These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!!

First post
Author
James Cannon Fodder
Doomheim
#1661 - 2015-09-09 12:39:46 UTC
Johan Civire wrote:
Now there are more (not the same) but the faster quik arcade game. People want fast games. Arcade style is back like in the 80. Slow progress games like the 90 are out again. And so on.


Yeah. I have to admit that over the past year working 6 day (and occasionally 7 day) weeks with no vacation, much of the appeal of Eve for me has been the ability to log on for just a few minutes to change skill ques, and then feel like I had achieved something.

Coming back after 2 weeks basically cut off from the game, to see that one of my characters was getting close to finishing a long training skill has kind of eased the frustration of having no time to do anything.

But for the rest of the game: everything takes so long! Or just about. Marketing can be done on my schedule. Maybe PI (haven't tried it yet.) Missions have the problem that I often fail them because I have to go, and I never get any free time to come back before they expire.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1662 - 2015-09-09 13:03:00 UTC
Webvan wrote:

What's bad about that?


Answer: nothing.


In fact, as has been said in this thread, most of the people who supposedly left were high sec people aka fair weather themepark casuals that didn't contribute much and whose loss won't be felt (and that's par tof what burns there "EVE is dying" people, less people like them while the actually dedicated hard cores stay lol). At worst, the only real players that will be affected are the gankers who will have fewer targets, but they'll adapt .

It would be a cause for concern if people who actually liked EVE sudden;y started getting all "EVER is dying" on us, but the truth is the people predicting doomsday are the same people who always do so, and have done so since 2003. Mainly because they are the unhappy sort that doesn't fit into the game, doesn't like what the game has to offer and don't think the game is much fun as it is.

When EVE was 'growing', the same people predicted doom, when the numbers plateaued the doubled down, when the pcu showed even the slightest sign of decline they really ramped up that doomsaying. The reality is that people like this like to find and use levers to get people to change things to suit them (rather than change themselves to suit the situation, or change venues to another game).

A pretty good irony here is that many of the EVE is dying crowd predicted that EVE would decline because of games like Elite and SC, and personally claimed that as soon as those game were out, they'd be gone. yet elite is here and some of SC is playable, and here they stay, because they were lying: they wanted to force change to EVE, they weren't personally looking for another game.

Even after years of CCP catering to these clowns (making the game safer for example, and stuffing the game with PVE in the form of improved AI, different races of npc to kill, new mechanics like incursions and burners etc etc, NONE of which helped retention btw), it's not enough. What they don't see is that for them, nothing can ever be enough, like some virulent disease that won't stop till the host is dead, these people can't be happy.

And they will never understand those of us who are generally happy with a game we chose on it's own merits (warts and all) rather than "how awesome it could one day be".
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1663 - 2015-09-09 13:17:40 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
In fact, as has been said in this thread, most of the people who supposedly left were high sec people aka fair weather themepark casuals that didn't contribute much and whose loss won't be felt (and that's par tof what burns there "EVE is dying" people, less people like them while the actually dedicated hard cores stay lol). At worst, the only real players that will be affected are the gankers who will have fewer targets, but they'll adapt .
Yep, only gankers will be affected.

Oh yeah and CCP employees.

Jenn aSide wrote:
It would be a cause for concern if people who actually liked EVE sudden;y started getting all "EVER is dying" on us, but the truth is the people predicting doomsday are the same people who always do so, and have done so since 2003. Mainly because they are the unhappy sort that doesn't fit into the game, doesn't like what the game has to offer and don't think the game is much fun as it is.
Personally, I rarely do "EVE is dying" and I do like EVE, I just don't only like EVE. This time round though it legitimately looks bad.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1664 - 2015-09-09 13:35:58 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

Oh yeah and CCP employees.


Of course your concern is for CCP employees. Not for yourself, it's all about other people!

Quote:
Personally, I rarely do "EVE is dying" and I do like EVE, I just don't only like EVE. This time round though it legitimately looks bad.


Bullcrap. Every post I've read of yours drips with discontent (at the community, at how certain people you don't like don't like have to easy, how the game isn't as fun as others or as 'unique' as players who actually like it claim it is). For as long as I've remember you've been on the "EVE needs more players and more 'diversity'" train.

You're a malcontent, like most you try to deny it (most radical malcontents claim 'moderate' status, hiding behind it like a cloak, in that this game is no different from real life), then you turn around and post something that suggests it all over again. Maybe not a level 1 malcontent like old Dinsdale was or Isthanchuk is, but definitely in the same general league.
Salvos Rhoska
#1665 - 2015-09-09 13:55:08 UTC
Shameless repost of my beautiful diagram (cos content):

http://i.imgur.com/r2luKMs.jpg
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1666 - 2015-09-09 13:58:05 UTC
Heh, you included highsec ganking Big smile

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

lilol' me
Comply Or Die
Pandemic Horde
#1667 - 2015-09-09 14:05:59 UTC
I think Eve needs to have a fundamental change in thinking. For all too long certain vets and groups I believe have held back the game for their own purposes. (and im a vet btw)

CCP never took any bold steps and its seriously affected the game especially drawing in new people. Vets are not the future of eve, they will leave eventually, new players are the future and eve needs to be built on the future not the now. Yes there will be people who sulk and unsub but thats part of natural progression and CCP should not be afraid of that.

