These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Balancing bumping and looting mechanics

First post
Author
Mag's
Azn Empire
#441 - 2016-01-31 19:43:14 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Does it mean I win Eve though?

On another note, the Wife has just informed me, that there is a guy out there with two. So now I know what she Googles. Lol


Wonder how long she had that little piece of trivia in the holster.
Seems she's been chatting with our eldest daughters. Now I'm not sure what to think. Shocked

Well I suppose I should be used to this stuff, after all these years. Lol

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#442 - 2016-01-31 19:45:10 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Does it mean I win Eve though?

On another note, the Wife has just informed me, that there is a guy out there with two. So now I know what she Googles. Lol


Wonder how long she had that little piece of trivia in the holster.
Seems she's been chatting with our eldest daughters. Now I'm not sure what to think. Shocked

Well I suppose I should be used to this stuff, after all these years. Lol


So glad my kids are both under 6.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#443 - 2016-01-31 19:47:22 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
give an ak freighter pilot some small chance of escape when bumped


Why? Why should they get anything more than they already have?

Just use webs, and don't get bumped to begin with. Asking for a get out of jail free card for when you've drastically failed is unacceptable.

Why should you be rewarded for failure?



i understand your consternation that any adjustment to the current bumping mechanics may have a detrimental effect on your style of gameplay /isk flow, but having a minute chance of escaping unlimited bumping is hardly a 'get out of jail free card'.

9 times out of 10 the most probable negative outcome for the gankers is losing a few ships and having to redock /reship b4 making another attempt .
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#444 - 2016-01-31 19:49:43 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
but having a minute chance of escaping unlimited bumping is hardly a 'get out of jail free card'.


Except you have ways out of that already.

They just involve other people. Why should you get any more? Because you don't use what already exists?

This is not a game mechanics problem. It's an attitude problem.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Mag's
Azn Empire
#445 - 2016-01-31 19:53:09 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Does it mean I win Eve though?

On another note, the Wife has just informed me, that there is a guy out there with two. So now I know what she Googles. Lol


Wonder how long she had that little piece of trivia in the holster.
Seems she's been chatting with our eldest daughters. Now I'm not sure what to think. Shocked

Well I suppose I should be used to this stuff, after all these years. Lol


So glad my kids are both under 6.
As are mine..... Boom boom tish...

Joking aside, you should hear them giggling sometimes. I have 3 girls 22, 18 and 14. I have to say they are all pretty awesome kids. Although I do miss those under 6 years. Treasure them while you can bud, it passes all too quickly.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#446 - 2016-01-31 20:01:24 UTC


This is not a game mechanics problem. It's an attitude problem.[/quote]

yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have regarding the botlike nature of farming freighters with the current broken unlimited bumping mechanic...Roll

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#447 - 2016-01-31 20:03:49 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have



Ah, and the projection starts.

Like the people who are asking for freighters to be even more disgustingly safe than they already are aren't the entitled ones.

Roll

Bring escort webs or get used to the idea of dying, carebear.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Mag's
Azn Empire
#448 - 2016-01-31 20:04:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
bigbud skunkafella wrote:


yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have regarding the botlike nature of farming freighters with the current broken unlimited bumping mechanic...Roll

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile

Our suggestion is even simpler. Use the tools and options currently available and be almost guaranteed safe passage. What's the problem?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#449 - 2016-01-31 20:05:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
give an ak freighter pilot some small chance of escape when bumped


Why? Why should they get anything more than they already have?

Just use webs, and don't get bumped to begin with. Asking for a get out of jail free card for when you've drastically failed is unacceptable.

Why should you be rewarded for failure?



i understand your consternation that any adjustment to the current bumping mechanics may have a detrimental effect on your style of gameplay /isk flow, but having a minute chance of escaping unlimited bumping is hardly a 'get out of jail free card'.

9 times out of 10 the most probable negative outcome for the gankers is losing a few ships and having to redock /reship b4 making another attempt .


The problem is you want this "chance" to handed to you on a silver platter via CCP. You have a small chance now...get people to gank the bumping ship. Do that and you can get away.

Problem is, that for you and players like you....you just won't do that.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#450 - 2016-01-31 20:07:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Mag's wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Does it mean I win Eve though?

