes being a jerk. If you don't want to be a jerk, you don't have to. You will, however, have to deal with them at some point.

In closing, having seen that you still don't get it, I'm going to ask you those dreaded questions you've still yet failed to answer.

How much more than 99.9% safety does it take for you to consider it reasonable?
Why should you not be responsible for your own safety in EvE?


Oops, almost missed this one, and that would've been a shame as it's so telling.
Bella Jennie wrote:
I even want you banned from HISEC if you're a habitual criminal.

So, contrary to some of your earlier statements, you do indeed want total safety in highsec. Those "habitual criminals" as you call them are quite literally the only threat freighters face in highsec. Banning them from highsec will simply ensure total 100% safety for any freighter in an NPC corp.

Gotta watch what you say in those times when you're spewing venom all over the forums. Your real agenda slips out when you do.

I admit I don't have all the answers.

I hope that discussion will spawn ideas.. but I do have a strong opinion about what is broken - and that is the lack of consequences when BUMPING in HISEC in order to arrange a gank.

I read your suggestions; I know all about it. Many are valid - but they don't fix the problem issue for me.

Read my other posts to address your "use the tools provided" suggestion..

I've also already addressed the "99.9%" number which you clearly enjoy spewing out so much.


As far as the jerks, NOPE, I don't want to be forced to deal with them, in HISEC, unless they are killed when they kill me or, help to kill me.

And if the opportunity to be a jerk is the main draw of Eve, it's kind of sad. You think CCP would be proud to list that as a selling point for their game? Really?

I don't mind someone trying to ruin my day.. but I want them to pay dearly for it when I'm in HISEC.
- At the very least, I want them to have THE RISK of paying for it.. in HISEC.

Stop preaching about AFK; you sound like a CODE clone. Meanwhile, I don't play AFK; never played AFK.. but thinking about it now that you brought it up, I might enjoy the option once in a while.. in HISEC.

You want status quo; I want evolution towards improvement, logic and realism.

Bottom line you come off as quite an an elitist. and your tone quite condescending. I get it, your a top player no doubt very proud of your kill score..

this game currently favors the DOUCHEBAGS