They started making some grounds with the jump fatigue, although i think it needs a bit of a tweak, where people should be able to chose their jump range (between 5-15 LY) which then affects the fatigue timer. This would really help.

Fozzie sov was genuius tbh, making people live and defend their space if they want sov was the right thing to do, too many large organisations holding space, doing nothing to defend it, and being able to jump acroos the universe in 5 minutes to defend it with 500 supers was just plain wrong. This makes people only take what they need and what they can defend. Although I still think we have a coaltion issue and how many people alliances can blue. Because I dont see the north ever losing a few systems becasue they are so tightly integrated.

But a big change which was great for eve. tweak it but dont change it CCP, this now give smaller groups the chance to own sov. Bravo.

So what else needs to change?
The game is still too simulation type, spreadsheets etc. to attract people

Get away from eve is niche crap.

Scamming is the biggest issue for new players. Man this has to be stopped. Sorry 10 years ago might of been cool and new but no its making people leave quickly. a one month old person doesnt understand the game, and gets scammed easily after all the time hes spent earning isk. After that he just thinks cant be bothered with that crap and ccp dont care so bye. Stop scamming! Corp thefts fine, but out and out blatant scamming needs to stop. Yes it does..

People want to pilot in cockpits!

The UI for PVP is terrible

Missions are boring as hell, make them interactive a bit like the missions in X3 for example

I have no real feeling of the npc races, they dont feel real to me. Make them come to life, i want to interact with them. All i see is icons that i kill.

I hate the skilling in eve, i can play for 10 years and some guy can play for 1 month and kill me, it shouldnt be about the range of things you can fit but how long you have been playing and using something as well. There is no reason to skill up if you just want to be focused. I could specialise in a few months and never have to skill again, because i can have one ship that is op for certain situations.

Let people make more ISK, whats this aversion to make isk? The more you make the more you will spend and the more pvping you can do.


Drag bubbles what the hell....

Mobile bubbles - what the hell... AFK camping.. seriously if you want to camp you need a specialised bubble ship, like a dictor, get rid of bubbles full stop

afk cloakers, sorry ridiculous you cant scan them down, they should leave a footprint over time, or their cap drains so that they end up uncloaking, or max time to cloak implemented. We need a solution..

More 0.0 npc space

Make supers actually be super motherships, that can move and hold lots of ships and people.

Titans - not sure about these anymore... there are too many of them..Maybe like them dock motherships, that could be fun. Maybe become mobile stations in away people can use them in the same way, but they can move about. That could be fun too.

oh im sure i have more...






Salvos Rhoska
#1668 - 2015-09-09 14:07:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Shameless repost of my beautiful diagram (cos content):
http://i.imgur.com/r2luKMs.jpg

Heh, you included highsec ganking Big smile

Yep, though its an odd one.

Its PvP, but essentially also PvE, as CONCORD/NPC is involved.

Also, if you are bored, you can print my diagram out and use it on a dartboard.
Whatever you hit is what you do that day in EVE!
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1669 - 2015-09-09 14:45:13 UTC
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1670 - 2015-09-09 14:47:00 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY

You're encouraging the decline in numbers turn into RAPID

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1671 - 2015-09-09 14:48:27 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Of course your concern is for CCP employees. Not for yourself, it's all about other people!
My concern (if it can be called that) is for the continuation of the game. No, I'm not overly concerned about the devs, but I'm still not going to pretend like the game losing subs is good news all round. I imagine CCP wants customers, and I'd like them to have costomers even if it's for selfish reasons such as the further development of EVE.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Bullcrap. Every post I've read of yours drips with discontent (at the community, at how certain people you don't like don't like have to easy, how the game isn't as fun as others or as 'unique' as players who actually like it claim it is). For as long as I've remember you've been on the "EVE needs more players and more 'diversity'" train.

You're a malcontent, like most you try to deny it (most radical malcontents claim 'moderate' status, hiding behind it like a cloak, in that this game is no different from real life), then you turn around and post something that suggests it all over again. Maybe not a level 1 malcontent like old Dinsdale was or Isthanchuk is, but definitely in the same general league.
That's probably because you read only a handful of my posts and even those you tend to take away more of what you imagine I'm saying than what I really am. If "as long as you can remember" is "a couple of years", then sure, I've been on that train, because that's how long I've thought that CCP is beating away at the same used up market. And sure, I do believe some people have it too easy, but because they kill stuff they feel like they are exempt from requiring a challenge.