On another note, the Wife has just informed me, that there is a guy out there with two. So now I know what she Googles. Lol


Wonder how long she had that little piece of trivia in the holster.
Seems she's been chatting with our eldest daughters. Now I'm not sure what to think. Shocked

Well I suppose I should be used to this stuff, after all these years. Lol


So glad my kids are both under 6.
As are mine..... Boom boom tish...

Joking aside, you should hear them giggling sometimes. I have 3 girls 22, 18 and 14. I have to say they are all pretty awesome kids. Although I do miss those under 6 years. Treasure them while you can bud, it passes all too quickly.


I'd say 4-12 are the best years. Old enough to be long past potty training and accidents, but still young and full of wonder.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#451 - 2016-01-31 20:12:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile


I'm not a ganker and I also can't see any reason currently to change the mechanics in this way.

Not only because it wouldn't actually work, but because the risk of bumping is extremely small if freighter pilots use what's already available and those that don't, don't deserve more tools to compensate for their choice not to use the current ones.

It still hasn't been established anywhere by anyone that bumping represents a significant problem that requires mechanics changes. The available evidence in this thread suggests the opposite. So why change something that isn't a problem?
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#452 - 2016-01-31 20:20:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
bigbud skunkafella wrote:


Quote:
This is not a game mechanics problem. It's an attitude problem.


yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have regarding the botlike nature of farming freighters with the current broken unlimited bumping mechanic...Roll

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile



Sorry, that is just nonsense. Ganking is clearly an example of emergent game play...which is entirely the point of this game. CCP set up a game with very few rules, some mechanics and sits back and sees what happens. Sometimes bad stuff, but usually very interesting stuff. For example, that we have people like Chribba who have built of a reputation of extreme honesty to allow players to do things there are no mechanics for...is for me amazing. It supports quite a bit of work on this in game theory and economics: reputation effects.

So to sit there and lump ganking in its current form as botlike is incredibly dishonest. Ganking in it's current form is absolutely an outgrowth of attempts to nerf ganking in the past. Changes to insurance, changes to CONCORD response times, and so forth. Ganking now is much more organized and sophisticated than it was in the past....and ironically more common.

You and players like you whined and whined, CCP responded and it blew up in your face. The gankers became even more organized and effective.

And talk about botlike. Even though events like Burn Jita and Amarr are talked about weeks before hand and there are fixed dates....freighter pilots still come to those systems and die in droves. Talk about being not just unaware of one's surroundings, but almost willfully ignorant of the fact that they are stepping into the bear's den.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#453 - 2016-01-31 20:21:56 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile



The problems are:

And do you know what rewards not only haulers at their keyboard, but smarter and more organised haulers as well?

Keeping bumping.



And whats with all these alts saying 'in no way...'

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#454 - 2016-01-31 21:20:41 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:


Quote:
This is not a game mechanics problem. It's an attitude problem.


yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have regarding the botlike nature of farming freighters with the current broken unlimited bumping mechanic...Roll

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile





You and players like you whined and whined, CCP responded and it blew up in your face. The gankers became even more organized and effective.

.


the title of this thread is 'balancing bumping and looting mechanics' , anyone who thinks that unlimited bumping with absolutely no consequence for the bumper isn't a broken mechanic is imho a few knives short of a cutlery set. Big smile

Eve is supposedly all about consequences for your actions , where's the consequences for a bumper in a npc corp who can just carry on bumping a target indefinitely if it takes his fancy, a target who probably hasn't decided to play Eve on 'easy mode' by kissing uncle jimmy or mittens ring with all the resultant welfare and mollycoddling ?

please link to anything i've posted anywhere where i've 'whined' about any mechanic on these forums to ccp. if you can't then please stop your trolling /ad hominem attacks and stay on topic or kindly shut up .

o7 bb

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#455 - 2016-01-31 21:24:25 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

the title of this thread is 'balancing bumping and looting mechanics' , anyone who thinks that unlimited bumping with absolutely no consequence for the bumper isn't a broken mechanic is imho a few knives short of a cutlery set. Big smile


Of course bumping has no mechanical consequences.

It is not a hostile act. Where your engines happen to be pointed will never be anything that has "consequences", because otherwise you basically break the whole game.

Quote:

Eve is supposedly all about consequences for your actions


Yeah, between players.

If you want bumping to have "consequences", then come inflict them yourself, coward. It's what the gankers are doing after all. They decided that they don't want hauling to be completely free of risk, so they are doing something about it and bringing risk to the haulers.

And that's the difference between carebears and real players. Real players get something done themselves, carebears want the game to play itself for them.