The thing is, you have some personal problem with me from some random time I've said something you disagreed with, so now no matter what I say you're automatically blinded by your own preconceptions. That doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just means you can't be objective. Objectively the playerbase has gone from 42k to 36k average year on year from the previous 12 months. Whatever way you shake it that's not a good sign.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1672 - 2015-09-09 14:49:05 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
You're encouraging the decline in numbers turn into RAPID

The good thing about rapids is that they wash all the crap downstream P

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1673 - 2015-09-09 14:49:30 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY
That's impersonation.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1674 - 2015-09-09 14:51:40 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY
That's impersonation.
So report it.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

lilol' me
Comply Or Die
Pandemic Horde
#1675 - 2015-09-09 14:57:06 UTC  |  Edited by: lilol' me
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY


your face is ugly and i shouldnt play this game because people like you are in it.. people that disagree with everythng, dont want change and happy to screw it up for everyone else...quote that..
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1676 - 2015-09-09 14:58:15 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
The thing is, you have some personal problem with me from some random time I've said something you disagreed with, so now no matter what I say you're automatically blinded by your own preconceptions. That doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just means you can't be objective.

I always thought it was just the corp/alliance tag....

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1677 - 2015-09-09 15:40:41 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Of course your concern is for CCP employees. Not for yourself, it's all about other people!
My concern (if it can be called that) is for the continuation of the game. No, I'm not overly concerned about the devs, but I'm still not going to pretend like the game losing subs is good news all round. I imagine CCP wants customers, and I'd like them to have costomers even if it's for selfish reasons such as the further development of EVE.


You're not overly concerned for the devs, color me surprised, even though it was you who mentioned them in the 1st place.

I too imagine CCP wants customers. What they want isn't our concern. No one wants EVE to continue more than I do, and If I thought there was some major problem, I'd say so. But you people (yes, including you) have been crying wolf for so long it's hard to know when a real problem exists

Quote:
That's probably because you read only a handful of my posts and even those you tend to take away more of what you imagine I'm saying than what I really am. If "as long as you can remember" is "a couple of years", then sure, I've been on that train, because that's how long I've thought that CCP is beating away at the same used up market. And sure, I do believe some people have it too easy, but because they kill stuff they feel like they are exempt from requiring a challenge.

The thing is, you have some personal problem with me from some random time I've said something you disagreed with, so now no matter what I say you're automatically blinded by your own preconceptions. That doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just means you can't be objective. Objectively the playerbase has gone from 42k to 36k average year on year from the previous 12 months. Whatever way you shake it that's not a good sign.


I know self awareness isn't your strong suit, but I find it amazing how 'misunderstood' you think you are . As if the rest of us imagine your posts, as if we can't read the English language. If there is a problem with how you are perceived (and not just how I perceive you, or did you notice that I'm not even in the top 10 of people you argue with around here), a good idea is to track down the problem via use of a mirror.

That's the big thing I think, you're not even honest enoguh with yourself about your self to have a conversation with, which is one of (but by no means the only) reason you're in the middle of these kinds of conversations all the time. Try to be honest, try to stop being a damn politician every time you post. Say what you mean instead of hemming and hawing about. For once at least.

As for the subject, the 'player base' hasn't done anything, not that you can tell, numbers of accounts online don't mean anything, unless you think I'm 4 people every time I log in my 4 accounts every night.


Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1678 - 2015-09-09 15:43:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
lilol' me wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY


your face is ugly and i shouldnt play this game because people like you are in it.. people that disagree with everythng, dont want change and happy to screw it up for everyone else...quote that..
Au contraire, I don't disagree with everything, nor am I afraid of change.

I disagree with you, and people like you, and the kind of changes that you propose because I perceive them to be ill conceived and detrimental; that is not everything, nor is it everybody.

I play Eve for the reasons that many people shy away from it. If Eve becomes watered down to the extent that it appeals to all and sundry, where do those of us who don't want to play games that pander to the mass market go?

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1679 - 2015-09-09 15:56:22 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
If Eve becomes watered down to the extent that it appeals to all and sundry, where do those of us who don't want to play games that pander to the mass market go?

Once all the systems have been conquered by the evil [MSMKT] alliance, there's only the ability to accept whatever the NPCs will give us.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

ImYourMom
Retribution Holdings Corp
Retribution.
#1680 - 2015-09-09 17:17:38 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
lilol' me wrote:
I should be playing another game because I clearly don't like this one
FTFY


your face is ugly and i shouldnt play this game because people like you are in it.. people that disagree with everythng, dont want change and happy to screw it up for everyone else...quote that..
Au contraire, I don't disagree with everything, nor am I afraid of change.

I disagree with you, and people like you, and the kind of changes that you propose because I perceive them to be ill conceived and detrimental; that is not everything, nor is it everybody.

I play Eve for the reasons that many people shy away from it. If Eve becomes watered down to the extent that it appeals to all and sundry, where do those of us who don't want to play games that pander to the mass market go?


Change is happening, and for the good. Adapt or die, htfu, it is long overdue, it is not about you, don't let the door hit you on the way out and all that jazz