Oh, and it gets funnier every time when you people talk about "easy mode" while defending hauling and mining. There is nothing in the MMO industry more lowest common denominator than hauling and mining. But apparently you think they need to be easier.

Get over yourself.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#456 - 2016-01-31 21:27:38 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile


...
And whats with all these alts saying 'in no way...'


sheesh, dontcha know there's only one bigbud skunkafella ? ShockedBig smile
bigbud skunkafella
Utama Incorporated
Astral Alliance
#457 - 2016-01-31 21:42:42 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

yes, the attitude of entitlement that gankers seem to have



Ah, and the projection starts.

Like the people who are asking for freighters to be even more disgustingly safe than they already are aren't the entitled ones.

Roll

Bring escort webs or get used to the idea of dying, carebear.


fyi i've never flown a freighter , can't remember the last time i missioned in hisec or mined. + most of my time on eve has been spent in my own corp . my main income for several years has been from hunting crims in hisec , i either build my own ships or buy em from proceeds of hunting crims , no srp or freebies . if that makes me a carebear in your eyes then fair enuf.

don't suppose you've got a deklein ratting alt or the taste of mittens ring on your lips perchance? Pirate

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#458 - 2016-01-31 23:22:33 UTC
bigbud skunkafella wrote:


the title of this thread is 'balancing bumping and looting mechanics' , anyone who thinks that unlimited bumping with absolutely no consequence for the bumper isn't a broken mechanic is imho a few knives short of a cutlery set. Big smile

Eve is supposedly all about consequences for your actions , where's the consequences for a bumper in a npc corp who can just carry on bumping a target indefinitely if it takes his fancy, a target who probably hasn't decided to play Eve on 'easy mode' by kissing uncle jimmy or mittens ring with all the resultant welfare and mollycoddling ?

please link to anything i've posted anywhere where i've 'whined' about any mechanic on these forums to ccp. if you can't then please stop your trolling /ad hominem attacks and stay on topic or kindly shut up .

o7 bb



You just don't get it. The consequences are not supposed to imposed by CCP. You the player have to impose them. If you decline that is not the problem of the guy doing the bumping....that is your problem. Running to CCP saying, "It's not fair! Fix it!" is antithetical to the very idea you just articulated: that there should be consequences to one's actions in game. If I blind jump to a cyno beacon and get my carrier burnt down...is it my fault? Or should I blame the people who burnt down my carrier and CCP?

To be getting bumped means you have catastrophically failed. You did NOT have a scout. You did NOT have a scout with webs. And you jumped into a system known for ganking...which relies on bumping.

Don't want to be bumped for 4-5 hours? Okay, logoff. Problem solved. Go do something else.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#459 - 2016-01-31 23:46:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
If a solution relies on a player having to use an alt (i.e. a second account), that's no solution. Players should not have to play the game with a main and an alt to avoid a certain built-in game mechanic. If you need two chars to play the game, then CCP would have to give every new subscriber two simultaneously playable chars.

The other way is the alt doing the (scouting, webbing, whatever) function has to be another player. If that's the case, then safe hauling can only be done by teams of players. Not solo. Which might be OK, game design-wise. But it would make hauling one other thing that a solo player can viably do in EVE.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#460 - 2016-02-01 00:09:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
bigbud skunkafella wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
bigbud skunkafella wrote:

my suggested solution is simple, rewards ak piloting , creates a few variables for the gankers, bumpers + target and is no way a nerf to ganking . what's the problem? Big smile


...
And whats with all these alts saying 'in no way...'


sheesh, dontcha know there's only one bigbud skunkafella ? ShockedBig smile


Its so hard to tell your posts apart from the other people who have no experience on the matter but want to nerf ganking anyways because they just dont like it.

@ khergit

Problem with your post.

- Why do you feel entitled to haul with a capital ship without friends or alts? Other caps are vulnerable to bumping and because of that are best used in teams. Why does the freighter need to be special?

Solo players are not meant to be as powerful as group's of players. You could instead fly a DST (something that is harder to bump and can even use the mwd trick).

Edit- and despite your doom and gloom, the truth is that piloting with a freighter, with no friends or alts, is commonly done with a very high rate of success. In fact you can go afk and still haul through gank systems with a better chance of surviving than getting ganked. So how cant I haul solo? You're attempt to make the situation seem worse than it actually is is simply disingenuous.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs